And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.
14. And the wall twelve foundations ] Probably each of the twelve sections into which the wall is divided by the gates rests on an enormous jewel, reaching from gate to gate. This symbolises the solidity as well as the beauty of the divine structure: and was itself symbolised by the enormous size of the stones used in the foundations of the earthly temple. See St Mar 13:1 and parallels. Had is literally having, a solecism like that of Rev 21:12.
twelve names of the twelve apostles ] Expressing the same doctrine as St Paul in Eph 2:20, and (probably) our Lord in St Mat 16:18. It is absurd to suppose that there is any pointed insistance on the Apostles being only twelve, St Paul being excluded: to introduce thirteen or fourteen would have spoilt the symmetry characteristic of the whole vision. We might just as well say, that there ought to be thirteen gates for the thirteen tribes; counting Ephraim, Manasseh and Levi all as coordinate with the rest. Really, it is idle to ask whether the twelfth name was that of St Paul or St Matthias. St John does not notice his own name being written there, though of course it was (cf. St Luk 10:20); the Apostles are here mentioned in their collective and official, not in their individual character. (See on Rev 5:5.)
of the Lamb ] His identity is taken for granted with the Jesus of the earthly ministry, as in Rev 14:1 with the Son of God.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
And the wall of the city had twelve foundations – It is not said whether these foundations were twelve rows of stones placed one above another under the city, and extending round it, or whether they were twelve stones placed at intervals. The former would seem to be the most probable, as the latter would indicate comparative feebleness and liability to fall. Compare the notes on Rev 21:19.
And in them – In the foundation of stones. That is, the names of the apostles were cut or carved in them so as to be conspicuous.
The names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb – Of the Lamb of God; the Messiah. For an illustration of this passage, see the notes on Eph 2:20.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Rev 21:14
And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.
Names on the stones
The twelve apostles of the Lamb are for the most part obscure and hidden figures in the later gospel history. We have often wondered what became of them, and why the record of their toilsome, suffering lives was not preserved. We find them together on the day of Pentecost and a few subsequent days, and then persecution scatters them abroad, and their names, with one or two exceptions, appear no more. Paul, Peter, and John are the only members of the holy brotherhood whose services are honoured with historical recognition, and the rest ere passed over in silence. Tradition, indeed, partly fills up the blank, and imaginative works have elaborated romances to supply the place of history. But it is none the less true that of the labours of the great majority of the apostles there is no trustworthy record whatever. It may be that some of them suffered martyrdom at an early period of their ministry; some, perhaps, were prevented from achieving great success by imprisonment or banishment; while others, like Andrew, may have been men of unobtrusive and retiring nature, and withal of such inferior power, that the results of their labours were too insignificant to gain public notice. Be that as it may, at the very commencement of the Churchs history their names drop out. The names, which no human historian thought worth inscribing, are gathered together by Gods own hand, the dust swept from their obscurity, and stamped in jewelled letters on the foundations of the everlasting walls. The meanest and the humblest names are made equal to the greatest and most honoured.
I. Christ, the Master Builder, writes the name of His servants alongside His own. He takes care that those who have been willing to forget themselves for His sake shall be eternally remembered, and that if they have been in a very small degree companions in His patience, they shall be in a very large degree sharers in His kingdom. The jasper superstructure on which His name shines does not overshadow and obscure the meaner atones on which their names ere written. It rather illumines them by its more brilliant light, and makes the obscure names splendid. Because He lives, they live also. They have been co-labourers with Him in His humiliation, and they are joint-heirs with Him in His glory. Now the Ideal Church is in this respect quite unique. There is nothing like it in the works and fashion of this world. On the great buildings which men raise only one name is inscribed. The founder or architect is immortalised, the helpers sink into speedy oblivion. Christopher Wren, maya history, built St. Pauls Cathedral; Michael Angelo, St. Peters; and with superb disdain it sweeps all their co-labourers into the dust of forgetfulness. In every battle of the warrior it is the general alone who carries off the palm. And even in great moral and religious works the same rule holds. On the basement of the Reformation building we find only the names of Wycliffe, Huss, Luther, and one or two others. The rest, if they were ever written, have been worn away by the slow abrasion of time. Now were this rule carried out in the building of the Church, we should find no name on the foundation walls but Christs. For He was the designer, His throughout was the directing and inspiring mind. It is a city, as John tells us, not earth-built, but coming down out of heaven from God, prepared and adorned throughout by the Divine hand of its builder. His name, therefore, is alone worthy to be inscribed on its walls. But the Master casts aside human rules, and honours His servants after a fashion of His own.
II. The obscure and unrecorded work abides in deathless character, and reappears in immortal glory. When the work of faithful souls is too insignificant to attract the attention of human scribes, God takes the part of historian, and writes the record, not on melting wax or fading paper, but on everlasting stones; or rather, He makes the work live and tell its own tale. Each one of these disciples, whether obscure or renowned, has added one precious stone to the eternal building. Their sorrows and tears and secret prayers, their pleadings of love and self-forgetfulness, their charity and faith and patience, have been thrown into Gods alembic, into Gods refining furnace; and there comes forth in each case a precious stone, with the name of the worker inscribed on it, and it remains for ever a spectacle unto angels and unto men. It has taken its place as one of the never-to-be-forgotten facts; and heaven and earth shall pass away sooner than one jot or tittle of its glory shall be diminished. It is well that Christian workers of every kind should lay to heart this joyful lesson, and especially those who are ever complaining that they are labouring in vain, and spending their strength for nought. Such a thing is not possible in the holy building of Christ. No statistics have chronicled our exploits, no human praise has flattered our vanity–that is often all. But God writes success where men write failure. Heaven sees triumphs in what the world calls blanks. The only true history is that which God writes, and His history is made up for the most part of unrecorded facts. Here are the stones on which you laboured, which seemed like clay there, but are now sapphire and chalcedony, all beautiful and complete, the human marks in them made Divine, the lines of mingled light and darkness transfigured into perfect glow; and if you look on them carefully you will find that where you wrote only Christs name He has written yours. Most men are trying to write their own names.
III. In the ideal church the lowly and obscure workers have equal recognition with the great and renowned. The most unknown of the apostles are placed in line with the best known. No one would be surprised to find the name of Paul in the foundation stones. We should look for that writ in largest characters of gold. For we know that with mighty signs and wonders he preached the gospel from Illyricum unto Jerusalem, won great trophies for the Masters kingdom, and laid more stones upon the building than any other worker. But we should hardly look for the names of Andrew, and Thomas, and Philip, and Bartholomew, and the rest, or if we did we should expect to find them writ in letters so small and indistinct as to be scarcely legible. For the part which they took in the great building, if measured by visible results, was quite insignificant. James suffered martyrdom almost as soon as he had put his hand to the work. Andrew was too retiring to do great things. But our text shows that the Divine Master has a grand disdain of all these differences. The great and small, the known and unknown, are equally recognised. The world measures men by their visible triumphs. All history, says Carlyle, is at bottom the history of great men, and that means the history of men who have made most noise in the world, and achieved the greatest successes. It is natural, says Emerson, to believe in great men. The knowledge that in the city is a great man raises the credit of all the citizens; but enormous populations, if they be all beggars or all obscure, are disgusting–the more the worse. Our religion, says he, is the love and cherishing of these great men. And this is the best gospel that the world has for those of us who are obscure, who do our work in quiet places. But, thank God, the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ is the gospel for common and obscure men. Its promises of honour are given to the humblest. All that Christ requires is that the one talent should be used as faithfully as the five; that being done, the honour at the end is equal. (J. G. Greenhough, M. A.)
Foundations of precious stones
By engraving upon the foundations the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb, John emphasises that standpoint, from which we view these foundations as representing the life and power of the Christ as received and manifested by His redeemed people, of whom the twelve apostles are here representative. The Christ becomes the foundation of the city only as He enters in all the fulness of His power and glory into the lives of men. The Incarnation, the Atonement, and the Resurrection uphold and upraise a new world only as they are transformed into vital truth and living force in the waking heart of human life. These precious stones have a human setting, and the brightness of them should and can be found in the lives of men. In brief, they denote all those Diviner qualities and forces that enter into the life of man from the Christ of the Cross. Thus we are led, as we anticipated, to see that John views the foundations as an adequate cause for the production of the ideal city. It not only supports the city, but the city must spring forth from it. It already contains the Divine energies by which the New Jerusalem shall be erected. If these foundations are present there can be no difficulty in conceiving a time when the completed city shall stand–the joy of the earth.
1. The preciousness of the foundations is very emphatic. The most precious material things in the world are chosen to symbolise it. John is clear on the point that the ideal city cannot be raised except on foundations of the Divinest quality, on a base where mans deepest life enters into fellowship with the glory of God. When we apply this principle to modem schemes for the construction of an ideal social life, we find that they disastrously fail to stand the test. For what are the foundations on which many would raise the temple of human glory? They would raise it on the foundations of intellectual advance, of scientific achievement and progress, of industrial invention, of the growth of moral science and art, of the increase of material resources, and of political changes. Alas! the foundations are brass, iron, wood, hay, stubble. No temple of true glory can ever be raised on such a base. The poverty of the foundations would be repeated in an intenser degree in the poverty of the city. The ideal city can stand only on a base of precious stones.
2. Another thought that forces itself upon us is the vastness and comprehensiveness of the foundations of the city. Not only does this city rise like a living growth out of a Divine root, where the most precious forces are encentred, but the preciousness of its base is equalled by its incomparable immensity. I determined, said Paul, not to know anything among you save Jesus Christ and Him crucified. There are some that would call this a narrow sphere of action, but that is because they are blind, and cannot see the wonder of God. In Jesus Christ the fulness of the infinite stretches around us, beneath us, and above us. He that would see and feel the power of the immeasurable, let him come hither. There are those that would explain away the incarnation of God by calling it a beautiful fiction. And, having done this they desire to have credit for breadth! They reduce the unspeakable wonder of the Atonement to a human exemplification of heroic fortitude. And then they desire to pose as men of expansive views! Poor fools! Their little horizon has narrowed around them until they can touch it with their outstretched hands. The length, and breadth, and height, and depth of the world has disappeared for them. Their little foundation will not bear the weight of a single human soul, much less the city of Gods coming ages of glory.
3. The manifoldness and variety of the citys foundations are also set forth graphically in this picture. They are adorned with all manner of precious stones. Not only must there be room in the structure of the city of God for a host of variant types, but such variety must of necessity be present in order to give it perfection and fulness. One uniform monotony would be an eternal weariness. So on far-extending and diverse foundations a rich manifoldness of life is based, and tree lives of every mould shall be upreared on the citys twelve foundations.
4. Our last thought is the homogeneity of the citys foundations. They are far-extending and various, yet through it all they possess a common nature. They are all precious stones. They all pertain to that which is most precious–that is, to that which is Divinest in human life. John will have no admixture of the lower elements of life in the foundations of the city. The gospel of Jesus Christ will to orate no admixture of worldly wisdom or achievement. Such admixture would only destroy its power. Some very clever people have what they call an eclectic religion. They put together stray bits from different religions and call this a collection of treasures. Such a gathering of odds and ends can never be the foundation of the holy city. All that we need is found in Jesus Christ, and in the Jesus Christ whom the apostles proclaimed. (John Thomas, M. A.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 14. The wall-had twelve foundations] Probably twelve stones, one of which served for a foundation or threshold to each gate; and on these were inscribed the names of the twelve apostles, to intimate that it was by the doctrine of the apostles that souls enter into the Church, and thence into the New Jerusalem.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
And the wall of the city had twelve foundations; the ancient church of God was founded in twelve patriarchs, and twelve tribes; the gospel church in twelve apostles; Christ is the only foundation of both, 1Co 3:11, but he is the foundation upon which the church: is built. The twelve apostles are called the foundations per quoe or per quos, by which the gospel church had its beginning.
And in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb; as workmen sometimes set their names upon foundation stones, by which it is made known who were they that builded the wall.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
14. twelve foundationsJoshua,the type of Jesus, chose twelve men out of the people, to carrytwelve stones over the Jordan with them, as Jesus chose twelveapostles to be the twelve foundations of the heavenly city, of whichHe is Himself the Chief corner-stone. Peter is not the only apostolicrock on whose preaching Christ builds His Church. Christ Himself isthe true foundation: the twelve are foundations only in regard totheir apostolic testimony concerning Him. Though Paul was an apostlebesides the twelve, yet the mystical number is retained, twelverepresenting the Church, namely thirty the divine number, multipliedby four, the world number.
in them the names, &c.Asarchitects often have their names inscribed on their great works, sothe names of the apostles shall be held in everlasting remembrance.Vulgate reads, “in them.” But A, B, Syriac,Coptic, and ANDREASread, “upon them.” These authorities also insert”twelve” before “names.”
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
And the wall of the city had twelve foundations,…. Christ is the one and only foundation of his church and people, of the covenant of grace, and of salvation; and of faith, hope, peace, and joy, and of eternal happiness, and so of this glorious state of the church; he will be the light and temple of it, the glory and safety of it; he will be all in all in it; but because he has been ministerially laid as the foundation, by the twelve apostles, for men to build their present and future happiness upon, therefore the foundations of the wall of salvation are said to be twelve; see Eph 2:20. Moreover, this may denote the firm and immovable state of the church at this time, it being a city which has foundations, or is well founded,
Heb 11:10 with which compare Isa 14:32. Hence it follows,
and in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb. The Alexandrian copy, Vulgate Latin, Syriac and Arabic versions, read, “the twelve names of the twelve apostles”; the allusion seems to be to the inscribing of the names of builders on stones laid in the foundation, in memory of them; and so these wise master builders will be had in everlasting remembrance.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
Had (). Masculine present active participle of instead of (neuter like to ), and the participle occurs independently as if a principal verb () as often in this book.
Twelve foundations ( ). Foundation stones, old adjective (from , from ), here as in 1Cor 3:11; 2Tim 2:19, with (stones understood), though often neuter substantive to (Luke 6:48; Acts 16:26). See Isa 28:16; Heb 11:10. Twelve because of the twelve apostles as foundation stones (Eph 2:20).
On them (‘ ). On the twelve foundation stones.
Names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb ( ). Jesus had spoken of twelve thrones for the apostles (Mt 19:28); names of all twelve are here written, not just that of Peter, as some would argue from Mt 16:18. As a matter of fact, Christ is the corner stone or (1Pet 2:6; 1Cor 3:10; Eph 2:20), though rejected by the Sanhedrin (Mt 21:42ff.). One may wonder if the name of Judas is on that stone or that of Matthias.
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
Foundations [] . See on the kindred verb qemeliwsei shalt settle, 1Pe 5:10.
In them the names [ ] . The correct reading is ejp’ aujtwn dwdeka ojnomata, on them twelve names.
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament
1) “And the wall of the city,” (kai to teichos tes poleos) “And the wall of the city,” about the city, surrounding it, referred to as “great and high,” symbol of safety and security of the bride, in contrast with the ruin of the wicked city, Babylon, abode of the Harlot and her daughters, Rev 17:1-6.
2) “Had twelve foundations,” (echon themelious dodeka) “Had (was existing of) twelve foundations; secure, as an house built upon a foundation rock, Mat 7:24-25; on which the church (the Bride, the Lamb’s wife) was supported in her superstructure, as they were built upon Christ, Eph 2:20; Heb 11:10; Heb 11:13-14.
3) “And in them the names,” (kai ep’ auton dodeka onomata) “And on (in) them twelve (different) names;” In the foundation columns, support of the new Jerusalem, the bride, the Lamb’s wife, were the names of the twelve Apostles of the Lord’s church, Rev 21:2; Rev 21:9-10; Gal 2:9; Luk 22:29-30; Mat 19:28.
4) “Of the twelve Apostles of the Lamb,” (ton dodeka apostolon tou arniou) “Those (were the Names) of the twelve Apostles (commissioned ones) of the Lamb,” who were foundation members of the Bride, the church, and they shall judge the twelve tribes of Israel, Luk 22:28-30. That they are to be glorified in eternity in both Israel and the church, in a particular way, is very evident from the New Testament Scriptures, Luk 1:33; 1Co 10:32; 1Co 12:28; Eph 2:19-22; Eph 3:21. These twelve foundations (columns, supports) are tributes God promised to the early-jewels of his church, as cited above, 1Ti 3:15.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
(14) And the wall of the city had . . .Or, rather, And the wall of the city having twelve foundations, and on them twelve names of the twelve Apostles of the Lamb. There were twelve large stones forming the basement of the wall, the names of the Apostles were inscribed on these. The whole Old and New Testament Church is represented in the appearance of the city; but the work of the Apostles receives its special recognition; it is on their teaching and witness for Christ that the great spiritual Jerusalem is built. There is complete harmony of thought here between St. Paul and St. John. St. Paul described the Church as built upon the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets, Jesus Christ Himself being the chief corner-stone (Eph. 2:20). We may compare the same illustration used by our Lord (Mat. 16:18) and afterwards by St. Peter (1Pe. 2:4-6). The argument that St. John could not be the writer of the Apocalypse because he speaks of the Apostles (and so includes himself) as the foundation-stones of the celestial city, might be applied with equal wisdom against the Pauline authorship of the Epistle to the Ephesians; it is, moreover, a class of argument which betrays a tendency to confusion of thought, and to misapprehension of the meaning and value of symbols. Historically and doctrinally the Church of Christ is built upon the foundations here described; our creeds declare an acknowledgment of a catholic and apostolic Church. Note the recurrence of the name, the Lamb, to describe our Lord. He is still the Lamb; the writer lingers over the well and early known image. (Comp. Joh. 1:29; Joh. 1:36.)
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
14. Had twelve strata of foundations As the gates bore the twelve tribal names, these basal strata bear the twelve apostolic names.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
‘And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and on them twelve names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.’
The city is founded on the twelve apostles, as was the Temple which comprised the church (Eph 2:20). The conjunction of the twelve tribes of Israel with the twelve apostles demonstrates that we have here the true people of God of all ages. ‘The twelve apostles’ signifies the whole apostleship, it is not intended to discriminate who the twelfth apostle may be (whether Matthias or Paul).
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
14 And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.
Ver. 14. And the wall ] A wall the Church hath about it, and a well within it, Rev 21:6 ; “A garden enclosed is my sister, my spouse a spring shut up, a fountain sealed,” Son 4:12 . This wall of the Church hath twelve foundations, that is, Christ the only foundation, 1Co 3:11 , laid by the twelve apostles; in whose names also the sum of Christian faith is made up in those twelve articles of the creed. Discessuri ab invicem Apostoli normam praedicationis in commune constituunt, saith Cyprian. (De Symbol. Apostol.) The apostles being to be severed into various countries to preach the gospel, agreed upon this as the sum and substance of their sermons. It was called Symbolum, a sign or badge, to distinguish Christians from unbelievers.
Had twelve foundations ] Foundation is taken either for Christ, 1Co 3:11 ; Mat 16:16 , or for the doctrine of the apostles teaching salvation only by Jesus Christ, as Eph 2:20 , and here. The Papists have lately added twelve new articles raised out of the Council of Trent, to be believed by as many as shall be saved; as above hath been noted.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
, another rough asyndeton. . . ., a symbolical and corporate expression for the historical origin of the church in the primitive circle of the disciples who adhered to Jesus ( cf. on Rev 22:19 ). It is not their names but their historical and apostolic position which is in the writer’s mind. The absence of Paul’s name is no more significant than the failure to emphasise that of Peter. For the objective and retrospective tone of the allusion, with its bearing on the question of the authorship, see Introd. 8. Foundation-stones in an ancient building were invested with high, sacred significance. Here the twelve apostles correspond roughly to the twelve of the Mosaic period (Mat 19:28 , Clem. Rom. xlii. xliii.).
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
foundations. Greek. themelios. See App-146.
in. The texts read App-104.
apostles. The twelfth will be Matthias, not Judas, See App-174 and App-189. Twelve is the basic number of the measurements of the city. See App-197 and App-10.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
foundations: Rev 21:19-21, Isa 54:11, Heb 11:10
and in: Rev 18:20, Mat 10:2-4, Mat 16:18, 1Co 3:10, 1Co 3:11, Gal 2:9, Eph 2:20, Eph 3:5, Eph 4:11, Jud 1:17
Reciprocal: Gen 35:22 – Now the sons Exo 24:4 – according Num 7:84 – the dedication 1Ki 5:17 – costly stones 2Ch 4:4 – It stood Mat 5:14 – a city Luk 6:13 – twelve Luk 9:48 – he that Luk 22:29 – General Joh 1:29 – Behold Joh 17:22 – the glory Act 1:2 – the apostles 2Ti 2:19 – the foundation Rev 12:1 – crown
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Rev 21:14. From the gates we are next taken to the foundations. And the wall of the city had twelve foundations (comp. Heb 11:10). We are not to think of foundations buried in the earth, but of great and massive stones rising above the soil as a pediment sustaining the whole structure. At the same time we have not before us twelve great foundation-stones going round the city in one line, but twelve courses of stones, each course encompassing the city, and constituting one foundation (see Rev 21:19).
And on them twelve names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb. There was one name doubtless on each foundation, but the main point of the figure is that the city rested on the twelve Apostles of our Lord. 1Co 3:11 is presupposed. The twelve Apostles are Apostles of the Lamb, placed by Him in their several positions, and fulfilling in Him their several functions. It ought to be unnecessary to say a single word in refutation of the idea that St. John would not thus have referred to himself as an Apostle had he really been the author of this book. He is not thinking of himself. He is lost in the magnitude and glory of the apostolic office. Nor is the idea in the least degree better founded that it is St. Johns intention, out of hatred to St. Paul, to exclude him from the apostolic office. The whole passage is symbolical; the Jewish imagery could not have admitted thirteen instead of twelve foundations, and St. Paul is no more excluded from the number of Apostles than are Gentile Christians from the happiness of the city.
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
The names of the Old Testament faithful have already been set forth in the symbolism of the twelve tribes and we now see the New Testament faithful joined to them under the fiure of the twelve apostles. The foundation stones are listed in more detail in verses 19-20.
Fuente: Gary Hampton Commentary on Selected Books
21:14 And the wall of the city had {12} twelve foundations, and in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.
(12) That is, foundation stones, according to the number of the gates, as is shown in Rev 21:19 .
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes
Since there are foundations to the city (cf. Heb 11:10; Heb 11:13-16), it will be a permanent abode for the righteous in contrast to temporary dwellings that lacked foundations. The foundations may be one on top of each other in layers, but probably each section of the wall, between the gate-towers, has its own foundation. [Note: Wilcock, p. 208.] As the walls and gates represent protection, so the foundations speak of permanence.
Evidently the church, represented by the apostles (cf. Eph 2:20), will be in the New Jerusalem, as will Israel (Rev 21:12). However assigning the name of each apostle to a particular foundation stone is as impossible as matching the names of Israel’s tribes with the gates. Even identifying exactly which of the apostles and tribes will receive this honor is impossible now. Note the distinction between Israel and the church even in the eternal state (cf. Mat 19:28; Luk 22:30). God had a role for each group and an identity separate from the other in the past and as He does in the present. [Note: Scott, pp. 433-34; Walvoord, The Revelation . . ., pp. 322-23; Johnson, p. 596.] This distinction between the foundations and the walls harmonizes with belief that the church did not replace Israel in the plans of God.
"The combination of the twelve tribes in Rev 21:12 and the twelve apostles is a way of saying that Israel of old and the Christian church are united in God’s final scheme of things." [Note: Morris, p. 250.]
Being a covenant theologian, Morris did not mean that Israel and the church will be distinct throughout eternity as different segments of the people of God. He meant that this passage presents Israel and the church as all the people of God united in God’s final scheme of things. However, as a dispensationalist I can accept his statement at face value.
That these are apostles "of the Lamb" again focuses glory on the Lamb in this city.