Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Proverbs 28:3
A poor man that oppresseth the poor [is like] a sweeping rain which leaveth no food.
3. a poor man ] Better, with R.V., a needy man, the Hebrew word being different from that rendered poor immediately after.
The proverb has commonly been held to refer to official oppression. “A man in authority is implied. In many Eastern countries the offices of government are frequently sold to needy men, who use their power to reimburse themselves by oppressing others,” Rel. Tr. Soc. Comm. But the scope of the proverb must not be restricted to this. It is quite general, and is verified in the exactions of the needy employer, or owner, or creditor among ourselves, as well as in the oppression of Oriental misrule.
“The hungry contractor undertakes the job at the lowest possible price, and secures his profit by getting hungrier and weaker creatures than himself to do the work at a price lower than possible, literally at starvation wages.” Horton.
leaveth no food ] Heb. without food; Vulg. in quo paratur fames; which, instead of bringing fruitful seasons (Act 14:17; Isa 30:23), takes away man’s food by uprooting the herbs of the field and washing the seed corn out of the earth.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
People raise a man of the people, poor like themselves, to power. They find him the worst oppressor of all, plundering them to their last morsels, like the storm-rain which sweeps off the seed-corn instead of bringing fertility.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Verse 3. A poor man that oppresseth the poor] Our Lord illustrates this proverb most beautifully, by the parable of the two debtors, Mt 18:23, c. One owed ten thousand talents, was insolvent, begged for time, was forgiven. A fellow servant owed this one a hundred pence: he was insolvent but prayed his fellow servant to give him a little time, and he would pay it all. He would not, took him by the throat, and cast him into prison till he should pay that debt. Here the poor oppressed the poor; and what was the consequence? The oppressing poor was delivered to the tormentors; and the forgiven debt charged to his amount, because he showed no mercy. The comparatively poor are often shockingly uncharitable and unfeeling towards the real poor.
Like a sweeping rain] These are frequent in the East; and sometimes carry flocks, crops, and houses, away with them.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
When a poor man being advanced into a place of authority, abuseth it to oppress those that are poor and unable to resist him, he is like a violent rain or flood, which washeth away the very seeds which are in the earth, and spoileth the corn and fruits which are upon it. He is the worst of all oppressors, because as he is of a base mind, which also is made much worse by a sudden change and elevation into a high condition; so his own necessities inflame his desires, and make him greedy to take all, yea, even the small, advantages of enriching himself; which the ancients expressed by the similitude of an empty horseleech, which sucketh much more strongly than that which is already filled; and of a dry sponge, which licks up far more water than that which was wet before.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
3. A poor man, &c.Such,in power, exact more severely, and so leave subjects bare.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
A poor man that oppresseth the poor,…. Either one that is poor at the time he oppresses another like himself, either by secret fraud or open injury; from whom the oppressed can get no redress, as sometimes he may and does from a rich man: or rather one that has been poor, but now become rich, and got into some place of authority and profit, who should remember what he had been; and it might be expected that such an one would put on bowels of compassion towards the poor, as knowing what it was to be in indigent circumstances; but if, instead of this, he exercises his authority over the poor in a severe and rigid manner, and oppresses them, and squeezes that little out of them they have: he
[is like] a sweeping rain which leaveth no food: like a violent hasty shower of rain; which, instead of watering the seed, herbs, and plants, and causing them to grow, as moderate rain does, it washes away the very seed sown in the earth, or beats out the ripe corn from the ears, or beats it down, so that it riseth not up again; the effect of which is, there is no bread to the eater, nor seed to the sower, and consequently a famine. The design of the proverb is, to show how unnatural as well as intolerable is the oppression of the poor, by one that has been poor himself; even as it is contrary to the nature and use of rain, which is to fructify, and not to sweep away and destroy; and which when it does, there is no standing against it or diverting it.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
A proverb of a tyrant here connects itself with that of usurpers:
A poor man and an oppressor of the lowly –
A sweeping rain without bringing bread.
Thus it is to be translated according to the accents. Fleischer otherwise, but also in conformity with the accents: Quales sunt vir pauper et oppressor miserorum, tales sunt pluvia omnia secum abripiens et qui panem non habent , i.e., the relation between a poor man and an oppressor of the needy is the same as that between a rain carrying all away with it and a people robbed thereby of their sustenance; in other words: a prince or potentate who robs the poor of their possessions is like a pouring rain which floods the fruitful fields – the separate members of the sentence would then correspond with each other after the scheme of the chiasmus. But the comparison would be faulty, for and fall together, and then the explanation would be idem per idem . A “sweeping rain” is one which has only that which is bad, and not that which is good in rain, for it only destroys instead of promoting the growth of the corn; and as the Arab, according to a proverb compared by Hitzig, says of an unjust sultan, that he is a stream without water, so an oppressor of the helpless is appropriately compared to a rain which floods the land and brings no bread. But then the words, “a poor man and an oppressor of the lowly,” must designate one person, and in that case the Heb. words must be accentuated, (cf. Pro 29:4). For, that the oppressor of the helpless deports himself toward the poor man like a sweeping rain which brings no bread, is a saying not intended to be here used, since this is altogether too obvious, that the poor man has nothing to hope for from such an extortioner. But the comparison would be appropriate if 3a referred to an oppressive master; for one who belongs to a master, or who is in any way subordinated to him, has before all to expect from him that which is good, as a requital for his services, and as a proof of his master’s condescending sympathy. It is thus asked whether “a poor man and an oppressor of the lowly” may be two properties united in the person of one master. This is certainly possible, for he may be primarily a poor official or an upstart (Zckler), such as were the Roman proconsuls and procurators, who enriched themselves by impoverishing their provinces (cf. lxx Pro 28:15); or a hereditary proprietor, who seeks to regain what he has lost by extorting it from his relatives and workmen. But (poor) is not sufficient to give this definite feature to the figure of the master; and what does this feature in the figure of the master at all mean? What the comparison 3b says is appropriate to any oppressive ruler, and one does not think of an oppressor of the poor as himself poor; he may find himself in the midst of shattered possessions, but he is not poor; much rather the oppressor and the poor are, as e.g., at Pro 29:13, contrasted with each other. Therefore we hold, with Hitzig, that of the text is to be read rosh , whether we have to change it into , or to suppose that the Jewish transcriber has here for once slipped into the Phoenician writing of the word;
(Note: The Phoen. writes ( i.e., , rus ); vid., Schrder’s Phnizische Gram. p. 133; cf. Gesen. Thes. under .)
we do not interpret, with Hitzig, in the sense of , Sir. 8:1, but explain: a man (or master = ) is the head (cf. e.g., Jdg 11:8), and oppresses the helpless. This rendering is probable, because , a poor man, is a combination of words without a parallel; the Book of Proverbs does not once use the expression , but always simply ( e.g., Pro 28:6; Pro 29:13); and is compatible with and the like, but not with . If we stumble at the isolated position of , we should consider that it is in a certain measure covered by ; for one has to think of the , who is the , also as the of these , as one placed in a high station who numbers poor people among his subordinates. The lxx translates as if the words of the text were (cf. the interchange of and in both texts of Psa 18:26), but what the lxx read must have been (Isa 5:22); and what can here mean? The statement here made refers to the ruinous conduct of a , a man of standing, or , a high lord, a “wicked ruler,” Pro 28:15. On the contrary, what kind of rain the rule of an ideal governor is compared to, Psa 72:1-8 tells.
Fuente: Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
3 A poor man that oppresseth the poor is like a sweeping rain which leaveth no food.
See here, 1. How hard-hearted poor people frequently are to one another, not only not doing such good offices as they might do one to another, but imposing upon and over-reaching one another. Those who know by experience the miseries of poverty should be compassionate to those who suffer the like, but they are inexcusably barbarous if they be injurious to them. 2. How imperious and griping those commonly are who, being indigent and necessitous, get into power. If a prince prefer a poor man, he forgets that ever he was poor, and none shall be so oppressive to the poor as he, nor squeeze them so cruelly. The hungry leech and the dry sponge suck most. Set a beggar on horseback, and he will ride without mercy. He is like a sweeping rain, which washes away the corn in the ground, and lays and beats out that which has grown, so that it leaves no food. Princes therefore ought not to put those into places of trust who are poor, and in debt, and behind-hand in the world, nor any who make it their main business to enrich themselves.
Fuente: Matthew Henry’s Whole Bible Commentary
Poor Oppressors of the Poor
Verse 3 affirms that for a poor man, one who well understands the ills of poverty, to oppress the poor is particularly grievous, like the rain that floods and sweeps away all planted food crops, Mat 18:28-30.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
MAIN HOMILETICS OF Pro. 28:3
THE MOST INEXCUSABLE OPPRESSION
I. Oppression from an unexpected quarter. Although poverty sometimes has a very hardening influence upon men, we do not often find it takes the form of oppression of their fellow-sufferers in poverty. On the contrary, the sympathy of one poor man for another is often the brightest spot in his character. But the ability to oppress implies some elevation of the oppressor over the oppressed, and therefore leads us rather to look for the heartless tyrant among those who have known poverty, but who are now in some degree raised above it. And even here we should hardly expect to find an oppressor of the poor. Such a man cannot plead ignorance of the miseries of poverty. We might expect that he would be full of sympathy for those into whose trials his own experience has so fitted him to enter. If we wanted a tender nurse for a wounded man we should expect to find one in him who has himself been wounded, and who knows what bodily pain is, and in a man who has himself been poor we ought to find the most patient and generous ruler and judge of the poor. Oppression from such a quarter is a painful surprise.
II. Oppression to an extreme degree. The oppressor of the proverb is one who has sinned against the knowledge furnished by his own experience, and is therefore a greater transgressor than one who sins without such experimental knowledge. If this barrier is not strong enough to restrain him, he is not likely to be hindered by any less powerful ones, and will therefore allow his cruel and unnatural passions to have full dominion over his conduct. And so it will come to pass that a man, who has been poor if he become an oppressor, will be a more terrible one than he who has been always rich and powerful. It may be regarded as a rule with few exceptions, that he who breaks through the most restraints in order to sin will go to the greatest lengths in it.
ILLUSTRATION
This illustrative comparison is here most impressive. It is founded upon a phenomenon which I have frequently seen, and sometimes felt. A small black cloud traverses [the sky in the latter part of summer or beginning of autumn and pours down a flood of rain that sweeps all before it. The Arabs call it sale; we, a water-spout, or the bursting of a cloud. In the neighbourhood of Hermon I have witnessed it repeatedly, and was caught in one last year, which in five minutes flooded the whole mountain side, washed away the fallen olivesthe food of the pooroverthrew stone walls, etc. Every summer threshing-floor along the line of its march was swept bare of all precious food And such is the oppression of a poor man that oppresseth the poor. These landlords, and sheiks, and emirs are generally poor, hungry, greedy, remorseless, and they come in successive swarms, each more ravenous than his predecessor. On a gigantic scale, every hungry pasha from the capital is such a sale, sweeping over the distant provinces of the empire. Vast regions, formerly covered with golden harvests in their season, and swarming with people full of food and gladness, are now reduced to frightful deserts by their rapacity.Thomsons The Land and the Book.
OUTLINES AND SUGGESTIVE COMMENTS
Woeful is the condition when necessity and imbecility meet together and encounter. For necessity hath no mercy, imbecility hath no help. When poverty oppresseth anyone, there is no measure in his oppressing another that is poor. He spares not to strip him naked who hath already no clothes on. He fears not to be a spoiler whom spoiling hath left nothing. For there is nothing that doth so harden the heart of man as his own need; and he hath little or no feeling of anothers misery, who feels the biting of his own. As the rain falls, so the earth bears it; and as oppression dealeth, so must the poor suffer it; for as the earth lieth under all, so doth he. The rich man is a dashing rain upon him, and when he pleaseth, washeth away his means and succour from him but there is no such sweeping rain unto him as when the oppressor is oppressed by poverty. For he having nothing, takes all that he can get, and the hunger of his own distress so devoureth all, as that he Jeaveth no food.Jermin.
Fuente: The Preacher’s Complete Homiletical Commentary Edited by Joseph S. Exell
(3) A poor man that oppresseth the poor.If the recollection of his own former troubles has not softened his heart towards his poor neighbours, he will be rendered more callous to their sufferings.
Is like a sweeping rain which leaveth no food.That sweeps away grain and soil, instead of bringing plenty with it.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
3. A poor man , ( gebher rash,) literally, a strong one poor, possibly a man naturally strong, but poor.
The poor , ( dallim,) the weak, feeble.
Sweeping rain A flood, sweeping off and carrying every thing before it.
Which leaveth no food Literally, no bread; this is the final result. A man of ability, but a needy wretch, promoted to some station of honour, is often a great scourge. It would be natural to suppose that a poor man would sympathize with the indigent; but observation, as a general thing, proves the contrary. Hence such an overbearing, insolent, and tyrannical officer is compared not to a rain producing its natural beneficent effects, fertilizing the ground, and augmenting the crops; but to a “sweeping rain,” which destroys and carries them away. “The comparatively poor are often shockingly uncharitable and unfeeling to the real poor.” A. Clarke. Comp. Mat 18:23-35.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Pro 28:3 A poor man that oppresseth the poor [is like] a sweeping rain which leaveth no food.
Ver. 3. A poor man that oppresseth the poor, &c. ] Such an oppressor bites hard (as a lean louse doth), makes clean work, plunders to the life, as they say, Omnia corradit et converret. Poor men should pity poor men, as knowing the misery of poverty; but to oppress or defraud their comrades is greatest inhumanity, as that merciless fellow servant did. Mat 18:28 , &c. A weasel is a ravenous beast, as well as a lion; a sparrow hawk as greedy as an eagle; and more mercy is to be expected from those more noble creatures than from the base and abject.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
poor = needy. Same root as in verses: Pro 28:6, Pro 28:19, Pro 28:27. Not the same word as in verses: Pro 28:3, Pro 28:8, Pro 28:11, Pro 3:15, Pro 3:22. Hebrew. rush.
man = strong man. Hebrew. geber. App-14.
the poor = weak ones. Hebrew. dal. See noteon “poverty” in Pro 6:11. Same word as in verses: Pro 28:8, Pro 28:11, Pro 28:15.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
Pro 28:3
Pro 28:3
“A needy man that oppresseth the poor Is like a sweeping rain that leaveth no food.”
Scholars admit that this is a fair rendition of the Hebrew text; but what is said here does not correspond with certain facts. Throughout the Old Testament, a poor man is nowhere presented as an oppressor of the poor; and furthermore it could not add to the distress of the poor that the oppressor was one of their own class. This has led to some various renditions. “A wicked ruler who oppresses the poor is a beating rain that leaves no food. “A tyrant oppressing the poor is like a flood that leaves no food. If the standard renditions are followed, we might cite Abimelech the son of Gideon as the type of “poor man” oppressor intended by the Hebrew text.
Pro 28:3. The needy man of this verse picks on the man who is poorer than himself, and when he takes the only thing of value that this poorer man has, there is nothing left. On a sweeping rain: These are frequent in the East; and sometimes carry flocks, crops, and houses, away with them (Clarke).
Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary
poor man: Mat 18:28-30
which leaveth no food: Heb. without food
Reciprocal: Lev 25:14 – General Jdg 6:4 – left no Job 20:10 – His children Job 37:6 – great Pro 22:16 – that oppresseth Pro 30:14 – to devour Pro 30:22 – a servant Ecc 4:1 – and considered Ecc 10:17 – when Eze 19:7 – and the land
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Pro 28:3. A poor man that oppresseth the poor Who, being advanced into a place of authority, abuses it, to oppress those that are poor, and unable to resist him; is like a sweeping rain, or flood, which leaveth no food Which washeth away the very seeds that are in the earth, and spoils the corn and fruit which are upon it. He is the worst of all oppressors, because his low and base mind is made worse by his sudden elevation into a high condition, and his own necessities inflame his desires, and make him greedy to take all, yea, even the smallest advantages for enriching himself. This the ancients expressed by the similitudes of an empty horseleech, which sticks much more strongly than that which is already filled; and of a dry sponge, which licks up far more water than one which is wet before. See Lord Bacons Adv. of Learning, lib. 8. cap. 2.