Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 6:24
But woe unto you that are rich! for ye have received your consolation.
24. But woe ] While sin lasts, there must still be woes over against Beatitudes, as Ebal stands for ever opposite to Gerizim. In St Matthew also we find (Matthew 23) eight woes as well as eight Beatitudes. See too Jer 17:5-8, but there the “cursed” precedes the “blessed.”
woe unto you that are rich ] The ‘woe !’ is not necessarily or wholly denunciatory; it is also the cry of compassion, and of course it only applies not to a Chuzas or a Nicodemus or a Joseph of Arimathaea, but to those rich who are not poor in spirit, but trust in riches (Mar 10:24), or are not rich towards God (Luk 12:21) and have not got the true riches (Luk 16:11; Amo 6:1; Jas 5:1). Observe the many parallels between the Epistle of St James and the Sermon on the Mount, Jas 1:2; Jas 1:4-5; Jas 1:9; Jas 1:20; Jas 2:13-14; Jas 2:17-18; Jas 4:4; Jas 4:10-11; Jas 5:2; Jas 5:10; Jas 5:12.
ye have received your consolation ] Rather, ye have to the full, Php 4:18; comp. Luk 16:25, “Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst good things.”
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Luk 6:24
But woe unto you that are rich! for ye have received your consolation
The danger of riches
Unless we were accustomed to read the New Testament from our childhood, I think we should be very much struck with the warnings it contains, not only against the love of riches, but the very possession of them.
That our Lord meant to speak of riches as being in some sense a calamity to the Christian is plain from His praises and recommendations of poverty.
1. The most obvious danger which worldly possessions present to our spiritual welfare is that they become practically a substitute in our hearts for that one object to which our supreme devotion is due. They are present; God is unseen. They are means at hand of effecting what we want; whether God will hear our petitions for these wants is uncertain. Thus they minister to the corrupt inclinations of our nature.
2. This, then, was some part of our Saviours meaning, when He connects together the having with the trusting in riches.
3. The danger of possessing riches is the carnal security to which they lead; that of desiring or pursuing them is that an object of this world is thus set before us as the end and aim of life. It is a part of Christian caution to see to it that our engagements do not become pursuits. Engagements are oar portion, but pursuits are for the most part of our own choosing.
4. Money is a sort of creation, and gives the acquirer, even more than the possessor, an imagination of his own power; and tends to make him idolize self. And if such be the result of gain on an individual, doubtless it will be the same on a nation; and if the peril be so great in the one case, why should it be less in the other? (J. H. Newman, D. D.)
The perils of rich men
1. One of the principal perils of rich men arises from their very exemption from many temptations to gross sin. Hence they are apt to think too well of themselves.
2. The rich man finds it very easy to do many kindly acts. It is very natural, therefore, that he should regard his own character and life complacently, and that he should think severely of the selfishness of these less fortunate than himself.
3. The rich mans Bible, with its morocco binding and gilt edges, has very much less in it than the poor mans Bible, bound in sheep. Pages which are read and re-read, which are marked, and scored, and thumbed in the one, are virtually mere blank paper in the other.
4. As the rich man loses many of the revelations of Gods sympathy, compassion, and care, which inspire the poor with intense and passionate gratitude, so he loses some of the most urgent motives to communion with God, which often make the poor man devout. (R. IV. Dale, LL. D.)
Danger of rich men
A holy woman was wont to say of the rich: They are hemmed round with no common misery; they go down to hell without thinking of it, because their staircase thither is of gold and porphyry. ( C. H. Spurgeon.)
Riches; or, a knife for the canker
To the love of money we trace the melancholy apostasy of Demas, the awful perfidity of Judas, the fatal lie of Ananias and Sapphira–all, and some of them distinguished, professors of religion. Be on your guard. Watch and pray. Their history is written for our instruction. Nor need any of His people who allow the love of money to entwine itself around their hearts, expect that in saving them God will do otherwise than the woodman, who, seeking to save a tree, applies his knife to the canker thai eats into its heart, or the ivy that has climbed its trunk and is choking it in its close embraces. (T. Guthrie, D. D.)
Smothered by wealth
Many of you are in imminent peril God is multiplying the sources of your power. Your resources are becoming numerous as the sands of the sea. I am not sorry, I am glad; but I am anxious that you should rise up in the midst of these things, and show yourselves greater than prosperity, and stronger and better on account of it. I dread to see a man smothered under his wealth. When a man, driving from the meadow, sits and sings cheerily upon his vast load of fragrant hay, how every one, looking upon him, thinks of his happiness and content l But by and by, at an unlucky jog, down goes the wheel and over goes the load, and the man is at the bottom, with all the hay upon him. Just in that way rich men are in danger of being smothered. The whole wain of your prosperity may capsize, and the superincumbent mass may hide from you the air and the sun of a true life. (H. W. Beecher.)
Ye have received your consolation
Let the full force of the word consolation be observed. It is used by way of contrast to the comfort which is promised to the Christian in the Beatitudes. Comfort, in the fulness of that word, as including help, guidance, encouragement, and support, is the peculiar promise of the gospel. There is then something very fearful in the intimation of the text, that those who have riches thereby receive their portion, such as it is, in full, instead of the heavenly gift of the gospel. The same doctrine is implied in our Lords words in the parable of Dives and Lazarus: Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things; but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented. (J. H. Newman, D. D.)
Conjunction and separation of woe and riches
We will therefore show–
I. In what conjunction these two, woe and riches, do stand.
II. How they may be sundered: find out why riches are so dangerous to receive, and how we may receive them without any danger. And with these we shall exercise your devotion at this time. Woe to rich men; which cannot be literally and generally true: for all rich men are not accursed. But it is the safest way to remove men as far from danger as may be. It is safest for some men to conceive feasting unlawful, that they may avoid gluttony; or sports unlawful, that they may not be wantons; to be afraid of an oath, that they may not be perjured; not to flatter themselves too much in the lawfulness of war, that they delight not in blood, but rather remember the lesson of Moses, or indeed of God: When thou goest out with the host against thine enemies, then keep thee from all wickedness (Deu 23:9).
1. But so far is the world from having that opinion of riches, that they have goodly and glorious titles bestowed upon them. They commend themselves unto us under the honest names of thrift, and frugality, and wisdom. What poor glass is a diamond, to him that is familiar with virtue! What trash is riches, to him who is filled with grace! What nicknames are the empty titles of secular honours, to him that knoweth the glory of a saint l What a nothing is the world, to him that hath studied heaven!
2. Further yet: Riches are accounted as necessaries, and as ornaments of virtue; and under that name we receive and entertain them.
3. Again: Riches are not only not necessary to religion and virtue, but rather a hindrance. They take us down from our third heaven, and take us off from the contemplation of future happiness, and bind our thoughts to the vanities of the earth, which so press them down and weary them that they cannot aspire. They are retinacula spei, fetters of our hope. For now where is our hope? (Job 17:15.) Even in the bowels of the earth.They are degraders of our faith. For whilst we walk in this vain shadow, how many degrees doth our faith fall back! The more we trust in uncertain riches the less we trust in God (1Ti 6:17). They are coolers and abaters of our charity: for, they make us ungrateful to God, severe to ourselves, and cruel to our brethren.
4. Further yet: As riches are a hindrance and obstacle to good, so are they instrumental to evil. They facilitate and help it forward, and are as the midwife to bring it to its birth, which otherwise peradventure had died in the womb, in the thought, and never seen the sun. If sin make our members the weapons of unrighteousness, riches are the handle without which they cannot well be managed. Every man cannot grind the face of the poor, every man cannot take his brother by the throat, every man cannot go into the foolish womans house, every man cannot bribe a judge, every man cannot be as wicked as he would. And it may seem to be a part of Gods restraining grace, to take riches from some men, as he took off the wheels of Pharaohs chariots, that they may not pursue their brethren. But when the purse is full, the heart will more easily vent all the poison it hath, in a reproach, in contempt, in a blow, in an injury, in oppression.
II. You have seen the rich and woe in a sad conjunction, a most malignant one as any astrology hath discovered. I am unwilling to leave them so; and therefore, in the last place, I must find out some means to put them asunder, that we may receive riches without danger; which is indeed to lead the camel through the needles eye.
1. We must bring riches into a subordination, nay, into a subjection, to Christianity. We may be rich, if we can be poor.
2. That the mind may be rightly affected, we must root out of it all love of riches. For if we set our hearts upon them, the love of them will estrange us from Christ, and make us idolaters.
3. I must bring you yet further, from not loving, not desiring riches, to contemning of them. For though I have emptied my store, and cast it before the wind, yet till I have made riches the object of my fear, till I can say within myself, This lordship may undo me, These riches may beggar me, This money may destroy me–till in this respect I make it the object of my contempt, and look upon it as a bait of Satan, I am not so far removed but that still the woe hangeth over me. For as, when a man taketh a wedge of lead upon his shoulders, it presseth and boweth his body to the earth; but if he put it under his feet, it will lift and keep him from the ground: so, when we place riches above us, and look upon them as upon our heaven; when we prefer them before salvation, and make gain our godliness; it must needs be that they will press us down to hell: but if we keep them below as slaves, and tread them under our feet, and contemn them as dung in comparison of Christ, they will then lift us up as high as heaven.
4. Therefore, in the last place, let me commend unto you a godly jealousy of yourselves. Suspicion in such a case as this is very useful.
5. I am unwilling to leave the rich and the woe so near together, but would set them at that distance that they may never meet. To conclude then: Let us not be too familiar with riches, lest whilst we embrace them we take the plague, and the woe enter into our very bowels. The love of the world is a catching disease, and it is drawn on with dallying, with a very look. We do not traffic for gold where there are no mines: nor can we find God in the world. He that maketh Him his purchase, will find business enough to take up his thoughts, and little time left for conference and commerce in the world, scarce any time to look upon it, but by the by and in the passage, as we use to look upon a stranger. A look is dangerous; a look of liking is too much: but a look Of love will bury us in the world, where we are sown in power, but are raised in weakness; sown in glory, but are raised in dishonour. We rest and sleep in this dust; and when we awake, the woe which hung over our heads falleth upon us. (A. Farindon, D. D.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 24. – 26. But wo unto you that are rich!] The Pharisees, who were laden with the spoils of the people which they received in gifts, c. These three verses are not found in the sermon, as recorded by Matthew. They seem to be spoken chiefly to the scribes and Pharisees, who, in order to be pleasing to all, spoke to every one what he liked best and by finesse, flattery, and lies, found out the method of gaining and keeping the good opinion of the multitude.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Not because you are rich, but because you are not rich towards God, because you look upon your riches as your portion, as your consolation; or, you that are rich in the opinion of your own righteousness.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
24, 25. rich . . . full . . .laughwho have all their good things and joyous feelings hereand now, in perishable objects.
received yourconsolation(see on Lu 16:25).
shall hungertheirinward craving strong as ever, but the materials of satisfactionforever gone.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
But woe unto you that are rich,…. Not in worldly riches and substance, for some of these have been, and are happy persons in a spiritual sense; and at most, it can only mean such, who trust in their riches, and place their, happiness in them; but it chiefly regards such, as are rich in their own opinion, and stand in need of nothing; who place their confidence in their own righteousness, and do not apply to Christ, in whom alone are durable riches and righteousness:
for ye have received your consolation; which they take from their own works, and a very unstable and short lived one it is; for while they are crying Peace, Peace, to themselves, from their own services, sudden destruction comes upon them, and all their comforts vanish away: for there is no true solid comfort but in Christ, and in his righteousness; that administers consolation now, and lays a foundation for everlasting comfort hereafter.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
But woe unto you that are rich ( ). Sharp contrast (). As a matter of fact the rich Pharisees and Sadducees were the chief opposers of Christ as of the early disciples later (Jas 5:1-6).
Ye have received (). Receipt in full means as the papyri show.
Consolation (). From , to call to one’s side, to encourage, to help, to cheer.
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
Woe. These woes are not noted by Matthew.
Have received [] . In Mt 6:5, 16, the Rev. has properly changed “they have their reward” to “they have received.” The verb, compounded of ajpo, off or from, and ecw, to have, literally means to have nothing left to desire. Thus in Phi 4:18, when Paul says, “I have all things [ ] ,” he does not mean merely an acknowledgment of the receipt of the Church ‘s gift, but that he is fully furnished. “I have all things to the full.”
Consolation [] . From para, to the side of, and kalew, to call or summon. Literally, a calling to one’s side to help; and therefore entreaty, passing on into the sense of exhortation, and thence into that of consolatory exhortation; and so coming round to mean that which one is summoned to give to a suppliant – consolation. Thus it embodies the call for help, and the response to the call. Its use corresponds with that of the kindred verb parakalew, to exhort or console. In its original sense of calling for aid the noun appears in the New Testament only in 2Co 8:4 : with much entreaty. The verb appears frequently in this sense, rendered beseech, pray (Mt 8:34; Mt 14:36; Mr 1:40; Mr 5:12, etc.). In the sense of consolation or comfort the noun occurs, in Luk 2:25; Luk 6:24; 2Co 1:3; 2Co 7:4; Phl 1:7. The verb, in Mt 2:18; Mt 5:4; Luk 16:25; 2Co 1:4. In some instances, however, the meaning wavers between console and exhort. In the sense of exhortation or counsel, the noun may be found in Act 2:40; Act 11:23; Act 14:22; Rom 12:8; Tit 2:15. Neither the noun nor the verb appear in the writings of John, but the kindred word paraklhtov, the Paraclete, Comforter, or Advocate, is peculiar to him. On this word, see on Joh 14:16. It should be noted, however, that the word comfort goes deeper than its popular conception of soothing. It is from the later Latin confortare, to make strong. Thus Wycliffe renders Luk 1:80, “the child waxed, and was comforted in spirit” (A. V., waxed strong); and Tyndale, Luk 22:43, “there appeared an angel from heaven comforting him” (A. V., strengthening). The comfort which Christ gives is not always soothing. The Holy Spirit, the Comforter, is to convince of sin and of judgment. Underlying the word is the sense of a wise counsel or admonition which rouses and braces the moral nature and encourages and strengthens it to do and to endure. When, therefore, Christ says “they that mourn shall be comforted,” he speaks in recognition of the fact that all sorrow is the outcome of sin, and that true comfort is given, not only in pardon for the past, but in strength to fight and resist and overcome sin. The atmosphere of the word, in short, is not the atmosphere of the sick chamber, but the tonic breath of the open world, of moral struggle and victory; the atmosphere for him that climbs and toils and fights.
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament
1) “But woe unto you that are rich!” (plen ouai humin tois plousiois) “But woe be or shall be to you all who are plutocrats or rich ones.” Four woes now fall upon the Jewish rejectors and persecutors of Jesus, Joh 1:11, who trust in uncertain riches, 1Ti 6:17.
2) “For ye have received your consolation.” (hoti apechete ten paraklesin humon) “Because you all have, hold, or now cling to your consolation,” your rich things of earth that you covet as security, as a security blanket, like the rich barn builder till death, and the crying rich man in hell, Luk 12:16; Luk 12:21; Luk 16:25-31. Riches held for selfish motives bring ruin, Ecc 5:13.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
Luk 6:24
. Woe to you that are rich. As Luke has related not more than four kinds of blessings, so he now contrasts with them four curses, so that the clauses mutually correspond. This contrast not only tends to strike terror into the ungodly, but to arouse believers, that they may not be lulled to sleep by the vain and deceitful allurements of the world. We know how prone men are to be intoxicated by prosperity, or ensnared by flattery; and on this account the children of God often envy the reprobate, when they see everything go on prosperously and smoothly with them.
He pronounces a curse on the rich, — not on all the rich, but on those who receive their consolation in the world; that is, who are so completely occupied with their worldly possessions, that they forget the life to come. The meaning is: riches are so far from making a man happy, that they often become the means of his destruction. In any other point of view, the rich are not excluded from the kingdom of heaven, provided they do not become snares for themselves, or fix their hope on the earth, so as to shut against them the kingdom of heaven. This is finely illustrated by Augustine, who, in order to show that riches are not in themselves a hindrance to the children of God, reminds his readers that poor Lazarus was received into the bosom of rich Abraham.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
(24) But woe unto you that are rich!Better, woe for you, the tone being, as sometimes (though, as Matthew 23 shows, not uniformly) with this expression, one of pity rather than denunciation. (Comp. Mat. 23:13; Mar. 13:17; Luk. 21:23.) We enter here on what is a distinct feature of the Sermon on the Plainthe woes that, as it were, balance the beatitudes. It obviously lay in St. Lukes purpose, as a physician of the soul, to treasure up and record all our Lords warnings against the perilous temptations that wealth brings with it. The truth thus stated in its naked awfulness is reproduced afterwards in the parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus (Luk. 16:19).
Ye have received your consolation.Better, simply, ye have your consolationi.e., all that you understand or care for, all, therefore, that you can have. The thought appears again in the words of Abraham, Thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things (Luk. 16:25). The verb is the same as in they have their reward, in Mat. 6:2; Mat. 6:5.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
24-26. We have no hesitation still to assume, as in the notes of the parallel passage in Matthew, that our Saviour pronounced for each Blessed an antithetical Woe, which Matthew wholly omits and Luke but partially supplies. And if these are two reports of the same discourse, then what we have noted in Matthew holds good, namely, that the limitation of the objects and sphere of both benedictions and woes are within the compass of religious things, it of course follows that the riches, the laughter, the fulness condemned by the woes, are things adverse in spirit to right and holiness. It is not riches or laughter in themselves, but the wantonness of spirit, the revelry of heart, in the spirit of a wicked and riotous age, against which our Lord threatens a future destitution and mourning.
The contrast between these blessings and woes coincides with the great antithesis between right and wrong, between religion and irreligion, between holiness and wickedness, between the kingdom of God and the kingdom of Satan, which must ever appear to the pure eye in the entire history, temporal and eternal, of God and man.
The term woe is indeed softer than the term cursed, pronounced by Jesus, as judge, in the sentence of the final day, in Mat 25:41. This word woe blends compassion with judgment; for it is pronounced in the day of grace and mercy; yet it indicates a destiny as terrible and as irrevocable, though uttered in a tone of genuine pathos, as that final Depart ye cursed. From that unmitigated finality, though pronounced by the same lips, all pathos has departed; for the era of judgment without mercy has arrived.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
“But woe to you who are rich! for you have received your consolation.
Woe to you, you who are full now! for you shall hunger.
Woe to you, you who laugh now! for you shall mourn and weep.
Woe to you, when all men shall speak well of you! for in the same manner did their fathers to the false prophets.”
Jesus then turned His attention to the group of wealthy onlookers. Any who are sitting there who are rich and complacent should note that they have already received their reward in this life. They may be simply supercilious, or they may be sneering, but they should recognise that they have nothing to look forward to. Those who are rich have already had their consolation (contrast Luk 2:25 which describes the consolation that they have lost). Those who are full and satisfied with themselves now, will one day be hungry as they see the good things that they will miss out on (compare Isa 65:13). Those who are laughing and having an easy time now, with little regard for others, should ask themselves why times are so easy for them. It is because they have little regard for God. Thus when they are called to account they will mourn and weep (compare Isa 65:14). And if all speak well of them it reveals that they are satisfied with the falsity and dishonesty of the religion around them, and are conforming with it, following the false prophets because it suits them. They have nothing to rejoice in or for which to jump for joy. For a commentary on this passage we only have to turn to Rev 3:15-20). ‘You say, “I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing”, and do not realise that you are the one who is wretched; miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked.’
‘The false prophets.’ These are those who are popular because their message suits people’s tastes. They soothe people’s consciences by saying, ‘peace, peace, where there is no peace’ (Jer 6:14; Jer 8:11). They are loved by all for they say nothing disturbing (see Jer 5:31).
It may well be that there were few such people as he has described here in his audience, and that these words were on the whole spoken mainly of those not present, as an encouragement to the godly that God does see how men behave towards them, and that He also had in mind future generations. He knew well enough that His words would be recorded and passed on into the future. But our knowledge of human beings tells us that His wonder-working must have drawn a number of such people, while such was the work of the Spirit that we would expect that a good number of such people, hungry of soul and seeking something more than they had, would have come to hear Him in order to try to find what all their wealth had not given them. For them the message would be very significant, as they recognised the change of direction that their lives must take if they were to be His disciples, and it would provide them with a warning of how seriously they must take the matter.
In the end the whole point here is that He is assessing the response of all who are present with Him and listening to His teaching. Those who walk humbly with God and acknowledge Him, will be blessed, those who allow the pleasures of the world, the deceitfulness of riches and the desire for other things to take their minds off responding to Him will in the end face woe. A stark choice lies before them. The Question is, will they respond to the new teaching that He has brought and recognise Him for what He is, or will they remain in the old ways, and perish?
‘Woe.’ This could be translated ‘alas’, but that would not be a good contrast with ‘Blessed’. The comparison of blessings and woes ties in with Isa 3:10-11. ‘Tell the righteous that it will be well with them, for they will eat the fruit of their deeds. Woe to the wicked it shall be ill with him, for what his hands have done will be done to him.’ This could well have been a summary of these words of Jesus. ‘Woes’ already occur fairly regularly in the Old Testament (Isa 3:9-11; Isa 5:8-23; Isa 10:1; Isa 33:1; Amo 5:18 to Amo 6:7; Hab 2:6-19), and even blessings in comparison with woes, and their equivalent (Ecc 10:16-17; Isa 3:9-11; compare Deu 28:3-19). Thus Jesus is speaking as the prophets of old of the fact that a man must choose between blessing and woe (see Mat 7:13-14). But the point is that they each choose the way for themselves.
So He will now lay out His new ways, and He calls on them to consider them and respond to them. For they are dynamic and demanding and call for a totally new approach to life, and a new attitude towards God and towards others. They speak of total self-giving, as against self-receiving.
They must, however, be seen in the light of the environment of His hearers. They are not speaking of how to deal with scoundrels and rogues who try to fleece them, and of outsiders who come with violence to attack them, but of how to respond to the people who live within their environment, who they rub shoulders with every day. Nor are they describing how the country must be run. A Christian will support his country’s laws and its police force, where these are behaving justly. He supports the punishment of evildoers (even though he may sometimes recommend mercy). The instructions here are personal not judicial. A country could not be run in this way, for there justice and punishment are necessary. He is rather speaking of how individual Christians should respond to others in their daily lives, of how we should treat all men, and especially our ‘neighbours’.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
A threefold woe:
v. 24. But woe unto you that are rich! for ye have received your consolation.
v. 25. Woe unto you that are full! for ye shall hunger. Woe unto you that laugh now! for ye shall mourn and weep.
v. 26. Woe unto you when all men shall speak well of you! for so did their fathers to the false prophets. Woe unto you rich people! for you have your solace in advance. This is spoken, as often in Scripture, Mar 10:23; 1Ti 6:9, of those that place their trust in their money. The Christian that is rich does not think of putting his faith in mammon. He knows that he is not in reality the owner of the goods entered under his name, but the steward of God, with the greater responsibilities, the greater the amount of riches which men call his. And he must give an account on the last day. Those people, therefore, that consider their wealth their own to do with as they please, and who use it with this idea in mind, to receive their good things in the present lifetime, Luk 16:25, have the only solace that they will ever get, Job 31:24. They may seem satisfied and try to persuade themselves and others that they are happy; but what about the world to come? Woe unto you that are filled up; for ye shall hunger. Those that seek the satisfaction of all their desires in this life and are rewarded in such a way that they get all that they have longed for, have their ambition realized. But they will have to suffer hunger throughout eternity. Woe unto you that laugh now; for ye shall mourn and weep. Those that have the motto: Let us eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we shall be dead, and live in accordance with it, may assume a boisterous happiness in the enjoyment of the pleasures of this world. But the time is coming when they must render account of every moment foolishly spent in the lust of the flesh, in the lust of the eyes, in the pride of life. Then there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. The last woe is one directed especially to the apostles. If every one speaks well of them, praises them, the chances are that they have omitted some part of their duty, that pertaining to the fearless denunciation of sin. That has ever been a special feature of the false prophet’s work that they preach to the itching ears of the people, 2Ti 4:3; Eze 13:18-20; Isa 56:10. That is no recommendation, but the strongest censure that could be spoken upon a pastor’s work, that he hurts no one, and that no one hurts him.
Fuente: The Popular Commentary on the Bible by Kretzmann
Luk 6:24. Woe unto you that are rich! We may observe another circumstance in this discourse, in which also it differs from that in St. Matthew, namely, that our Lord not only pronounced blessings, but likewise maledictions, in it. As poverty, which is neither good nor bad in itself, cannot be acceptable to God, unless it is accompanied with the graces and virtues which are suitable to an afflicted state; so riches do not make us the objects of God’s hatred, unless they be accompanied with those vices which frequently spring from an opulent fortune; namely, pride, luxury, love of pleasure, or covetousness. Rich men, infected with such vices as these, are the objects of the woe here denounced; and not they who make a proper use of their wealth, and possess, through divine grace, the dispositions and virtues which should accompany affluence. Wherefore, though there is no restriction added to the word rich in the malediction, as there is to the word poor in the complete denunciation of the beatitude, Mat 5:3 yet it is equally to be understood: “Woe unto you that are rich in spirit;” you who are proud, covetous, lovers of pleasure; “for ye have received your consolation.” The parable of the rich man and Lazarus may be considered as an illustration both of the beatitude and the malediction. The reader will find, by referring to the parallel passages in Matthew 5 : &c. and the notes, the dubious expressions in this discourse fully elucidated.
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
Luk 6:24-25 . The woes of the later tradition closely corresponding to the beatitudes. Comp. on Luk 6:20 .
] on the other hand, verumtamen , so that also might be used as at Luk 6:35 ; Luk 11:41 , and elsewhere. See Klotz, ad Devar . p. 725.
] Conceive Jesus here extending His glance beyond the disciples (Luk 6:20 ) to a wider circle.
] see on Mat 6:2 .
. ] Instead of receiving the consolation which you would receive by possession of the Messiah’s kingdom (comp. Luk 2:25 ), if you belonged to the , you have by anticipation what is accounted to you instead of that consolation! Comp. the history of the rich man, ch. 16. Here the Messianic retributive punishment is described negatively , and by , . . ., positively .
] ye now are filled up, satisfied , Herod. i. 112. Comp. on Col 2:23 . For the contrast, Luk 1:53 . On the nominative, Buttmann, Neut. Gr . p. 123 [E. T. 141].
Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary
24 But woe unto you that are rich! for ye have received your consolation.
Ver. 24. But woe unto you that are rich ] sc. In this world only, and not to Godward. See Trapp on “ Jam 5:1 “ See Trapp on “ Jam 5:3 “ See Trapp on “ Jam 5:3 “ Every grain of riches hath a vermin of pride and ambition in it.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
24. ] Of course (see Prolegg. ch. 1.) I cannot assent to any such view as that taken by Meyer and others, that these ‘woes’ are inserted from later tradition ( gehdren zur Formation der spatern Mberlieferung ); in other words, were never spoken by our Lord at all: either we must suppose that they ought to follow Mat 5:12 , which is from the context most improbable, or that they, and perhaps the four preceding beatitudes with them, were on some occasion spoken by our Lord in this exact form, and so have been here placed in that form.
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
Luk 6:24-26 . , but, used here adversatively, a favourite word with Lk., suggesting therefore the hypothesis that he is responsible for the “woes” following, peculiar to his version of the sermon. , ye have in full; riches and nothing besides your reward ( cf. Mat 6:2 ).
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
But. Greek. plen. Emphatic. woe. This is not a different and discrepant version of the Sermon on the Mount, but a varied repetition of parts of it.
have received = are receiving. Greek. apecho. The common word in the Papyri for a receipt. See note on Mat 6:2.
consolation. Greek paraklesis = comfort. Akin to “Comforter”. Joh 14:16, Joh 14:26
, &c. Compare Luk 2:25.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
24.] Of course (see Prolegg. ch. 1.) I cannot assent to any such view as that taken by Meyer and others, that these woes are inserted from later tradition (gehdren zur Formation der spatern Mberlieferung); in other words, were never spoken by our Lord at all:-either we must suppose that they ought to follow Mat 5:12, which is from the context most improbable,-or that they, and perhaps the four preceding beatitudes with them, were on some occasion spoken by our Lord in this exact form, and so have been here placed in that form.
Fuente: The Greek Testament
Luk 6:24. [ , woe is [not be] unto you) This is a denunciation, not an imprecation.-V. g.]-, consolation) Psa 49:7; Psa 49:19; Psa 17:14.
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
woe: Luk 12:15-21, Luk 18:23-25, Job 21:7-15, Psa 49:6, Psa 49:7, Psa 49:16-19, Psa 73:3-12, Pro 1:32, Jer 5:4-6, Amo 4:1-3, Amo 6:1-6, Hag 2:9, 1Ti 6:17, Jam 2:6, Jam 5:1-6, Rev 18:6-8
for: Luk 16:19-25, Mat 6:2, Mat 6:5, Mat 6:16
Reciprocal: Luk 1:53 – and Luk 6:20 – Blessed Luk 12:21 – he Luk 16:25 – thy good Rev 3:17 – I am
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
4
This is somewhat figurative, meaning to be enjoying the pleasures of this world by neglecting the obligation of a righteous life.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Luk 6:24. Rich, i.e., fancying themselves possessed of what they crave and need. This class is made up largely of those actually wealthy.
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
Observe here, 1. That though St. Luke omits divers of the beatitudes mentioned by St. Matthew, chap. 5, yet he recites the woes which St. Matthew omitted. If we will understand our Saviour’s doctrine fully, we must consult all the evangelists thoroughly.
Observe, 2. These woes are not to be understood absolutely, but restrainedly: the woes do not belong to men because they are rich, because they are full, because they do laugh; but because they place their happiness in these things; take up with them for their portions, and rejoice in them as their chief good, valuing themselves by what they have in hand, not by what they have in hope.
He that is rich and righteous, he that is great and gracious, he that has his hands full of this world, and his heart empty of pride and vain confidence; he that laughs when God smiles, he that expresses himself joyfully when God expresses himself graciously, such a man is rich in grace, who is thus gracious in the midst of riches. For to be rich and holy, argues much riches of holiness.
Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament
Luk 6:24-25. But wo, &c. Here we see that this discourse differs very materially from the sermon on the mount; there our Lord pronounced blessings only, here he denounces curses; or, to speak more properly, he compassionately bewails the condition of persons of a contrary character to that of those pronounced happy in the preceding verses. For, as Grotius justly observes, the expression, , wo unto you, vox est dolentis, non ir incensi, is the expression of one lamenting, [or bewailing the unhappy condition of another,] not of one inflamed with anger. It is like that used by our Lord, Mat 24:19, wo to them that are with child, &c., in those days; an expression which no one can understand otherwise than as a declaration of the unhappiness of women in these circumstances, at such a time of general calamity as is referred to. The parallel passage in Luk 23:29 where we have the same prophecy, makes this evident. As our Lord, therefore, in the former sentences, pronounces the poor, the needy, the mournful, and the persecuted happy, so he here pronounces the rich, the jovial, and the applauded, miserable; the circumstances in which such are placed being peculiarly insnaring, and the danger being great lest they should be so taken up with the transient pleasures of time, as to forget and forfeit everlasting happiness. His words may be thus paraphrased: Miserable are ye rich If ye have received or sought your consolation or happiness in your riches. Miserable are you that are full Of meat and drink, and worldly goods, and take up with these things as your portion; for you shall ere long hunger Shall fall into a state of great indigence and misery, aggravated by all the plenty which you enjoyed and abused. Miserable are you that laugh That spend your lives in mirth and gayety, or are of a light, trifling spirit; for you shall mourn and weep You have reason to expect a portion in those doleful regions, where, without intermission and without end, you shall be abandoned to weeping, and wailing, and gnashing of teeth. Our Lords malediction, [declaration,] says a modern author, is not inconsistent with the apostles precepts, which command Christians always to rejoice. Neither is the mirth against which the wo is here denounced to be understood of that constant cheerfulness of temper, which arises to true Christians from the comfortable and cheerful doctrines with which they are enlightened by the gospel, the assurance they have of reconciliation with God, the hope they have of everlasting life and the pleasure they enjoy in the practice of piety and the other duties of religion. But it is to be understood of that turbulent, carnal mirth, that levity and vanity of spirit, which arises, not from any solid foundation, but from sensual pleasure, or those vain amusements of life by which the giddy and the gay contrive to make away their time; that sort of mirth which dissipates thought, leaves no time for consideration, and gives them an utter aversion to all serious reflections. Persons who continue to indulge themselves in this sort of mirth through life, shall weep and mourn eternally, when they are excluded from the joys of heaven, and banished for ever from the presence of God, by the light of whose countenance all the blessed are enlightened, and made transcendently happy.
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Vers. 24-26.But woe unto you that are rich! for ye have received your consolation. 25. Woe unto you that are full! for ye shall hunger. Woe unto you that laugh now! for ye shall mourn and weep. 26. Woe unto you when all men shall speak well of you! for so did their fathers to the false prophets.
Jesus here contemplates in spirit those adversaries who were sharpening against Him only just before (Luk 6:11) the sword of persecution: the rich and powerful at Jerusalem, whose emissaries surrounded Him in Galilee. Perhaps at this very moment He perceives some of their spies in the outer ranks of the congregation. Certainly it is not the rich, as such, that He curses, any more than He pronounced the poor as such blessed. A Nicodemus or a Joseph of Arimathea will be welcomed with open arms as readily as the poorest man in Israel. Jesus is dealing here with historical fact, not with moral philosophy. He takes the fact as it presented itself to Him at that time. Were not the rich and powerful, as a class, already in open opposition to His mission? They were thus excluding themselves from the kingdom of God. The fall of Jerusalem fulfilled only too literally the maledictions to which Jesus gave utterance on that solemn day.
The , except, only, which we can only render by but (Luk 6:24), makes the persons here designated an exception as regards the preceding beatitudes.
The term rich refers to social position, full to mode of living; the expression, you that laugh, describes a personal disposition. All these outward conditions are considered as associated with an avaricious spirit, with injustice, proud self-satisfaction, and a profane levity, which did indeed attach to them at that time. It was to the Pharisees and Sadducees more particularly that these threatenings were addressed.
The word , now, which several MSS. read in the first proposition, is a faulty imitation of the second, where it is found in all the documents. It is in place in the latter; for the notion of laughing contains something more transient than that of being full.
The expression , which we have rendered by ye have received, signifies: you have taken and carried away everything; all therefore is exhausted. Comp. Luk 16:25.
The terms hunger, weeping, were literally realized in the great national catastrophe which followed soon after this malediction; but they also contain an allusion to the privations and sufferings which await, after death, those who have found their happiness in this world.
In Luk 6:26 it is more particularly the Pharisees and scribes, who were so generally honoured in Israel, that Jesus points out as continuing the work of the false prophets. These four woes would be incompatible with the spiritual sense of the terms poor, hungry, etc., in the beatitudes.
The second part of the discourse: Luk 6:27-45. The New Law.
Here we have the body of the discourse. Jesus proclaims the supreme law of the new society. The difference from Matthew comes out in a yet more striking manner in this part than in the preceding. In the first Gospel, the principal idea is the opposition between legal righteousness and the new righteousness which Jesus came to establish. He Himself announces the text of the discourse in this saying (Luk 6:20): Except your righteousness exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven. The law, in the greater number of its statutes, seemed at first sight only to require outward observance. But it was evident to every true heart, that by these commandments the God of holiness desired to lead His worshippers, not to hypocritical formalism, but to spiritual obedience. The tenth commandment made this very clear, as far as respected the decalogue. Israelitish teaching should have laboured to explain the law in this truly moral sense, and to have carried the people up from the letter to the spirit, as the prophets had endeavoured to do. Instead of that, Pharisaism had taken pleasure in multiplying indefinitely legal observances, and in regulating them with the minutest exactness, urging the letter of the precept to such a degree as sometimes even to make it contradict its spirit. It had stifled morality under legalism. Comp. Mat 15:1-20; Mat 15:23. In dealing with this crying abuse, Jesus breaks into the heart of the letter with a bold hand, in order to set free its spirit, and displaying this in all its beauty, casts aside at once the letter, which was only its imperfect envelope, and that Pharisaical righteousness, which rested on nothing else than an indefinite amplification of the letter. Thus Jesus finds the secret of the abolition of the law in its very fulfilment. Paul understood and developed this better than anybody. What in fact, is the legislator’s intention in imposing the letter? Not the letter, but the spirit. The letter, like the thick calyx under the protection of which the flower, with its delicate organs, is formed, was only a means of preserving and developing its inward meaning of goodness, until the time came when it could bloom freely. This time had come. Jesus on the mountain proclaims it. And this is why this day is the counterpart of the day of Sinai. He opposes the letter of the divine commandment, understood as letter, to the spirit contained in it, and developes this contrast, Matthew 5, in a series of antitheses so striking, that it is impossible to doubt either their authenticity, or that they formed the real substance, the centre of the Sermon on the Mount. Holtzmann will never succeed in persuading any one to the contrary; his entire critical hypothesis as to the relations of the Syn. will crumble away sooner than this conviction. The connection of the discourse in Matthew is this: 1. Jesus discloses wherein the Pharisaical righteousness fails, its want of inward truth (Luk 6:13-48). 2. He judges, by this law, the three positive manifestations of this boasted righteousness: almsgiving, prayer, and fasting (Luk 6:1-18). 3. He attacks two of the most characteristic sins of Pharisaism: covetousness and censoriousness (Luk 6:19-34, Luk 7:1-5). 4. Lastly there come various particular precepts on prayer, conversion, false religious teaching, etc. (Luk 7:6-20). But between these precepts it is no longer possible to establish a perfectly natural connection. Such is the body of the Sermon in Matthew: at the commencement, an unbroken chain of thought; then a connection which becomes slighter and slighter, until it ceases altogether, and the discourse becomes a simple collection of detached sayings. But the fundamental idea is still the opposition between the formalism of the ancient righteousness and the spirituality of the new.
In Luke also, the subject of the discourse is the perfect law of the new order of things; but this law is exhibited, not under its abstract and polemical relation of spirituality, but under its concrete and positive form of charity. The plan of this part of the discourse, in Luke, is as follows: 1 st. Jesus describes the practical manifestations of the new principle (Luk 6:27-30); then, 2 d. He gives concise expression to it (Luk 6:31); 3 d. He indicates the distinctive characteristics of charity, by contrasting this virtue with certain natural analogous sentiments (Luk 6:32-35 a); 4 th. He sets forth its model and source (Luk 6:35 b and 36); 5 th. Lastly, He exhibits this gratuitous, disinterested love as the principle of all sound judgment and salutary religious teaching, contrasting in this respect the new ministry, which He is establishing in the earth in the presence of His disciples, with the old, which, as embodied in the Pharisees, is vanishing away (Luk 6:37-45).
At the first glance, there seems little or nothing in common between this body of the discourse, and that which, as we have just seen, Matthew gives us. We can even understand, to a certain extent, the odd notion of Schleiermacher, that these two versions emanated from two hearers, of whom one was more favourably situated for hearing than the other! The difference, however, between these two versions may be accounted for by connecting the fully-developed subject in Luke with the subject of the last two of the six antitheses, by which Jesus describes (Matthew 5) the contrast between legal righteousness and true righteousness. Jesus attacks, Luk 6:38-48, the Pharisaical commentary on these two precepts of the law: an eye for an eye…; and, thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. This commentary, by applying the lex talionis, which had only been given as a rule for the judges of Israel, to private life, and by deducing from the word neighbour this consequence: therefore thou mayest hate him who is not thy neighbour, that is to say, the foreigner, or thine enemy, had entirely falsified the meaning of the law on these two points. In opposition to these caricatures, Jesus sets forth, in Matthew, the inexhaustible and perfect grace of charity, as exhibited to man in the example of his heavenly Benefactor; then He proceeds to identify this charity in man with the divine perfection itself: Be ye perfect [through charity], as your Father which is in heaven is perfect. Now it is just at this point that Luke begins to appropriate the central part of the discourse. These last two antitheses, which terminate in Matthew in the lofty thought (Luk 6:48) of man being elevated by love to the perfection of God, furnish Luke with the leading idea of the discourse as he presents it, namely, charity as the law of the new life. Its theme is in this way modified in form, but it is not altered in substance. For if, as St. Paul says, Rom 13:10, charity is the fulfilling of the law; if perfect spirituality, complete likeness to God, consists in charity; the fundamental agreement between these two forms of the Sermon on the Mount is evident. Only Luke has deemed it advisable to omit all that specially referred to the ancient law and the comments of the Pharisees, and to preserve only that which has a universal human bearing, the opposition between charity and the natural selfishness of the human heart.
The two accounts being thus related, it follows, that as regards the original structure of the discourse, in so far as this was determined by opposition to Pharisaism, Matthew has preserved it more completely than Luke. But though this is so, Matthew’s discourse still contains many details not originally belonging to it, which Luke has very properly assigned to entirely different places in other parts of his narrative. We find here once more the two writers following their respective bent: Matthew, having a didactic aim, exhibits in a general manner the teaching of Jesus on the righteousness of the kingdom, by including in this outline many sayings spoken on other occasions, but bearing on the same subject; Luke, writing as a historian, confines himself more strictly to the actual words which Jesus uttered at this time. Thus each of them has his own kind of superiority over the other.
1 st. The manifestations of charity: Luk 6:27-30. To describe the manifestations of this new principle, which is henceforth to sway the world, was the most popular and effectual way of introducing it into the consciences of his hearers. Jesus describes, first of all, charity in its active form (Luk 6:27-28) then in its passive form of endurance (Luk 6:29-30).
Fuente: Godet Commentary (Luke, John, Romans and 1 Corinthians)
Verse 24
This is not spoken of rich men universally. Abraham, David, and Joseph of Arimathea, were rich men. The language is simply an energetic expression of the hopeless condition of those who have earthly riches only, for their portion.
Fuente: Abbott’s Illustrated New Testament
6:24 But woe unto you that are rich! for ye have {f} received your consolation.
(f) That is, you reap now of your riches all the convenience and blessing you are ever likely to have, and therefore you have no other reward to look for; Mat 6:2 .
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes
The Woes 6:24-26
Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)
The woes contrast with the beatitudes in content and in the structure of the passage (cf. Luk 1:53). They address those disciples who refuse to give up all to follow Jesus or who face temptation to draw back from following Him faithfully (cf. Luk 6:46-49). This section of the sermon begins with a word of strong contrast: but (Gr. plen). "Woe" means "alas," (NEB) or "How terrible," (TEV) and it introduces an expression of pity for those who are under divine judgment. [Note: Marshall, The Gospel . . ., p. 255.]
Disciples who choose present riches over identification with the Son of Man are pitiable because they can expect no greater riches in the future from His hand. The context clarifies that Jesus was not condemning the rich simply for being rich. He was warning those who were choosing present riches at the expense of total commitment to Him as His disciples. Wealth tempts people to think that they need nothing beyond money (cf. Luk 12:19).