Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Romans 13:3
For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:
3. The passage distinctly forbids revolutionary action in a Christian. Action within the limits of the existing constitution he may employ; for the constitution is, in fact, the “power that is,” be it good or bad. But he must not plot for its demolition, nor indeed act for its demolition in any way of “violence;” be it violence of deed or word, violence direct or indirect.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
3. For rulers, &c.] St Paul enforces the certainty of “judgment” in this case by pointing out its manifest justice. “Rulers” (lit. the rulers, rulers as a class,) are, as a fact, an agency on the side of right and order; it is justly, then, a sin in the sight of God to resist their authority. No doubt the statement here is never fully realized save where the rulers are personally just and the constitution equitable; (and by no means always, in detail, even then). But the statement is not to be limited to such cases. Civil authority, even in its most distorted forms, never systematically favours wrong as wrong and punishes right as right. Even when a Nero or a Decius persecuted the Church of Christ, the theory of persecution (apart from personal rancour) was the preservation of order; and meantime, in the innumerable details of the common life of the Roman world, the authority of a Nero or a Decius was a necessity and a providential blessing.
Wilt thou then not be afraid ] With the fear of an enemy; the feeling of a weaker towards a stronger opponent. “ Then ” is lit. but; and so better, perhaps: But wilt thou not, &c. Q. d., “But if, as a fact, they are a terror to thee, and thou willest to shake off that terror the remedy is simple; be a good citizen and subject.”
praise ] That at least of protection and security; the “good” referred to in the next clause.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
For rulers – The apostle here speaks of rulers in general. It may not be universally true that they are not a terror to good works, for many of them have persecuted the good; but it is generally true that they who are virtuous have nothing to fear from the laws. It is universally true that the design of their appointment by God was, not to injure and oppress the good, but to detect and punish the evil. Magistrates, as such, are not a terror to good works.
Are not a terror … – Are not appointed to punish the good. Their appointment is not to inspire terror in those who are virtuous and peaceable citizens; compare 1Ti 1:9.
But to the evil – Appointed to detect and punish evildoers; and therefore an object of terror to them. The design of the apostle here is evidently to reconcile Christians to submission to the government, from its utility. It is appointed to protect the good against the evil; to restrain oppression, injustice, and fraud; to bring offenders to justice, and thus promote the peace and harmony of the community. As it is designed to promote order and happiness, it should be submitted to; and so long as this object is pursued, and obtained, government should receive the countenance and support of Christians. But if it departs from this principle, and becomes the protector of the evil and the oppressor of the good, the case is reversed, and the obligation to its support must cease.
Wilt thou not … – If you do evil by resisting the laws, and in any other manner, will you not fear the power of the government? Fear is one of the means by which men are restrained from crime in a community. On many minds it operates with much more power than any other motive. And it is one which a magistrate must make use of to restrain men from evil.
Do that which is good – Be a virtuous and peaceable citizen; abstain from crime, and yield obedience to all the just laws of the land,
And thou shalt have praise of the same – Compare 1Pe 2:14-15. You shall be unmolested and uninjured, and shall receive the commendation of being peaceable and upright citizens. The prospect of that protection, and even of that reputation, is not an unworthy motive to yield obedience to the laws. Every Christian should desire the reputation of being a man seeking the welfare of his country, and the just execution of the laws.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Rom 13:3-6
For rulers are not a terror to good works.
The duties of rulers and subjects
I. Of rulers.
1. To protect the good.
2. To restrain the evil.
3. To reward merit.
II. Of subjects.
1. To respect authority.
2. To do good.
3. And thereby merit praise. (J. Lyth, D.D.)
Do that which is good, and thou shall; have praise of the same.—
Conscientiousness
When the Emperor Nicholas was in England, in 1844, industry in Russia could hardly be said to exist, and the Czar was extremely anxious to introduce machinery of all sorts into his arsenals, so as to become independent of foreign makers. With this object he visited a number of large establishments in the Midland Counties and the North; and one Sunday morning Mr. James Nasmyth, the inventor of the steam hammer, and proprietor of large works at Patricroft, was much surprised at the appearance in his garden of an officer in a carriage and a gorgeous uniform, whose chasseur, still more gorgeous than his master, was sent up to disturb the old gentlemans Sabbath rest by loudly announcing, Prince K–. The prince himself walked in, smoking a cigarette, and informed Mr. Nasmyth in good English that the Czar intended to honour the Patricroft works with a visit on that afternoon. Indeed! replied their owner, I regret that his majesty will not see much, as it is Sunday. But it would be easy, rejoined the aide-de-camp, coolly helping himself to a bon-bon which his chasseur handed him out of a handsome box, to start the works for a few hours. Mr. Nasmyth might be sure of his majestys favour. Sir, replied Mr. Nasmyth, the favour of my God is more important to me than that of your master. And if I were inclined to break the Sabbath for him, my men would not. Would you not start the works for Queen Victoria on Sunday? asked the astonished aide-de-camp. Her Gracious Majesty, replied the old Briton, would never suggest such a thing. The Czar did not visit Patricroft.
For he is a minister of God to thee for good.—
The ministry of civil rulers
The civil ruler is–
I. A minister of God.
1. Paul does not say he ought to be so, or it would be well if he would consent to be so, but that he is. It is not in his pleasure not to be so. He must be so, if he rebel against it ever so fiercely. Neros will might be devilish; every power which he wielded was Divine. He had been appointed to rule the world which he tormented by Him who loved that world.
2. How would such a doctrine affect the Roman Christians? They could not confound vital power with those outside accidents of it which our vulgar nature prompts us to admire when they recollected from whom it came, and they must have hated every wanton exercise of it. The effect of regarding Nero as a minister of God was, no doubt, to make them patient under his government, and afraid to engage in any mad schemes for subverting it. But this faith gave strength to their cries that the earth might be delivered from all her oppressors, assured them that those cries would not be in vain, and made them welcome their own sufferings as steps towards the redemption.
3. Those who attempt to find apologies for tyranny in Scripture, sometimes ask, If Neros power was ordained by God, what subjects can pretend that the powers which are over them have some lower origin? I answer, Certainly none. And subjects would be most unwise if they wished otherwise. For it imports that every power is a trust, and implies responsibility to a judge whom the greatest criminal cannot escape. Read Roman history in the light of St. Pauls sentence. Every sting of conscience which visited Nero that night when he knew himself to be his mothers murderer was a message to him, Thou art Gods minister, and thou hast used His sword against thy own flesh and blood. The assassin by whom he fell at last was saying, Thou art Gods minister; and so am I, guilty like thyself, but ordained to call thee to His judgment-seat.
4. Surely, if rulers and people believed this, it would be something more than the notion that they may be brought to the bar of public opinion. But let those who confess the power of public opinion ask themselves whether it requires any more credulity to acknowledge the presence of a living, personal ruler?
II. A minister of God to thee.
1. A strange assertion! A minister of God to the Roman world the emperor might be, however little he fulfilled his ministry. But a minister of God to some individual member of the Roman Church, who must have counted it the best privilege of his obscurity that the emperor would never hear of him, never inquire after him, how could he be such to that man? In this way: When a man was taken into the Christian Church, he contracted affinities and obligations to Jew and Greek, barbarian and Scythian, bond and free. But he might easily forget these, and fancy that the Church was an isolated body. The fact of being under a common civil ruler deepened and expanded the doctrine. Nor was the benefit destroyed by the character of the ruler. If he was an oppressor, there was more necessity of falling back on the Source from which his authority proceeded, in prayer that His will might be done on earth as it is in heaven.
2. But I am far more desirous to assert the truth in reference to those rulers who confess their calling and try to fulfil it. So far as they contribute to the health and growth of the body politic, so far they must be ministers of God to each one of us personally. For are they not quickening our hearts and hopes, and enabling us to enter more truly the kingdom of God? It is impossible that all true human rule should not be like the Divine rule in this, that it is most minute when it is most comprehensive; that it calls for the most personal loyalty when it is most generally even and just.
III. A minister of God to thee for good.
1. St. Paul writes this to men who might, in a short time, be lighting the city as torches to cover the guilt of him who set it on fire. Well! and was he not, and was not Charles IX in France, and Philip II in the Netherlands? Were they not ministers of God for good to those whom they sent beyond the reach of their crimes, to cry beneath the altar for the day when the earth should no more conceal her blood or cover her slain? And it will be known, some day, to how many men, governments the most accursed have been ministers of good, by leading them from trifling to earnestness, by changing them from reckless plotters into self-denying patriots, by turning their atheism or devil-worship into a grounded faith in the God of Truth. Many such, I fear, will rise up in judgment against those who live in happier circumstances.
2. But the apostle was enabled to proclaim this principle on other grounds. As he believed Christ to be the King of men, he could not help believing that all human society was organised according to the law which He embodied. The Chief of all is the servant of all. He could not doubt that if the emperor believed this he would be a blessing to the world; that he was a curse to it because he thought the world was to minister to him, and not he to it. He could not doubt that every Christian ought to maintain the truth which Nero set at naught, and that if he did, it would prove itself in his case–Nero would be a minister of God for good to him.
3. How did the faith that there is a constitution for nations, which kings did not create, work itself into the heart of modern Europe? When a mediator between God and man is rejected, you must have an absolute caliph or sultan, and a government carried on by mere officials; you cannot have the confession of a relationship between the sovereign and his subjects, involving mutual obligation. This is involved in the faith of a Son of God and a Son of Man. Whatever has suffocated that faith–be it ecclesiastical pretension, or revolt against that pretension, be it the worship of money, or the worship of a tyrant instead of a father–undermines constitutional liberty. To bring forth that faith in its fulness before the nations which nominally confess it, is to help them to break their political fetters. (F. D. Maurice, M.A.)
The functions of the ruler
I. To maintain law and order.
1. As the minister of God.
2. For the benefit of man.
II. To punish crime.
1. For this purpose he is invested with the power of life and death.
2. Must use it righteously.
3. As responsible to God.
4. For the suppression of evil. (J. Lyth, D.D.)
The relative duties of rulers and subjects
I. The nature of civil government.
1. The events of the seventeenth century, which changed the form of government and placed its institutions on a new footing, naturally gave rise to searching inquiries into the origin of lawful authority.
(1) Filmer maintained that kings had a Divine hereditary right to their thrones in virtue of Adams absolute and arbitrary dominion over his offspring. But we read of no grant of any such dominion which, had it existed, would have rendered slavery coeval with the first human family, and would nullify the claims of all monarchs excepting the true heir of Adam, if he could be found.
(2) Sidney and Locke endeavoured to base the relation between rulers and subjects on the supposition that an agreement was originally entered into by the first founders of a state, which involved a tacit compact between all succeeding members of it. But we have no evidence of any such social compact having ever been made.
(3) It seems more satisfactory to regard government as arising from the nature of man, though still having its first elements in the relation between the head of a family and the children. The idea of authority on the one hand, and of submission on the other, thus gained, would easily prepare the way for the union of a number of families under one head.
2. Reason cannot fail to discern the importance cf civil government to save society from a disorder which must soon have issued in its dissolution, if not in the destruction of the very race itself. Accordingly, in the Scriptures, we find civil government very clearly recognised as a Divine institution; and the general obligation to obedience is enforced under penalty of the consequences of resisting an ordinance of God. But though God has given His own sanction to the institution we have no evidence that any one particular form has been prescribed, or even that uniformity in this respect would be a good. When it is said, the powers that be are ordained of God, the meaning is, that as government is designed for the security and happiness of society, every government, whatsoever its form, which in any particular country promotes this end, is agreeable to the will of God. Until Saul reigned, the human form of the theocratic government had been substantially a sort of republic. The monarchy, however, after it became established, received the Divine sanction.
II. The ties which severally attach to the governing power and the governed.
1. The duties of rulers.
(1) To remember their responsibility to God. He that ruleth over men must be just, ruling in the fear of God. When it is considered that the happiness of millions is entrusted to them, how deeply should they feel that they have a Master in heaven!
(2) To act exclusively for the public good. Not only does the text describe the civil ruler as a minister of God for good, but pagan sages; Aristotle defines a king as one who governs for the good and profit of his people, and not for his own ends. The doctrine that a ruler has a right to hold power merely for his own sake is a monstrous perversion of the useful principle of hereditary or vested right. Happily, this doctrine has been repudiated in our own country by the revolution of 1688. Memorable examples of the same principle have occurred in Trance and Belgium.
(3) To exercise their high function so as to make the civil government a moral power and influence. A military despotism may be obeyed because it cannot be resisted; a government which seeks to gain its ends chiefly by a system of espionage; bribing may be equally dreaded, but such governments will never be respected.
(4) To create the persuasion of general good and benevolent intention on their part. Rulers may often commit errors, but these will be viewed patiently if uprightness of intention is manifest; but not the most splendid talents nor even great services will compensate for the want of sincerity. Not, however, that a statesman may not modify his opinions from conviction; but how many pledges have been made on the hustings only to be broken when some prospect has dazzled the vision! Either let such pledges never be made, or let them be kept, or let those who cannot keep them retire from the scene. This uprightness of intention must be shown especially in appointments to places of trust and profit.
(5) To be well informed on the main topics with which they are called to deal. Want of enlarged views and ignorance of men and things may lead to reckless and sudden changes for which the mind of a nation is not prepared, and indeed has often produced revolutions.
(6) To see that the laws are impartial, and that they are impartially administered. It is the dictate, both of Scripture and of reason, that there should not be one law for the rich and another for the poor. The same principle of impartiality might be applied to the economy of trade, of education, and even of religion.
(7) To set a good example. If rulers are profligate, what readier way to the demoralisation of a people! The morals of the higher classes tend to become more and more an index to those of the people.
(8) To be patriotic. His country claims the statesmans highest aims and best services. He should be, then, a man of peace. Of all the calamities that can befal nations, war is by far the greatest. Peace furnishes upright and wise rulers the opportunity of domestic improvement.
2. The duties of subjects.
(1) To obey the laws, or else the very design of civil government and the plain injunctions of Scripture go for nothing. Of course we ought to obey God rather than men, but we should remember that this was said by those who, as inspired men, could not mistake as to what is obedience to God. Before, therefore, we resist the ordinance of man, let us be sure that it really does clash with the plain ordinance of God. The supremacy of the law implies that the subject surrenders the right of redressing his private wrongs to the political society of which he is a member, otherwise offences would often not be punished at all, for the aggressor might be the stronger; or, if not, the aggressor might be punished from revenge. Besides, one retaliation would lead to another, and there would be no end to this reciprocal brute force, but in the destruction of one or both of the parties. Still it must be admitted that if a robber or a murderer were to attack us we should certainly be justified in repelling him, in self-defence, because we cannot at the moment command the protection of society.
(2) To honour his rulers, but not by insincere flattery, and servile fawning for the sake of advantage. To reverence the Sovereign, in whom the dignity and power of the state is embodied, is a natural sentiment as well as a religious duty; while despising government is strongly condemned (2Pe 2:10). Still as it would be irrational to suppose that rulers are infallible, it cannot be wrong, on certain occasions, to find fault with their public acts. Our Saviour and the apostles did so, but censures should be tempered with the recollection that nothing is more easy than to sit in judgment on mens motives only because we ourselves may be of a different opinion. Much more has been effected towards the removal of bad laws by sober and persevering remonstrance than by unmeasured abuse. The Christian law of courtesy has as much claim to operation here as in any of the other intercourses of life.
(3) To pray for them. In thus doing we are praying for the community at large, and for the whole world, the interests of which are affected by the international measures of rulers, and especially of our own, whose policy is felt over the globe.
(4) To pay the taxes. The machine of government must always, in a state of society like our own, be expensive; but the complaint respecting taxation has too often been well- grounded in consequence of the self-interest and extravagance of rulers themselves. Again; a tax may have a wrong object, or it may be so levied as to bear disproportionably on the relative means of those who have to pay it. But still, when it is imposed constitutionally, it must be submitted to.
(5) To do all in their power to exert a salutary influence over their rulers, so as to render the machine of government as perfect an instrument as possible for promoting the freedom and happiness of the governed. If rulers ever forget this high and religious destination and enact tyrannical laws, and if no milder measures avail to remedy intolerable oppressions, subjects are justified in resisting these encroachments. But usually the best and most direct means of exercising a salutary influence on public affairs is the election of such men for members of parliament as are likely, from their character and principles, to seek the general good. Hence it is one of the most incumbent duties of subjects to use uprightly and with an enlightened mind the elective franchise. Few notions have less foundation in reason, or in Scripture, than that religion has nothing to do with politics. That a passion for party politics may injure the spirit of religion is not to be doubted; but this only proves that what is even obligatory may be engaged in with a wrong state of mind, and thus become evil. (J. Hoppus, LL.D.)
But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain—
Duty of the magistrate
I. We must place the sword and fasten it, too, in its proper place, the hand of the magistrate.
1. God giveth the power, the magistrate hath it: God lendeth the sword, the magistrate bears it. And though ambition hath presented this power under divers forms of popularity, aristocracy, and monarchy, yet the commission and seal is still the same. The kings broad seal, what is it? The matter is wax; a small piece of money will buy a greater quantity: but having the image and superscription of my prince, it is either my pardon, or my liberty, or my charter, or my possessions. So the magistrate, what is he? My fellow, dust and ashes, nay, a sinful man. And yet, as the minister of God, he is sealed, and hath the image and superscription of the Deity.
2. But though God hath conveyed His power, yet He hath not done it to every man upon the same terms; not to Joab the captain as to David the king; not to Shaphan the chanceller as to Josiah on the throne; not to Gallio the deputy as to Caesar the emperor; not to the under-officers as to the judge; not to the judge as to the king. No private man may be a swordsman. If Peterer will be drawing to lop off an ear he must hear, They that use the sword, etc. (Mat 26:52).
3. As God hath given the sword to the magistrate, so hath He fastened it to his hand. No discontent shall move it, no argument stir it, no murmuring sheath it; no time, no calling, no liberty free or privilege from the power of it. Behold St. Paul here, upholding that sword which he was to feel, adoring that power he sunk under, and bowing to majesty when the throne was Neros.
II. We must now place the non frustra upon the sword. Wherefore the sword? wherefore authority? That we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty (1Ti 2:2); that every man may sit under his own vine, and under his own fig-tree; that the poor man may keep his lamb, and the jawbone of the oppressor be broken; that peace may shadow the commonwealth and plenty crown it. Authority is not only not in vain, but profitable and necessary. God could have governed us without a sword, but it was not good for men to be so governed. We love and fear at a distance. And as the object is either nigh or remote, so it either affects or frights us. We fear man more than God, and the shaking of his whip than the scorpions of a Deity.
1. The magistrate, like God Himself, governs us by that which is adverse to us, curbeth the transgressor by the execution of penal laws.
2. No magistrate doth simply will the affliction of the offender, or punish only to show his authority, but for the amendment of the offender and the peace of the commonwealth. You who are invested with this power remember the end. Remember you were placed with a sword to pursue the wicked, to run after the oppressor, and take the prey out of his mouth. And in doing this you defend and safeguard the innocent. The death of one murderer may save a thousand lives. The neglect hereof heaps injury upon injury.
(1) The first lights upon God Himself, of whose Divine power this power is a very beam. By injustice men undervalue Him, and put Him below His vassal, as if His omnipotency were weaker than man, His honour cheaper than a fee, heaven at a lower price than a bribe, and Christ Himself not worth forty pieces of silver.
(2) From God the injury descends to the commonwealth. It brings in that which it should cast out. Sin unpunished makes a greater breach than sin committed. For adultery, murder, drunkenness, deceit, may give the blow, but injustice wounds.
(3) Many times the injury falls upon the offender, whose greatest punishment it is that he is so much wronged as to be befriended, and so much favoured as to be unpunished.
(4) But the wrong rests and dwells in the magistrate, who in a manner abjures his office, degrades himself by his connivance, and makes the sword less terrible by not using it; the not executing the law upon the greatest working a secret and reserved contempt thereof in the meanest. (A. Farindon, D.D.)
Mistaken clemency in courts of justice
Mirabeau once said, We live in an age where wrong constantly triumphs over right, and where justice itself is a lie. There can be no greater curse to a nation than a corrupt judge and a perjured juror, and the Bible distinctly declares that God will call all such to a terrible account. It has ever been the case that where wholesome and just laws have failed to be strictly administered lawlessness and crime have abounded. Mercy to a great criminal often means cruelty and injustice to the people. This mistaken clemency leads to serious evils.
1. It confuses the public conscience as to the distinction between right and wrong.
2. It undermines respect for law and rulers.
3. It tends to anarchy, mob, and lynch law.
4. It jeopardises the securities and rights of society, and is subversive of morality and order. (Homiletic Monthly.)
The sword the symbol of righteous authority
The sword is not only the breaker, it is more constantly the preserver of national peace. Physical force in quiescence is like a sentinel, guarding our liberties and our laws. The magistrate, as well as the soldier, bears not the sword in vain. Though it be seldom drawn from its sheath, it is the commanding symbol of righteous authority. (E. Johnson, M.A.)
Wherefore ye must needs be subject for conscience sake.—
The Christians subjection to the civil authority is
I. Necessary. Because–
1. It is a Divine ordinance.
2. Essential to the general good.
II. Obliging.
1. Not only for wrath,
2. But conscience sake.
III. Complete. Because it is–
1. Willing.
2. Sincere.
3. Conscientious. (J. Lyth, D.D.)
Subjection for conscience sake
Our notions about public duty are low altogether, because we often look upon civil society either as a matter of mutual convenience only between man and man, or else as an injustice and encroachment made by the rich and powerful on the rights and welfare of others. But as Christ has ennobled and sanctified the dearest of our domestic relations, that of marriage, by comparing it to the tender and affectionate care with which He watches over those who are united in one body to Him as the Head, so are our public relations raised by being equally connected with the service of our Lord. Laws and governments are His ordinance, just as marriage is His ordinance, or the relations between parents and their children. They are His ordinance, because He knew that without them we should be in a state hardly better than that of beasts; because He willed that some image of His own just government, however faint, should exist in the world; some power that should put down the most violent forms of evil, even though it could not touch those which lurk within the heart, nor reward the virtue of the good. And hence laws are entitled to our obedience, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake; that is, not only because we may incur a penalty if we disobey them, but because, whether we do or no, we are certainly, by disobeying them, doing that which is displeasing in the sight of God. (T. Arnold, D.D.)
For this cause pay ye tribute also.
Why shall we pay taxes
?–Because–
1. Government must be supported.
2. The governor as well as the labourer is worthy of his hire.
3. The governor is Gods minister.
4. It is a conscientious duty. (J. Lyth, D.D.)
Render therefore to all their dues.–We owe–
I. To god–
1. Fear (Mat 10:28). By reason of–
(1) His sovereignty (Mal 1:6).
(2) His justice.
(3) His power (Jer 5:22).
2. Love (Deu 6:5); for–
(1) His excellency in Himself (Son 5:16).
(2) His love to us (1Jn 4:10-11).
3. Desires (Psa 73:25). Because He is–
(1) The ocean of happiness in Himself (Mat 19:17).
(2) The fountain of it to us (Psa 36:9).
4. Faith in what He saith (1Jn 5:10).
(1) Because of His own veracity (Heb 6:18).
(2) The certainty of the revelations confirmed by miracles (2Pe 1:18-19).
5. Trust on what He promises (Pro 3:5; Rom 4:20). Because of–
(1) His freedom in making them.
(2) His faithfulness in keeping them (Deu 7:9).
6. Thankfulness (1Th 5:18). Because–
(1) We are unworthy of any mercy (Gen 32:10).
(2) It is all we can return (Mic 6:8).
7. Obedience (1Sa 15:22).
(1) Which should be–
(a) Sincere (Rom 6:17).
(b) Universal (Luk 1:6; Psa 119:6).
(c) Constant (Luk 1:75).
(2) This we owe, by reason of our–
(a) Creation.
(b) Preservation (Act 17:28).
(c) Redemption (1Co 6:20).
(d) Vow in baptism.
(e) Our profession of the Christian religion (2Ti 2:19).
8. Honour and adoration (Mal 1:6).
(1) Of His wisdom (Rom 11:33).
(2) Omniscience (Psa 147:5).
(3). Omnipresence (Psa 139:5; Psa 139:7).
(4) Omnipotence (Mat 19:26).
(5) Mercy (Exo 34:6).
(6) Justice.
(7) Eternity (Exo 3:14).
9. Then render unto God His dues. Consider–
(1) Otherwise you rob God (Mal 3:8).
(2) You rob yourselves, your happiness consisting in obeying God. You rob yourselves–
(a) Of the comforts of a good conscience (2Co 1:12).
(b) Of joy in the Holy Ghost (Rom 14:17).
(c) Of the favour of God (Isa 59:2).
(d) Of a blessing here (Deu 28:1).
(e) Of happiness hereafter (Heb 7:14).
(3) By paying Him His due you secure yourselves–
(a) From present curses (Mal 2:2; chap. 8:28).
(b) Future torments (2Th 1:8-9).
(4) He will call you to account (2Co 5:10).
(5) Render His due, and He will render to you His promise in heaven (Mat 25:46).
II. To men.
1. Superiors, civil, ecclesiastical, economical.
(1) Subjection (Rom 5:1; Tit 3:1).
(2) Tribute (Mat 17:24-27).
(3) Custom.
(a) We ought to have a care of the public good.
(b) It is a debt of gratitude for the benefits we receive from the magistrate.
(c) A debt of justice for his trouble in the management of public affairs (Rom 13:6).
(4) Fear (Pro 24:21).
(5) Honour (1Pe 2:17).
(a) So as to acknowledge them to be ordained of God.
(b) Love them for their office sake.
(c) Be thankful for the benefits we receive from them.
(d) Fidelity and allegiance (2Sa 20:2).
(e) Entertain no ill thoughts of his person or actions (Ecc 10:20).
2. Inferiors (Job 31:13-15).
(1) Humility and respect (Php 2:3).
(2) Charity and relief (1Ti 6:17; Job 31:16-21). Consider–
(a) He that pities the poor, lends to God (Pro 19:17).
(b) This is the only way to lay up our treasures in heaven (Mat 6:19-20).
III. To all.
1. Love (verse 8).
(1) This is Christs special command (Joh 13:34).
(2) Without this we have no love for God (1Jn 4:20-21).
2. Honour (1Pe 2:17). Because–
(1) None but excel us in some things (Php 2:3).
(2) All are made in the image of God (Gen 1:26).
(3) We are all professors of the Christian religion (Mar 9:41; 1Pe 3:7).
3. Charitable thoughts (1Co 13:5).
(1) We know not others hearts (1Co 2:11).
(2) Nor Gods intentions towards them (Jam 4:12).
4. Do good to all (Gal 6:10).
(1) Hereby we imitate God (Mat 5:44-45).
(2) Give glory to God (Mat 5:16).
5. Speak well of all (Jam 4:11).
6. Pray for all (1Ti 2:1; Mat 5:44), for their–
(1) Temporal good.
(2) Spiritual (1Ti 2:4).
7. Be just and honest to all (Mat 7:12; 1Th 4:6); otherwise, if we defraud others, we can get no good by it (Pro 10:22), but much hurt (Hag 1:6).
8. Render to all their dues. Consider–
(1) Unless we render them to men we cannot to God.
(2) Unless we do this we sin against the very light of nature.
(3) God will bring us into judgment for all unjust dealings. (Bp. Beveridge.)
Our debts
It is one degree of thrift to bring our debts into as few hands as we can. Our debt here we cannot bring into fewer than these three:
I. Our debts to God. Consider them to be our sins, and we dare not come into reckoning with Him, but we discharge ourselves entirely on our Surety, Christ; but yet of that debt we must pay an acknowledgment, an interest, as it were, of praise for all we would have and prayer for all we would have.
II. Our debts to man. Our creditors are–
1. Persons above us. To these we owe in matter of substance, tribute, and custom; and in matter of ceremony, fear, and honour.
2. Persons below us to whom we owe counsel to direct them and relief in compassion of their sufferings.
III. Our debts to ourselves.
1. Some of these are to be tendered at noon, i.e., to be paid in our best strength and prosperity in the course of our lives.
2. Others are to be tendered at night at our deaths.
Conclusion: Render therefore to all their dues.
1. For your debt to God we bring you to Church. This is no place to arrest in, but yet the Spirit of God calls upon you for these debts. Praise Him in His holy place, and pray to Him in His house, which is the house of prayer.
2. For your debts to man we send you to court to pay those owing to superiors; to hospitals and prisons to pay those owing to inferiors. And though courts and prisons be illpaying places, yet pay your debts of substance and ceremony, of tribute and honour, at court; and your debts of counsel and relief to those who need them in the darkest corners.
3. For your debts to yourselves, make even with yourselves all the way in your lives, lest your payment prove too heavy, and you break, and your hearts break when you come to see that you cannot do that upon your death bed. (J. Donne, D.D.)
The rights of the ruler
are here–
I. Defined.
1. Support.
2. Submission.
3. Respect.
II. Enforced.
1. As due.
2. As recognised by God.
3. As imperative on all Christians. (J. Lyth, D.D.)
Tribute to whom tribute is due, custom to whom custom.—
Tribute and custom
There is some difficulty about the distinctive signification of (tribute), and (custom). By some the former is regarded as a tax upon land; by others, as upon property generally, whether movable or immovable. Those critics who give to the wider signification, limit to a capitation tax; and those who confine to a tax upon land give a larger meaning, as signifying a tax upon merchandise as well as upon persons. Judging from the apostles use of the word, was the general term for all contributions, and was used in the same way that the word taxes is sometimes largely used; and in its limited sense it applies to all burdens upon landed or personal property; while was a capitation tax which Christ told Peter to pay for himself and his Lord. (J. Knight.)
Honour to whom honour.–
Honour to whom honour is due
Lord Dartmouth is the person to whom Newtons Letters in the Cardiphonia to a Nobleman, are addressed, and to whom Cowper alludes, And one that wears a coronet and prays. It is said that after the prince came to the throne, on a public day Lord Dartmouth appeared at the levee, when one of the attendant noblemen said, Ill bet Dartmouth has been at prayer to-day. Yes, and please your majesty, said Lord Dartmouth, I thought it right first to pay my duty to my God and then to my king. Well said, Dartmouth, replied his majesty, and like yourself. (Scottish Christian Herald.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 3. For rulers are not a terror to good works] Here the apostle shows the civil magistrate what he should be: he is clothed with great power, but that power is entrusted to him, not for the terror and oppression of the upright man, but to overawe and punish the wicked. It is, in a word, for the benefit of the community, and not for the aggrandizement of himself, that God has entrusted the supreme civil power to any man. If he should use this to wrong, rob, spoil, oppress, and persecute his subjects, he is not only a bad man, but also a bad prince. He infringes on the essential principles of law and equity. Should he persecute his obedient, loyal subjects, on any religious account, this is contrary to all law and right; and his doing so renders him unworthy of their confidence, and they must consider him not as a blessing but a plague. Yet, even in this case, though in our country it would be a breach of the constitution, which allows every man to worship God according to his conscience, the truly pious will not feel that even this would justify rebellion against the prince; they are to suffer patiently, and commend themselves and their cause to him that judgeth righteously. It is an awful thing to rebel, and the cases are extremely rare that can justify rebellion against the constituted authorities. See the doctrine on Ro 13:1.
Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power?] If thou wouldst not live in fear of the civil magistrate, live according to the laws; and thou mayest expect that he will rule according to the laws, and consequently instead of incurring blame thou wilt have praise. This is said on the supposition that the ruler is himself a good man: such the laws suppose him to be; and the apostle, on the general question of obedience and protection, assumes the point that the magistrate is such.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
This verse contains a further argument for subjection to the higher powers, and it is taken from the benefit thereof, or from the end of magistracy, which is for the punishment of evil, and the encouragement of good works: see 1Pe 2:14. When he says, that
rulers are not a terror to good works, he means, they are not so ordinarily; or they were not ordained for that end, but the contrary. Or else, by are not understand they ought not, so to be.
Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good,
and thou shalt have praise of the same: q.d. Wouldst thou be free from fear of being punished by the magistrate? Do that which is good, and thou shalt not only be free from fear, but sure of praise and reward: see Pro 14:35; 16:13.
By good he means, not that which is so theologically. but morally: q. d. Live honestly, hurt no man in word or deed, give to every man his due, &c. This is good in the sight of all men, of heathens themselves.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
3, 4. For rulers are not a terror togood works“to the good work,” as the true readingappears to be
but to the evil.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
For rulers are not a terror to good works,…. That is, to them that do good works in a civil sense; who behave well in the neighbourhoods, towns, cities, and countries where they dwell. The apostle seems to anticipate an objection made against governors, as if there was something very terrible and formidable in them; and which might be taken up from the last clause of the preceding verse; and which he removes by observing, that governors neither do, nor ought to inject terror into men that behave well, obey the laws, and keep a good decorum among their fellow subjects, not doing any injury to any man’s person, property, and estate. The Jews a have a saying,
“that a governor that injects more fear into the people, than is for the honour of God, shall be punished, and shall not see his son a disciple of a wise man.”
But to the evil; to wicked men, who make no conscience of doing hurt to their fellow creatures, by abusing their persons, defrauding them of their substance, and by various illicit methods doing damage to them; to such, rulers are, and ought to be terrors; such are to be menaced, and threatened with inflicting upon them the penalty of the laws they break; and which ought to be inflicted on them by way of punishment to them, and for the terror of others. R. Chanina, the Sagan of the priests b, used to say,
“pray for the peace of the kingdom, for if there was no
, “fear”, (i.e. a magistrate to inject fear,) one man would devour another alive.”
Wilt thou not then be afraid of the power? of the civil magistrate, in power and authority, to oppose him, to refuse subjection to him, to break the laws, which, according to his office, he is to put in execution.
Do that which is good: in a civil sense, between man and man, by complying with the laws of the land, which are not contrary to the laws of God; for of doing good in a spiritual and religious sense he is no judge:
and thou shalt have praise of the same; shall be commended as a good neighbour, a good citizen, and a good commonwealth’s man; an honest, quiet, peaceable man, that does not disturb the peace of civil society, but strengthens and increases it.
a T. Bab. Roshhashana, fol. 17. 1. Maimon. Hilch. Sanhedrin, c. 25. sect. 1. b Pirke Abot, c. 3. sect. 2.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
A terror (). This meaning in Isa 8:13. Paul does not approve all that rulers do, but he is speaking generally of the ideal before rulers. Nero was Emperor at this time.
From the same ( ). “From it” (, personified in verse 4).
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
1) “For rulers are not a terror to good works,” (hoi gar archontes ouk eisin phobos to agatho ergo) -For the rulers are not (exist not) as a fear to morally and ethically good works,” (Eph 2:10. Rulers are to protect the good, the upright in society, from terror of those who do wrong. Subjects have a corresponding duty to do good, do right, and deport themselves so as to merit the respect of authorities, Mat 5:15-16.
2) “But to the evil,” (alla to kako) “But they are (do exist) as an occasion of fear or terror to or toward immoral and unethical work, deeds, or behavior,” as a restraint to them. It is the duty of properly appointed civil authorities to punish evil doers as surely as it is to praise the orderly in conduct.
3) “Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power?” (theleis de me phobeisthai ten eksousian); “And do you not have a high moral will to fear (to be respecting) the authority?” Do you not then will, desire or choose to be orderly and do good rather than to live under fear of ordained punishment for breaking the civil laws you are under? You should. For the fear of man bringeth a snare, a trap, an ordained punishment, 1Jn 4:18; Pro 29:25.
4) “Do that which is good,” (to agatho poiei) “Do the good,” the morally and ethically proper thing; unless you are evil. 1Pe 3:13; 1Pe 4:14-16; Pro 3:27; Even our Lord was praised because he “went about doing good,” Act 10:38. Let every church member and Christian citizen follow his example, walk in his steps.
5) “And thou shalt have praise of the same,” (kai ekseis epainon eks autes) “And thou wilt have praise from doing it;” 1Pe 2:14; Mat 5:16. You will have both protection and favor of men (your rulers) and of God for good and obedience to and respect for established law and order.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
3 . For princes, etc. He now commends to us obedience to princes on the ground of utility; for the causative γὰρ, for, is to be referred to the first proposition, and not to the last verse. Now, the utility is this, — that the Lord has designed in this way to provide for the tranquillity of the good, and to restrain the waywardness of the wicked; by which two things the safety of mankind is secured: for except the fury of the wicked be resisted, and the innocent be protected from their violence, all things would come to an entire confusion. Since then this is the only remedy by which mankind can be preserved from destruction, it ought to be carefully observed by us, unless we wish to avow ourselves as the public enemies of the human race.
And he adds, Wilt not thou then fear the power? Do good. By this he intimates, that there is no reason why we should dislike the magistrate, if indeed we are good; nay, that it is an implied proof of an evil conscience, and of one that is devising some mischief, when any one wishes to shake off or to remove from himself this yoke. But he speaks here of the true, and, as it were, of the native duty of the magistrate, from which however they who hold power often degenerate; yet the obedience due to princes ought to be rendered to them. For since a wicked prince is the Lord’s scourge to punish the sins of the people, let us remember, that it happens through our fault that this excellent blessing of God is turned into a curse.
Let us then continue to honor the good appointment of God, which may be easily done, provided we impute to ourselves whatever evil may accompany it. Hence he teaches us here the end for which magistrates are instituted by the Lord; the happy effects of which would always appear, were not so noble and salutary an institution marred through our fault. At the same time, princes do never so far abuse their power, by harassing the good and innocent, that they do not retain in their tyranny some kind of just government: there can then be no tyranny which does not in some respects assist in consolidating the society of men.
He has here noticed two things, which even philosophers have considered as making a part of a well-ordered administration of a commonwealth, that is, rewards for the good, and punishment for the wicked. The word praise has here, after the Hebrew manner, a wide meaning.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
(3) To good works.Literally, to the good work, as if it were personified. Human law can only take account of that which is actually done, not of the intention.
In this and the following verse it is clearly the ideal aspect of the magistracy that the Apostle has in view. So Bishop Butler, in the paragraph next to that just quoted, continues: If it be objected that good actions, and such as are beneficial to society, are often punished, as in the case of persecution and in other cases, and that ill and mischievous actions are often rewarded, it may be answered distinctly: first, that this is in no sort necessary, and consequently not natural, in the sense in which it is necessary and therefore natural, that ill or mischievous actions should be punished; and in the next place, that good actions are never punished considered as beneficial to society, nor ill actions rewarded under the view of their being hurtful to it. So that it stands good . . . that the Author of Nature has as truly directed that vicious actions, considered as mischievous to society, should be punished, and put mankind under a necessity of punishing them, as He has directed and necessitated us to preserve our lives by food. Occasional failures of justice on the part of the executive do not make the strict administration of justice any the less its proper duty and office.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
3. Not a terror to good In its legitimate character, government is necessary to prevent evil and to secure peace. The very worst government is better than aimless anarchy.
Not be afraid To fear the just penalty of law is a duty. So to fear the just penalty of the law of God is a duty.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
‘For rulers are not a terror to the good work, but to the evil. And would you have no fear of the power?’
And the logic behind this is that rulers are set up by God to control and prevent evil. Thus those who do good will have nothing to fear. It is only those who do evil who will be in terror of the authorities. And this is right, for in the face of justice all should be in fear of the consequences of doing evil. Paul was, of course, writing as one who had himself experienced the justice of Roman appointed governors, and was aware that on the whole Roman justice worked well. He does not deal with the case where the higher power is itself doing gross evil.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
‘Do what is good,
And you will have praise from the same,
For he is a minister of God to you for good.
But if you do what is evil,
Be afraid, for he bears not the sword in vain,
For he is a minister of God, an avenger for wrath to him who does evil.’
In a balanced sentence Paul takes up what he said in Rom 13:3 a and its contrast between someone doing good and doing evil. Those who do good will have praise from the one in authority, because he is a servant of God to them for good. But those who do evil have reason to be afraid, for he holds the sword of authority, (or possibly controls the executioner’s sword), and while he is a servant of God, it is in order to be an avenger for wrath to him who does evil. In other words he acts on behalf of the wrath of God and the wrath of the state. Again Paul is assuming a governing authority which is genuinely aiming to maintain justice.
Note the parallel contrasts:
‘Do what is good — but (on the other hand) if you do what is evil.’
‘You will have praise from him — be afraid because of his sword.’
‘A minister of God for good — a minister of God as an avenger for wrath.’
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
Rom 13:3. Rulers are not a terror to good works To the well-doer, . See Junius in Wetstein. Heylin renders the passage,to those who do well, but to those who do ill. If circumstances arise to which the argument in this verse is not applicable, it is reasonably to be taken for granted, that the Apostle did not intend here to pronounce concerning such cases. Nothing can be said for interpreting these passages in favour of unlimited passive obedience, which will not prove anyresistance of a private injury unlawful, by the limited authority of our Lord’s decision, Mat 5:39-40. This would subvert the great foundation of magistracy itself, which is appointed to ward off and prevent by force, or to avenge such injuries; but it was very prudent in the Apostle not to enter into any question relating to the right of resistance in some extraordinary cases; as those cases are comparatively few, and as the just decisions which couldhave been given on that subject might possibly have been misrepresented to his own detriment, and that of the Gospel. The general laws of benevolence to the whole, so strongly asserted in this context, are in particular cases to determine; and all particular precepts, in whatever universal terms they are delivered, are always to give way to them. See Doddridge, and Bishop Hoadley’s “Measures of Submission.”
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
Rom 13:3 . ] Ground assigned for .
] The good work and the evil work are personified. We are not here to compare Rom 2:7 or Rom 2:15 (Reiche, de Wette).
] a terror , i.e. formidandi . For examples of the same use, see Kypke, II. p. 183. Comp. Lobeck, Paralip . p. 513; just so the Latin timor, e.g. Propert. iii. 5. 40.
] the simple . The proposition itself may be either interrogatory (Beza, Calvin, and others, including Lachmann, Tischendorf, Ewald, Hofmann), or as protasis in categorical form (see on 1Co 7:8 , and Pflugk, ad Eur. Med . 386). So Luther and others, including Tholuck and Philippi. The former is more lively, the latter more appropriate and emphatic, and thus more in keeping with the whole character of the adjoining context.
] praise, testimony of approbation (which the magistrate is wont to bestow; see also Philo, Vit. M . i. p. 626 C); not any more than in Rom 2:29 , 1Co 4:5 , reward (Calvin, Loesner, and others). Grotius rightly remarks: “Cum haec scriberet Paulus, non saeviebatur Romae in Christianos.” It was still the better time of Nero’s rule. But the proposition has a general validity, which is based on the divinely-ordained position of the magistracy, and is not annulled by their injustices in practice, which Paul had himself so copiously experienced. Comp. 1Pe 2:14 .
Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary
3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:
Ver. 3. For rulers, are not, &c. ] They should not be. But Jeroboam set a net on Mizpeh, and spread a snare upon Tabor, to watch who would go from him to Judah to worship, Hos 5:1 .
A terror to good works, but to the evil ] The sword of justice (saith one) must be furbished with the oil of mercy; yet there are cases wherein severity ought to cast the scale. Duresce, Duresce, o infaelix Lantgravie, Be sern, be stern oh unhappy Lantgrave, said the poor smith to the Landgrave of Thuring, more mild than was for his people’s good. Bonis nocet, qui malis parcit. He harms the good who spares the wicked. Edward the Confessor was held a bad prince, not by doing, but enduring ill.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
3 .] And the tendency of these powers is salutary : to encourage good works, and discourage evil. It is not necessary to set a note of interrogation after : the clause may be treated as hypothetical, see 1Co 7:18 . Tholuck observes, that this verse is a token that the Apostle wrote the Epistle before the commencement of the Neronian persecution . Had this been otherwise , the principle stated by him would have been the same ; but he could hardly have passed so apparent an exception to it without remark.
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
Rom 13:3 . . . . The can only be connected in a forced and artificial way with the clause which immediately precedes: it really introduces the reason for a frank and unreserved acceptance of that view of “authorities” which the Apostle is laying down. It is as if he said: Recognise the Divine right of the State, for its representatives are not a terror an object of dread to the good work, but to the bad. as in Isa 8:13 . It is implied that those to whom he speaks will always be identified with the good work, and so have the authorities on their side: it is taken for granted also that the State will not act in violation of its own idea, and identify itself with the bad. . . . This is most expressive when read as an interrogation, though some prefer to take it as an assertion: that is, to regard Paul as assuming that the reader does not want to be afraid of the magistrate, rather than as inquiring whether he does or not. To escape fear, : do what is (legally and morally) good.
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
rulers. App-172.
evil App-128.
Wilt . . . power? = desirest thou not then to fear the power?
Wilt. App-102.
do. Greek. poieo.
praise. See Rom 2:29.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
3.] And the tendency of these powers is salutary: to encourage good works, and discourage evil. It is not necessary to set a note of interrogation after : the clause may be treated as hypothetical,-see 1Co 7:18. Tholuck observes, that this verse is a token that the Apostle wrote the Epistle before the commencement of the Neronian persecution. Had this been otherwise, the principle stated by him would have been the same; but he could hardly have passed so apparent an exception to it without remark.
Fuente: The Greek Testament
Rom 13:3. [135] -) not-of good works. This is immediately discussed, Wilt thou-as to good.-, of evil) This is treated of at Rom 13:4, if [thou do that which is evil]-upon him that doeth [evil]. They especially do evil who are also rebellious. For at the beginning of the verse thus retains its own proper force.-, wilt thou) All in some degree will, but they do not in an equal degree so act.- , not be afraid) One kind of fear precedes bad actions, and deters men from committing them; this fear continues, Rom 13:7 : another kind follows bad actions, and from this fear, they are free, who do well.-, praise) 1Pe 2:14, along with a reward; comp. 1Co 4:5.
[135] The margin of the 2d Ed. prefers the reading, , . So also the German version.-E. B. So the oldest authorities ABD corr. later, G, Vulg. fg Iren. Memph. But both Syr. Versions have -.-ED.
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
Rom 13:3
Rom 13:3
For rulers are not a terror to the good work, but to the evil.-All the persecutions that came upon Christians, even in the days of Nero, were needed by them to promote their true and eternal welfare. All the afflictions that came upon them were for their good. They were for their good in the courses they pursued-in the positions in which they placed themselves. In the different courses they would not have been needed for their good. One chief good was to wean them from the kingdoms of the world. How can this wicked ruler be a terror to evil works and not to good? Because God permits only so much affliction to come upon his children as will promote their true good. All the evil that comes upon them is intended by God to restrain and deter them from sin and to encourage them to do good.
And wouldest thou have no fear of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise from the same:-The essentials to all quiet, stable government are such as to make even wicked men in authority prefer goodness, forbearance, and industry-the qualities inculcated by the Christian religion-to the turbulent, disorderly, and rebellious spirit- the concomitant of sin and godlessness. And it is only when there is animosity toward good men on account of their fidelity to principle, or to parties that are offensive, and are persecuted for their principles, that even the tyrannical rulers would not encourage and reward the orderly, quiet spirit in preference to the disorderly and wicked. All government, then, is a terror to evildoers and not to the good.
Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary
rulers: Rom 13:4, Deu 25:1, Pro 14:35, Pro 20:2, Ecc 10:4-6, Jer 22:15-18
Wilt: 1Pe 2:13, 1Pe 2:14, 1Pe 3:13, 1Pe 3:14
Reciprocal: Deu 19:20 – General Deu 21:2 – General Jdg 18:7 – magistrate 1Sa 9:17 – reign over 2Sa 20:19 – peaceable 1Ki 10:9 – to do Neh 13:21 – I will lay Neh 13:28 – I chased Job 29:8 – young men Dan 6:16 – the king Luk 18:3 – Avenge Joh 8:11 – Neither Act 18:14 – bear Act 18:16 – General 1Co 11:17 – I praise Phi 4:8 – praise
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
3:3
Rom 13:3. In most of the verses Paul is considering the penal parts of the law. To be afraid of these rulers means to respect their laws against wrongdoing. Have praise of the same. If a man does right he will be regarded as a good citizen.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Rom 13:3. For rulers (lit, the rulers, as a class), etc. Some connect this with Rom 13:1, as an additional reason for obedience, namely, the salutary design of government; others find here the ground for the last clause of Rom 13:2. The former accords better with the fuller statements of Rom 13:3-4.
Not a terror to the good work, etc. The good work and the evil are personified. Beyond the work, and to the intention, the prerogative of the magistrate does not extend (Meyer). If this verse gives a reason for the last clause of Rom 13:2, then good work and evil must be limited to obedience and resistance; which seems objectionable.
Dost thou then wish, etc. The clause may be taken as hypothetical: Thou dost not wish, etc.
Thou shalt have praise from the same. In thus presenting an ideal of civil government, the Apostle gives the reason for obedience to rightful authority, and establishes a principle of general validity. But the ideal itself suggests that when rulers become a terror to the good work, another maxim can have place, that of the Apostles (Act 5:29): We must obey God rather than man. Nero had not yet shown his true character, when this Epistle was written. Even he persecuted the Christians as alleged evil-doers.
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
Here we have a further argument for subjection to rulers and governors, drawn from the end of the magistrate’s office, which is to punish vice, and to promote virtue: Rulers are not a terror to good works; that is, they ought not, and they ordinarily are not; they were not ordained for that end, and it is not their place so to be, namely, a terror to the good, but to the bad only; for God giveth no authority against himself, or his own righteous laws, which require the punishing of the bad, and the rewarding of the good.
Learn hence, 1. That magistrates, by virtue of their place, ought to be a terror, or exceeding terrible, to evil works, and evil workers.
Learn, 2. That magistrates are not terrible, but amiable, to good men; they fear rulers, but it is with a fear of reverence, not with a tormenting, servile fear: Do that which is good, and thou shalt not be afraid of the power.
Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament
Rom 13:3-5. For rulers In general, notwithstanding some particular exceptions; are not a terror to good works Were not ordained, and do not use to punish those that do well, and conform to good laws; but to the evil From which they deter people by punishing those who do them. Wilt thou Wouldest thou then; not be afraid of the power Of the high authority with which they are invested? Do that which is good Carefully perform the good actions which they enjoin, and, according to the general course of administration, thou shalt have Not only protection, but praise and respect from it. There is one fear that precedes evil actions, and deters from them: this should always remain. There is another which follows evil actions: they who do well are free from this. For he is According to the original appointment, to be considered as elevated above his fellow-men, not for his own indulgence, dominion, and advantage, but that he might be to thee, and to all the rest of his subjects, as the minister of God for good By maintaining all in their just possessions, and protecting them from all injury and violence. But if thou do that which is evil And so makest thyself the enemy of that society of which he is the guardian; be afraid Thou hast reason to be so. For he beareth not the sword in vain Namely, the sword of justice, the instrument of capital punishment, which God hath put into his hands, and hath authorized him to use against malefactors. A revenger to execute wrath Not his own personal resentment, but the wrath of a righteous Providence; upon him that doeth evil In instances wherein it would be highly improper to leave that avenging power in the hands of private injured persons. Therefore a sense of duty to God, as well as prudence and human virtue, will teach you, that you must needs be subject, not only for fear of wrath That is, punishment from man; but for conscience sake Out of obedience to God. It must be well observed, that the apostle did not mean that they were to be subject to the sinful laws of the countries where they lived, otherwise he made it necessary for the Roman brethren to join in the worship of idols, contrary to the superior obligation they were under of obeying God rather than man. Besides, by telling them they were to be subject on account of conscience, he intimated that the subjection which he enjoined did not extend to things sinful.
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Vv. 3, 4. For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil.Now wouldest thou not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise from the same; for he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for it is not in vain that he beareth the sword, for he is a minister of God, to execute just wrath upon him that doeth evil.
If revolt is a crime, and a crime which cannot fail to receive punishment, it is because the power whose authority it attacks is a divine delegation in the midst of human society, and is charged with a moral mission of the highest importance; hence the for.
The good work is not submission, and the evil work is not revolt. Paul means by the one the practice of justice, and by the other that of injustice, in general, in the whole social life. The state is called to encourage the doing of good, and to repress the doing of evil in the domain which is confided to it. This domain is not that of the inward feelings, it is that of external deeds, of work or works, as the apostle says. It matters little which of the two readings (the dative singular or the genitive plural) is preferred; the first is better supported.
After this general declaration, the apostle takes up again each of the two alternatives. And first that of well-doing, Rom 13:3 b and 4a. The verses have been badly divided here. The first proposition of Rom 13:4 belongs still to the idea of Rom 13:3, that of well-doing.
No doubt it may happen, contrary to what the apostle says, that the virtuous man falls under the vengeance of the laws, or becomes a butt for the unjust dealings of the magistracy. But it remains true that in this case good is not punished as good. An unjust law or a tyrannical power make it appear falsely as evil; and the result of this suffering unjustly endured will certainly be the reform of the law and the fall of the power. Never has any power whatever laid down as a principle the punishment of good and the reward of evil, for thereby it would be its own destroyer.
The praise of which the apostle speaks consists, no doubt, in the consideration which the man of probity generally enjoys in the eyes of the magistracy, as well as in the honorable functions which he is called by it to fill.
Ver. 4a If it is so, it is because magistracy is a divine ministry, instituted for the good of every citizen (, to thee), and because, though it may err in the application, it cannot in principle deny its charge to assert justice.
Ver. 4b The other alternative: evil-doing. The power of the state is not to be feared except by him who acts unjustly.
The verb , a frequentative from , to carry, denotes official and habitual bearing.
The term , sword, denotes (in opposition to , the poniard or straightedged sword) a large knife with bent blade, like that carried by the chiefs in the Iliad, and with which they cut the neck of the victims, similar to our sabre. Paul by this expression does not here denote the weapon which the emperor and his pretorian prefect carried as a sign of their power of life and deaththe application would be too restrictedbut that which was worn at their side, in the provinces, by the superior magistrates, to whom belonged the right of capital punishment, and which they caused to be borne solemnly before them in public processions. It has been said that this expression was not intended by the apostle to convey the notion of the punishment of death. The sword, it is said, was simply the emblem of the right to punish in general, without involving anything as to the punishment of death in particular. Is not Philippi right in answering to this: that it is impossible to exclude from the right of punishing the very kind of punishment from which the emblem representing this right is taken? It is improper to bring in here the idea of the grace of the gospel. For at the very time when the state is carrying out on the criminal the work of justice to which it is called, the church may, without the least contradiction, carry out toward the same man the work of mercy which is divinely confided to it. Thus Paul devotes to the destruction of the flesh (1Co 5:4-5) the same man whose salvation he labors to procure against the day of Christ. And Peter tells us of men who perished when judged according to the flesh, but to whom the gospel is preached that they may live in spirit according to God. Experience even proves that the last punishment of the law is very often the means of opening up in the heart of the malefactor a way for divine grace. The penalty of death was the first duty imposed on the state at the time of its divine founding, Gen 9:6 : Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed; for God made man after His image. It is profound respect for human life which in certain cases enjoins the sacrifice of human life. The question involved is not that of simple social expediency, but that of keeping up the human conscience to the level of the value which God Himself attaches to the human person.
The last proposition is exactly parallel to that with which the apostle had concluded the first alternative, that of good (Rom 13:4 a). When the magistracy punishes, no less than when it rewards, it does so as God’s agent and vicegerent on the earth (, servant).
In the expression , an avenger for wrath, there is not, as might be thought, an unmeaning pleonasm. The meaning is: an avenger by office to satisfy the demands of wrath, that of God, the only wrath perfectly holy. The expression might be used here in a favorable sense: to render justice to him who is trampled on; comp. Luk 18:3; Luk 18:5; Luk 18:7-8.
Fuente: Godet Commentary (Luke, John, Romans and 1 Corinthians)
For rulers are not a terror to the good work, but to the evil. [“For” explains why the punishment comes upon the rebel. It is because government exists to promote the good and suppress the evil (1Ti 2:1-2; 1Pe 2:13-17). If it does otherwise, “it,” as Burkitt sagely remarks, “was not ordained for that end.” A good man may suffer through misunderstanding, the machination of evil men, or even maladministration, but he can never suffer as a good man. Even Nero punished Christians as evil-doers (2Ti 2:9). History presents no instance where any government set itself to put down righteousness and exalt evil as such; though there are myriads of cases where human ignorance, prejudice and bigotry mistook the wrong for the right, and made havoc of the good, supposing it to be evil. Paul himself, as an executive of the Jewish Government, had been party to such an error (Act 8:3; Act 9:1-2; 1Ti 1:13). Intentional punishment of the good and countenancing of the evil would be governmental insanity and suicide. When it becomes apparent to the populace that the government has fallen into this state of aberrance, revolution is inevitable; but till the information becomes general, the individual must submit, for slight mistakes do not justify momentous changes and vast social upheavals, and peace for the many may well be purchased at the discomfiture of the few. But if armed or physical resistance is forbidden, moral resistance is strictly and unequivocally enjoined. The government must exact nothing contrary to or inconsistent with Christian duty. If it does, we must obey God rather than men (Act 4:18-20; Act 5:28-29); for under no circumstance can God’s children be justified in doing wrong (Mat 10:28; Rom 3:8). Allegiance ceases when the law of the land seeks to subvert the law of God; and Paul teaches nothing to the contrary. As the martyr Polycarp said to the governor who bade him denounce Christ, and swear by the fortunes of Csar: “We are taught to give honor to princes and potentates, but such honor as is not contrary to God’s religion.” “It was the student of Paul,” says Moule, “who, alone before the great Diet, uttering no denunciation, temperate and respectful in his whole bearing, was yet found immovable by pope and emperor: ‘I can not otherwise; so help me God.'”] And wouldest thou have no fear of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise from the same [comp. 1Pe 2:14]:
Fuente: McGarvey and Pendleton Commentaries (New Testament)
13:3 {4} For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. {5} Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:
(4) The third argument, taken from the reason for which they were made, which is that they are to be most profitable: because God by this means preserves the good and bridles the wicked: by which words the magistrates themselves are put in mind of that duty which they owe to their subjects.
(5) An excellent way to bear this yoke, not only without grief, but also with great profit.
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes
There are two possible ways to explain this verse that on the surface seems very naive. Each of these interpretations will have very different results for those who hold them. The problem, of course, is that rulers are sometimes, perhaps often, a cause of fear for those who do right. Government authorities sometimes abuse their powers for selfish ends. If they do not but serve the welfare of the people as they should, we have no fear of them and can submit to them fairly easily. What if they are evil?
The first way some people have interpreted this verse is to assume that Paul was speaking only of the norm. The normal situation would be a good government that punishes evil and rewards good. Obviously rebellion and revolution would be wrong in such a situation. However those actions might not be wrong if the state ceased to serve its God-given function and began denying the rights and removing the liberties of its citizens. Moderate advocates of this interpretation usually do not suggest that the church as an institution should lead a revolution. Most of them would say, however, that Christians as individuals could justifiably participate in a revolution against such a government. Christians should speak out against such abuses at least. We must be careful not to confuse submission with silence. Silence can express approval.
The second way of interpreting this verse is to take Paul’s words at face value and trust in the fact expressed in Rom 8:28. The Christian who takes this view would not participate in a revolution though he might speak out against a government’s evils. He should prepare himself to accept the consequences of his actions. Such was the position of some pastors in Nazi Germany during World War II, for example, who went to prison not for revolting against the government but for speaking out against it. Another alternative might be to flee from the persecution of a hostile government (cf. Mat 10:23). This is what the Huguenots, who fled from France to England, and the Puritans, who fled from England to America, did.
I tend to prefer the second option mainly because I am uncomfortable if I assume that Paul meant something that he did not state. I prefer to accept what he said at face value. In this case the rulers would be a cause of fear for the Christian neither if the rulers were just nor unjust. The Christian would be obedient to God by submitting in either case. The problem with this view is that evil governments do not praise those who oppose them. But in a sense they do. For example, a German pastor whom the Nazis jailed for disobeying the law received the commendation of the rest of the world. The martyrdom of Christians by Nero shortly after Paul wrote Romans was an indirect praise of them for their fidelity to Christ. The evil government may not issue a certificate of commendation to the faithful Christian, but his or her submissive conduct can be the cause of his praise. Even if no other human being ever learned of the martyr’s conduct, God would know about it and would praise him or her.