Biblia

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Matthew 10:39

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Matthew 10:39

He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it.

39. He that findeth his life shall lose it ] The Greek word for life ( ) embraces every form of life from mere vegetative existence to the highest spiritual life of the soul. Sometimes this variety of meaning is found within the limits of a single sentence “He that findeth the life of external comfort and pleasure, shall lose the eternal life of spiritual joy.”

Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges

He that findeth his life … – The word life in this passage is used evidently in two senses. The meaning may be expressed thus: He that is anxious to save his temporal life, or his comfort and security here, shall lose eternal life, or shall fail of heaven. He that is willing to risk or lose his comfort and life here for my sake, shall find life everlasting, or shall be saved. The manner of speaking is similar to that where he said, Let the dead bury their dead. See notes at Mat 8:22.

Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible

Mat 10:39

He that findeth his life.

The love of life


I.
The nature and end of this love of life. This attachment not engendered since the fall-a degraded exhibition of some early beauty. Adam loved life; but the life he loved was a fragment of immortality. He loved it as an unbroken walk with the Eternal; we commonly cling to life as a removal from His presence. Adam loved an immortality begun; we an immortality put off. But a Divine purification of our nature and the old lineaments shall start forth from the canvass. This love of life of Divine implantation; it survives all pleasure in life; and is not accounted for by dread of the future. The Almighty appointed that it should act as a powerful engine in the furtherance of His several dispensations. Take it away, and society is shaken in every part. Evidence that man is far even from original righteousness in the eagerness with which he clings to absence from his Maker. The love of life a perpetual source of honour to God by the opportunity afforded for the display of His grace.


II.
When the principle takes a right direction, and when a wrong direction. We have shown that the principle which in fallen man is the love of life, was in unfallen man the love of immortality; hence as it is our own aim to return to the privileges of the unfallen state, we give the principle its right direction when we draw it off from the mortal, and fasten it upon the immortal. To find by losing is the principle rightly applied; for this is the mortal surrendered to the immortal. To lose by finding is the principle wrongly applied; for this is the immortal basely exchanged for the mortal. We call upon you to love life, but you must understand what life is; not mere existence. (H. Melvill.)

Nothing to lose

He that would loss nothing, must learn to have nothing. (Farindon.)

Finding by losing

A remarkable instance of the literal fulfilment of this promise, even with regard to this life, is furnished by a circumstance lately mentioned to us by one who knew the subject of it well. A devoted Christian woman had been in the habit of carrying on extensive religious work in a large and important town, especially in the infirmary of the workhouse, which she was constantly in the habit of visiting. When no longer young, in fact she must have been nearly fifty, Miss G-became seriously ill, and her medical advisers pronounced it their opinion that she could not recover. She requested to be told how long, according to their calculation, she could possibly live, and the reply was, At the longest about a year, but you must take perfect rest, and give up all work and exertion. No, replied Miss G-; if I am to live so short a time, I must work all the more heartily for my Master. She did so, continuing her classes, visits, etc., but it did not shorten her life. At the present time, fifteen years after, Miss G-still lives, and still works actively, though between sixty and seventy years of age.

Losing life for others

Ernest entered heartily into the sport of marble-playing when that season came round; and, as he played for keeps, it was not long before complaints began to be made against him. He was a good player and did win a good many marbles; and nobody likes to lose at play, be it money or marbles. Ernest resented the hard talk about his playing, and one day when he met his pastor he told him how unjust and unkind the boys were. The pastor listened kindly; he was one of the men who have the good sense and the good taste to love boys. When Ernest paused he said: Well, Ernest, you do win a good many marbles, dont you? Why, yes, sir; of course I do. I wonder, now, if you ever ask the Lord Jesus about this marble playing? Yes, sir; I do, answered Ernest, heartily. And what do you ask Him? I ask Him to let me hit. Ernest, do you ever ask Him to let another boy hit? No, sir; of course I dont. Why not? Why, I want to get all the marbles I can. It seems as if the other boys might like to win sometimes, said Mr. Burch, thoughtfully. Ernest, are you trying to show God to the boys? Yes, Mr. Burch; I am, very earnestly. Do you ever talk to them about God? Yes, sir, I do; Id like to have the boys know Him. Well, do they seem to want to love Him much? No, Mr. Burch; I think the boys dont care much about God. Well, Ernest, I dont know that I wonder much at it. The God that they see is your God. He lets you have all that you want, but does not tell you to ask Him to give them anything! You are not showing them the God who laid down His life. What do you mean by that, Mr. Burch? Giving up the thing that we want is the very heart of Christs religion. Christ laid down His life for us, and we are to lay clown our lives for others. If we lose our life-that is, our will, our way, our pleasure, our advantage-for Christs sake, we shall find the real life, which He only can give. Try it, Ernest; lose your life among the boys, and see if they wont think better of your God.

Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell

Verse 39. He that findeth his life, c.] i.e. He who, for the sake of his temporal interest, abandons his spiritual concerns, shall lose his soul and he who, in order to avoid martyrdom, abjures the pure religion of Christ, shall lose his soul, and perhaps his life too. He that findeth his life shall lose it, was literally fulfilled in Archbishop Cranmer. He confessed Christ against the devil, and his eldest son, the pope. He was ordered to be burnt; to save his life he recanted, and was, notwithstanding, burnt. Whatever a man sacrifices to God is never lost, for he finds it again in God.

There is a fine piece on this subject in Juvenal, Sat. viii. l. 80, which deserves to be recorded here.

———– ambiguae si quando citabere testis

Incertaeque rei, Phalaris liect imperet ut sis

Falsus, et admoto dictet perjuria tauro,

Summum crede nefas ANIMAM praeferre PUDORI

Et propter VITAM VIVENDI perdere causas.

———- If ever call’d

To give thy witness in a doubtful case,

Though Phalaris himself should bid thee lie,

On pain of torture in his flaming bull,

Disdain to barter innocence for life;

To which life owes its lustre and its worth.

Wakefield.

Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible

Joh 12:25, giveth us a commentary upon these words thus, He that loveth his life shall lose it; and he that hateth his life in this world shall keep it unto life eternal. He in this text is said to find his life, who thinks that he hath found, that is, saved it, who is so much in love with his life that, rather than he will lose it, he will lose Gods favour, deny the Lord that brought him, deny the most fundamental truths of the gospel. The man that doth thus (saith Christ) shall lose it; possibly he shall not obtain the end he aims at here, but if he doth he shall lose eternal life. When, on the contrary, he that is valiant for the truth shall sometimes be preserved, notwithstanding his enemies rage; but if this happens not, yet he shall have life eternal, his mortality shall be swallowed up in life.

Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole

39. He that findeth his life shalllose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall finditanother of those pregnant sayings which our Lord so oftenreiterates (Mat 16:25; Luk 17:33;Joh 12:25). The pith of suchparadoxical maxims depends on the double sense attached to the word”life”a lower and a higher, the natural and thespiritual, the temporal and eternal. An entire sacrifice of thelower, with all its relationships and interestsor, a willingnessto make it which is the same thingis indispensable to thepreservation of the higher life; and he who cannot bring himself tosurrender the one for the sake of the other shall eventually loseboth.

Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible

He that findeth his life shall lose it,…. That man that seeks to preserve his life, and the temporal enjoyments of it, by a sinful compliance with his friends and the world, and by a denial of Christ, or non-confession of him; if he is not, by the providence of God, deprived of the good things of life, and dies a shameful death, both which are sometimes the case of such persons; yet he is sure to lose the happy and eternal life of his soul and body, in the world to come: so that the present finding of life, or the possession of it, on such sinful terms, will in the issue prove an infinite and irreparable loss unto him. On the other hand, Christ observes,

he that loseth his life for my sake, shall find it. That man that is willing to forego the present advantages of life, to suffer reproach and persecution, and lay down his life cheerfully for the sake of Christ and his Gospel, for the profession of his name, rather than drop, deny, conceal, or neglect any truth and ordinance of his, shall find his soul possessed of eternal life, as soon as separated from his body; and shall find his corporal life again, in the resurrection morn, to great advantage; and shall live with Christ in soul and body, in the utmost happiness, to all eternity.

Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible

Shall lose it ( ). This paradox appears in four forms according to Allen (I) Mt 10:39 (2) Mark 8:35; Matt 16:25; Luke 9:24 (3) Lu 17:33 (4) Joh 12:25. The Wisdom of Sirach (Hebrew text) in 51:26 has: “He that giveth his life findeth her (wisdom).” It is one of the profound sayings of Christ that he repeated many times. Plato (Gorgias 512) has language somewhat similar though not so sharply put. The article and aorist participles here ( , ) are timeless in themselves just like in verses 40 and 41.

Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament

Findeth [] . The word is really a past participle, found. Our Lord looked back in thought to each man’s past, and forward to its appropriate consummation in the future. Similarly, he who lost [] . Plato seems to have foreshadowed this wonderful thought. “O my friend ! I want you to see that the noble and the good may possibly be something different from saving and being saved, and that he who is truly a man ought not to care about living a certain time : he knows, as women say, that we must all die, and therefore he is not fond of life; he leaves all that with God, and considers in what way he can best spend his appointed term” (” Gorgias, ” 512). Still more to the point, Euripides :

“Who knows if life be not death, and death life ?”

Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament

1) “He that findeth his life shall lose it:” (ho heuron ten psuchen autou apolesei auten) “The one who continually finds his life, for himself, selfishly, will lose it;” If he saves it or in priority uses it for himself, Rom 4:4.

2) “And he that loseth his life for my sake,” (kai ho apolesas ten psuchen autou eneken emou) “And the one continually losing his life for my sake,” unselfishly witnessing and laboring in the vineyard of life, Luk 16:25; Luk 17:33.

3) “Shall find it.” (heuresei auten) “He will find it,” in the hour of rewarding, 1Co 3:8; 1Co 15:58.

No one bears a velvet cross. The cross of Jesus Christ is still rough and rugged to bear, but blessed are those who bear it, Gal 6:14; Mat 5:11-12. Every wise person understands and lives the principle of “dying to live,” 2Co 5:1.

Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary

39. He who findeth his life Lest the former doctrine, which is very difficult and troublesome to the flesh, should have little weight with us, Christ confirms it in two ways by this statement. He affirms that persons of excessive caution and foresight, when they look upon themselves as having very well defended their life, will be disappointed and will lose it; and, on the other hand, that those who disregard their life will sustain no loss, for they will recover it. We know that there is nothing which men will not do or leave undone for the sake of life, (so powerful is that attachment to it which is natural to us all;) and, therefore, it was necessary that Christ should employ such promises and threatenings in exciting his followers to despise death.

To find the life means here to possess it, or to have it in safe keeping. Those who are excessively desirous of an earthly life, take pains to guard themselves against every kind of danger, and flatter themselves with unfounded confidence, as if they were looking well to themselves, (Psa 49:18 🙂 but their life, though defended by such powerful safeguards, will pass away; for they will at last die, and death will bring to them everlasting ruin. On the other hand, when believers surrender themselves to die, their soul, which appears to vanish in a moment, passes into a better life. Yet as persons are sometimes found, who heedlessly lay down their life, either for the sake of ambition or of madness, Christ expressly states the reason why we ought to expose ourselves to death.

It is uncertain if the discourse, which is related by Luke, was delivered on another occasion. There, too, our Lord exhorts his followers to bear the cross, but does not dwell upon it at equal length. To support this sentiment he immediately adds two comparisons, of which Matthew takes no notice: but as the subject treated is substantially the same, I have not scrupled to introduce in this place what we find in Luke.

Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary

(39) He that findeth his life.The word is the same as that translated soul (i.e., that by which man lives in the lower or the higher sense of life) in Mat. 10:28. The point of the maxim lies in the contrast between the two senses. To gain the lower now is to lose the higher hereafter, and conversely, to lose the lower for the sake of Christ (i.e., to die a martyrs death in confessing Him) is to gain the higher.

Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)

39. He that findeth his life Findeth his life by avoiding the cross mentioned in the last verse. Our Lord uses the word findeth here in the sense of saveth, in order to form an antithesis with the word loseth.

But the greatest difficulty in the interpretation of this verse is in the word life. The Greek word , psyche, signifies either life or soul, inasmuch as it is the presence of the soul in the body which constitutes it a living body. It is the same word as is rendered soul in Mat 10:28. In our view it should have been rendered soul throughout the discourse. The force of the antithesis, then, in the present verse would be this: He that, by avoiding the cross, findeth or saveth his soul, (as the vivifier of his body,) shall lose it in the future world. He attains a present, earthly, and corporeal retention of his soul, by the future loss of his soul in the world to come. He that loseth his life Loseth his soul from his body by a martyr’s death. Shall find it In the world of heavenly blessedness.

Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

Mat 10:39. He that findeth his life, &c. “He who makes shipwreck of faith and a good conscience to save his life, shall lose that which is really so,his everlasting happiness; whereas he who maintains his integrity with the loss of life, and all its enjoyments, shall find what is infinitely better,a blessed immortality.” See ch. Mat 16:24. There is in this sentence a kind of figure, whereby the same word is used in different senses, in such a manner as to convey the sentiment with greater energy to the attentive. “He who, by making a sacrifice of his duty, preserves temporal life, shall lose eternal life; and contrariwise.” The like trope or figure our Lord employs in that expression, ch. Mat 8:22. Let the dead bury their dead. Let the spiritually dead bury the naturally dead. See also ch. Mat 13:12. In the present instance, the figure has a beauty in the original, which we cannot give in a version. See Campbell.

Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke

Mat 10:39 . and have no other meaning than that of soul (Mat 2:20 , Mat 6:25 , Mat 9:28 ); but the point lies in the reference of the finding and losing not being the same in the first as in the second half of the verse. “Whoever will have found his soul (by a saving of his life in this world through denying me in those times when life is endangered), will lose it (namely, through the , Mat 7:13 , the eternal death at the second coming; comp. Luk 9:24 f.); and whoever will have lost his soul (through the loss of his life in this world in persecution, through an act of self-sacrifice), will find it ” (at the resurrection to the eternal ); , Mat 10:22 . For . , comp. Eur. Hec . 21; Anth. Pal . vii. 272. 2. The finding in the first half, accordingly, denotes the saving of the , when to all appearance hopelessly endangered from temporal death; while, in the second , it denotes the saving of the after it has actually succumbed to death. The former is a finding that issues in eternal death; the latter , one that conducts to eternal life.

Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary

39 He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it.

Ver. 39. He that findeth his llfe shall lose it ] This is a strange expression, a riddle to the world, a seeming contradiction, a such as natural reason can never reconcile. But if the paradoxes of the Stoics might be proven, much more may those of the gospel. He that findeth his life, that is, redeemeth it with the forfeiture of his faith, with the shipwreck of his conscience, makes a loser’s bargain, makes more haste than good speed; while in running from death as far as he can he runs to it as fast as he can. Christ will kill him with death, Rev 2:23 ; and sentence him, as an apostate, unto double damnation.

He that loseth his life for my sake, &c. ] For else all is lost, since it is not poena penalty, but causa reason that makes a martyr. Christ and the thieves were in the same condemnation: Samson and the Philistines in the same destruction, by the downfall of the house: Similis poena, dissimilis causa, saith Augustine. Martyrdom is a crown, as old age, if it be found in the way of righteousness. One martyr cried out, Blessed be God that ever I was born to this happy hour. To another, when it was said, Take heed; it is a hard matter to burn. Indeed, said he, it is for him that hath his soul linked to his body, as a thief’s foot in a pair of fetters. Can I die but once for Christ? said a third.

Shall find it ] For the line of his lost life shall be hidden in the endless maze of God’s surest mercies. The passion days of the martyrs were therefore anciently called, Natalitia salutis, the birthdays of salvation, the daybreak of eternal brightness. Those poor seduced souls that lost their lives in the Holy Wars, as they called them, and were persuaded that thereby they made amends to Christ for his death, were much to be pitied.

a ’ .

Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)

39. ] refer to the same thing , but in somewhat different senses. The first is the life of this world , which we here all count so dear to us; the second , implied in , the real life of man in a blessed eternity.

= , Joh 12:25 = , Mar 8:34 . The past participles are used proleptically, with reference to that day when the loss and gain shall become apparent. But and are again somewhat different in position: the first implying earnest desire to save, but not so the second any will or voluntary act to destroy. This is brought out by the , which gives the ruling providential arrangement whereby the is brought about. But besides the primary meaning of this saying as regards the laying down of life literally for Christ’s sake, we cannot fail to recognize in it a far deeper sense, in which he who loses his life shall find it. In Luk 9:23 , the taking up of the cross is to be ; in ch. Mat 16:24 [118] Mark is joined with it. Thus we have the crucifying of the life of this world, the death to sin spoken of Rom 6:4-11 , and life unto God. And this life unto God is the real, true , which the self-denier shall find, and preserve unto life eternal. See Joh 12:25 and note.

[118] When, in the Gospels, and in the Evangelic statement, 1Co 11:23-25 , the sign () occurs in a reference, it is signified that the word occurs in the parallel place in the other Gospels, which will always be found indicated at the head of the note on the paragraph. When the sign () is qualified , thus, ‘ Mk.,’ or ‘ Mt. Mk.,’ &c., it is signified that the word occurs in the parallel place in that Gospel or Gospels, but not in the other or others .

Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament

Mat 10:39 . , : crucifixion, death ignominious, as a criminal horrible; but horrible though it be it means salvation. This paradox is one of Christ’s great, deep, yet ever true words. It turns on a double sense of the term as denoting now the lower now the higher life. Every wise man understands and acts on the maxim, “dying to live”.

Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson

Matthew

A LIFE LOST AND FOUND 1

Mat 10:39 .

My heart impels me to break this morning my usual rule of avoiding personal references in the pulpit. Death has been busy in our own congregation this last week, and yesterday we laid in the grave all that was mortal of a man to whom Manchester owes more than it knows. Mr. Crossley has been for thirty years my close and dear friend. He was long a member of this church and congregation. I need not speak of his utter unselfishness, of his lifelong consecration, of his lavish generosity, of his unstinted work for God and man; but thinking of him and of it, I have felt as if the words of my text were the secret of his life, and as if he now understood the fulness of the promise they contain: ‘He that loseth his life for My sake shall find it.’ Now, looking at these words in the light of the example so tenderly beloved by some of us, so sharply criticised by many, but now so fully recognised as saintly by all, I ask you to consider-

I. The stringent requirement for the Christian life that is here made.

Now we shall very much impoverish the meaning and narrow the sweep of these great and penetrating words, if we understand by ‘losing one’s life’ only the actual surrender of physical existence. It is not only the martyr on whose bleeding brows the crown of life is gently placed; it is not only the temples that have been torn by the crown of thorns, that are soothed by that unfading wreath; but there is a daily dying, which is continually required from all Christian people, and is, perhaps, as hard as, or harder than, the brief and bloody passage of martyrdom by which some enter into rest. For the true losing of life is the slaying of self, and that has to be done day by day, and not once for all, in some supreme act of surrender at the end, or in some initial act of submission and yielding at the beginning, of the Christian life. We ourselves have to take the knife into our own hands and strike, and that not once, but ever, right on through our whole career. For, by natural disposition, we are all inclined to make our own selves to be our own centres, our own aims, the objects of our trust, our own law; and if we do so, we are dead whilst we live, and the death that brings life is when, day by day, we ‘crucify the old man with his affections and lusts.’ Crucifixion was no sudden death; it was an exquisitely painful one, which made every nerve quiver and the whole frame thrill with anguish; and that slow agony, in all its terribleness and protractedness, is the image that is set before us as the true ideal of every life that would not be a living death. The world is to be crucified to me, and I to the world.

We have our centre in ourselves, and we need the centre to be shifted, or we live in sin. If I might venture upon so violent an image, the comets that career about the heavens need to be caught and tamed, and bound to peaceful revolution round some central sun, or else they are ‘wandering stars to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever.’ So, brethren, the slaying of self by a painful, protracted process, is the requirement of Christ.

But do not let us confine ourselves to generalities. What is meant? This is meant-the absolute submission of the will to commandments and providences, the making of that obstinate part of our nature meek and obedient and plastic as the clay in the potter’s hands. The tanner takes a stiff hide, and soaks it in bitter waters, and dresses it with sharp tools, and lubricates it with unguents, and his work is not done till all the stiffness is out of it and it is flexible. And we do not lose our lives in the lofty, noble sense, until we can say-and verify the speech by our actions-’Not my will but Thine be done.’ They who thus submit, they who thus welcome into their hearts, and enthrone upon the sovereign seat in their wills, Christ and His will-these are they who have lost their lives. When we can say, ‘I live, yet not I, but Christ liveth in me,’ then, and only then, have we in the deepest sense of the words ‘lost our lives.’

The phrase means the suppression, and sometimes the excision, of appetites, passions, desires, inclinations. It means the hallowing of all aims; it means the devotion and the consecration of all activities. It means the surrender and the stewardship of all possessions. And only then, when we have done these things, shall we have come to practical obedience to the initial requirement that Christ makes from us all-to lose our lives for His sake.

I need not diverge here to point to that life from which my thoughts have taken their start in this sermon. Surely if there was any one characteristic in it more distinct and lovely than another, it was that self was dead and that Christ lived. There may be sometimes a call for the actual-which is the lesser-surrender of the bodily life, in obedience to the call of duty. There have been Christian men who have wrought themselves to death in the Master’s service. Perhaps he of whom I have been speaking was one of these. It may be that, if he had done like so many of our wealthy men-had flung himself into business and then collapsed into repose-he would have been here to-day. Perhaps it would have been better if there had been a less entire throwing of himself into arduous and clamant duties. I am not going to enter on the ethics of that question. I do not think there are many of this generation of Christians who are likely to work themselves to death in Christ’s cause; and perhaps, after all, the old saying is a true one, ‘Better to wear out than to rust out.’ But only this I will say: we honour the martyrs of Science, of Commerce, of Empire, why should not we honour the martyrs of Faith? And why should they be branded as imprudent enthusiasts, if they make the same sacrifice which, when an explorer or a soldier makes, his memory is honoured as heroic, and his cold brows are crowned with laurels? Surely it is as wise to die for Christ as for England. But be that as it may; the requirement, the stringent requirement, of my text is not addressed to any spiritual aristocracy, but is laid upon the consciences of all professing Christians.

II. Observe the grounds of this requirement.

Did you ever think-or has the fact become so familiar to you that it ceases to attract notice?-did you ever think what an extraordinary position it is for the son of a carpenter in Nazareth to plant Himself before the human race and say, ‘You will be wise if you die for My sake, and you will be doing nothing more than your plain duty’? What business has He to assume such a position as that? What warrants that autocratic and all-demanding tone from His lips? ‘Who art Thou’-we may fancy people saying-’that Thou shouldst put out a masterful hand and claim to take as Thine the life of my heart?’ Ah! brethren, there is but one answer: ‘Who loved me, and gave Himself for me.’ The foolish, loving, impulsive apostle that blurted out, before his time had come, ‘I will lay down my life for Thy sake,’ was only premature; he was not mistaken. There needed that His Lord should lay down His life for Peter’s sake; and then He had a right to turn to the apostle and say, ‘Thou shalt follow Me afterwards,’ and ‘lay down thy life for My sake.’ The ground of Christ’s unique claim is Christ’s solitary sacrifice. He who has died for men, and He only, has the right to require the unconditional, the absolute surrender of themselves, not only in the sacrifice of a life that is submitted, but, if circumstances demand, in the sacrifice of a death. The ground of the requirement is laid, first in the fact of our Lord’s divine nature, and second, in the fact that He who asks my life has first of all given His.

But that same phrase, ‘for My sake,’ suggests-

III. The all-sufficient motive which makes such a loss of life possible.

I suppose that there is nothing else that will wholly dethrone self but the enthroning of Jesus Christ. That dominion is too deeply rooted to be abolished by any enthusiasms, however noble they may be, except the one that kindles its undying torch at the flame of Christ’s own love. God forbid that I should deny that wonderful and lovely instances of self-oblivion may be found in hearts untouched by the supreme love of Christ! But whilst I recognise all the beauty of such, I, for my part, humbly venture to believe and assert that, for the entire deliverance of a man from self-regard, the one sufficient motive power is the reception into his opening heart of the love of Jesus Christ.

Ah! brethren, you and I know how hard it is to escape from the tyrannous dominion of self, and how the evil spirits that have taken possession of us mock at all lesser charms than the name which ‘devils fear and fly’; ‘the Name that is above every name.’ We have tried other motives. We have sought to reprove our selfishness by other considerations. Human love-which itself is sometimes only the love of self, seeking satisfaction from another-human love does conquer it, but yet conquers it partially. The demons turn round upon all other would-be exorcists, and say, ‘Jesus we know . . . but who are ye?’ It is only when the Ark is carried into the Temple that Dagon falls prone before it. If you would drive self out of your hearts-and if you do not it will slay you-if you would drive self out, let Christ’s love and sacrifice come in. And then, what no brooms and brushes, no spades nor wheelbarrows, will ever do-namely, cleanse out the filth that lodges there-the turning of the river in will do, and float it all away. The one possibility for complete, conclusive deliverance from the dominion and tyranny of Self is to be found in the words ‘For My sake.’ Ah! brethren, I suppose there are none of us so poor in earthly love, possessed or remembered, but that we know the omnipotence of these words when whispered by beloved lips, ‘For My sake’; and Jesus Christ is saying them to us all.

IV. Lastly, notice the recompense of the stringent requirement.

‘Shall find it,’ and that finding, like the losing, has a twofold reference and accomplishment: here and now, yonder and then.

Here and now, no man possesses himself till he has given himself to Jesus Christ. Only then, when we put the reins into His hands, can we coerce and guide the fiery steeds of passion and of impulse, And so Scripture, in more than one place, uses a remarkable expression, when it speaks of those that believe to the ‘acquiring of their souls.’ You are not your own masters until you are Christ’s servants; and when you fancy yourselves to be most entirely your own masters, you have promised yourselves liberty and have become the slave of corruption. So if you would own yourselves, give yourselves away. And such an one ‘shall find’ his life, here and now, in that all earthly things will be sweeter and better. The altar sanctifies the gift. When some pebble is plunged into a sunlit stream, the water brings out the veined colourings of the stone that looked all dull and dim when it was lying upon the bank. Fling your whole being, your wealth, your activities, and everything, into that stream, and they will flash in splendour else unknown. Did not my friend, of whom I have been speaking, enjoy his wealth far more, when he poured it out like water upon good causes, than if he had spent it in luxury and self-indulgence? And shall we not find that everything is sweeter, nobler, better, fuller of capacity to delight, if we give it all to our Master? The stringent requirement of Christ is the perfection of prudence. ‘Who pleasure follows pleasure slays,’ and who slays pleasure finds a deeper and a holier delight. The keenest epicureanism could devise no better means for sucking the last drop of sweetness out of the clustering grapes of the gladnesses of earth than to obey this stringent requirement, and so realise the blessed promise, ‘Whoso loseth his life for My sake shall find it.’ The selfish man is a roundabout fool. The self-devoted man, the Christ-enthroning man, is the wise man.

And there will be the further finding hereafter, about which we cannot speak. Only remember, how in a passage parallel with this of my text, spoken when almost within sight of Calvary, our Lord laid down not only the principle of His own life but the principle for all His servants, when He said, ‘Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone: but if it die, it bringeth forth much fruit.’ The solitary grain dropped into the furrow brings forth a waving harvest. We may not, we need not, particularise, but the life that is found at last is as the fruit an hundredfold of the life that men called ‘lost’ and God called ‘sown.’

‘Blessed are the dead which die in the Lord; they rest from their labours, and their works do follow them.’

1 Preached after the funeral of Mr. F. W. Crossley.

Fuente: Expositions Of Holy Scripture by Alexander MacLaren

He that findeth = He that has found. Note the Introversion in this verse (find, lose; lose, find).

life = soul. See App-110.

loseth = has lost.

for My sake = on account of Me. Luk 14:14; Luk 20:35, Luk 20:36. Joh 5:29; Joh 11:25.

find it. In resurrection. Compare 1Pe 4:19.

Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics

39.] refer to the same thing, but in somewhat different senses. The first is the life of this world, which we here all count so dear to us; the second, implied in , the real life of man in a blessed eternity.

= , Joh 12:25 = , Mar 8:34. The past participles are used proleptically, with reference to that day when the loss and gain shall become apparent. But and are again somewhat different in position: the first implying earnest desire to save, but not so the second any will or voluntary act to destroy. This is brought out by the , which gives the ruling providential arrangement whereby the is brought about. But besides the primary meaning of this saying as regards the laying down of life literally for Christs sake, we cannot fail to recognize in it a far deeper sense, in which he who loses his life shall find it. In Luk 9:23, the taking up of the cross is to be ; in ch. Mat 16:24 [118] Mark is joined with it. Thus we have the crucifying of the life of this world,-the death to sin spoken of Rom 6:4-11, and life unto God. And this life unto God is the real, true , which the self-denier shall find, and preserve unto life eternal. See Joh 12:25 and note.

[118] When, in the Gospels, and in the Evangelic statement, 1Co 11:23-25, the sign () occurs in a reference, it is signified that the word occurs in the parallel place in the other Gospels, which will always be found indicated at the head of the note on the paragraph. When the sign () is qualified, thus, Mk., or Mt. Mk., &c., it is signified that the word occurs in the parallel place in that Gospel or Gospels, but not in the other or others.

Fuente: The Greek Testament

Mat 10:39. , soul) i.e., man with respect to his natural life, himself; cf. Luk 9:24-25.- , for My sake) Many lose their soul for the sake of the world.

Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament

Mat 16:25, Mat 16:26, Mar 8:35, Mar 8:36, Luk 17:33, Joh 12:25, Phi 1:20, Phi 1:21, 2Ti 4:6-8, Rev 2:10

Reciprocal: Jer 26:21 – he was Dan 3:18 – be it Mat 5:11 – for Mat 10:22 – for Luk 6:22 – for Luk 9:23 – If Joh 15:21 – all 1Pe 3:14 – if

Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge

0:39

The key word in this verse is life which comes from PSUCHE in both cases. The word has been rendered in the Authorized Version by heart 1 time, life 40, mind 3, soul 58. Among the phrases in Thayer’s long definition are the following: “Breath; the vital force; life; that in which there is life; the soul; the seat of the feelings, desires, affections; the soul as an essence which differs from the body and is not dissolved by death.” From the above information we may learn that man has an outer and an inner life. Expressed in another way, he has a physical life and an inner life that can be saved spiritually. Both kinds of life must be considered in this verse which will make it read as follows: “He that findeth [or is working for] his earthly life shall lose his spiritual life.” Of course the last half of the verse means just the opposite, but we may extend the language and say that if a man actually loses his earthly or outer life (verse 28) for the sake of Christ, he will gain eternal life.

Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary

Mat 10:39. He that findeth his life, shall lose (or destroy) it, etc. Life is here used in two senses; otherwise the paradoxical statement would have no meaning at all. (Comp. chap. Mat 16:25-26.) In both clauses it means, in the first instance, the outward, earthly life, with all its pleasures and comforts; and in the second (it) the inward, spiritual life, beginning here in faith, and to be perfected in heaven. This is the climax, in setting forth Christ as the supreme object of our affection. It is not said, that we must lose the one life in order to gain the other; nor that each one is called to make the sacrifice literally. The meaning is: Christ must be loved more than life itself, or, he that gains or saves his earthly life, saving it by unfaithfulness, shall lose his heavenly life; but he that loses his temporal life by faithfulness, shall find eternal life. The standard is not too high. He gave His life for us, and therefore asks us to give our lives for Him; He gives His life to us, so that we can give our lives both to and for Him.

Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament

Mat 10:39-42. He that findeth his life shall lose it He that saves his life by denying me shall lose it eternally; and he that loses his life by confessing me shall save it eternally. Or, as Macknight expresses it, He that makes shipwreck of faith and a good conscience to save his life, shall lose that which is really his life his everlasting happiness; whereas, he that maintaineth integrity at the expense of life, and all its enjoyments, shall find what is infinitely better a blessed immortality. It is justly observed by Campbell, that there is a kind of a paronomasia in the sentence, whereby the same word is used in different senses, in such a manner as to convey the sentiment with greater energy to the attentive. He who, by making a sacrifice of his duty, preserves temporal life, shall lose eternal life; and contrariwise. The trope has a beauty in the original which we cannot give it in a version: the word being equivocal, and signifying both life and soul, and consequently being much better fitted for exhibiting, with entire perspicuity, the two meanings, than the English word life. The Syro- Chaldaic, which was the language then spoken in Palestine, had, in this respect, the same advantage with the Greek. He that receiveth you receiveth me And as you shall be thus rewarded, so, in proportion, shall they who entertain you for my sake. He that receiveth a prophet in the name of a prophet That is, because he is such, shall receive a prophets reward Shall have a reward like that conferred on a prophet. It is evident, that by a prophet here is meant, not merely one that foretels future events, but a minister of God in general. And the word , rendered receive, plainly signifies here to entertain in an hospitable way, as it does also Heb 11:31; Jas 2:25, &c. Nor can the gradation, in the following words, be understood without such an interpretation, for Jesus descends here from a prophet to a righteous man, and from a righteous man to a disciple, termed a little one, that is, any believer, however poor, mean, and contemptible in the world. It must be observed, that what renders the good works here mentioned valuable in the sight of God, and procures them a recompense from him, is their being done out of regard for him and his blessed Son. By the rewards here promised, Le Clerc understands the happiness of heaven, paraphrasing the worsts thus: He that showeth kindness to a prophet, on account of his mission and doctrine, or to a righteous man, on account of his righteousness, especially if by so doing he exposes himself to persecution, shall be as highly rewarded as that righteous man or prophet shall be; nay, he who doth any good office whatever to the meanest of my disciples, though it should be but the small service of handing a cup of cold water to them, shall not go unrewarded, that is, if he shall give it to him in the name of a disciple, or with a real affection to him, on account of his relation to me. This seems to be the true interpretation of the passage. Thus also Dr. Hammond, How great soever your persecutions are, and how dangerous soever it be to profess to be a follower of Christ, yet shall no man have reason to fear the entertaining of you; for the same protection which awaits you, and the same reward that attends you, shall await them that receive you. It shall be as if they had entertained, not only angels, but Christ and God himself. He that doth support, and enable a prophet to do His work that sent him, shall receive the same reward that he should if himself had been sent to prophesy. This, as it is a great incitement to others to express their kindness to Christs ministers and faithful servants, so is it also to his ministers to apply themselves to his service with a ready mind, and with the utmost diligence in the execution of their pastoral office. Whitby.

Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

Verse 39

Findeth; seeketh unduly. The meaning is, He that sacrifices his duty to save his life, shall lose his soul.

Fuente: Abbott’s Illustrated New Testament

10:39 He that {p} findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it.

(p) They are said to find their life, who deliver it out of danger: and this is spoken against the opinion of the people, who think those that die are certainly lost, because they think not of the life to come.

Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes