And the building of the wall of it was [of] jasper: and the city [was] pure gold, like unto clear glass.
The building foundations and street, Rev 21:18-21
18. And the building ] The word is a half-technical one, as it were “the superstructure,” as distinct from the foundations.
jasper ] See on Rev 4:3.
the city was pure gold ] i.e. the houses included within the wall.
like glass] This gold is transparent, not like the earthly: see note on Rev 21:11. The epithet of the glass is the same as that of the gold: both should be rendered pure.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
And the building of the wall of it – The material of which the wall was composed. This means the wall above the foundation, for that was composed of twelve rows of precious stones, Rev 21:14, Rev 21:19-20. The height of the foundation is not stated, but the entire wall above was composed of jasper.
Was of jasper – See the notes on Rev 4:3. Of course, this cannot be taken literally; and an attempt to explain all this literally would show that that method of interpreting the Apocalypse is impracticable.
And the city was pure gold – The material of which the edifices were composed.
Like unto clear glass – The word rendered glass in this place – hualos – occurs in the New Testament only here and in Rev 21:21. It means, properly, anything transparent like water; as, for example, any transparent stone or gem, or as rock-salt, crystal, glass (Robinson, Lexicon). Here the meaning is, that the golden city would be so bright and burnished that it would seem to be glass reflecting the sunbeams. Would the appearance of a city, as the sun is setting, when the reflection of its beams from thousands of panes of glass gives it the appearance of burnished gold, represent the idea here? If we were to suppose a city made entirely of glass, and the setting sunbeams falling on it, it might convey the idea represented here. It is certain that, as nothing could be more magnificent, so nothing could more beautifully combine the two ideas referred to here – that of gold and glass.
Perhaps the reflection of the sunbeams from the Crystal Palace, erected for the late industrial exhibition in London, would convey a better idea of what is intended to be represented here than anything which our world has furnished. The following description from one who was an eyewitness, drawn up by him at the time, and without any reference to this passage, and furnished at my request, will supply a better illustration of the passage before us than any description which I could give: Seen as the morning vapors rolled around its base – its far-stretching roofs rising one above another, and its great transept, majestically arched, soaring out of the envelope of clouds – its pillars, window-bars, and pinnacles, looked literally like a castle in the air; like some palace, such as one reads of in idle tales of Arabian enchantment, having about it all the ethereal softness of a dream. Looked at from a distance at noon, when the sunbeams came pouring upon the terraced and vaulted roof, it resembles a regal palace of silver, built for some Eastern prince; when the sun at eventide sheds on its sides his parting rays, the edifice is transformed into a temple of gold and rubies; and in the calm hours of night, when the moon walketh in her brightness, the immense surface of glass which the building presents looks like a sea, or like throwing back, in flickering smile, the radiant glances of the queen of heaven.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Rev 21:18
And the building of the wall of It was of jasper.
The jasper super-structure
That is, the superstructure, all that part of the wall which rises above the foundation rows, was one great mass of brilliant jasper. There was jasper at the foundation and jasper at the summit; this stone is the beginning and the end, the Alpha and the Omega, of the heavenly building, clasping the intervening rows together by two perfect bands of light. Now what this jasper was cannot be exactly ascertained; but it is perfectly certain that it was not the stone which bears that name now. The common jasper is of many kinds. Sometimes purple, sometimes cerulean, sometimes green, and more frequently a green stone streaked with veins of red. Moreover, it is not very precious, not distinguished by its brilliancy, and it is far surpassed both in beauty and worth by many others. These marks prove beyond question that our jasper is not the stone which was in the apostles mind. The descriptions which are given of it in the Apocalypse correspond exactly with the characters of the diamond, and unless the diamond was unknown to the ancients, which is hardly possible, the jasper must have been this stone. But whether the diamond or not, the jasper of Johns vision had all the characteristic features of the diamond. It was the most precious of stones, it shone like the sun, and, while showing no particular colour, contained all the colours in its pure, white light. Bear in mind, further, that the jasper throughout the Apocalypse is the type of Christ. He that sat upon the throne was to look upon like a jasper, says the inspired writer; and, further, God Almighty and the Lamb are the light of the city, and this light is like unto a jasper. The thought of our text, then, is this–that above the foundation rows, with their stones of various colours and of various price, is the stone most precious, most brilliant, shining with the pure, white glorious light of Christ. Christ is the top-stone as He is the chief corner-stone, the superstructure as He is the foundation.
I. The superstructure of this building contains in perfection and completeness all that the foundations save in imperfection and incompleteness. The sapphire, the chalcedony, the sardius, and the rest, are very beautiful; but they are stones of one or, at most, two colours, and these colours not clear, but flecked and stained with spots and dark lines; while the white light of the jasper, like the white light of the sun, contains all the colours, and contains them in unmixed purity. As all the hues of the rainbow are in the suns rays, so all the hues of the twelve foundation stones are combined in the splendid jasper band which crowns the summit. Or, putting it in other words, while the foundations have each their separate grace, and shine each with their distinct glory, the jasper superstructure holds all the graces, there all the glories unite. All the special qualities found separately in the stones below are found in splendid combination in the building above. And this means–
1. That Christ combines in Himself all actual and possible graces. The prophets and apostles and holy men of old were like the rows of foundation stones, men of one colour, of some one or two distinguishing graces. At their best they were still one-sided men; giants in one Christ-like virtue. Gods glory shone through them all, but they were imperfect mediums. They intercepted more than they transmitted of it: they showed only one or two hues of the jasper light in perfection. But Christ unites them all, and shows them all in their most complete and glorious form. It is this all-comprehending beauty and perfection of Christ that charms us, touches every fibre of our moral nature, and chains our wandering fancies to His feet. Everything that we have ever admired, or ever longed for in our best moods, meets us here. Here is perfect love and sinless anger; mighty self-assertion, and still mightier self-abnegation; a childs humility, and a kings dignity; a peasants simplicity, and a philosophers profundity; Davids fearlessness, Elijahs zeal, Isaiahs raptures, Jeremiahs tears, a womans tenderness, and Gods almighty strength. Yes: in Him is all that the most aspiring souls ever longed for, and the most heroic hearts ever throbbed for. He is the chief among ten thousand, and the altogether lovely.
2. The ideal Church, the Church that is to be, combines in itself, like Christ, all the graces. It is growing up out of the parti-coloured stones into the white, all-embracing jasper. The Church, as we have known it in history and experience, has always been one-sided; the successive ages of the Church have been almost exactly like the foundation stones, showing each of them one prominent colour. Each period in the Churchs history has been distinguished by one strongly marked Christian virtue. The first age was bold in confessing Christ, strong in its contempt for the world, full of the martyrs zeal; yet strangely impatient, almost inviting martyrdom. That early Church was sublime in some of its moods, but altogether childish in others. Look at the early monastic age again. There also the Church is strong in its contempt for the worlds pleasures, in its power to trample on the lusts of the flesh and the pride of life; but there is no Christ-like sympathy, no concern for a guilty, sorrowing world. See again the Church of the Reformation. It has a giants strength and courage; faith mighty enough to remove mountains. It walks with God, but its sternness is not tempered by the gentleness of Christ. It has the Masters hatred of sin without the Masters mercy for the sinner. And the Church of to-day, while great in charity and humanitarianism, is in danger of becoming, if it has not already become, just as one-sided in another way. It is tempted to look only on the gentle side of Christian doctrine, to let charity enfeeble its robustness, and pity for the sinner engender shallow views of sin. But the Church is striving up, patiently, through the coloured rows, to the superstructure. When it has attained that it will no longer be a partial, one-sided Church, but beautiful, with all the graces of the Master. More faithful than the early Church, purer from the worlds stains than the Monastic Church, stronger in its zeal against sin than the Reformation Church, and more tender and charitable than the Church of to-day. Nothing will be lacking to its completeness.
3. The same thing is true of the individual believer. Our growth in Christ is like that of the Church–each stage characterised by some prominent grace, but not one of them uniting all the graces. In the early stages of the Christian life there is much faith and courage, but little patience; in the later stages, great patience, but often diminished zeal. The average Christian is never eminently Christ-like at more than one or two points. It is as if he had to starve one grace to feed another. When our lives are fairest and our faith strongest we still show only one or two sides of the beauty of our Lord. We have His tenderness without His strength, or His gentleness without His stern hatred of sin, or His boldness without His forbearance. But this is because the building has not yet risen above the foundation rows. The superstructure of it is of jasper. We shall be complete in Christ. When He has finished the work in us there will be nothing wanting. No partial colouring there, but the white jasper light which combines all the hues. For each believer, then, as well as for the Church, the building of the wall is of jasper.
II. The beauty and glory of the superstructure are made up in great part of the elements which compose the foundation. If you could take the twelve rows of stones, bring all their varied colours into combination, concentrate their diffused radiance, and remove all impurity, the result would be just such a brilliant diamond belt as the wall of jasper. As you trace the foundation stones from the base to the summit, you see them becoming continually more glorious and ethereal, nearer to the perfect white, the higher bands taking in all the colours of the underlying ones until the jasper completes and embraces all. And the thought is this, that the glory of the perfected Church will be made up, as it were, of all that it has been and done and suffered through all the ages of its history. In spite of all evidences to the contrary, the Church of to-day is stronger and more faithful and more able to wrestle and endure, more like her Master than she has ever been before. For she has learnt something, and won something, from every one of her past experiences. The fervour of the first centuries, the purity and contempt for the world of the monastic age, the strong warrior-like faith and courage of the Reformation period, have influenced her, moulded her, bequeathed their best features to her. And all her waiting, all her labours, all her conflicts, are still helping to supply the colours which are wanted for her perfect beauty, so that the jasper wall may be at last complete. And this truth holds of individual believers just as fully as of the Church. The superstructure of our lives, the glory to which we are growing in Christ, is made up in large measure of the trials and struggles and patience, the faith and hope and love, of our present changeful experience. If you look at the solar spectrum–that is, sunlight divided into its component rays by passage through a prism–you will see all the colours of the rainbow there; and not only these colours, but dark lines, thousands and thousands of them–dark lines, and quite mysterious, for scientists cannot explain them, or say what purpose they serve. Yet they are necessary parts of the ray, they join with the colours to make the light complete. And so it is with our lives when they are fashioned into Christs perfect beauty, made up of many colours bright and sombre, from sorrowful blood-red to triumphant purple, and crossed with dark lines innumerable, incomprehensible. We would leave some of these colours out if we could, we should like to erase all the dark lines. We would have no red, especially–no passion, no tears, no sorrow. But the result would be miserably disappointing. For the royal purple is made up of blue and red, and the golden has red for its base, and the perfect white light needs all the colours and all the dark lines to make it complete. We cannot reach the jasper superstructure without passing through the trial and patience which are symbolised by the stones below. But all these things are helping to form the perfect Christ in us. The foundation-stones are beautiful because Christ is in them, but they are not like the top-stone which knows no darkness, no lines of sin, no incompleteness, and where joy and peace are stamped in perfect and eternal characters. We are reaching up to that, Christs strong hand holding ours to make the ascent secure. And the superstructure is of jasper. (J. G. Greenhough, M. A.)
The jasper wall
The picture of the measurement of the city has a colour and tone of triumph in it. Heaven rejoices in its divinely perfect proportions. Goal marks with the exactness of love the holy city that mirrors heavens own beauty, and would proclaim its lineaments and proportions of glory to all the world. There are some things that are not worth measuring. Heaven will take no copy of some lives, that they may die the sooner. The measurement also symbolises heavens inexorable demand for ideal perfection in human life. In the city of God there must be no defect or redundancy. The vessels of Gods glory must be without flaw and without alloy. No column in His temple shall be broken or deficient. God will not stop half-way, or be content with rough approximations to His ideal. Hence it is that the best human structures must fail and be condemned. This measuring is, therefore, further, a symbol of eternal preservation. To measure off implies a selection for some purpose or other, and here it is clearly for the purpose of honour and preservation. In the first verse of the eleventh chapter we find the temple of God and the altar, and them that worship therein, measured in the same way, while the court without the temple is left unmeasured. In that passage the symbol is explained by the assertion that the outer court is so far left unprotected that it has been given unto the nations for forty and two months.
I. The first question that presses for an answer in any attempt to interpret this symbol is, What relation does the jasper wall hold to the general structure and constitution of that city?
1. In the first place, the jasper wall gives unity to the varied expanse of the city. In the ancient conception, a city without a surrounding wall scarcely found a place in the mind at all, except as a picture of desolation and ruin. The myriad-sided life of the city and State can never be gathered into perfect harmony except within the wall of jasper, except by being pervaded by the Divine life in its profoundest manifestation of love. Men will of a certainty remain scattered, in spite of all human devices, until they are united by that transcendent love which comes through faith in Jesus Christ. Through this, and through this alone, are those strong conflicting interests overcome that separate men from one another.
2. Further, this wall of jasper marks the extent of the city. With the encompassing wall the city ends. The description which John gives, therefore, represents the ideal city as being of vast and magnificent extent. It is bounded by the jasper wall–that is, by nothing of narrower dimensions than the vast thought, purpose, and power of redeeming love. At this point John adds symbol to symbol, in order that there may be no mistake as to his meaning, and that the meaning may be emphasised in the strongest way. The length and breadth and height of the city are given in symbolic numbers. The three are equal, and their measurement is twelve thousand furlongs. That is, we are informed by a new symbol that this city is as vast as the energies of the Divine kingdom of redeeming love. Of course, it is now clear that the length and the breadth and the height of it cannot be other than equal. In every direction of its life it must reach the full measurement of redeeming power. As far as the love of Calvary can transform the lives of men, as far as it can lift the thoughts and purposes and attainments of men towards the lofty heavens, so great is the length, the breadth, and the height of the holy city.
3. It is instructive to note, further, that the wall of a city was its great watch-tower. Upon its summit the watchman stood to take observation of the country around, to warn the city of danger, and to instruct it concerning the outer world. The walls of the ideal city are not only ramparts, but also watch-towers, the place of furthest vision. The blind children of this world make the mistake of supposing that the city of redemption is a narrow enclosure, which hides from us the wide and varied prospect which they imagine lies before themselves. They pity us, and invite us to leave the narrowness of the Cross, and the fetters of redeeming love, that our vision may become as free as theirs. It is they that are enclosed around, and cannot see afar off. The Cross is the true watch-tower of the mind, as well as of the spirit. It is not only the centre of power, but also of wisdom and knowledge. It is the light of God in which we also shall see light. In proportion as we rise to the knowledge of the revelation of God in Christ, all the vast realm of thought will appear in its true character and proportions before us; for the God-man is, in every sense, the light of the world.
4. The jasper wall is, further, representative of the defence of the city. The need of defence against attack was probably the earliest reason for the construction of the ancient city walls, the other ideas of which we have spoken having afterwards grown upon this underlying one. So the ideal city is safe for ever, guarded by this wall of jasper, which is great and high. No battering ram can beat down these walls, for they are constructed out of the mightiest forces of omnipotence, the forces of eternal grace and infinite love.
II. A few words will suffice to show the relation of the jasper wall to the foundations of the city. The first thing that strikes us as impressively suggestive is the fact that the deepest base of the city and its towering walls are composed of the same material. When we begin to search for the strength of the twelve foundations, John meets us with the assertion: The foundation is jasper. When we raise our eyes to behold its lofty ramparts, and would fain know what its topmost glory is that mingles with the skies, John again says: The building of the wall thereof was jasper. It is the symbolic representation of the utterance of the Divine Saviour, who says: I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end. In Christ, the effulgence of the Fathers glory, the first foundations are laid of the city of a glorified human life, and in Him its final splendour will be realised. The name of Jesus is the all-potent source of new life for the fallen sons of earth, and it shall be the eternal boast and wonder of the glorified. As is the lowest foundation of the holy city, so shall be its supremest splendour. The Cross can never be superseded. The wall of jasper is a living growth out of the foundations of precious stones. This living relation in the growth of the ideal city is determined by eternal and inexorable law. The citys jasper wall cannot be built unless the foundations are set in precious stones, and the deepest of these is jasper. Passing from symbolic language to plainer speech, the quality of a citys life cannot rise higher than its deepest foundations. The nature of the principles and ideals upon which men proceed will determine the value and permanence of such a social life as they are likely to create. Upon foundations of iron and brass nothing better than iron and brass can ever be built. If our ideals fall short of the divinest that are possible to men, if our deepest principles fall short of the glory of the eternal skies, then the building of the ideal city becomes for ever impossible for us. On the other hand, the foundations of precious stones cannot fail to issue in the wall of jasper. When Divine forces form the base, the city is certain to rise in the likeness of God. Out of the love of the Cross a kingdom of love shall of necessity grow. All ye that desire to build the jasper wall, remember that it cannot be built except on the jasper foundation.
III. There are one or two points remaining in the characterisation of the jasper wall which must receive brief notice. One consists in the measurement of the thickness of the wall, which is declared to be a hundred and forty and four cubits–that is, twelve cubits by twelve. This is clearly, once more, the number that symbolises redemption, and so brings the thickness of the city-wall into line with the twelve thousand furlongs that measure the length and breadth and height of it. In the last place, it is instructive to note that the city when measured proves to be an exact cube. The length and the breadth and the height thereof are equal. The cube has from ancient times been regarded as a symbol of ideal perfection. Here human life is at last full and complete, having found the complete cycle of its power. Probably, however, Johns picture is more immediately connected with the form of the holy of holies in the tabernacle, which was also a perfect cube, no doubt based upon the ancient idea of that form as being specially perfect and sacred. (John Thomas, M. A.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 18. The building of the wall of it was of jasper] The oriental jasper is exceedingly hard, and almost indestructible. Pillars made of this stone have lasted some thousands of years, and appear to have suffered scarcely any thing from the tooth of time.
Pure gold, like unto clear glass.] Does not this imply that the walls were made of some beautifully bright yellow stone, very highly polished? This description has been most injudiciously applied to heaven; and in some public discourses, for the comfort and edification of the pious, we hear of heaven with its golden walls, golden pavements, gates of pearl, c., c., not considering that nothing of this description was ever intended to be literally understood and that gold and jewels can have no place in the spiritual and eternal world. But do not such descriptions as these tend to keep up a fondness for gold and ornaments? In symbols they are proper but construed into realities, they are very improper.
The ancient Jews teach that “when Jerusalem and the temple shall be built, they will be all of precious stones, and pearls, and sapphire, and with every species of jewels.”-Sepher Rasiel Haggadol, fol. 24, 1.
The same authors divide paradise into seven parts or houses; the third they describe thus: “The third house is built of gold and pure silver, and all kinds of jewels and pearls. It is very spacious, and in it all kinds of the good things, either in heaven or earth, are to be found. All kinds of precious things, perfumes, and spiritual virtues, are there planted. In the midst of it is the tree of life, the height of which is five hundred years; (i.e., it is equal in height to the journey which a man might perform in five hundred years,) and under it dwell Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, the twelve patriarchs, and all that came out of Egypt, and died in the wilderness. Over these Moses and Aaron preside, and teach them the law,” c.-Yalcut Rubeni, fol. 13, 4. In the same tract, fol. 182, 1, we find these words: “Know that we have a tradition, that when the Messiah, with the collected captivity, shall come to the land of Israel, in that day the dead in Israel shall rise again and in that day the fiery walls of the city of Jerusalem shall descend from heaven, and in that day the temple shall be builded of jewels and pearls.”
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
And the building of the wall of it was of jasper; strong and impregnable, not subject to impressions from enemies, as it is said of the jasper, that no hammer will break it.
And the city was pure gold; all that make up this city are perfect and noble.
Like unto clear glass; pure, without spots.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
18. the building“thestructure” [TREGELLES],Greek, “endomeesis.”
gold, like . . . clearglassIdeal gold, transparent as no gold here is [ALFORD].Excellencies will be combined in the heavenly city which now seemincompatible.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
And the building of the wall of it was of jasper,…. Which is expressive of the impregnableness, duration, brightness, and glory of salvation by Christ, the jasper being a very hard, durable, and bright stone; and salvation can never be made void, and of none effect; it will last for ever, and in this state will come forth as light, and as a lamp that burneth; it is represented by the same precious stone as God and Christ themselves are; see Re 4:2. And the city was pure gold, like unto clear glass; it was made or built of gold; its parts, buildings, houses, and palaces, were all of gold, and that the best; and it was like to transparent glass; that is, either the city, as most copies read, or the gold; for the Alexandrian copy reads,
, and so the Vulgate Latin version; the gold of which it was is different from common gold; and as this city, the new Jerusalem, designs the saints, the precious sons of Zion, comparable to fine gold, the inhabitants of the new earth; this denotes the solidity, excellency, and preciousness of them, the rich and happy state they will be in, as well as their purity and freedom from all sin and corruption, and the clear knowledge of things they themselves will have, and others will have of them; their hearts and actions will be open to all; nor will this gold have any rust upon it any more, or ever be changed, and become dim.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
The building of the wall ( ). Or , elsewhere so far only in Josephus (Ant. XV. 9. 6, a mole or breakwater) and in an inscription (Syll. 583 31), apparently from , to build in, and so the fact of building in. The wall had jasper (verse 11) built into it.
Was pure gold ( ). No copula (was) expressed. The city shone like a mass of gold in contrast with the jasper lustre of the wall.
Pure glass ( ). Associative instrumental case after . H (apparently from , it rains, and so raindrop) in N.T. only Rev 21:18; Rev 21:21.
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
The building [] . Only here in the New Testament. From ejn in and dwmaw to build. Lit., that which is built in. Hence the building of the wall is the material built into the wall; of which the wall was composed.
Glass [] . Only here and ver. 21. For the kindred adjective uJalinov of glass, see on ch. Rev 4:6.
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament
1) “And the building of the wall of it was of jasper,” (kai he endomesis tou teichous autes iaspis) “And the building (coping) covering of its wall was of jasper material,” of and like a very precious stone, used in the High Priest’s breastplate, Rev 21:11; Exo 28:20; Exo 39:13.
2) “And the city was pure gold,” (kai he polis chrusion katharon) “And the city existed, (was made), pure (clean) gold,” A fitting atmosphere of the Royal Abode of God, the Lamb, His Bride, (the church) and Israel, God’s wife; and place of visitation and center of worship of the redeemed of the nations who shall come into her, Jer 3:8; Jer 3:14; Rom 11:24-25; Rev 21:2; Rev 21:9-10; Rev 21:13; Rev 21:26.
3) “Like unto clear glass,” (homoion hualo katharo) “Similar to pure (clean) or clear crystal, in its radiant glow, reflection of purity, perfection and glory. This is part of what Paul described, 1Co 2:9; 2Co 5:1.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
THE BUILDING OR MATERIAL OF THE CITY.
(18) And the building of the wall . . .Or, And the building-work (or, the masonry, so Alford) of the wall of it was jasper, and the city was pure gold, like pure glass. The general aspect of the city was jasperlike, because the material of the wall was of the jasper stone. On this stone, see Note on Rev. 4:3, and on Rev. 21:11 above. The city was gold. On the meaning of the gold see Note on Rev. 21:15 and on Rev. 3:18. To what has been said may be added the following:Gold has an inalienable reference to the sun itself, consequently, to the symbol of the face of God, or Christ, i.e., to the manifestation of Gods love (Lange).
The wealth of heaven is love; love is the circulating medium of all holy activity and of all holy work: all who dwell within the heavenly city are encompassed by it; all who tread the streets of that city move along the ways of love; no dimness or obscuring motives of self-interest mar its lustrethe gold is clear as pure glass.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
18. The building That is, the superstructure standing above and upon the foundations.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
‘And the building of its wall was jasper, and the city was pure gold like pure glass.’
The jasper is presumably similar to the jasper of Rev 21:11, clear as crystal which, with the glass-like nature of the city, demonstrates its purity and righteousness. The mention that it is made of gold stresses that it is beyond price and demonstrates its magnificence. Even Solomon’s Temple and Herod’s Temple pale into insignificance beside it. It again indicates its identity with the inner Sanctuary.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
18 And the building of the wall of it was of jasper: and the city was pure gold, like unto clear glass.
Ver. 18. Was of jasper ] A stone of great worth and glory, the beauty whereof, saith one, it is easier to admire than to declare. It hath a variety of sweetness in it; such as none of the most cunning wits and sharpest eyes are able to distinguish. Heaven (we are sure) is such as eye hath not seen, ear hath not heard, &c. Sermo non valet exprimere, experimento opus est. Words are too weak to utter its happiness; get to it once, and you will say so. (Chrysost.)
Pure gold ] A metal that shineth in the fire wasteth not in the use, rusteth not with long lying, rotteth not though cast into brine or vinegar (as Pliny noteth), to show that this city is incorruptible, invincible.
Like unto clear glass ] Glittering gold, such as this world affords not. No, not those two islands in India called Chryse and Arger, for the abundance of gold and silver there found, as Soline telleth us.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
18 27 .] Material , and further description of the city. And the building-work (Jos. in ref. is speaking of the harbour of Csarea, as built by Herod the Great: he describes it as being , because the materials were costly and brought from a distance: and says, . This would be, as appears when he afterwards describes (as here) its materials, a mole or breastwork, against the sea. The word seems to be no where else found) of the wall of it ( was ) jasper (ch. Rev 4:3 , note), and the city ( was ) pure gold ( , the metal itself: , the same wrought into any form for use: so with and ) like to pure glass (i. e. ideal gold, transparent, such as no gold is here, but surpassing it in splendour). The foundation-stones of the wall of the city (see above, Rev 21:14 ) ( were ) adorned with every (cf. , ch. Rev 18:12 ) precious stone (not that the stones were merely set on the , but that the . themselves consisted of them: see below, and cf. Isa 54:12 ): the first foundation-stone ( was ) jasper (the material of the upper building of the wall, Rev 21:18 ), the second, sapphire ( , reff. The stone described under this name by Pliny seems to be our lapis lazuli: he says, xxxvii. 39, “Sapphirus et aureis punctis collucet. Crule et sapphiri, raroque cum purpura.” But the sapphire of the Scriptures seems more like the present hard sky-blue stone known by that name: see ref. Eze 1 ; and Winer, Realw., Edelstein, 5), the third, chalcedony (this name is unknown: corresponding perhasps to , Exo 28:19 ; Exo 39:12 [ Exo 36:18 ], which the LXX and Josephus render , agate. There seems to have been an agate brought from Chalcedon. It is described as semi-opaque, sky-blue, with stripes of other colours: “morientibus arboribus similes,” Plin. xxxvii. 30. See Winer, ut supra, 8, and 16), the fourth, emerald (note, ch. Rev 4:3 ), the fifth, sardonyx ( , Exo 39:11 ; Eze 28:13 ; Pliny, xxxvii. 24, says, “Sardonyches olim ut ex nomine ipso apparet, intelligebantur candore in sarda, hoc est velut carnibus in ungue hominis imposito, et utroque translucido.” The ancient versions and Josephus call it onyx. See Winer, ut supra, 6), the sixth, sardius (ch. Rev 4:3 , note), the seventh , chrysolith ( : reff. al. and Josephus thus render it. The stone at present so called is pale green, transparent, and crystallized with shifting colours. But the ancient chrysoliths are described by Pliny as “aureo fulgore translucentes,” and have been supposed the same as our topaz: or by some, as amber: see Winer, ut supra, 10), the eighth, beryl ( , ref. Exod.: rendered by the LXX in Gen 2:12 , , and variously in other places. Epiphanius in Wetst. says, , : and Pliny xxxvii. 20, “viriditatem puri maris imitantur,” Winer, ut supra, 11), the ninth, topaz ( , reff. and al. Strabo describes it as , , xvi. p. 770, Wetst., where see more testimonies. But Plin. xxxvii. 32, says “egregia etiamnum to-pazio gloria est, suo virenti genere:” whence some have supposed it our chrysolith: see above. Cf. Job 28:19 ; and Winer ut supra, 2), the tenth, chrysoprasus (this word is found only in Pliny, xxxvii. 20, “vicinum genus huic (beryllo) est pallidius, et a quibusdam proprii generis existimatur, vocaturque chrysoprasus:” and 21, “amethysti fulgens purpura”), the eleventh, jacinth ( : so alii apud Tromm. in Exo 28:19 , where the LXX have , which again occurs in Eze 28:13 , where is not found: while in Exo 28:20 Symm. renders by . The word is not found in LXX as the name of a gem. Pliny, xxxvii. 41: “ille emicans in amethysto fulgor violaceus dilutus est in hyacintho”), the twelfth, amethyst ( reff. Pliny, xxxvii. 40, reckons the amethyst among the purple stones, and says of the best, the Indian, “absolutum felicis purpur colorem habent perlucent autem omnes violaceo colore.” So that it seems to be the stone now known by that name). And the twelve gates, twelve pearls (Isa 54:12 , “carbuncles.” Wetst. quotes from the Rabbinical Bava Bathra, f. 75. 1: “Deus S. B. adducet gemmas et margaritas, triginta cubitos longas totidemque latas: easque excavabit in altitudinem xx cubitorum, et latitudinem x cubitorum, collocabitque eas in portis Hierosolymorum.” See many more in Wetst. and Schttgen), each one separately (reff.) of the gates was ( made ) out of one pearl. And the street (generic: the street-material, throughout) of the city ( was ) pure gold like transparent glass (see above on Rev 21:18 ). And a temple I saw not in it: for the Lord God Almighty is the temple of it, and the Lamb (i. e. the inhabitants need no place of worship or sacrifice, the object of all worship being present, and the great Sacrifice Himself being there). And the city hath not need of the sun nor yet of the moon, that they should shine on her ( , dat. commodi): for the glory of God (the brightness of His presence, the Shechinah: see above, Rev 21:11 ) lightened her, and her lamp was the Lamb (see Isa 60:19-20 . No assignment of the members of the sentence must be thought of, such as that . is her Sun, and her Moon: so Grot. and Ewald (not De Wette, as Dsterd., who only thinks that corresponds to the sun and to the moon, but protests against applying these to the divine Persons separately)): and the nations shall walk by means of her light (i. e. she shall be so bright as to serve for light, for sun and moon both, to the world that then is, and her inhabitants. For such inhabitants are clearly supposed; see below, and ch. Rev 22:2 ). And the kings of the earth (no longer hostile to Christ) bring (pres. of habit and certainty, as so often in this prophecy) their (the kings’, not the nations’, as Rev 21:26 ) glory (cf. Isa 60:3 ; all in which they glory ) into her: and her gates shall never be shut by day (i. e. in meaning , shall never be shut, seeing it will always be day: shall never be shut, for if they were, they must be shut by day): for night shall not exist there. And they (men) shall bring the glory and the costliness of the nations into her (Isa 66:12 . Among the mysteries of this new heaven and new earth this is set forth to us: that, besides the glorified church, there shall still be dwelling on the renewed earth nations, organized under kings, and (ch. Rev 22:2 ) saved by means of the influences of the heavenly city). And there shall never enter into her, every thing unclean, and working abomination and falsehood, but only (lit. except) they that are written in the book of life of the Lamb (if then the kings of the earth, and the nations, bring their glory and their treasures into her, and if none shall ever enter into her that is not written in the book of life, it follows, that these kings, and these nations, are written in the book of life. And so perhaps some light may be thrown on one of the darkest mysteries of redemption. There may be, I say it with all diffidence, those who have been saved by Christ without ever forming a part of his visible organized Church).
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
The materials of the city. , so an undated but pre-Christian inscription, . (Dittenberger’s Sylloge inscript . Graec. 583), where the orthography is pronounced “nova” (see reff.).
While the city itself (or its streets, Rev 21:21 ) is supposed to be constructed of transparent gold like the house of Zeus ( Hippol. 69), the wall appearing above the monoliths or foundation-stones is made entirely of jasper, which again is the special ornament assigned to the first foundation-stone (Rev 21:19 , see on Rev 21:11 ). The Babylonian zikkurats were picked out with coloured bricks; but the exterior of this second city is to be what only the interior of a Babylonian sanctuary had been brilliant as the sun flashing with precious stones and gold and silver. In Yasht Rev 13:3 the heavenly Zoroastrian palace of the sky also “shines in its body of ruby.” The general sketch is suggested by Isa 54:11-12 , and even more directly by Tob 13:16-17 (“For Jerusalem shall be builded with sapphire and emerald, thy walls with precious stones, the towers and battlements with pure gold; and the streets of Jerusalem shall be paved with beryl and carbuncle and stones of Ophir”). The Egyptian mansion of Life is also composed of jasper, with four walls, facing the south, the north, the east, and the west ( cf. Records of Past , 6:113). The twelve gems correspond upon the whole to those set in gold ( cf. Eze 28:13 ) upon the high priest’s breastplate in 2 Peter (Exo 28:17-20 ; Exo 39:10-13 ), which the writer loosely reproduces from memory. What the old covenant confined to the high priest is now a privilege extended to the whole people of God ( cf. Rev 21:22 ); for the astrological basis and the relation of the two O.T. and the present lists, cf. Flinders Petrie in Hastings’ D. B. 4:619 621; Myres in E. Bi. 4800 f.; St. Clair in Journ. Theol. Studies , 8:213 f.; and Jeremias, 68, 88 f. No occult or mystical significance attaches to these stones. The writer is simply trying to convey the impression of a radiant and superb structure. = lapis lazuli (sapphirus et aureis punctis collucet. Caeruleae et sapphiri, raroque cum purpura, Pliny, H. N. 37:39), a blue stone prized in Egypt and in Assyria, where it was often “used to overlay the highest parts of buildings” ( E. Bi. 2710). = either a variety of dioptase or emerald gathered on a mountain in Chalcedon (Pliny), or more probably an agate (arkedr Pesh. rendering of = LXX Exo 28:19 ), i.e. , a variegated stone, whose base is chalcedony. The modern chalcedony is merely a translucent (grey) quartz, with a milky tinge. = a gem of some (sparkling?) golden hue (LXX = ), perhaps some variety of our topaz or beryl, which ranges from emerald-green to pale blue and yellow. The modern chrysolite is merely a hard greenish mineral, of no particular value. and (a leek-coloured gem) are probably varieties of the ancient beryl, unless the latter is the green chalcedony, and the former the modern topaz. . . . (on their value in the ancient world, see Usener’s study in Theol. Abhand. 203 213): the conception is simplified from an old Jewish fancy of R. Jochanan preserved in Baba-Bathra, f. 75, 1, “Deus adducet gemmas et margaritas, triginta cubitos longas totidemque latas, easque excauabit in altitudinem xx cubitorum, et latitudinem x cubitorum, collocabitque in portis Hierosolymorum”. , generic = “the streets” (like , Rev 22:2 ), unless it has the sense of “forum” or “market-place” (as 2Ch 32:6 , Job 29:7 LXX). But the singular may allude to the fact that “the typical Eastern city had one street which led from the void place at the entering in of the gate to the court of the king’s palace” (Simcox). Philo ( quis haer. 44., leg. alleg. 20.) had already made gold emblematic of the divine nature diffused through all the world, owing to the metal’s fusible qualities.
[923]P Codex Porphyrianus (sc. ix.), at St. Petersburg, collated by Tischendorf. Its text is deficient for chap. Rev 2:13-16 .
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
building = fabric, or material. Greek. endomesis. Only here. pure, clear. Same word.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
18-27.] Material, and further description of the city. And the building-work (Jos. in ref. is speaking of the harbour of Csarea, as built by Herod the Great: he describes it as being , because the materials were costly and brought from a distance: and says, . This would be, as appears when he afterwards describes (as here) its materials, a mole or breastwork, against the sea. The word seems to be no where else found) of the wall of it (was) jasper (ch. Rev 4:3, note), and the city (was) pure gold (, the metal itself: , the same wrought into any form for use: so with and ) like to pure glass (i. e. ideal gold, transparent, such as no gold is here, but surpassing it in splendour). The foundation-stones of the wall of the city (see above, Rev 21:14) (were) adorned with every (cf. , ch. Rev 18:12) precious stone (not that the stones were merely set on the , but that the . themselves consisted of them: see below, and cf. Isa 54:12): the first foundation-stone (was) jasper (the material of the upper building of the wall, Rev 21:18), the second, sapphire (, reff. The stone described under this name by Pliny seems to be our lapis lazuli: he says, xxxvii. 39, Sapphirus et aureis punctis collucet. Crule et sapphiri, raroque cum purpura. But the sapphire of the Scriptures seems more like the present hard sky-blue stone known by that name: see ref. Ezekiel 1; and Winer, Realw., Edelstein, 5), the third, chalcedony (this name is unknown: corresponding perhasps to , Exo 28:19; Exo 39:12 [Exo 36:18], which the LXX and Josephus render , agate. There seems to have been an agate brought from Chalcedon. It is described as semi-opaque, sky-blue, with stripes of other colours: morientibus arboribus similes, Plin. xxxvii. 30. See Winer, ut supra, 8, and 16), the fourth, emerald (note, ch. Rev 4:3), the fifth, sardonyx (, Exo 39:11; Eze 28:13; Pliny, xxxvii. 24, says, Sardonyches olim ut ex nomine ipso apparet, intelligebantur candore in sarda, hoc est velut carnibus in ungue hominis imposito, et utroque translucido. The ancient versions and Josephus call it onyx. See Winer, ut supra, 6), the sixth, sardius (ch. Rev 4:3, note), the seventh, chrysolith (: reff. al. and Josephus thus render it. The stone at present so called is pale green, transparent, and crystallized with shifting colours. But the ancient chrysoliths are described by Pliny as aureo fulgore translucentes, and have been supposed the same as our topaz: or by some, as amber: see Winer, ut supra, 10), the eighth, beryl (, ref. Exod.: rendered by the LXX in Gen 2:12, , and variously in other places. Epiphanius in Wetst. says, , : and Pliny xxxvii. 20, viriditatem puri maris imitantur, Winer, ut supra, 11), the ninth, topaz (, reff. and al. Strabo describes it as , , xvi. p. 770, Wetst., where see more testimonies. But Plin. xxxvii. 32, says egregia etiamnum to-pazio gloria est, suo virenti genere: whence some have supposed it our chrysolith: see above. Cf. Job 28:19; and Winer ut supra, 2), the tenth, chrysoprasus (this word is found only in Pliny, xxxvii. 20, vicinum genus huic (beryllo) est pallidius, et a quibusdam proprii generis existimatur, vocaturque chrysoprasus: and 21, amethysti fulgens purpura), the eleventh, jacinth (: so alii apud Tromm. in Exo 28:19, where the LXX have , which again occurs in Eze 28:13, where is not found: while in Exo 28:20 Symm. renders by . The word is not found in LXX as the name of a gem. Pliny, xxxvii. 41: ille emicans in amethysto fulgor violaceus dilutus est in hyacintho), the twelfth, amethyst ( reff. Pliny, xxxvii. 40, reckons the amethyst among the purple stones, and says of the best, the Indian, absolutum felicis purpur colorem habent perlucent autem omnes violaceo colore. So that it seems to be the stone now known by that name). And the twelve gates, twelve pearls (Isa 54:12, carbuncles. Wetst. quotes from the Rabbinical Bava Bathra, f. 75. 1: Deus S. B. adducet gemmas et margaritas, triginta cubitos longas totidemque latas: easque excavabit in altitudinem xx cubitorum, et latitudinem x cubitorum, collocabitque eas in portis Hierosolymorum. See many more in Wetst. and Schttgen), each one separately (reff.) of the gates was (made) out of one pearl. And the street (generic: the street-material, throughout) of the city (was) pure gold like transparent glass (see above on Rev 21:18). And a temple I saw not in it: for the Lord God Almighty is the temple of it, and the Lamb (i. e. the inhabitants need no place of worship or sacrifice, the object of all worship being present, and the great Sacrifice Himself being there). And the city hath not need of the sun nor yet of the moon, that they should shine on her (, dat. commodi): for the glory of God (the brightness of His presence, the Shechinah: see above, Rev 21:11) lightened her, and her lamp was the Lamb (see Isa 60:19-20. No assignment of the members of the sentence must be thought of, such as that . is her Sun, and her Moon: so Grot. and Ewald (not De Wette, as Dsterd., who only thinks that corresponds to the sun and to the moon, but protests against applying these to the divine Persons separately)): and the nations shall walk by means of her light (i. e. she shall be so bright as to serve for light,-for sun and moon both,-to the world that then is, and her inhabitants. For such inhabitants are clearly supposed; see below, and ch. Rev 22:2). And the kings of the earth (no longer hostile to Christ) bring (pres. of habit and certainty, as so often in this prophecy) their (the kings, not the nations, as Rev 21:26) glory (cf. Isa 60:3; all in which they glory) into her: and her gates shall never be shut by day (i. e. in meaning, shall never be shut, seeing it will always be day: shall never be shut, for if they were, they must be shut by day): for night shall not exist there. And they (men) shall bring the glory and the costliness of the nations into her (Isa 66:12. Among the mysteries of this new heaven and new earth this is set forth to us: that, besides the glorified church, there shall still be dwelling on the renewed earth nations, organized under kings, and (ch. Rev 22:2) saved by means of the influences of the heavenly city). And there shall never enter into her, every thing unclean, and working abomination and falsehood, but only (lit. except) they that are written in the book of life of the Lamb (if then the kings of the earth, and the nations, bring their glory and their treasures into her, and if none shall ever enter into her that is not written in the book of life, it follows, that these kings, and these nations, are written in the book of life. And so perhaps some light may be thrown on one of the darkest mysteries of redemption. There may be,-I say it with all diffidence,-those who have been saved by Christ without ever forming a part of his visible organized Church).
Fuente: The Greek Testament
Rev 21:18. ) Hesychius, (for it is written with and ) . Therefore the structure itself of the wall is here of jasper, as it is commonly of stone. , in this particular compound word, has the sense of entirely.
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
was of: Rev 21:11, Rev 21:19
like: Rev 21:11, Rev 21:21
Reciprocal: Exo 24:10 – in his clearness Exo 28:20 – a jasper 1Ki 6:30 – General 1Ch 29:2 – onyx stones 2Ch 3:6 – precious Isa 54:11 – I will lay 1Co 3:12 – precious Rev 15:2 – a sea
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Comments on Rev 21:18-21
Rev 21:18. The body of the wall was of jasper, which we Rev 21:21 in verse 11 is a substance that is “clear as crystal” thus describing a diamond. Let us try to see with our mind’s eye a diamond that is fifteen hundred miles in diameter and we will have a mental picture of one side of this city. City was pure gold means the street of it according to verse 21. Gold is a metal (not a stone), hence the likeness to clear glass is explained In verse 21 as of transparent glass. Literal gold is one of the most condensed of metals and hence would naturally be the opposite of transparent. So we should understand that the metal was so pure and the texture so fine that it would take on a very high polish. It was so much that way that in looking upon it one would really seem to see a substance that his eyes were penetrating (as if they were performing the action of an X-ray), when in reality he was beholding something with an incomprehensibly high gloss.
Rev 21:19. The foundation stones of the wall were garnished (decorated) with all manner of precious stones, which means with stones of various descriptions. The first was jasper which we have previously learned h like a diamond. Sapphires are of several varieties and no special one is named, but the general description in the English dictionaries shows them to be brilliant gems inclined to be transparent. A chalcedony is a stone with a blue tint and a glossy surface. Emerald is a stone with rich coloring of green and very much prized as a precious stone.
Rev 21:20. A sardonyx is described by Thayer as follows: “A precious stone marked by the red color of the carnelian (sard) and the white of the onyx.” A sardius is a flesh-colored stone. Thayer says a chrysolyte is “a precious stone of a golden color,” and he says a beryl is “a precious stone of a pale green color.” A topaz is a stone of a greenish-yellow color as given by Thayer. Chrysoprasus. Thayer defines this as follows: “A precious stone in color like a leek, of a translucent [transparent] golden-green.” A jacinth is also the name of a flower (commonly called a hyacinth). The color of it and the stone by the same name is dark-blue, almost black. Thayer says an amethyst is a precious stone of a violet and purple color.
Rev 21:21. Every seveRev 21:18-21 of one pearl. There is nothing said nor intimated that the gates resembled pearls or were merely as beautiful as pearls. No, the first phrase is, the twelve gates were twelve pearls. And we should take for granted that the Lord would not use any but genuine pearl, but He would also Use the best of it for the construction of a city to be the eternal home of the redeemed, where they are to share the glory with Him and all the celestial beings that He has created. I will quote from Smith’s Bible DictionaryHeb 12:22-23 ation about pearls: “The finest specimens of the pearl are yielded by the pearl oyster . . . the oysters grow in clusters on rock in deep water, and the peJas 1:18 ound inside the shell, and is the result of a diseased secretion caused by the introduction of foreign bodies, etc., between the mantle and the shell . . . The size of a good Oriental pearl varies from that of a pea to about three times that . . . Pearls have been valued as high as $200,000 apiece.” Now let us do some calculating and try to form some idea of the beauty and value of just the gates to the celestial city. Everything thus far has been in the proportions that would be required for beauty, hence these gates would be of the width and height that would not be out of proportion. In a wall fifteen hundred miles high and two hundred and sixteen feet thick, any opening of ordinary dimensions would look like a tunnel more than an entrance to a city of residence. We are not given the actual dimensions of the gates, but in order to bring them near enough for us to do some kind of calculating, we know they would not have been less than a hundred feet wide and two hundred feet high. If a pearl three times the size of a pea is worth two hundred thousand dollars, then one pearl as large as I have suggested (and doubtless these gates were larger) would be worth many timeRev 21:22 an all the wealth of the world, and besides this, there were twelve of these costly gems. I would be willing to give a year or more of the severest kind of service just to see one of those gates.
Comments by Foy E. Wallace
Verse 18-21.
(4) The indescribable grandeur 1Ki 8:27 ifAct 7:47-50 he new Jerusalem–Rev 21:18-21.
It would be impractical, if not entirely futile and frustrating, to attempt a descriptive application of each precious stone which decorated the Holy City. There is no singular meRev 21:22-27 inition that can be imparted to these jewels of adornment, but altogether the enumeration of all existing precious stones presented a vision so exquisite in the extreme as to exceed all human imagination or contemplation.
The sublime apocalypse portrayed the New Jerusalem as being the church of the firstborn ones (Heb 12:22-23), the citizens of which have their names inscribed in the registry of heaven. Its citizenry consisted Rev 21:22 of firstfruits of all of God’s creatures (Jas 1:18)–they are his choice creation. Its structure Mat 27:51 f constructed of pure gold; its streetway, or passage syEph 2:21 s Rev 7:15 as of the city–of solid gold, and transparent. The expression pure gold means unalloyed, without the comparative carats in weight or measuRev 21:23 ree of content; but in purity no mixture or alloy. The eye of man has discovered and discerned pure gold, but no man has ever seen transparent gold, a description that adds visional resplendence to the delineations.
The portals of the City were composed of pure pearls, each gate consisting of one solid pearl; and its twelve foundations were garnished with twelve rare jewels of glistening beauty, which in the order from one to twelve were: jasper, sapphire, chalcedony, an emerald, sardonyx, sardius, chrysolite, beryl, topaz, chrysoprasus, jacinth and an amethyst. With vast clusters of edifices within the high wall the super-structure of the City was embellished by whatever materials were known to man to be the most estimable and resplendent of earth’s treasures–and these all were adapted to enhance the glorious majesty of the New Jerusalem, the Lamb’s Bride–the church of Christ.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Rev 21:18. The measuring has been completed. We have next the materials of which the city was composed. Those of the wall are first mentioned. And the building of the wall of it was jasper. We have been already told in Rev 21:11 that the light shining from the city was like that of a jasper stone. The wall, which was of jasper, must have shone with a like crystalline clearness,a distinct proof of the falseness of the idea which makes the wall low in order that it may not obstruct the light of the city.
And the city was pure gold, the most precious metal known, but in this case transfigured and glorified, for it was like unto pure glass.
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
Some will have all this to signify and represent the purest state of the church here upon earth; but if there shall be any state on this side eternity which answereth this glorious representation, how much more will the perfect glorious church in heaven fully answer it; What was said of Jerusalem of old may be truly spoken of the New Jerusalem above, Very excellent things are spoken of thee thou city of God, Psa 87:3 : her pavement of gold, her gates of pearl, her walls of precious stones, denoting the durableness and permanency of the saints’ happiness, the delight and satisfaction that accompany it, and the resplendent glory of it; as gold excels all metals, and is not subject to corruption, as precious stones are full of splendour and glory, in like manner will the mansions of heaven be most glorious, the conversation there pure and incorrupt, affording saints such an entire satisfaction as entirely exceeds all that the most rich and glorious things of this world can afford for the gratification of the outward senses.
Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament
The wall was made of jasper, or diamonds, and the city was of a gold so pure one could see through it.
Fuente: Gary Hampton Commentary on Selected Books
Rev 21:18-27. (c) The Character of the City.
Rev 21:19 f. This list of stones should be compared with the stones of the high priests breastplate (Exo 28:17 ff. Exo 39:10 ff.) and the description of Tyre (Eze 28:13 ff.). There is considerable difficulty in identifying these stones, but probably, as C. A. Scott (Cent.B) says, the sapphire is our lapis-lazuli, the chalcedony is our onyx, the emerald our emerald, the sardonyx our onyx, the sardius our cornelian, the chrysolite is a golden-yellow stone probably amber or topaz, the beryl is our beryl, the topaz our chrysolite but of a paler yellow, the jacinth is our sapphire, the amethyst our amethyst (see also Precious Stones in HDB).
Rev 21:22. no temple: The city possesses no sanctuary, for it is itself a Holy of Holies. . . . The Eternal Presence renders the New Jerusalem one vast temple (Swete).
Rev 21:23. This description is suggested by Isa 60:19. In fact the whole of Rev 21:23-26 is practically borrowed from Isaiah 60.
Fuente: Peake’s Commentary on the Bible
Verse 18
Gold, like unto clear glass; the richness and value of gold combined with the brilliancy and splendor of glass.
Fuente: Abbott’s Illustrated New Testament
21:18 {15} And the building of the wall of it was [of] jasper: and the city [was] pure gold, like unto clear glass.
(15) The matter most precious and glittering, which the presence of God makes most glorious.
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes
The walls appeared to be glistening (cf. Rev 21:11; Rev 4:3). The word "material" (Gr. endomesis) means "building in" and suggests that the material on the wall was jasper, not that the wall was solid jasper. Perhaps John meant that the walls were overlaid with this brilliant material, suggesting further the radiance of God’s holy presence. The whole city appeared to shine as a mass of pure gold. The many limestone buildings of old Jerusalem today take on a beautiful golden color in the light of the rising or setting sun, but this is a pale shadow of what the New Jerusalem will look like. Clear glass was the best quality glass in John’s day, so when he compared the gold to clear glass he probably meant that there was no impurity in the city. [Note: Mounce, p. 381.] John apparently described the New Jerusalem by using similes and metaphors to communicate its ineffable glory.