Do not ye yet understand, that whatsoever entereth in at the mouth goeth into the belly, and is cast out into the draught?
Mat 15:17-20
For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts.
Our evil thoughts
I. When may your thoughts be counted voluntary, and we be truly and justly answerable for then?
1. When evil thoughts are plainly occasioned by anything that was voluntary in us, then they are to be accounted voluntary and sinful.
2. When evil thoughts proceed from gross, supine negligence and carelessness, then we are accountable for them; when we keep no guard at all over our minds and fancies, but give them free liberty wildly to rove and ramble.
3. Though evil thoughts may be involuntary at the first starting of them, being occasioned by what we could not avoid hearing and seeing, or coming upon us unawares, or proceeding from the temper and habit of our bodies, or the accidental impulses and motions of the animal spirits in our brains, which are the most immediate instruments the soul uses in her operations; though thus the first rise of evil thoughts may be involuntary., yet if we with pleasure entertain and cherish them, if our fancies are tickled by them, if they are delightful and grateful to us, this implies the consent of our wills. They then become greatly sinful to us.
II. The nature and kinds of evil thoughts.
(a) Especially dwell on the representing and acting over sins in our minds and thoughts; when we erect a stage in our fancies, and on it with strange complacence, imagine those satisfactions and filthinesses which we have not opportunity to bring into outward act.
1. Consider these lewd imaginations as to the present time. There is no sin or wickedness so vile and heinous but a man may become truly guilty of it in the sight of God only by imagining it done in his mind, and taking pleasure in such a thought.
2. As to what is past, there is reciting and repeating over those sins in our thoughts and fancies, which we had long before committed, and, perhaps, as to the external acts, quite forsaken.
3. With respect to the time to come, the speculative wickedness of mens fancies and imaginations shows itself in the wild and extravagant suppositions they make to themselves, feigning themselves to be what they would fain be, and then imagining in their minds what in such circumstances they would do.
(b) Dwell on unworthy, atheistical, profane, desperate thoughts of (led Almighty.
(c) Thinkings that become evil because of the seasons of them.
(d) Envious, malicious, fretting thoughts.
(e) Troublesome, anxious thoughts of future events.
(f) Haughty, proud, admiring thoughts of ourselves.
III. Practical rules for the right government of our thoughts.
1. If they proceed from the hearts, then we must look after them.
2. Consider what care and art wicked men use to prevent good thoughts, and let us use the same diligence and endeavours to hinder evil and wicked thoughts and motions.
3. Avoid idleness.
4. Live under the due awe of Gods continual presence with us.
5. Serious devotion, especially humble and hearty prayer to God Almighty. (B. Calamy.)
Evil thoughts.
I. Define the classes of thought which may be regarded as evil.
1. Vain thoughts. These are not of a directly noxious quality; yet, light, empty, trifling, and insignificant, they form a most fearful waste of the noble faculty of thought.
2. Thoughts of a directly irreligious tendency. Impious and unworthy conceptions of God, sceptical thoughts in relation to various parts of revealed religion nourished as a subterfuge for sin, rebellious thoughts formed in the hardness of our hearts against the allotments of His providence, etc.
3. Intensely selfish and worldly thoughts.
4. Thoughts of deliberate wickedness.
II. Indicate the sinfulness of evil thoughts.
1. They have the stamp of guilt affixed to them by the Divine law.
2. They lead to the expressions of evil actions.
3. They defraud us of the supreme end of thought.
III. Enforce the necessity of resistance of evil, thoughts. How necessary such resistance when we consider the advantages accruing, e.g., the influence-
1. Upon our personal character.
2. Upon society.
3. Upon a review of life in leaving it and during eternity. (James Foster, B. A.)
The heart a den of evil
I. The humiliating truth which the saviour here sets forth,
II. The truths which are connected with this humbling fact.
1. We are driven to believe in the doctrine of the fall.
2. It shows the need of a new nature.
3. Admire the grace of God.
4. This doctrine illustrates the doctrine of the atonement. (C. H. Spugeon.)
Sin deeply seated
He plainly tells us that the part of human nature which yields such poisonous fruit is not a bough which may be sawn off, a limb which may be cut away, but the very core and substance of the man-his heart. He in effect tells us that lust doth not come out of the eye merely, but from the inmost nature of a depraved being. Murder comes not in the first place from the hasty hand, but from a wild ungovernable heart. (C. H. Spurgeon.)
Sin natural
You never need educate any man into sin. As soon as ever the young crocodile has left its shell it begins to act just like its parent, and to bite at the stick which broke the shell. The serpent is scarcely born before it rears itself and begins to hiss. The young tiger may be nurtured in your parlour, but it will develop ere long the same thirst for blood as if it were in the forest. So is it with man; he sins as naturally as the young lion seeks for blood, or the young serpent stores up venom. (C. H. Spurgeon.)
Sin inward
If you can drive a man from outward vice, how far have you improved him if he lives in inward sin? You have benefited him as far as the sight of man is concerned, but not before God. There was a man killed on Holborn Hill this week, and I have heard that there was little or no external appearance of injury upon his body. He had been crushed between an omnibus and a cart, and all the wounds were internal, but he died just as surely as if he had been beaten black and blue, or cut into a thousand gashes. So a man may die of internal sin; it does not appear outwardly for certain reasons, but he will die of it just the same if it be within. Many a man has died from internal bleeding, and yet there has been no wound whatever to be seen by the eye. You, my dear hearer, may go to hell as well dressed in the garnishings of morality as in the rags of immorality. (C. H. Spurgeon.)
The heart the home of sin
The Saviour does not stop to prove that these things come out of the heart. He asserts it, and asserts it because it is self-evident. When you see a thing coming forth, you are clear it was there first. Last summa.: I noticed hornets continually flying from a number of decayed logs in my garden. I saw them constantly flying in and out, and I did not think myself at all unreasonable in concluding that there was a hornets nest there; and so, if we see the hornets of sin flying out of a man, we suppose at once there is sin within him. (C. H. Spurgeon.)
The heart needs the remedy
Some malady which you do not understand troubles and alarms you. The physician is called. Thinking that the illness proceeds from a certain inflammatory process on a portion of your skin, you anxiously direct his attention to the spot. Silently, but sympathizingly, he looks at the place where you have bidden him look, and because you have bidden him look there, but soon he turns away. He is busy with an instrument on another part of your body. He presses his trumpet tube gently to your breast, and listens for the pulsations which faintly but distinctly pass through. He looks and listens there, and saddens as he looks. You again direct his attention to the cutaneous eruption which annoys you. He sighs and sits silent. When you reiterate your request that something should be done for the external eruption, he gently shakes his head, and answers not a word. From this silence you would learn the truth at last, you would not miss its meaning long. (W. Arnot.)
The heart the root of actual evil
Original sin is the womb of all actual sin. Every sinful act in us derives its descent from this. This is the spawn; actual transgressions are the offspring. This is actual sin in the egg, more than the cockatrices. Hatched by Satan, it yields a fearful brood, whose name is legion, whose end is destruction, whose grave is hell. In Eden there was a tree of life, so will there be in the Eden above-a tree whose leaves are for the healing of the nations. But since man was thrust out of Paradise, a tree of death, a root of bitterness, has grown in every soul, bearing all manner of cursed fruits; and every leaf, every bud, tends to destroy life and ruin man. Its grapes are gall, its clusters are bitter, its wine is the poison of asps. Ransack the records of human crime, dig up from the grave of forgetfulness every atrocity, however unprecedented, however abominable, it lay in germ in the ordinary corruption of human nature. Ten thousand trees spread their arms over the earth in giant magnitude, yet all spring from the one same root. (R. B. Nichol.)
Inward derangement the cause of outward wickedness
The heart is the seat and source of every great wickedness. No wonder that the wickedness of man is great. If the pendulum and weights and machinery of a clock are all deranged, it is quite clear that the hands will not point with correctness to the hours. If the fountain is corrupt and impure, the streams must inevitably be so. (J. Cumming, D. D.)
Inward sin
If a man covets, he steals. If a man has murderous hate, he murders. If a man broods dishonest thoughts, he is a -knave. If a man harbours sharp and bitter jealousies, envies, hatreds, though he never express them by his tongue, or shape them by his hand, they are there. There are many goodseeming men, who, if all their days thoughts and feelings were to be suddenly developed into acts visible to the eye, would run from themselves, as men in earthquakes run from the fiery gapings of the ground, and sulphurous cracks that open the way to the uncooled centre of perdition. (H. W. Beecher.)
The heart-mill
Anselm says, Our heart is like a mill, ever grinding, which a certain lord gave in charge to his servant, enjoining that he should only grind in it his masters grain, whether wheat, barley, or oats, and telling him that he must subsist on the produce. But that servant has an enemy, who is always playing tricks on the mill. If, any moment, he finds it unwatched, he throws in gravel to keep the stones from acting, or pitch to clog them, or dirt and chaff to mix with the meal. If the servant is careful in tending his mill, there flows forth a beautiful flour, which is at once a service to his master, and a subsistence to himself; but if he plays truant, and allows his enemy to tamper with his machinery, the bad outcome tells the tale; his lord is angry; and he himself is starved. This mill, ever grinding, is the heart; thoughts are the grain; the devil is the watchful enemy: he throws in bad thoughts, which can only be prevented by watchfulness and prayer.
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 17. Cast out into the draught] , [Anglo-Saxon]. And beeth into the forthgoing a sent – what is not fit for nourishment is evacuated; is thrown into the sink. This I believe to be the meaning of this difficult and variously translated word, . Diodati translates it properly, nella latrina, into the privy. And the Persian translator has given a good paraphrase, and appears to have collected the general meaning [Persian] her teche der dehen ander ayeed, az nusheeb beeroon rood, we ber zemeen aftad: “Whatsoever enters into the mouth goes downward, and falls upon the ground.” Michaelis, and his annotator, Dr. Marsh, have been much perplexed with this perplexing passage. See Michaelis’s Introduction, vol. i. note 35. p. 458.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Mark hath this, with very small difference in words, Mar 7:18-23; only he specifies some more sins than Matthew enumerates. The sum of what our Saviour saith is this: That all sin proceedeth from lust, some desires in the heart of man after things forbidden in the law of God. All the ticklings of our hearts with such thoughts, all the willings and desires of such things, though they never issue in overt acts, yet defile and pollute a man; and from these inward motions of the heart proceed those overt acts (mentioned by Matthew or Mark) of murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, pride, foolishness: now these things, take them in their nest, which is the heart, they defile and pollute that; take them in their passage through our lips into the world, they pollute that; take them in their overt act, they pollute the man. But to eat with unwashen hands, a thing no where forbidden by God, only by the Pharisees, who had no such authority given them from God to command any such things, this doth not pollute a man. It is possible that men may sin in not obeying the commandments of men, but it must be then in things in which God hath authorized them to command, and to determine our practice in, for the pollution lies in a disobedience to the commandment of God, not of men.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
17, 18. Do not ye yet understandthat whatsoever entereth in at the mouth, c.Familiar thoughthese sayings have now become, what freedom from bondage to outwardthings do they proclaim, on the one hand and on the other, howsearching is the truth which they expressthat nothing which entersfrom without can really defile us; and that only the evil that is inthe heart, that is allowed to stir there, to rise up in thought andaffection, and to flow forth in voluntary action, really defiles aman!
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Do not ye understand,…. You must understand, you cannot be so ignorant,
that whatsoever entereth in at the mouth, goeth into the belly, and is cast out into the draught? that is, that whatsoever food a man takes in at his mouth, he swallows down, and it is received into his stomach; which, having performed its office, the grosser parts go down into the belly, and passing through the bowels, are evacuated into the vault, or privy, “purging all meats”, as Mark says; for that only receives the filth and excrementitious matter; so that what is left in the body is pure, wholesome, and nourishing: nor can any part of what goes into a man defile him, because it only enters into the body, and passes through it; and, as Mark says, “entereth not into the heart”, which is the seat of moral impurity; so that no moral pollution can be contracted by eating any sort of food, even though it should not be clean itself, nor be eaten with clean hands.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
Perceive ye not? ( ). Christ expects us to make use of our , intellect, not for pride, but for insight. The mind does not work infallibly, but we should use it for its God-given purpose. Intellectual laziness or flabbiness is no credit to a devout soul.
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
(17) Is cast out into the draught.The word is used in its old English meaning, as equivalent to drain, sewer, cesspool (see 2Ki. 10:27). St. Mark (Mar. 7:19) adds the somewhat perplexing words, purging all meats, on which see Note on that verse. The principle implied is that a process purely physical from first to last cannot in itself bring any moral defilement. It was possible, of course, that the appetites connected with that process might bring the taint of moral evil; but then these appetites were there before the food, and they took their place among the things that came out of the heart, and not into it.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
17. Entereth in mouth draught The food passes the stomach and goes to the draught or privy without touching the soul to defile it.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
“Do you not perceive that whatever goes into the mouth passes into the digestive system, and is cast out into the draught?”
So His disciples need to recognise that when something is eaten it goes through the digestive system, and that what then remains, leaves their bodies as waste and goes into the latrine. It takes no uncleanness in and it leaves no uncleanness behind. Thus it cannot cause religious defilement. (This has nothing to do with whether it can cause physical problems). So the idea that food can pass on religious contamination is to be seen as a fallacy.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
Mat 15:17 ff. , . . .] Do you not yet understand that , and so on, notwithstanding all that I have already done to develope your minds?
Food and drink are simply things that pass into the stomach to be digested there, and have nothing in common with man’s spiritual nature, with his reason, his will, and his affections and desires ( , the centre of the whole inner life, see note on Mat 22:37 ). Notice the contrast between ( abdominal cavity , see note on Joh 7:38 ) and .
Mat 15:19 . Proof of what is said in Mat 15:18 : for the heart is the place where immoral thoughts, murders, adulteries, and so on, therefore where inward and outward sins, are first conceived, and from which they pass into actual transgressions. Accordingly, it is that which comes out of the heart , and expresses itself by means of the mouth (Mat 15:18 ), which defiles the man as a moral being. The opposite case, in which the heart sends forth what is good , presupposes conversion .
The plurals denote different instances of murder, adultery, and so on (Khner, II. 1, p. 15 f.; Maetzner, ad Lycurg . p. 144 f.), and render the language more forcible (Bremi, ad Aeschin . p. 326).
.] i.e. against one’s neighbour, on account of the connection with . Comp. note on Eph 4:31 .
Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary
17 Do not ye yet understand, that whatsoever entereth in at the mouth goeth into the belly, and is cast out into the draught?
Ver. 17. Whatsoever entereth in at the mouth ] In nature, Animantis cuiusque vita est fuga. Life, were it not for the repair by daily nourishment, would be soon extinguished, Hence it is called, “The life of our hand,” because maintained by the labour of our hands, Isa 5:7 ; Isa 5:10 . But that which our Saviour here driveth at is, to set forth the ridiculous madness of the Pharisees, while they placed a kind of holiness in those things that were evacuated and thrown into the draught. And do not Papists the very same? Qui gustavit ovum trahitur in carcerem, cogiturque de haeresi causam dicere, saith Erasmus. To eat flesh, or but an egg, in Lent, is punished with death. Whereas in the year of Christ 330, Spiridion, a godly bishop in Cyprus, having not what else ready to set before a guest that came to him in Lent, set him a piece of pork to feed on. And when the stranger made scruple of eating flesh in Lent, saying, I am a Christian, and may not do it: Nay, therefore thou mayest do it, said he, because “to the pure all things are pure,” and the kingdom of God consists not in meats and drinks, &c., Rom 14:20 .
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
17. ] , , , , .
, . , , . Philo de Opif. Mundi, 40, vol. i. p. 29.
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
Mat 15:17 . : here only, probably a Macedonian word = privy ; a vulgar word and a vulgar subject which Jesus would gladly have avoided, but He forces Himself to speak of it for the sake of His disciples. The idea is: from food no moral defilement comes to the soul; such defilement as there is, purely physical, passing through the bowels into the place of discharge. Doubtless Jesus said this, otherwise no one would have put it into His mouth. Were the Twelve any the wiser? Probably the very rudeness of the speech led them to think.
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
in at = into. Greek. eis. App-104.
draught = sewer, or sink. Greek. aphedron, a Macedonian word.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
17.] , , , , .
, . , , . Philo de Opif. Mundi, 40, vol. i. p. 29.
Fuente: The Greek Testament
Mat 15:17. , not yet) Although you have been instructed in Mat 15:11, and elsewhere, in the whole system of divine morality, from which you might have inferred this matter also.-) perceive.-, into) Into is repeated thrice without any mention of the heart, which is the true seat of real purity or impurity.
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
that: Mat 7:19, Mat 7:20, Luk 6:45, 1Co 6:13, Col 2:21, Col 2:22, Jam 3:6
and is: 2Ki 10:27
Reciprocal: Eze 17:12 – Know Mat 13:51 – Have Mat 16:9 – ye not Mar 7:18 – General Mar 7:19 – General Mar 8:17 – perceive Mar 16:14 – and upbraided
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
5:17
Mere filth that is not in the nature of disease germs goes through the stomach and other digestive organs and is separated from food particles the same as the other waste matter, and it is then discharged from the body without having done it any harm. A draught corresponds with our modern sanitary stool.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Mat 15:17. Perceive ye not? The truth affirmed was one easy to be perceived by the spiritually minded
Into the draught, i.e., drain, sink, or privy. The thought of the verse (especially when further explained by the words in Mar 7:19 : because it entereth not into his heart,) is that food affects the body not the heart, that the moral and spiritual state of man is not dependent on the food or drink he uses, much less on certain ceremonial observances in regard to these things. This verse indirectly opposes modern materialism.
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
Jesus contrasted tangible food with intangible thoughts. Matthew’s list of the heart’s products follows the order of the Ten Commandments essentially. Jesus’ point was this: what a person is determines what he or she does and says (cf. Mat 12:34-35; Rom 14:14; Rom 14:17; 1Co 8:8; Heb 9:10). Note that Jesus presupposed the biblical revelation that the heart (the seat of thought and will) is evil (cf. Mat 7:11). True religion must deal with people’s basic nature and not just with externals. The Pharisees and scribes had become so preoccupied with the externals that they failed to deal with what is more basic and important, namely, a real relationship with God. Jesus had more concern for human nature than for the form of worship. He came to seek and to save the lost (Mat 1:21; cf. Mat 6:1-33; Mat 12:34-35).
In this pericope Jesus rejected the Pharisees and scribes as Israel’s authentic interpreters of the Old Testament. He claimed that role instead for Himself. This was a theological issue that ultimately led to Jesus’ arrest and crucifixion.
"The occupation with the outward religious ceremony, instead of inner transformation of the heart, has all too often attended all forms of religion and has plagued the church as well as it has Judaism. How many Christians in church history have been executed for difference of opinion on the meaning of the Lord’s Supper elements or the mode of baptism or for failure to bow to church authority? The heart of man, which is so incurably religious, is also incurably evil, apart from the grace of God." [Note: Walvoord, Matthew: . . ., pp. 117-18.]