Biblia

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Matthew 5:36

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Matthew 5:36

Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black.

36. by thy head ] A common form of oath in the ancient world: cp. “Per caput hoc juro per quod pater ante solebat.” Verg. n.

Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges

Neither shalt thou swear by thy head – This was a common oath. The Gentiles also used this oath. To swear by the head was the same as to swear by the life; or to say, I will forfeit my life if what I say is not true. God is the Author of the life, and to swear by that, therefore, is the same as to swear by him.

Because thou canst not make one hair white or black – You have no control or right over your own life. You cannot even change one single hair. God has all that control; and it is therefore improper and profane to pledge what is Gods gift and Gods property; and it is the same as swearing by God himself.

Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible

Verse 36. Neither shalt thou swear by thy head] For these plain reasons:

1st. God commands thee not to do it.

2dly. Thou hast nothing which is thy own, and thou shouldst not pledge another’s property.

3dly. It never did, and never can, answer any good purpose. And

4thly. Being a breach of the law of God, it is the way to everlasting misery.

Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible

36. Neither shalt thou swear by thyhead, because thou canst not make one hair white or blackInthe other oaths specified, God’s name was profaned quite as really asif His name had been uttered, because it was instantly suggestedby the mention of His “throne,” His “footstool,”His “city.” But in swearing by our own head and thelike, the objection lies in their being “beyond our control,”and therefore profanely assumed to have a stability which they havenot.

Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible

Neither shalt thou swear by thy head,…. This also was a common form of swearing among the Jews: take a few instances.

“If anyone is bound to his friend by an oath, and says to him, vow unto me , “by the life of thy head”; R. Meir says u, he may retract it; but the wise men say, he cannot.”

Again w, a certain Rabbi said to Elijah,

“I heard “Bath Kol” (or the voice from heaven) mourning like a dove, and saying, woe to my children; for, because of their sins, I have destroyed my house, and have burnt my temple, and have carried them captive among the nations: and he (Elijah) said unto him , “by thy life, and by the life of thy head”, not this time only it says so, but it says so three times every day.”

Once more x, says R. Simeon ben Antipatras, to R. Joshua,

“I have heard from the mouth of the wise men, that he that vows in the law, and transgresses, is to be beaten with forty stripes: he replies, blessed art thou of God, that thou hast so done, , “by thy life, and by the life of thy head”, he that is used to do so is to be beaten.”

This form of swearing is condemned, for this reason,

because thou canst not make one hair white or black: which shows, that a man’s head, nor, indeed, one hair of his head, is in his own power, and therefore he ought not to swear by it; as he ought not to swear by heaven, or earth, or Jerusalem, because these were in the possession of God. Some copies read, “canst not make one white hair black”.

u Misn. Sanhedrim, c. 3. sect 2. w T. Bab. Beracot, fol. 3. 1. x Derech. Eretz, c. 6. fol. 18. 2.

Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible

1) “Neither shall thou swear by thy head,” (mete en te kephale sou homoses) “Neither by your head are you to swear,” even as an individual, for your head does not belong to you for covetous purposes, apart from the will of God for your life, 1Co 6:19-20.

2) “Because thou canst not make one hair white or black.” (hoti ou dunasai mian tricha leuken poiesai e melainan) “Because you are not able to make even one hair white or black,” or add one cubit to your own stature, Mat 6:27; Luk 12:28. Since God’s throne, footstool, and city (heaven, the earth, and Jerusalem) are forbidden as oath-confirming things that belong to God, it is also asserted that man should have more integrity of character than to feel obligated to swear, make an oath confirmation on the basis of his (head), having it cut off, if he were not telling the truth, see? For even his body is sacred, belongs to Christ, 1Co 3:22; 1Co 6:19-20.

Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary

(36) By thy head.This is apparently chosen as an extreme instance of a common oath in which men found no reference to God. Yet here, too, nothing but an implied reference to Him fits it to be an oath at all. He made us, and not we ourselves, and the hairs of our head are not only numbered, but are subject in all their changes to His laws, and not to our volition.

Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)

36. Swear by thy head ”It is very common among the Orientals,” says Mr. Paxton in his Illustrations, “to swear by the life or head of the king.” Joseph, improperly yielding to the fashion of the country, swore by the life of Pharaoh; and this oath is still used in various parts of the East. According to Mr. Hanway, the most sacred oath among the Persians is by the head of the king; and Thevenot asserts that to swear by the head of the king is, in Persia, more authentic and of greater credit than if they swore by all that is most sacred in heaven and upon the earth. The ordinary phrase, “I will give you my head if it is not so,” is a colloquial form of swearing of the same kind; it pledges the head or the life upon the certainty of the affirmation.

Thou canst not make one hair white or black Thy life, thy head, thy every hair are all God’s workmanship, and their preservation is his act. To swear, therefore, by life or head, is to swear by the act, power, and person of God. The presumption of the oath reaches the Divine Being.

Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

36 Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black.

Ver. 36. Neither shalt thou swear by thy head ] That is, by thy health, which is the life of our lives, say some: by thy life, say others, which is a sweet blessing; a for a living dog is better than a dead lion; yea, though full of crosses, yet why is living man sorrowful? q.d. it is a mercy that amidst all his crosses he is yet alive. “Joseph is yet alive, I have enough,” saith Jacob. They told him of his honour, he speaks of his life. Life is better than honour, and is not therefore to be laid to pawn upon every light occasion, as they that so often use, As I live, and As true as I live: whereof something before.

Because thou canst not make one hair, &c. ] God is great in great things, saith St Augustine, and not little in the smallest. ( Magnus in magnis, nec parvus in minimis. ) What less than a hair? yet in making a hair white or black, God’s power appeareth. The devil can as little create a hair of the head as he could of old a louse in the land of Egypt, Exo 8:18 . There are miracles enough in man’s body to fill a volume. It is the image of God and a little world ( ), an epitome of the visible world, as his soul is of the invisible. The idea or example of the great world, which was in God from all eternity, is, as it were, briefly and summarily exprest by God in man. Hence man is called every creature; “Go preach the gospel to every creature,” Mar 16:15 , as if there were none to him, none besides him. A philosopher could say, “there is nothing great in earth besides man.” And an orator, “the greatest thing in the least room is a good soul in a man’s body.” Man, saith the poet, is the masterpiece of the wisest workman; he is, saith the historian, the fairest piece of the chiefest architect; the very miracle of daring nature, saith Trismegist. b Galen, a profane physician, after he had described the nature and parts of man’s body, was forced to sing a hymn to that God that he knew not. And St Augustine complaineth, that men can admire the height of the hills, the hugeness of the waves, the compass of the ocean, and the circumvolution of the stars, and yet not once mark nor admire the power and goodness of God shining in their own souls and bodies, as in a mirror. c “Fearfully and wonderfully am I made,” saith David; “yea, and curiously wrought in the lowest parts of the earth;” that is, in my mother’s womb, Psa 139:13-15 . A counsel was called in heaven when man was to be formed: “Let us make man,” Gen 1:26 . And were not the birth of a child so common, should it happen but once in an age, people would run together to see it, as to a miracle. Pliny wondereth at the gnat, so small a creature, yet making so great a buzzing; and so also at the butterfly. He also maketh mention of one that spent 58 years in searching out the nature of the bee, and could not in all that time attain to the full of it. What a shame is it for us, not to see God in every creature, in ourselves especially, and even the least part of us! There is not a hair upon our heads, white or black, but hath God for the maker and God for the master too. Let those that pride themselves in their hair, think what a heavy account Absalom made to God for that sin. Absolon Marte furens, pensilis arbore, obit. Long hair in women is a token of modesty. But modesty grows short in men, as their hair grows long, saith one. And Seneca, speaking of the curled and crisped youths of his time, telleth us that they had more care of their locks than of their limbs, and had rather the commonwealth should be disturbed than their frizzled tresses disheveled. d Pompey was taxed for this neat nicety: Unico digitulo caput scalpit. And of Helen, too curious of her hair at her mother’s funeral, the poet bringeth in one that saith, : This is old Helen still, no changeling in all this time. The holy women of old dared not adorn themselves with plaited or braided hair, as St Peter testifieth, but trusted in God, and decked themselves with a meek and quiet spirit, 1Pe 3:3-5 . And “doth not nature itself teach us,” saith St Paul, “that it is a shame to a man to wear long hair?” It is objected, that the apostle intends such hair as is as long as women’s. But it is answered, that Homer useth the same word of the Greeks, calling them , and yet they did not wear their hair as long as women’s. But as it is a shame to wear it, so it is a sin to swear by it, whether long or short, white or black. Neither helps it to say, The matter is but small we swear by. For, first, it is a forsaking of God; and count you that a small matter? Compare Jer 5:7 ; cf. Jer 2:12-13 . Secondly, the more base and vile the thing is a man sweareth by, the greater is the oath, because he ascribeth that to a vile creature which is proper to God only, sc. to know the heart, to be a discerner of secrets, and an avenger, of falsehood. And if a man may not swear by his hair, much less by his faith and loyalty, that are much more precious; and to swear by them so often and ordinary, what doth it argue but that we are low brought and hardly driven? For who but a bankrupt will lay the best jewel in his house to pledge for every trifle? Besides, they are not ours to pledge; for we have plighted them already to God. Lastly, he that pawneth them so often, will easily forfeit them at length, as the pitcher doeth not so often to the well but at last it comes broken home. A man may soon swear away his faith and loyalty and it is a marvel if he that often sweareth doth not too often forswear, and so forfeit all. Swear not therefore at all in this sort. These petty oaths (as they count them) are great faults, and to be refused in our talk as poison in our meat. e The dishonour of them redounds to God, though he be not named in them. But of this see more. See trapp on “ Mat 5:35

a Vita non est vivere, sed valere. Sen. Felix dicitur ab , . Becman.

b Nihil in terra magnum praeter hominem. Favorinus. , &c. Isocr. . Eurip. . Xenophon. .

c Eunt homines mirari alta montium, ingentes fluctus maris, oceani ambitum, et gyros syderum, et relinquunt seipsos, nec mirantur. Aug.

d Rempub. turbari malunt quam comam.

Pulchra coma est pulchro digestaeque ordine frondes.

Sed fructus nullos haec coma pulchra gerit.

e Leviter volant, non leviter vulnerant.

Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)

36. . . . . ] Thou hast no control over the appearance of grey hairs on thy head thy head is not thine own; thou swearest then by a creature of God, whose destinies and changes are in God’s hand; so that every oath is an appeal to God . And, indeed, men generally regard it as such now, even unconsciously.

Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament

36. . . . .] Thou hast no control over the appearance of grey hairs on thy head-thy head is not thine own;-thou swearest then by a creature of God, whose destinies and changes are in Gods hand; so that every oath is an appeal to God. And, indeed, men generally regard it as such now, even unconsciously.

Fuente: The Greek Testament

Mat 5:36. , head) Their sin is still graver who swear by their life or their soul.- , to make one hair [thereof] white or black) The dye of human art is not real whiteness or blackness. Not merely is a single hair, but even the colour of a single hair, beyond the power of man.

Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament

shalt: Mat 23:16-21

because: Mat 6:27, Luk 12:25

Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge

5:36

If a man cannot even cause one hair of his head to change its color at his will, it would be foolish to rely upon it for making his oath good.

Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary

Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black.

[Thou canst not make one hair white or black.] That is, Thou canst not put on gray hairs, or lay them aside.

Fuente: Lightfoot Commentary Gospels

Mat 5:36. By thy head. No man can create a hair of his head, or even transform its color; what solemnity, then, in such an oath. Or, if carried further, to swear by what is under Gods control alone, is to swear by Him, and that in a very roundabout and senseless way. Dr. Thomson (The Land And The Book) says the Orientals today are fearfully profane, swearing continually, by the heart, their life, the temple, or the church.

Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament

Verse 36

Thou canst not, &c. The human frame is the work of God.

Fuente: Abbott’s Illustrated New Testament