Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Romans 2:25

For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law: but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision.

25. For circumcision verily profiteth ] With this verse a minor section or paragraph begins. The thought is not in. strict sequence with what has just been said, though in full connexion with the same general subject. “ Profiteth: ” for comment on this word, see Rom 3:1. Circumcision was the gate to ample privileges; above all to the familiar knowledge of the written oracles. But these privileges would finally benefit only the personally pious Jew.

if thou keep the law ] Lit. if thou do the law. The reference, probably, is not to absolute righteousness (q. d., “if thou act with sinless obedience”), but to practical sincere piety, as contrasted with neglectful or wilful disobedience. The emphasis here is on the destructive effect of this latter. In Gal 5:2-3, where a widely different error is combated (not native Jewish pride, but Judaical ritualism creeping back amongst Christians), the Apostle emphasizes as he does not here the vast demands of the covenant of circumcision viewed as terms of justification.

is made uncircumcision ] The benefits of thy circumcision are as if they had not been.

Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges

For circumcision – Joh 7:22 note; Act 7:8 note. This was the special rite by which the relation to the covenant of Abraham was recognised; or by which the right to all the privileges of a member of the Jewish commonwealth was acknowledged. The Jews of course affixed a high importance to the rite.

Verily profiteth – Is truly a benefit; or is an advantage. The meaning is, that their being recognised as members of the Jewish commonwealth, and introduced to the privileges of the Jew, was an advantage; see Rom 3:1-2. The apostle was not disposed to deny that they possessed this advantage, but he tells them why it was a benefit, and how it might fail of conferring any favor.

If thou keep the law – The mere sign can be of no value, The mere fact of being a Jew is not what God requires. It may be a favor to have his Law, but the mere possession of the Law cannot entitle to the favor of God. So it is a privilege to be born in a Christian land; to have had pious parents; to be amidst the ordinances of religion; to be trained in Sundayschools; and to be devoted to God in baptism: for all these are favorable circumstances for salvation. But none of them entitle to the favor of God; and unless they are improved as they should be, they may be only the means of increasing our condemnation; 2Co 2:16.

Thy circumcision is made uncircumcision – Thy circumcision, or thy being called a Jew, is of no value. It will not distinguish you from those who are not circumcised. You will be treated as a pagan. No external advantages, no name, or rite, or ceremony will save you. God requires the obedience of the heart and of the life. Where there is a disposition to render that, there is an advantage in possessing the external means of grace. Where that is missing, no rite or profession can save. This applies with as much force to those who have been baptized in infancy, and to those who have made a profession of religion in a Christian church, as to the Jew.

Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible

Rom 2:25-29

For circumcision verily profiteth if thou keep the law.

Circumcision in relation to baptism

I. Its institution (Gen 17:9). It is called the covenant, and the token of the covenant, which God established with Abraham and his seed. So circumcision was not of mans invention, but of Gods appointment. And baptism is not a ceremony introduced into the Church by the invention of man. Christ said, Go and baptize all nations, etc.

II. The history of the ordinance.

1. It commenced with adults (Gen 17:23). We do not read about the state of mind of all these adults. It is certain that Ishmael differed exceedingly from Isaac and from his father. So baptism was first amongst adults. You remember the instance of Lydia. She having her heart opened, was afterwards baptized, and her house, without any specific mention of the character of the parties composing her household.

2. It continued not amongst adults, but on children (Gen 21:4). And this became a custom in Israel. Korah, Dathan, and Abiram were as truly circumcised as Moses and Aaron; Jeroboam and Ahab as David or Hezekiah. And thus it came to pass, by the continuance of the outward ordinance, not waiting upon the individual character, but taking its rise on the eighth day of the childs age, there came to be an Israel in two senses–spiritual, inclusive of that chosen people that God reserved to Himself; and national, inclusive of the others, together with the mixed multitude which knew not God. And so the apostle tells us, All are not Israel that are of Israel. Now the analogy here again is perfect. Baptism, which commenced with adults, soon proceeded among the children; the children of the baptized converts, were themselves baptized. There is no especial commandment for the purpose. None was needed, because the earliest Christians, who were Jews, regarded their children as entitled to the same privileges as themselves. It would have been strange if Christianity, placing before them greater privileges in every other respect, had restricted them in this. They were in the habit of bringing their children as Jews; to do so as Christians, at the same age, was natural. But if instead of presenting them at eight days old, they were to keep them back till they had formed some judgment of their character, then, indeed, a special commandment would have been required, because they would have been called to change their already established practice. The same consequences would naturally follow which followed in the case of Israel. There would grow up a baptized community, a variety of characters. All would not be Christians which were of Christendom; as all were not Israelites, indeed, who were of Israel in the flesh.

III. The nature of the ordinance and the abuse of it (Rom 4:11).

1. Here faith is distinguished from circumcision. It was enjoyed by Abraham previous to the circumcision; and he received the circumcision–a sign, and declared also to be a seal, to him of the righteousness of the faith which he had before. Nothing less than this could ever have been supposed to belong to circumcision by any believing Israelite. Remembering it was a seal to his father Abraham of the righteousness of faith, he would look upon it as a seal to himself in like manner, and would ask for it as a seal upon his child also, and would give thanks unto God that his infant might be sealed in like manner. He would presently find, indeed, that many have the seal Who grow up without the faith. But would their falling off alter his view of the ordinance of God? No. He would be called to distinguish between the ordinance itself and the abuse of it, into which the nation had fallen; and he would endeavour, amidst all the degeneracy of the people around him, to rise into holy confidence that God would bless His own ordinance, and as he found that faith working within him, he would appeal to that ordinance as a proof of Gods loving kindness to him. Now here the analogy is the same. Baptism was, indeed, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which the first adult Christian had, being yet unbaptized. It does not follow that no persons were baptized except true believers. We know of one who was baptized, and the apostle told him that he had neither part nor lot in the matter. But all who made a profession of faith were baptized. If the answer were the answer of a good conscience, then baptism was all that it was intended to be–a seal to them of the righteousness of the faith which God had given them. But afterwards, when the infants of those believing parents were baptized, it would presently appear that many were baptized in the flesh who lived without God in the world: and the faith of the believer would then be put to a trial. Baptism has been abused, as circumcision was.

2. See, then, how circumcision was abused. It is the nature of the human heart to desire to escape punishment without desiring to avoid sin; and therefore the tendency of man always has been to substitute some form for real religion. The Jews boasted of being the children of Abraham, and placed their confidence in that for escape from punishment. There is nothing that the Scripture is more express against than this resting in outward privileges, as if they could give them safety with God (Mat 3:8-9; Joh 8:33, etc.; Act 7:51; Rom 2:28-29). How awful is the analogy here. With regard to the outward forms of religion, there remains a large class of persons amongst ourselves who place the same sort of bold reliance upon the outward ordinance of baptism that the Jews placed upon their being the children of Abraham. Read from Rom 2:17 in its application to yourselves: most remarkable it is, by the transposition of a few words–changing Jew for Christian and changing circumcision for baptism. Oh, be assured that while circumcision was a seal of the righteousness of Abrahams faith, the baptism which is of the heart is the purifying power of God. (H. McNeill, D. D.)

Religious forms

1. Are intended to promote holy living.

2. If this end be accomplished they are invaluable.

3. If not our very religion becomes irreligion. (J. Lyth, D. D.)

For he is not a Jew that is one outwardly.—

Outward and inward religion

I. Merely outward religion is no true religion at all.

1. The apostle is proving that both Jews and Gentiles are all under sin. He has shown this respecting the Gentiles. He next comes to the Jew, and there is a harder task, for the Jew was so blinded, prejudiced, and self-righteous. There was nothing which the Jew more gloried in than in that of circumcision. God having, as they said, promised Abraham that, if his children transgressed, He would remember their compliance with this ordinance, and deliver them on account of the merit of circumcision. They accounted this one rite equal to the keeping of all the commandments of God. But in this they showed a lamentable ignorance of their own Scriptures (Deu 10:16; Jer 9:25; Jer 4:4). Surely these are sufficiently plain as to the utter outward worthlessness of circumcision. So, with regard to the other rites, when the Jews would substitute them for true religion, then they became an object of aversion to God (Isa 1:13, etc.). What is there in outward rites and practice which, of itself, can be acceptable to God, who is a Spirit. Worship offered to the Divine being must have some correspondence to His nature, and accordance with His will and Word. If God had a body, and were not a Spirit, then a religion of bodily exercise might serve without any regard to the inward state of the worshippers mind and heart. But God has no corporeal form, and therefore bodily service, without spiritual worship, is no worship at all. If, again, God were a stock or a stone, then a religion which exercises neither the mind nor the spirit might satisfy His claim. But when God is a pure Mind, a great Spirit–when God is love, and claims all souls as His, then to attempt to put Him off with outward forms is an insult to His spiritual character and His holy majesty.

2. Are there none of you who have thought that, if you came to church once or twice a week, this alone proved that you were good Christians? And yet it might be that there was only a bodily attendance: your minds might have been at home, or with your business, or with the last pleasure. And so with baptism, which has taken the place of circumcision. The Scripture itself guards us against not resting in the mere outward form or outward rite (1Pe 3:21). And yet many, if baptized with water, never examine themselves as to whether they have also been baptized with the Holy Spirit. And so the spirit of formality can turn even the Lords Supper, which is meant to deepen penitence, and to call forth simple glory in the Cross of Christ, into self-righteous formality and a judaizing ceremony.

II. The absolute necessity of an inward work of Divine grace. For he is a Jew which is one inwardly, etc.

1. This may be learned from the Old Testament. Moses taught (Deu 30:6) that true circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter, a Divine work, inwardly wrought.

2. What was the design of this peculiar rite?

(1) St. Paul says, Abraham received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had, being yet uncircumcised. So, in Gen 17:1-27, God calls it a token of the covenant betwixt Him and Abraham. In that covenant God had engaged to make Abraham a father of many nations; to be a God to him and his seed after him, and in this all blessings are comprehended; and if Abraham had not believed God, he would not have complied with a rite so painful to flesh and blood. Thus, in its very origin, this rite was connected with faith, and if used without faith, it did not answer its original design.

(2) But, again, this rite also denoted that man is by nature, from his very birth, a sinner; that the covenant of grace requires blood to be shed in order to atone for him; that there must be the inward mortification of the body of sin; and that there must be a marked distinction in spirit between the people of God and the children of the world. It especially set forth Christ the Mediator of the covenant who should arise of the seed of Abraham, who should shed His blood in atonement for sin, through whom also should be given the Holy Spirit, who should impart a new nature, a new heart, and should enable men to mortify their sinful lusts, and thus to become a peculiar people, separate from the world indeed, zealous of good works. But all this spiritual meaning was lost where men used only the outward form. Hence the declaration of verses 25-29.

3. To this rite of circumcision our Lord personally submitted. He had not the personal need which others had. It was because He had consented to be made under the law, to be obedient unto the law for men, yea, to shed His blood for the atonement of the sins of men. As He ended, so He began His life, with shedding His sacred blood. Here was part of the vicarious obedience paid by Christ to the law, whence our safety, our peace, our happiness, our salvation.

4. But now, under the gospel, the outward rite is gone with the types of the ceremonial law, but the inward blessing is as important as ever. We are by nature born in sin; we have to look with faith to the blood of the everlasting covenant; we have, through the help of the Holy Spirit, to mortify our members which are on earth; we have to come out of the world. Especially we have to receive Jesus as the Messiah in all His offices, and we are to depend on Christ, in the fulness of His grace, for the help of the Holy Spirit, to regenerate, to mortify, and to sanctify. These things are not less essential to our religion than they were to the Jew; without them our Christianity is nothing worth. Whatever outward things the Christian may do, he will never allow himself to forget the necessity of inward piety. But in his zeal for spiritual religion he need not neglect the few or simple ordinances of religion; but while using all means must trust to Christ only. (J. Hambleton, M. A.)

Church privileges no sign of grace

This point deserveth a lively discovery, because it is the only evidence of most Christians for heaven. And whereas in other things they would judge a title without reality to be a miserable comfort, yet in religion they are strongly contented to have the repute of Christians, baptized persons, professors of Christs doctrine, and yet know not the power of these things, being like a dead corpse with sweet flowers strewed upon it.

1. Therefore to explicate this necessary point, consider some things by way of foundation.

(1) We find it such a sin that generally the people of Israel were guilty of, insomuch that the great contestation between the prophets in the Old Testament and the Israelites living then, between Christ and His apostles and the Jews living then, to have been upon this very particular. No minister, no sermon, could take them off from this, that because they had the external privileges, therefore they did belong to God, and were the children of Abraham.

(2) If you look over all Christianity you shall find this the universal sin, whereby Christ and regeneration with powerful godliness is wholly neglected, and a fleshly carnal confidence in the titles and ordinances of Christianity established.

(3) To demonstrate the connaturality of this sin, observe how ingenious the fleshly minds of men have been by arguments and opinions to encourage a carnal confidence in these externals.

2. While we give this explication, you must by way of caution take heed of two other extremes.

(1) To cry down the very being and use of these external ordinances as being but forms, and the spiritual frame of the heart is made all in all.

(2) We are also deficient when, although we do not cry down forms wholly, yet we give too little to these institutions of Christ.

3. Consider why people are so apt to rest upon these as comfortable testimonies, and there are several reasons.

(1) Because they being duties commanded, when performed, that gives some ease and comfort to a natural conscience.

(2) We are apt to rest in these things because they are easy to be done; whereas the way of mortification is tedious to flesh and blood. Hence it is called crucifying the flesh, and cutting off the right hand, and pulling out the right eye.

(3) Men rest upon these because they are ignorant of the work and necessity of regeneration. The apostle calls circumcision of the heart, circumcision made without hands; and so baptism and the sacraments in the heart, which are not visible in the eyes of the world, make us esteemed before God. Be not, then, idol Christians that have eyes and see not, hearts and understand not the inward virtue and spiritual efficacy of Christ in His ordinances.

(4) They put confidence in them because they are ignorant of the righteousness by faith in Christ.

(5) Men rest on them because they look on these duties as satisfactory and compensatory to God.

(6) Carnal people rely on these because they mistake the nature of them. They look upon them as those things which will of themselves make them acceptable to God, notwithstanding any preparation or spiritual managing of them. Whereas setting aside the Word of God that works the first grace in us, all other duties they are but as garments to the body, which cannot warm a dead body, but if there be life in the body to heat them first, then they will increase the heat. And thus it is here: if there be spiritual life in thee, and thou put it forth in these duties, then these duties will corroborate and strengthen it more. (A. Burgess.)

The having and enjoying such seals is not sign sure enough for our being in the state of grace

1. That they are not may appear in that the Scripture makes it not only possible for such to be damned, but doth foretell even actual damnation, and that to the greater part of such persons.

2. The Scripture reckons the condition of a man with these privileges and one without them in the same condition if there be not holiness. Thus Jeremiah makes the uncircumcised in heart, though circumcised in flesh, all one with the worst of heathens, the Moabites and the Ammonites. And to this purpose, also, the apostle in the verses before, Shall not thy circumcision be accounted uncircumcision if thou keep not the law? So that as long as wickedness is in thy life, thy baptism doth no more advantage thee than the heathens no-baptism.

3. The Scripture goeth higher, and doth not only make them equal with pagans, but God professeth His abomination of all their religious service, and thy wickedness is more noisome than all thy religion is well-pleasing. See Isa 1:1-31, how God expresseth Himself concerning the sacrifices and new moons of the sinful Israelites. He hated them; they were an abomination to Him. It was like cutting off a dogs head. Oh, how contrary are Gods thoughts and thy thoughts about the same religious duties! The prophet Haggai also (Hag 2:1-23) doth by an excellent instance show, that if a man be unclean and sinful, his holy services do not take off from his uncleanness, but his uncleanness defiles them.

4. These are so far from being signs without grace, that they will be aggravations of thy condemnation. As in some countries when their malefactors were to be burnt at the fire, they poured oil and pitch to increase their torment the more, so will every sacrament, every prayer, every church privilege, make hell the hotter for thee. (A. Burgess.)

Outward and inward religion

I. There are some who are only Christians outwardly and others who are also Christians inwardly. This difference appears–

1. In the different characters given those who profess the same faith and true religion (Mat 13:47-48). The tares and the wheat and the goats and the sheep, the wise and the foolish (Mat 25:1-46), are in the Church.

2. In the different effects religion has on the lives of those who are called Christians. There are some whose religion makes them holy, others who have nothing but an idle form (2Ti 3:5). The knowledge of some is confined to their heads, it never gets down to their hearts (Tit 1:16). Others, by reason of their light, dare not venture on an ill thing, more than on a precipice. The pretended religion of others leaves them loose.

3. In the different acceptance which persons prayers get. Some are very pleasing, others God abhors (Pro 28:9; Isa 66:2-3; Isa 1:11).

4. From the different feeling which those have of the advantage of religion, the ordinances and duties thereof. Some are acquainted with the gain of religion, and, from their own experience, can give a solid reason why they follow it (1Ti 6:6). But unto others all these things are but as empty husks (Pro 14:10). They abide in the outer court of religion all their days.

5. In the different effects of the religion which those profess. Grace is of a growing nature (Pro 4:18). And the longer that saints have a standing in religion they will be the more firmly rooted (Psa 92:13-14; Pro 26:14). But others think they are right, and they seek no farther, and some, instead of growing better, grow worse and worse (Rev 3:16).

6. In the different passage which those have out of time into eternity. Death is the point at which we all meet; but it is the point where outside and inside Christians part forever (Psa 37:37-38).

II. The causes of this difference.

1. The different way that persons come by their religion. There is a difference–

(1) In the weight which their entering on their religion had on their spirits. Some come very lightly by their religion; hence it sits lightly upon them, and often goes as lightly from them. They venture upon building a tower without counting the cost. To others it is not so easy, but they are brought to the utmost seriousness in the matter (Luk 14:28-29); hence they go to the bottom of the matter, while others satisfy themselves with superficial work.

(2) In the depth of their conviction and humiliation (Luk 6:48-49). The plough of conviction lightly going over the fallow ground of the heart is sufficient to make an outside Christian (Mat 13:5; Mat 13:20). But it must be carried deeper to make an inside Christian, even to the root of the most inward beloved lust, and to the discovery of Christ for sanctification, as well as justification.

(3) In the issue of their exercises about their souls case. In the one they have issued in the change of their nature (Eze 36:26); but in the other, whatever stir has been made in the affections, the stony heart has remained untaken away (Mat 13:5).

2. The different ways in which professors follow religion.

(1) Some make religion their main business (Gen 5:24). And this makes an inside Christian (Psa 119:6). Others make religion but a bye-work; their main business is of another kind. In regard to the one, all things else about him bow to his religion; whereas, as to the other, he makes his religion bow to his other designs.

(2) They follow religion from different principles, motives, and ends.

(a) Some follow it from a natural conscience. Fear of punishment, or hope of reward, are powerful enough to make an outward Christian. But an inside Christian has a gracious principle of love to God and holiness implanted in him which incline him unto holiness.

(b) Some aim at approving themselves to men in their religion (Mat 6:2), and others study to approve themselves to God (2Co 5:9).

III. What is the outside and letter of religion which only makes an outside Christian and what is the inside and spirit of it which makes a Christian?

1. The outside of religion is that part of it which lies open to the view of the world by which men form their estimate, not God (1Sa 16:7). It comprehends all Church privileges, duties, and attainments lying open to the view of men.

2. The letter of religion is that part of it which is agreeable to the letter of the law, whether in externals or internals. And it comprehends not only the outside, but internal dispositions and attainments as to the matter of them; for example, Judass sorrow for sin, the stony grounds joy at receiving the seed of the Word, and the hypocrites delight in approaching God (Isa 58:1-14).

3. The inside of religion is that part of it which is open to the all-seeing eye of God (Mat 6:4).

4. The spirit or spirituality of religion is the eternal grace joined to the external performance (Joh 4:24; 1Ti 1:5).

IV. Not the former, but the latter, sort of religion marks a true Christian. This is evident if we consider–

1. That there is nothing in the outside or letter of religion but what man may reach in an unregenerate state, in which no man can ever please God (Rom 3:8).

2. That the outside and letter of religion may be without any true love to God in the heart, which yet is the substance of practical holiness and the comprehensive duty of the whole law (Eze 33:31).

3. That the outside and letter of religion may consist with the reign of sin in the heart (2Ti 3:5).

4. That men are in religion only what they are before God, not what they are before men (Gen 17:1). (T. Boston, D. D.)

Outward and inward religion

Though the apostle here addresses Jews, yet his words concern us. Change Jew into Christian, and circumcision into baptism, and those outward duties and privileges which we set so high a value upon, and the text will fit us. As they believed themselves secure of Gods favour, merely because they had all the external characters of Judaism upon them, so do we, too, often presume upon an outward Christianity. Note–

I. The parallel between outward Judaism and outward Christianity.

1. The Jews place their confidence in being the seed of Abraham, being circumcised, and having the true religion and worship of God among them, and consequently despised all the world besides, and thought that therefore they should certainly be saved, let them lead what lives they would. It is this notion that the Baptist tacitly reproves in Mat 3:8-9. But many among us build upon no better a foundation. What great difference is there between being natural-born Jews and being born of Christian parents? between an outward circumcision and an outward baptism? between an external profession of the law of God given by Moses and an external profession of the gospel of Christ? And yet are there not too many of us that hope to be saved merely on account of these things? Far am I from undervaluing these privileges, but to rest upon them alone is just the folly of a man, that, being born to a good estate, riotously spends it all, and yet thinks to die rich. Baptism and the profession of a holy religion are unspeakable blessings; but they were granted us that we might be obliged to forsake the devil and all his works, and follow the example of our Lord. If we do not make use of our baptism and profession, they will signify nothing to us.

2. The Jews boasted in being skilful in the knowledge of their law (verses 19, 20), and the more they excelled in this the better Jews they took themselves to be, and the more acceptable to God, and the more they despised their inferiors in this knowledge (Joh 7:49). Hence, instead of practising the law their study was taken up in speculations about it. And are there not some now that make Christianity little more than a mere speculation, or a set of orthodox opinions? And too many, who read the Word of God, but with no intent to better their lives, but merely for the confirmation of some notion they have taken up? Others study Scripture merely for the sake of its language, which they so wretchedly misapply that it is little better than jargon and cant. With some of these, to be a good Christian is to be able to dispute about articles of faith. With others of them, Christianity is but talking warmly in Scripture phrase about matters they never troubled to understand–such regard with contempt those plain simple Christians that heartily believe their creed, and endeavour to serve God, but yet trouble not about points of speculation. This is the worst representation of Christianity that can be (Rom 2:13; Joh 13:17; Joh 2:3-4).

3. The Jews had an extraordinary zeal for things indifferent, and not commanded of God (Mar 7:7-9). What a stir did they make about their phylacteries, which they were abundantly more careful to have tied on their heads than to have the law of God written upon their hearts. What conscience did they make of cleansing cups and platters, etc. (Mat 15:1; Mar 7:2). We who know better are apt to deride these superstitions; but are not many of us as foolish? Is it not as great piece of superstition to make it a matter of conscience to forbear the use of an indifferent thing when God hath not forbid the use of it, as it is to make it a matter of conscience to use an indifferent thing when God hath not commanded it? And those who think to recommend themselves to God merely by a conformity to the forms prescribed in the worship of God, without any inward devotion, are as much devoid of the life of God as any I have now represented.

4. The Jews showed a greater zeal for rituals than for the moral duties of the law (Mat 23:23; Mat 6:5; Luk 18:12; Mat 15:8). Now, consider whether we also do not frequently thus play the Jews with God. Hath not the world experience of some who would not, for any consideration, swear an oath, that yet will make no scruple of using very indirect arts for the promoting their own interests? These are those who are very strict in keeping the Lords day; but yet they are not so strict in keeping faith and trust, and preserving their minds from worldliness and sensuality.

II. The characteristics of inward religion.

1. The inward Jew is one who is an Israelite indeed (Joh 1:47). A true disciple of Christ is one who is so far from vaunting himself in the outward privileges he enjoys, that he draws from hence an argument of working out his salvation with greater fear and trembling, knowing that the greater advantages he enjoys above others involve him in greater obligations to outstrip them in holiness.

2. He is one that hath quitted his mind of all its sinful prejudices, so that he is always prepared to receive any truth of God, though conveyed to him by mean instruments, and though never so disagreeable.

3. He is one that gives every duty its due and just place in his esteem, preferring inward acts of piety, and so ordering his devotions towards God that they promote the duties he owes to his neighbour.

4. He is one who endeavours to yield a universal obedience to the laws of God, not picking and choosing those that are easiest and least repugnant.

5. He seeks not the praise of men, but hath a mighty care to approve himself to God.

6. He is one that, when he hath done all, is yet humble, not pretending to merit anything at the hand of God (Luk 17:10; Psa 115:1). (Abp. Sharp.)

Outward and inward religion

Would the washing of the windows of a house make the inhabitants thereof clean? Yea, does the painting and ornamenting of the exterior of a mansion make the dwellers in it healthier or holier men? We read of devils entering into a clean-swept and garnished house, and the last end of that man was worse than the first. All the outward cleansing is but the gilding of the bars of the cage full of unclean birds; the whitewashing of sepulchres full of rottenness and dead mens bones. Washing the outside of a box will leave all the clothes inside as foul as ever. Remember, therefore, that all that you can do in the way of outward religion is nothing but the sacrifice of the fat of rams, and to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams. (C. H. Spurgeon.)

Outward and inward religion

The Egyptian temples were very beautiful on the outside, but within you shall find nothing but some serpent or crocodile. (M. Mede.)

Artificial religion

When Archdeacon Hare first visited Rome, some of his Protestant friends, it is said, who knew his love of art, and the personal sympathy which he had with the Eternal City, trembled for the effect it might produce upon his mind. These fears were groundless. Rome was all, and more than all, he had imagined. But the splendid vision left him a stronger Protestant than it found him. I saw the Pope, he used to say, apparently kneeling in prayer for mankind; but the legs that kneeled were artificial–he was in his chair. That sight was enough to counteract all the aesthetical impressions of the worship, if they had been a hundred times stronger than they were. Thus it is with all mere ritualism and other formalism–the legs which kneel are artificial.

The mere routine of religion

Richard Knill notes in his journal the following amusing incident of the force of habit, as exemplified in his horse. Mr. and Mrs. Loveless would have me live with them, but they charged me very little for my board, whereby I was enabled, with my salary, to support seven native schools. These were so situated that I could visit them all in one day. My horse and gig were seen constantly on the rounds, and my horse at last knew where to stop as well as I did, This nearly cost a Bengal officer his life. Captain Page, a godly man, who was staying with us until a ship was ready to take him to the Cape, one morning requested me to lend him my horse and gig to take him to the city. The captain was driving officer-like, when the horse stopped suddenly, and nearly threw him out. He inquired, What place is this? The answer was, Its the Sailors Hospital. They started again, and soon the horse stopped suddenly, and the captain was nearly out as before. Whats this? A school, sir, was the reply. At last he finished his business, and resolved to return another way. By doing this he came near my schools, and again and again the horse stopped. When he got home, he said, I am glad that I have returned without broken bones, but never will I drive a religious horse again. Persons who go to places of worship from mere habit, and without entering into the devotions of the service, may here see that their religion is only such as a horse may possess, and a horses religion will never save a man. (C. H. Spurgeon.)

The true Christian described; the hypocrite detected

I. He is not a true Christian who only bears the visible badges of Christianity, but he who, with the visible badges, also partakes of the invisible grace (Mar 16:16).

1. One may be baptized in the name of Christ, and yet be even at the last only an outside Christian (as in our text, and Act 8:13; Act 8:21). But he is a true Christian who has the invisible grace signified by baptism. See the difference in this (Mat 3:11, and 1Pe 3:21).

2. Persons may be admitted to the Lords table, and yet not be true Christians. They may be admitted to an external partaking of the childrens bread, and yet be but dogs in the sight of the heart-searching God (Luk 12:26; Mat 22:13). But he is a true Christian who is admitted to communion with God in that ordinance (Son 5:1; Joh 6:57). The one is held in the outer court, the other is admitted into the inner, and is there feasted.

II. He is not a true Christian whose outward man only is cleansed from the pollutions of the world, but he whose inward man is also cleansed. Saving grace penetrates to the inside (Psa 24:3-4; Luk 23:11; 1Co 6:9-10). A blameless life in the world, though good in itself, yet comes not the length of true Christianity.

1. There are several things that may in some measure cleanse the conversation from gross pollutions.

(1) Good education and company, as in the case of Joash under the tutorage of Jehoiada. This may chain mens lusts, though it cannot change their nature.

(2) A good natural temper and disposition. But no man is born a true Christian, as he is with his natural temper; religion is a supernatural temper (2Pe 1:4).

(3) Their being kept out of the way of temptation. The outward cleanness of many is owing more to circumstances than to any gracious disposition. Many have kept right as long as they were not tried, but so soon as the trial comes they give way.

(4) The workings of a natural conscience under a rousing ministry (Mar 6:20).

(5) Self-love, fear of punishment, and hope of reward, are powerful incentives, where Gods authority is but little valued (Mat 6:2; Eze 8:12).

2. But the true Christian has this cleanness of the outward conversation, and goes farther.

(1) He joins internal purity to external (Psa 24:4; Mat 5:8; Gal 5:24).

(2) Even his external purity is from religious motives, springs, and principles (Gen 39:9).

III. He is not the true Christian who only performs the duties of external obedience, but he who also with them joins the duties of internal obedience.

(1) A man may perform the external duties of morality towards his neighbour, and yet be no more than an outward Christian. He may be just in his dealings with men (Luk 18:11), and be liberal towards the needy (1Co 13:3). True Christianity makes a good neighbour; but when a man is nothing else he is but half, and hardly half, a true Christian.

(2) A man may perform the outward duties of piety towards God, yet after all be but an outside Christian.

(a) Persons may be very punctual in their attendance at public ordinances, and behave themselves gravely and attentively (Isa 58:2; Eze 33:1-33; Eze 31:1-18), and be at much pains in following ordinances from place to place (Joh 6:24; Joh 6:26), and talk well of what they hear (1Co 13:1), and after all be but outside Christians.

(b) They may be praying persons, and so carry religion into their families, and into their closets (Jer 12:2; Heb 12:17).

(c) They may also be sufferers for religion (1Co 13:3). Hypocrisy is such a salamander as can live in the fire of persecution; and many whom the violent wind of persecution has not been able to drive off the Lords way, the warm sun of prosperity has done their business.

(3) They may join both the outward of the first and second tables, and yet be but outside Christians (Luk 18:12; Php 3:6). All this may be, and yet not beyond the boundaries of Pharisaical righteousness (Mat 5:20).

2. The inside exceeds the outside Christian.

(1) He performs the duties of evangelical obedience, in subjecting his whole heart and soul to the Lord, as well as the outward man (Joh 4:23; Php 3:3; Gal 5:24).

(2) He is unreserved and universal in his obedience, which the outside Christian never is.

(3) His obedience is son-like, the other is servile and slavish. The highest principle with the hypocrite is fear of punishment, and hope of reward (Hos 10:11), their highest end is themselves (Hos 10:1). Jehu professed zeal for the Lord, but in effect it was but zeal for a kingdom. The inside Christian serves God as a son does his father. Prompted by love to Him, and aiming at His honour (1Co 10:31).

IV. He is not a true Christian who has inside religion only in the letter of it, but he who also has it in its spirituality.

1. A man may carry his religion into internals, and yet be but a Christian in the letter. He may do and have that in religion which no eye but God sees or can see, and yet be no true Christian (Jer 17:9-10; Jer 3:10).

(1) A natural conscience may cheek for sins that no eye sees but Gods (Rom 2:15).

(2) An unsanctified desire of salvation, in the way of the covenant of works, may carry a man to the internals in religion (Rom 10:3). Observe the case of the young man in Mat 19:16-20.

(3) Light may be strong, and kept strong by the common operations of the Holy Spirit, in an unholy heart. Thus, Balaam durst not entertain a thought of cursing Israel; though he would fain have gained the wages of unrighteousness.

2. The true Christian has inside religion, not in the letter only, but in the spirituality thereof (Php 3:3), which consists–

(1) In the graciousness of the principle (1Ti 1:5). Their inward religion is the fruit of their new nature; it is natural, and not forced by terrors or necessity.

(2) In the holiness of their aim (Col 1:10). (T. Boston, D. D.)

But he is a Jew which is one inwardly.

A Jew in the true sense

A man may be born an Englishman or become naturalised, and yet be un-English in his thoughts and habits and character, and disloyal in his conduct; while a foreigner may be English in his sympathies and behaviour, and deeply attached to the crown. Which of the twain is the true Englishman? Which of the twain would be the most acceptable to the Sovereign? The former represents the case of the unfaithful Jew, while the latter that of the believing Gentile. (C. Neil, M. A.)

Profession and reality

If the idea we have of a philosopher and his profession were merely to wear a cloak and a long chain, those who do so may be entitled to the name; but if it be rather to keep himself free from faults, why are not those who do not fulfil the profession deprived of the title? When we see one handle an axe awkwardly we say, This man is no carpenter; and when we hear one sing badly we say, This fellow is no musician; so shall it be with philosophers who act contrary to their profession. (Epictetus.)

Literal and spiritual obedience

There are two kinds of obedience to law–the literal and the spiritual. The former depends upon specific directions; it is doing just as much as is in the letter, and because it is in the letter. This obedience is merely outward and mechanical; it is in the knee, tongue, or head, but not in the heart. It is always a burden. This was the observance of the Jews. The other is spiritual. Supreme love to the Lawgiver is the motive and inspiration. This is happiness. There are two sons, children of the same father, living under the same roof, subject to the same domestic laws; one has lost all filial love, his father has no longer any hold upon his affections. The other is full of the sentiment; the filial instinct in him is almost passion. How different is the obedience of these two sons! The one does nothing but what is found in the command, and does that merely as a matter of form; he would not do it if he could help it. The other does it not because it is in the command, but because it is the wish of him he loves. He goes beyond the written law; he anticipates his fathers will. Obedience is burden in the one case, but delight in the other. (H. Allon, D. D.)

Spiritual Judaism

To be a Jew in the proper sense was a high privilege indeed. It was to bear the highest style of man. St. Paul could give no sadder state of the unevangelised Gentiles than that they were aliens from the commonwealth of Israel. On the road to Damascus he had beheld the True Jew. This was the Messiah Himself, the only type and model henceforth of a Jew. Sauls zeal for Judaism was not diminished but rather increased by the heavenly vision. Yet it took a wholly new direction from the fundamental change in his conception of what Judaism was. True Judaism has three characteristics:–

1. It is not a thing of mere observances, but a hidden life, a sanctification of the affections, right direction of the will, a regal power which holds all inferior faculties in subjection, which mortifies all worldly and carnal lusts, and is in all things obedient to Gods blessed will.

2. It is spiritual, not a literal Judaism, not in bondage to statutes and rules, but taking the principle of the law, which being written on the heart, the Lawgivers intention is carried out in life. It is an energy which goes beyond the rules of justice to the unconstrained works of reverence, love, and pity.

3. And then, just because it is thus hidden and spiritual, the being and the beauty of it are manifest to God rather than man. Let us come to our Great High Priest for this circumcision of the heart. (Homilist.)

Inward religion is found in

I. The state of the understanding. The eyes of your understanding being enlightened. It is in this faculty that the work of grace commences, in order to bring into a right state this leading power by which all the rest are governed. If we are Christians inwardly, then our understandings will be so enlightened as that all the truths of God essential for us to know shall be so clearly discerned as to exercise an influence as powerful as their importance demands. Hero is the great cause of error in those who fancy they have already acquired a right knowledge of the truth because they have been instructed in the Christian theory. They rest in the knowledge of some general propositions; and this is perfectly consistent with complete spiritual blindness. Christ prayed for His disciples, Sanctify them through Thy truth: Thy word is truth. The truth of God, when apprehended by the understanding in the light of the Holy Spirit, exerts its own sanctifying influence on the soul.

II. In the state of the judgment. And this I pray, said the apostle (Php 1:9-10), i.e., that we may come to such conclusions in our judgment respecting the truth which our understanding has admitted as shall render our knowledge of the truth practical. What is faith, in fact, intellectually considered, but an expression of our judgments on Divine truth? What is the faith of credit but the expression of our judgment on the credibility of that which we believe? And what is the faith of trust and reliance which justifies but the expression of our judgment that the great truths of Christianity are worthy of being admitted into our spirit, and rested and acted upon? It is here that we find a great difference between outward and inward Christians. The judgment of the former respecting Divine things seldom, if ever, amounts to more than a general belief of their truth. But he who possesses inward religion has been brought to this serious judgment, that he must be born again, or he cannot enter the kingdom of God; that Christ must be received, and His atonement embraced personally; that he must yield obedience to His laws. And thus it is that the state of our religion is, to a great extent, regulated by the state of our judgment in Divine things. If this judgment is weak and feeble there is little effect produced. If it is strong, and the truth of God form the continual basis of our judgment, there will be a decision of mind which operates as a principle, and rapidly becomes a habit.

III. In the state of the will. When this is right, it will be clearly manifested in–

1. Submission to the Divine authority–i.e., a full acknowledgment that we belong to Christ, and have no right to ourselves. When we are brought to this state, everything that God has fixed as the object of our choice will be accepted by us readily, constantly, and fully.

2. Acquiescence in all the dispensations of Providence, even in the infliction of pain and trouble. Inward religion always brings us to imitate Him who said, Nevertheless not as I will, but as Thou wilt.

IV. In the state of our principles. All are men of principle, some way or other. Sometimes the principles may be right, sometimes wrong. It is only he who is a Christian inwardly that has a principle capable of universal reference, and thus of uniform operation. The grand principle on which the men of the world act is to live to themselves. The blindness of their understanding conceals from them those true and holy principles which ought to govern their feelings and life. If we are Christians inwardly, new principles are fixed in our heart and are operating there; and they all resolve themselves into this: We are not our own; we are bought with a price, etc. And how easy of application this is! What a universal rule it affords for the government of all our actions! If this great principle entirely governs us, it is impossible for us to be practically wrong.

V. In the state of the feelings. There are some who deny that feeling forms any essential part of religion. They might as well say, either that man has no feelings, or that there is one faculty of the mind which religion does not control. We do not say that these deep emotions are always visibly expressed, but wherever there is true piety there will be strong feelings. Look at man as God has made him, and then say if it would not be strange if the great things of eternity could be set before him, and cordially believed by him, without producing lively and constant emotion. Whatever danger may be ascribed to religious emotions, the real danger will be found to be, not so much in the emotion itself, as in the opinions and principles by which it is directed. The feelings that arise from right principles and opinions will seldom be wrong. Conclusion: As an inference from this passage, I would say–

1. That those external things which do not promote this state of mind are, as to us, whatever they may be to others, of no value at all (verse 25). No person derives benefit merely from having heard the name of Christ, by being acquainted with the doctrines of Christianity. This doctrine of the difference between a merely outward religion, and one which is enthroned in the heart and reigns over the whole man, separates the chaff from the wheat, and ought to lead to the inquiry, in what manner we are affected by our external privileges.

2. Let not those be discouraged who find that their understandings, judgments, will, principles, and feeling are not yet exactly in the state that has been described, if they are penitently and earnestly seeking inward religion. God will not break the bruised reed, nor quench the smoking flax.

3. When we thus bring our character and experience to the test of Gods holy Word, there is an impression which may almost naturally be made on our mind. We may think these requisitions of Almighty God to be somewhat severe and rigorous. But let us correct ourselves. He requires all this of us, not only as He is our Judge, but as He is our Saviour. (R. Watson.)

Inward religion its own evidence

A Roman Catholic priest, a Protestant minister, a farmer, and an atheist were in a railway carriage together. The atheist commenced the conversation by asking the priest this question, What, in your opinion, is sufficient proof of the truth of the Christianity which you profess to believe and teach? The priest began to talk of councils, of the traditions of the Church, and so on; but the atheist had been all over that ground before, and soon replied to the arguments advanced. He then turned to the Protestant minister and asked the same question. The minister talked of external evidences, of internal evidences, of collateral evidences, and so forth; but the infidel had also considered all these arguments, and had his answer ready. The minister then referred the atheist to the old farmer, whom he happened to know. The farmers indignation had been welling up for a considerable time at hearing his Lord and Master reviled, and when the atheist said, with a contemptuous air, Well, my man, what in your opinion is sufficient proof of the truth of the Christianity you profess to believe? the farmer answered earnestly, Sir, I feel it! The atheist was surprised at the reply, and said, Gentlemen, I cant answer that! (Gervase Smith, D. D.)

And circumcision is that of the heart.—

The circumcision of the heart

In general it is that habitual disposition of the soul which is termed holiness, and which consists in being cleansed from sin and being endued with those virtues which were in Christ. To be more particular, it implies–

I. Humility. Humility, a right judgment of ourselves, cleanses our minds from those high conceits of our abilities and attainments which are the fruit of a corrupted nature. It convinces us that in our best estate we are of ourselves sin and vanity; that we are insufficient to help ourselves; that without the help of the Spirit of God we can do nothing but add sin to sin; that it is He alone who works in us to will or do that which is good. A sure effect of having formed this right judgment will be a disregard of the honour that cometh of men.

II. This knowledge of our disease disposes us to embrace with a willing mind that faith which alone is able to make us whole. The best guide of the blind, the surest light of those who sit in darkness, the most perfect instructor of the foolish, is faith. But it is such a faith as is mighty to the overturning of all the prejudices of corrupt reason, all false maxims and evil customs and habits. All things are possible to him who thus believeth. The eyes of his understanding being enlightened he sees what is his calling, viz., to glorify God who hath bought him with a price. He feels what is the exceeding greatness of His power who is able to quicken the dead in sin. This faith is not only an assent to all, even the most important, truths of Scripture, but the conviction of Christs personal love who gave Himself for me. Such a faith cannot fail to show evidently the power of Him who inspires it, by delivering His children from the yoke of sin, and purging their consciences from dead works.

III. Those who are thus by faith born of God have also strong consolation through hope–even the testimony of their own spirit with the Spirit which witnesses in their hearts that they are the children of God. It is that Spirit who works in them that clear and cheerful confidence that their heart is upright toward God; who gives them the expectation of receiving all good things at Christs hand; who assures them that their labour is not in vain.

IV. Yet lackest thou one thing. If thou writ be perfect add to all these love, and thou hast the circumcision of the heart. Love is the fulfilling of the law, the end of the commandment.

1. To God.

2. To our neighbour.

3. To our brethren in Christ. (J. Wesley, M. A.)

Circumcision of the heart essential

It is not merely true that your sabbaths and sacraments may be as useless to you as the rite of circumcision ever was to the Jews; that the whole ceremonial of Christianity may be duly and regularly described on your part, without praise or without acceptance on the part of God; that worship may be held every day in your own houses, and your families be mustered at every recurring opportunity to close and unfailing attendance on the house of God. But it is also true that all the moral honesties of life may be rendered, and yet one thing may be lacking. The circumcision of the heart may be that which you have no part in. All its longings may be towards the affairs and the enjoyments and the interests of mortality. Your taste is not to what is sordid, but to what is splendid in character; but still it is but an earthly and a perishable splendour. Your very virtues are but the virtues of the world. They have not upon them the impress of that saintliness which will bear to be transplanted into heaven. The present and the peopled region of sense on which you expatiate, you deck, it is true, with the lustre of many fine accomplishments; but they have neither the stamp nor the endurance of eternity. And, difficult as it was to convict the Hebrew of sin, robed in the sanctities of a revered and imposing ceremonial, it is at least a task of as great strenuousness to lay the humiliation of the gospel spirit upon him, who lives surrounded by the smiles and the applauses of society–or so to awaken the blindness, and circumcise the vanity of his heart, as to bring him down a humble supplicant at the footstool of mercy. What turns the virtues of earth into splendid sins is that nothing of God is there. It is the want of this animating breath which impresses upon them all the worthlessness of materialism. It is this which makes all the native loveliness of our moral world of as little account, in the pure and spiritual reckoning of the upper sanctuary, as is a mere efflorescence of beauty on the face of the vegetable creation. It serves to adorn and even to sustain the interests of a fleeting generation. Verily it hath its reward. But not till, under a sense of nothingness and of guilt, man hies him to the Cross of expiation; not till, in the attitude of one whose breast is humbled out of all its proud complacencies, he receives the atonement of the gospel, and along with it receives a clean heart and a right spirit from the hand of his accepted Mediator; it is not till the period of such a transformation, when he is made the workmanship of God in Christ Jesus, that the true image of moral excellence which was obliterated from our species at the fall, comes to be restored to him, or that he is put in the way of attaining a resemblance to his Maker in righteousness and in true holiness. (T. Chalmers, D. D.)

Whose praise is not of men, but of God.–

The praise of true religion

The love of praise is a natural passion. We see it in children, young people, and adults. Its highest earthly form is ambition, or the love of fame. Among other things men praise religion; but that which the world commends is only an outward religion, one that can be seen, is profuse and sanctimonious in pious exercises, or which is charitable to the poor. True religion is abhorrent to the world.

I. Men do not praise it.

1. They have a difficulty in understanding it. It consists so much of feelings and experiences with which they have no sympathy.

2. They fail to appreciate what they cannot understand. Surely it is enough to do good, and harm nobody, and there can be no need for so much praying, crying, and love.

3. They make its possession no standard of worth. Their heroes are of quite another order. If they should admire a philanthropist, it will be because they view his public usefulness quite apart from his spiritual principles.

4. They often bitterly hate and persecute it.

II. Its praise is of God.

1. Why does He commend it? Because–

(1) Of its intrinsic excellence. There is an inherent worth about humility, goodness, devotedness to God, self surrender to Him, the entire circumcision of the heart.

(2) It is the produce of His own grace and power. Wherever spiritual religion exists it has been imparted supernaturally by the power of the Holy Ghost.

(3) It reflects His own image and character. God must approve Himself, and therefore He must admire all that resembles Himself.

2. How does He show it?

(1) By the inward witness of His Spirit; giving to the humble and happy soul a sweet and secret sense of His approval.

(2) By outward tokens of success and prosperity, as in the history of Abraham, Moses, David, and Daniel.

(3) Hereafter by open acknowledgment of His own elect in the day of judgment. Conclusion: The love of praise will influence you, among other motives, in matters of religion. Will you, then, seek to please men or God? If you please men, you must displease God; and what will their commendation and applause do for you in the article of death, or in the hour of judgment? Therefore–

1. Seek only to please God.

2. Be satisfied with His approval.

3. Thus overcome the worldly lust of fame.

4. And enjoy perfect peace.

5. And show yourself a pattern of high and genuine heroism. (T. G. Horton.)

.

Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell

Verse 25. For circumcision verily profiteth] It is a blessing to belong to the Church of God and wear the sign of the covenant, provided the terms of the covenant are complied with.

But if thou be a breaker of the law] If thou do not observe the conditions of the covenant, the outward sign is both without meaning and without effect. This was a maxim of the rabbins themselves; for they allowed that an apostate or ungodly Israelite must go to hell, notwithstanding his circumcision.

Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible

The Jews might object: If the former privileges availed not to righteousness and salvation, yet circumcision at least might stand them in some stead. In answer whereunto you have,

1. A concession; circumcision indeed is profitable.

2. A limitation; if thou keep the law; which is illustrated by a large antithesis, Rom 2:26,27.

3. A distinction; circumcision is of two sorts, outward and literal; inward and spiritual; the latter stands in force, and hath acceptation with God, Rom 2:28,29.

If thou keep the law; if thou keep it perfectly, to which circumcision obligeth, Gal 5:3; or if thou use thy utmost care and endeavour so to do.

But if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision; i.e. if otherwise thou transgress the law, thy circumcision avails thee nothing, it gives thee no privilege above the uncircumcised. A wicked Jew is to God as an Ethiopian, Amo 9:7. The apostle corrects the carnal confidence and hypocrisy of the Jews, who valued themselves upon the account of this outward ceremony, and thought it sufficient to be circumcised in the flesh. Some think the apostle hath respect in these words to the time of the law, whilst circumcision was an ordinary sacrament of the covenant; then indeed it was profitable and available; but now, in the times of the gospel, it is abrogated: see Gal 5:2,6.

Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole

25-29. For circumcisionthatis, One’s being within the covenant of which circumcision was theoutward sign and seal.

verily profiteth, if thoukeep the lawif the inward reality correspond to the outwardsign.

but if, &c.thatis, “Otherwise, thou art no better than the uncircumcisedheathen.”

Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible

For circumcision verily profiteth,…. The plea from circumcision in favour of the Jews, and their acceptance with God, and justification before him, is here, and in the following verses, considered. The apostle allows that circumcision was profitable; which must be understood whilst it was in force, before the abrogation of it, for since, it is not profitable but pernicious; and then it was only profitable, in case the law was kept:

if thou keepest the law; that is, perfectly; for circumcision obliged persons to keep the whole law. Now the circumcised Jews did not keep it in such sense; wherefore circumcision was of no use to them, but, on the contrary, was an handwriting against them.

But if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision; that is, it is not accounted circumcision; it is of no avail; such a man was all one as an uncircumcised Gentile, and appeared to be uncircumcised in a spiritual sense: the apostle perhaps alludes to a practice among some of the Jews, to bring on and draw over the foreskin, after they had been circumcised; [See comments on 1Co 7:18].

Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible

If thou be a doer of the law ( ). Condition of third class and the present (continued action) subjunctive of , a verb meaning to do as a habit.

Is become uncircumcision ( ). The Jew is then like the Gentile, with no privilege at all. Circumcision was simply the seal of the covenant relation of Israel with God.

Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament

Breaker of the law [] . Rev., transgressor. See on Jas 2:11.

Thy circumcision is made uncircumcision. “But if any citizen be found guilty of any great or unmentionable wrong, either in relation to the gods, or his parents, or the state, let the judge deem him to be incurable, remembering what an education and training he has had from youth upward, and yet has not abstained from the greatest of crimes” (Plato, “Laws,” 854).

Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament

1) For circumcision verily profiteth, (peritome men gar opheilei) For indeed circumcision profits, It gave assurance and advantage to the circumcised and uncircumcised that he was a member of the race which was heir of Gods land-grant promises.

2) If thou keep the law, (ean nomon prasses) if thou practice (the) law, to which you are honor-bound as Jews by covenant relation; Gal 5:3. In this covenant they were debtors or under obligation to the law to keep and guard it, else they would be judged as a nation.

3) But if thou be a breaker of the law, (ean de para Bates nomou es) But if thou art a transgressor (breaker) of (the) Law, a person or people who does or do not abide by the moral and ethical precepts set forth in the law, and they were Rom 3:19; Rom 3:23.

4) Thy circumcision is made uncircumcision, (he peritome sou akrobustia gegonen) Your circumcision has become (as) uncircumcision, or you are to be Divinely judged as an uncircumcised person, as one who needs repentance, pardon, cleansing, and freedom from condemnation of law-breaking. The keeping of the law was a condition to national and personal blessings from God, never a condition to redemption or salvation of the soul from death. It was designed thru its religious worship and sacrifices to point men to Christ who would through their personal faith exercised remit their sins, Gal 3:19; Gal 3:22-26.

Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary

25. For circumcision indeed profits, etc. He dissipates by anticipation what the Jews might have objected in opposition to him in the defense of their own cause: for since circumcision was a symbol of the Lord’s covenant, by which he had chosen Abraham and his seed as his peculiar people, they seemed not to have gloried in vain; but as they neglected what the sign signified, and regarded only the outward form, he gives this answer — That they had no reason to lay claim to any thing on account of the bare sign. The true character of circumcision was a spiritual promise, which required faith: the Jews neglected both, the promise as well as faith. Then foolish was their confidence. Hence it is, that he omits to state here the main use of circumcision, and proceeds to expose their gross error, as he does in his Epistle to the Galatians. And this ought to be carefully noticed; for if he were explaining the whole character and design of circumcision, it would have been inconsistent in him not to have made mention of grace and free promise: but in both instances he spoke according to what the subject he had in hand required, and therefore he only discussed that part which was controverted.

They thought that circumcision was of itself sufficient for the purpose of obtaining righteousness. Hence, speaking according to such an opinion, he gives this reply — That if this benefit be expected from circumcision, it is on this condition, that he who is circumcised, must serve God wholly and perfectly. Circumcision then requires perfection. The same may be also said of our baptism: when any one confidently relies on the water of baptism alone, and thinks that he is justified, as though he had obtained holiness by that ordinance itself, the end of baptism must be adduced as an objection; which is, that the Lord thereby calls us to holiness of life: the grace and promise, which baptism testifies ( testificatur ) and seals, ( obsignat ,) need not in this case to be mentioned; for our business is with those who, being satisfied with the empty shadow of baptism, care not for nor consider what is material ( solidum — substantial) in it. And this very thing you may observe in Paul — that when he speaks to the faithful of signs, apart from controversy, he connects them with the efficacy and fulfillment of the promises which belong to them; but when he contends with the absurd and unskillful interpreters of signs, he omits all mention of the proper and true character of signs, and directs his whole discourse against their perverted interpretation.

Now many, seeing that Paul brings forward circumcision rather than any other part of the law, suppose that he takes away justification only from ceremonies: but the matter is far otherwise; for it always happens, that those who dare to set up their own merits against the righteousness of God, glory more in outward observances than in real goodness; for no one, who is seriously touched and moved by the fear of God, will ever dare to raise up his eyes to heaven, since the more he strives after true righteousness, the clearer he sees how far he is from it. But as to the Pharisees, who were satisfied with imitating holiness by an outward disguise, it is no wonder that they so easily deluded themselves. Hence Paul, after having left the Jews nothing, but this poor subterfuge of being justified by circumcision, does now also take from them even this empty pretense.

Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary

CRITICAL NOTES

Rom. 2:27. plainly means here what we call a state of nature, in distinction from a state in which a revelation is enjoyed.

Rom. 2:29.Olshausen says that Ruchert is right in understanding of the New of the Old Testament, for the spirit in the Old Testament is just the New Testament in its : consisting in spirit, not in letter; spiritual, not literal; a new dispensation, not of letter, but of spiritnot consisting of a written code of enactments, but conveying a new spirita spirit made new by the Holy Ghost.

MAIN HOMILETICS OF THE PARAGRAPH.Rom. 2:25-29

False religion.Reference is not here intended to the false religions which have cursed the earth, but to the false religion which is inside the true, which may be founded upon and be a perversion of the true. It may be noted that false religions are perversions or distortions of the true. The Jewish religion was true for the time then present. It originated in the divine mind, and was promulgated by divine agents; and yet from it sprang, or perhaps we may say in connection with it rose up, those who were further from the light and the truth than the unenlightened but virtuous heathen. Circumcision was a profitable ordinance; but it became a curse under the handling of degenerate natures. The sacraments are profitable; but sacramental efficacy and sacerdotalism, its progenitor and concomitant, have been fraught with great moral damage. The extremes of truth become falsehoods. One-sided aspects of truth lead to moral ruin. Let us look at the whole truth; let us keep before the eyes of our minds the whole of its comely form, and thus become enamoured of its beautiful and harmonious proportions.

I. False religion is a mere system.This both to the community and the individual. An arranged scheme, with more or less of order, sometimes very disorderly, so that the word system becomes a misnomer. It is a mere vain scaffolding, which does not serve to build up any moral structure. The scaffolding will fall with hideous ruin; the religious house built on the sand by system-mongers will be swept away by the tempest of divine wrath. The false religionist is a system-worshipper; he believes in schemes. How many system-makers to-day in our Christian England! They are building but only castles in the air.

II. False religion is thus in outward seeming.The further we get away from the truth, the more anxious we become to make a fair and beautiful outside. We dress and adorn the dead that it may wear the semblance of life; but memories can never show the brightness and beauty of life. The sparkling eye dancing and beaming above a poor peasants dress is more beautiful than all the pearls and jewels with which the dead or the sickly may be adorned. There are power and beauty in a soul possessed and moved by spiritual life which cannot be imitated by the greatest zealot of outward forms and ceremonies.

III. False religion parades itself.It glories in circumcision; it multiplies the number of its sacraments: its genuflections are numerous. All, however, is done to be seen of men. The false religionist does not care for moral drill except on review days. We have observed, we think, that the showy religious system, which has often in it more of the false than the true, is only possible where wealth accumulates and men and women gather. Have we ever seen an elaborate ritual in the remote hamlet; and yet is there no religion there? Can the Pharisees be religious if placed individually, like Robinson Crusoe, on desert islands? If they can, will their religion sing to their souls sweet songs to charm away the sense of loneliness? If they can, will their religion put joy and strength and solace into their hearts, making them sing for very gladness, as it did for Paul and Silas when in prison? We want a religion for battle days as well as review days; and such a religion is possessed by him whose circumcision is of the heart, in the spirit and not in the letter, whose praise is not of men, but of God.

IV. False religion thus is impressive.Of course it is impressiveglare and tinsel are impressive. A glittering image would be seized by a childa nugget of gold would be neglected. Most men and women are children in moral things. Nebuchadnezzars golden image has become dim, yea, has altogether disappeared; but the God of the Hebrews has still a place in some hearts. The tinsel of false religion shall be destroyed; the fine gold of true religion shall not find any consuming firethis gold will enrich for eternity.

V. The false religion judged by the no-religion.Will there be the class of no-religionists in heaven? Rabbis taught that no circumcised person goes into hell, and that all Israel, except heretics and apostates, have their portion in the world to come. Circumcision opens the gates of heaven; the uncircumcised go there too, if they fulfil the law. Startling if!if they fulfil the law. Let us not say religion is no use; let us not declare sacraments are empty forms. Let us look to our hearts, so that the man of no religion may not rise in judgment; let us fulfil the high laws of love to God, to Jesus Christ, and our neighbour. Let us obey the gospel commandment, that we should believe on the name of His Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as He gave us commandment.

True religion.Outward ordinances and actions are necessary in our religious life, but they are not in themselves true religion. True religion is essentially an inward statea vital principle or power in a mans heart and spirit, without which all outward acts are worthless. This truth, so important, but so easily forgotten, is strikingly enforced in these versesshowing us, as they do, that even in the Jewish dispensation the divinely appointed ordinance which sets an indispensable mark upon every Israelite is declared to be vain and worthless if unaccompanied by a true circumcision of the heart. Still more forcibly then will such remarks apply to the Christians life and profession, for ours is especially a dispensation of the Spirit. And as all baptised persons are called Christians, we may take up these words of St. Paul, and say, He is not a Christian who is one outwardly, neither is that baptism which is outward in the flesh, etc. This Scripture thus personally applied to ourselves may suggest to us two great truths:

I. The value and importance of Christian ordinances.

II. Our religion must be something more than such outward observances, however sacred, and must be a divine life and power in the heart, without which all religious acts are only a delusion and a sham.

I. The value of Christian ordinances seen:

1. From their necessity, owing to the very nature of mana creature with a body and a spirit.

(1) Necessary even for individual Christianse.g., in hearing, reading, praying.

(2) Still more necessary for Christian congregations. They could not act together without some outward forms and Acts 2. From the honour put upon them by our Lord Jesus Christ.

(1) Christ Himself appointed them. Specially those which we call sacraments. Prayer, even a form of prayer, called by us after His name. Preaching.

(2) The blessings attached to them in the New Testament baptism: made disciples by it (Mat. 28:19); sins washed away by it (Act. 22:16); saved by it (1Pe. 3:21). The Lords Supper: with its visible symbols of His body and blood (Luk. 22:19-20); the communion of or participation in the Lords death thereby obtained (1Co. 10:16). Prayer: all-powerful (Mat. 7:7); Christ Himself present where two or three worshippers meet. Preaching: believers saved by it (1Co. 1:21); preaching saves men (1Ti. 4:16).

II. Outward acts and ordinances worth nothing if they are all our religion.Jesus Christ is the only Saviour; the Holy Spirit is the only power which brings Christ and His salvation to each individual soul.

1. Hence all outward ordinances are valuable, only as they draw us near to Christ; only in their spiritual use; only as they produce or strengthen in us repentance, faith, hope, and love; only as they are blessed by the Spirit in our hearts.
2. Hence also, if not thus used, they may be even more than useless. They may be even a form of godliness without any of its power; they may shut out Christ, and hide Him from our eyes; they may delude the worshipper with an appearance of religion, while he has in reality none.

III. Let us be on our guard against the temptation to be satisfied with an outward religion.Let us watch well the nature of our profession (2Co. 13:5). Let us ever look to Jesus as the centre and very soul of our religion; a true Christian life is a life from God, with God, to God, in the power of the Spirit.Dr. Jacob.

Rom. 2:29. Inward religion.Mans obligations to worship God and obey His laws are generally acknowledged. Did we not know human nature the inference would be that man is a very religious being, and that his heart must be powerfully influenced by the truths he acknowledges and the prayers he offers up. The contrary, however, is the fact. How are we to account for it? Whilst the obligations of religion are acknowledged, and its services, under some form or other, observed, yet is man the slave of sin, and his principles and practices have therefore been thus at variance with the conviction of his understanding. We cannot doubt from these facts but that man has the dreadful power of deceiving himself; that there is scarcely any error into which he falls more easily than into religious delusioninto the habit of thinking that he does God service, even while he disobeys the plainest commands; and that by outward religious performances he atones for the disregard of moral obligations. Inward religion is found in the state of the understanding. If we are Christians inwardly, then our understanding will be so enlightened as that all the truths of God essential for us to know shall be so clearly discerned as to exercise their proper influence upon usan influence as powerful as their importance demands. We must look for inward religion in the state of the judgmentthat is, to those conclusions to which we come as to the truths proposed in this book and apprehended by the understanding. What is faith in fact, intellectually considered, but an expression of our judgment on divine truth? What is the faith of credit but the expression of our judgment on the credibility of that which we believe? And what is the faith of truth and reliance, entering into the very essence of that particular faith in Christ which justifies, but the expression of our judgment that the great truths of Christianity are not merely worthy of being believed but of being admitted into the spirit and acted upon? We must look for inward religion in the state of the will. When this is right, it will be clearly manifested in submission and acquiescence. There is submission to the divine authority. There is a full acknowledgment of this great and humbling principle to which no man comes but by the grace of God: that we are under the government of Godthat we belong to Jesus Christ, and have no right to ourselves. When this is fully recognised, then our will submits. And hence arises that right direction of our choice which may be said both to constitute and mark the rectitude of our will. The man may be conscious of an inward strugglehe may feel that he comes short of that state of rectitude to which his will shall be brought when, by the blessing of God, Christianity has effected all its purposes in him. But still grace gives him the victory. He is persuaded that the will of God is right, however dark and painful its appointments may at present appear; and therefore he says, The will of God be done. We are to look for inward religion in the state of our principles. If our principles be right, they are produced by the reception of some of those original but universal truths revealed in the word of God. These, when properly received, become principles of action and conduct laid up in the heart. All men are men of principle some way or other. It is only he who is a Christian inwardly that has a principle capable of universal reference, and thus of uniform operation. Right actions show that we are under the influence of right principles. We must look for inward religion in the state of the feelings. We are to contend for the important truth that Christianity takes hold of the whole mind and is intended thoroughly to sanctify the whole man. There are some who deny that feeling forms any essential part of religion. I have no hesitation in saying that wherever Christianity is it must produce deep and strong and constant emotion.R. Watson.

SUGGESTIVE COMMENTS ON Rom. 2:25-29

Necessity of repentance.Shemoth Rabba, f. 138, 13, declares: Let no heretics and apostates and impious ones of Israel say, Because we are circumcised we do not descend into hell. What does the holy and blessed God? He sends an angel and makes them uncircumcised, that they may descend into hell. We have further and melancholy confirmation of the same in the applicability of the reasoning of this chapter to many Christians, not only in the dark ages, but in our own day and in the most enlightened Churches. Many who do what they know to be wrong rely for salvation, perhaps unconsciously, upon their knowledge by means of the gospel of the way of salvation, of which knowledge the only result in their case is that they are ready to teach or to condemn others less instructed or less orthodox than themselves; or upon their outward connection with the people of God or their attention to religious ordinances. By teaching that God looks at the heart and judges all men according to their works, Paul pronounces sentence upon all such. This may be seen by reading Christian instead of Jew in this chapter. The substitution only increases the force of the argument. The difference between the words and works of some who bear the name of Christ brings practical dishonour to that namethe name of Him who died for themand hinders the work He died to accomplish. God, who of old required the circumcision of the heart, requires to-day that men worship Him in spirit and in truth. The existence among ourselves of the deadly errors here referred to gives to this chapter an abiding and incalculable worth. From this chapter we learn the absolute necessity of repentance. Since God is angry with all sin, none but those who turn from sin can enjoy His favour. And therefore none can intelligently seek His favour but those who sincerely purpose to avoid all sin, and none but those who actually conquer sin can intelligently believe that they possess the favour of God. Not only does Paul thus prove mans absolute need of repentance, but by proclaiming Gods anger against all sinners he does as much as words can do to lead men to it.

A safeguard against the perversion of justification.This chapter is a safeguard against a common perversion of the great doctrine of chap. 3justification through faith. Through the failure of some teachers to give prominence to the truths of this chapter the doctrine of justification through faith has been frequently and seriously perverted. The teaching of chap. 2 occupies a place in relation to the rest of the epistle similar to that of the epistle of James in relation to the epistles of Paul, of the first gospel in relation to the remainder of the New Testament, and especially similar to that of the teaching of John the Baptist in relation to the teaching of Christ. The resemblance is seen in the modes of thought and even in the words of this chapter. It is therefore of great value as a means of harmonising these very different, and at first sight apparently contradictory, portions of the New Testament. The chapter from the study of which we now rise receives its entire value from the chapters which follow. It can do good only by preparing us for the more glorious truths of chap. 3. It is a voice crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord. Like the greatness of the prophets, it points to that which is greater than itself. We may sum up the whole and its bearing on chap. 1 in the words of the Master, Except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.Beet.

Decline of religion shown by outward observances.When true religion declines, the disposition to lay undue stress on external rites is increased. The Jews when they lost their spirituality supposed that circumcision had power to save. St. Paul does not deny but asserts the value of circumcision. So likewise the Christian sacraments, baptism and the Lords supper, are of the utmost importance, and to neglect or reject them is a great sin. It is a mark of genuine piety to be disposed always to justify God and to condemn ourselves. On the other hand, a disposition to self-justification and the examination of our sins, however secret, is an indication of the want of a proper sense of our own unworthiness and of the divine excellence. There is no better evidence against the truth of any doctrine than that its tendency is immoral. Speculative and moral truths which are self-evident to the mind should be regarded as authoritative and as fixed points in all reasonings.Hodge.

The way to end boastings.If all men were willing to sacrifice their opinions when they appeared to impinge on the veracity of God, if they started back with instinctive shuddering at the very supposition of such a want of fidelity in Him, how soon would an end be put to the boastings of error, to the pride of philosophy, to lofty dictation in religion! No man with this feeling could be a universalist for a moment, and none could be an infidel.Barnes.

Outward observance must be heart-prompted.External ecclesiasticism and confession has value only when it leads to religion of the heart and life, otherwise it is only the same as heathenism. The great difference between outward and inward Christianity is internal. The true worshipper of God is inward, is concealed from the world, and is known only to God. The worth and merit of the pious person are exalted above all opinion of the world:

1. Because true piety by no means passes in the world for the highest good, but only that which is profitable and shines.
2. Because men cannot discern this inner, pure condition of heart, neither can they credit it to others.
3. Because the world cannot reward this piety. Gods word is committed to us. Use it aright, support it, propagate it. In many cases it has disappeared through the fault of menin Asia, in Africa. Gods honour cannot be touched. Nothing can be charged against God; it would be blasphemy to charge Him with blame of any kind.Heubner.

Outside and inside.Many have clean hands, but unclean hearts. They wash the outside of the cup and platter when all is filthy within. Now the former without the latter profits a man no more than it profited Pilate, who condemned Christ, to wash his hands in the presence of the people. He washed his hands of the blood of Christ, and yet had a hand in the death of Christ. The Egyptian temples were beautiful on the outside, but within you shall find nothing but some serpent or crocodile. He is not a Jew which is one outwardly. Judas was a saint without, but a sinner within; openly a disciple, but secretly a devil.

A questionable silence.For a time I feared he (Judge Hale) was wanting in experimental religion, as he seldom spake of his own spiritual views and feelings; but upon better acquaintance I found that I was mistaken. He had heard from many in his time so much of hypocrisy and fanaticism that he was urged towards the extreme silence.

ILLUSTRATIONS TO CHAPTER 2

Rom. 2:25-27. Moral maxims not enough.Some men tie themselves with all manner of moral maxims, and so full oft influenced by worldly wisdom and worldly motives, pass sin by. There is such a thing as honesty being the best policy, and nothing more than policy. This is shown in the words of a well-known modern writer, where one of his characters says, You dont think he could do anything mean or dishonourable? I think, was the reply, his own good opinion of himself would guard against that; self-esteem, and not any very high notion of morality, keeps many a man from picking a pocket. What all this means is simply this, that men may seem to lead great and good lives, and yet be all wrong within; they are quite willing to follow the invitations of sin, but the cords of fear and what is called decency restrain them. The heart is all aglow with hidden lusts, and the only reason why there is no open flinging of life into the arms of beautiful sins is that the dread of social ostracism binds them and holds them in check. This is not enough, and Christianity, coming with her sweet song, so fills the soul that sins most sorcerous chants are powerless. Sin loses its power of enticing when Jesus sings the sweet story of old. There is no need for chains and fettersthe soul of its own free-will goes past temptation; and this is liberty in Christ Jesus.

Rom. 2:25-27.The girl in the workroom.A girl had been mixed with others in a workroom in the city; weeks passed on, nothing was ever said about religion, until one of the girls said to her: I want to ask you something. I have been thinking you are a Christian. Do you mind telling me if it is so? The one asked said, I am sorry, Leslie, I did not show it so plainly that there could be no doubt in your mind. Oh, said the other, I knew from the first that you were different to the others, and now I know why. Again, a friend had passed through a trial, and one was speaking who had never owned herself religious: I know why you got through. You had Jesus Spirit to help.

Rom. 2:27-29. John Wesleys dream.John Wesley once, in the visions of the night, found himself, as he thought, at the gates of hell. He knocked and asked who were within. Are there any Roman Catholics here? he asked. Yes, was the answer, a great many. Any Church of England men? Yes, a great many. Any Presbyterians? Yes, a great many. Any Independents? Yes, a great many. Any Baptists? Yes, a great many. Any Wesleyans here? Yes, a great many. Disappointed and dismayed, especially at the last reply, he turned his steps upward, and found himself at the gates of Paradise, and here he repeated the same questions. Any Wesleyans here? No. Any Presbyterians? No. Any Church of England men? No. Any Roman Catholics? No. Any Baptists? No. Any Independents? No. Whom have you here, then? he asked, in astonishment. We know nothing here, was the reply, of any of those names you have mentioned. The only name of which we know anything here is Christian. We all are Christians here; and of these we have a great multitude which no man can number, of all nations, and kindreds, and peoples, and tongues. How many there are whose only Christianity is their name, who look for their salvation from the fact that they are good members of this communion or thatoften from the fact that they are red-hot and unchristian partisans! One is of Paul, and one of Apollos, and another of Cephas; and comparatively few really of Christ. Oh that we may go deep down below all names and sects and Church memberships to the foundation rockJesus Christ; and, viewing all differences, which are not fundamental ones, in the light of eternity and heaven, find in the fact that we are Christians a bond of fellowship and brotherhood while we are here!Quiver, Short Arrows.

Rom. 2:29. The kings son in the harp.An old Norse legend tells how a certain harper played as never man playedhis music instinct with such power and pathos that all must listen. The secret of his power was, that concealed in the harp foot was a little child, the son of the exiled king, whose plaintive cries, mingling with the bards story, gave it a new power. May we not say, at this time, the passionate, loving cries of our Kings Son are the strength and power of all our melodies and songs?

Fuente: The Preacher’s Complete Homiletical Commentary Edited by Joseph S. Exell

Text

Rom. 2:25-29. For circumcision indeed profiteth, if thou be a doer of the law; but if thou be a transgressor of the law, thy circumcision is become uncircumcision. Rom. 2:26 If therefore the uncircumcision keep the ordinances of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision? Rom. 2:27 and shall not the uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfill the law, judge thee, who with the letter and circumcision are a transgressor of the law? Rom. 2:28 For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision which is outward in the flesh: Rom. 2:29 but he is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.

REALIZING ROMANS, Rom. 2:25-29

89.

In what sense would circumcision be of any profit? I thought we were answerable to the gospel.

50.

What phrase contains the crux of the whole matter? Explain.

90.

Either a man is circumcised or not, After being circumcised, how could he be uncircumcised?

91.

Paul seems to understand circumcision in an entirely new light. Does this have any application to Christian baptism? cp. Col. 2:12-14. If so, what?

92.

What is the meaning of the word judge in Rom. 2:27?

93.

What is the letter of Rom. 2:27?

94.

Do outward forms have any significance at all?

95.

In this section a good synonym for circumcision would be ____?

96.

Could we as Christians keep the spirit of the Faith and not the letter, and yet still be acceptable with God? Explain.

Paraphrase

Rom. 2:25-29. Whilst ye continue wicked, it is foolish to expect salvation because ye are circumcised; for circumcision, indeed, as the sign of Gods covenant, will profit thee, if thou keepest the law of faith enjoined in the covenant; but if thou be a transgressor of that law, thou are in the condition of a wicked Gentile.

Rom. 2:26 And if a heathen, instructed by right reason, and by the grace of God, perform the precepts of the law of faith, will not God treat him as a person circumcised, by bestowing on him justification, the blessing promised to Abrahams seed?

Rom. 2:27 And will not every uncircumcised Gentile, who, under the direction of reason and conscience, without revelation, practices the faith and obedience enjoined in the covenant with Abraham, condemn thee as a transgressor of that covenant, though a Jew by the circumcision which is according to the letter of Mosess precept?

Rom. 2:28 For he is not a son of Abraham, and an heir of the promises, who is one by natural descent only; neither is true circumcision that which is outward in the flesh:

Rom. 2:29 But he is a Jew who is one in the temper of his mind; and circumcision is that of the heart, by cutting off evil desires, according to the spirit, not according to the letter of the law. Of such a real Jew, the praise will not be from the Jews, who will disown him if he is uncircumcised, but it will come from God, who, knowing his heart, will acknowledge him as one of Abrahams spiritual seed.

Summary

Circumcision is of no value unless the law is kept. The Gentile who keeps the law, though not circumcised, will be accepted. The Jew who breaks the law, though circumcised, will be condemned. The Judaism and circumcision which save men are in the heart and spirit, and not outward in literal fleshly marks.

51.

What means of special approval did the Jew attempt to use?

Comment

Properly humbled, the Jew now searches for some way to bolster his deflated ego. He harkens back to the old prejudice of special favor supposedly found in circumcision. Paul speaks of the true meaning of circumcision after this fashion: Circumcision is indeed of profit if you are a doer of the law, but if you are not, of what value is your circumcision? You had just as well be uncircumcised. And speaking of the matter of circumcision, that person who does not bear this rite, if he keeps the ordinance of the law, will he not be considered as if he were circumcised? And would not such a person judge and shame you who have the law and circumcision, yet are a transgressor? As shocking as it may sound, being a Jew is not a matter of outward form, nor circumcision a mere physical rite, for God recognizes a man as a Jew from the condition of his heart. Likewise with circumcision, it also is of the heart and not of the letter. The circumstances are thus constituted so God may do the praising (since the name Jew means praise) and not man. Rom. 2:25-29.

Fuente: College Press Bible Study Textbook Series

(25) Is made.Is become,ipso facto, is reduced to the case of.

Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)

(25-29) This section forms a connecting-link with the opening of the next chapter. The characteristic mark and badge of the Jew has two sides, the one outward and formal, the other inward and real. Its essence consists in the latter, and without this inward circumcision the outward profits nothing. It is not necessary to be born a Jew to possess it. Precisely the same language might be applied to the Christian sacraments, or to the privileges of any particular communion. Privileges they may be, but they depend for their efficacy entirely upon the disposition of the heart which underlies them.

Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)

25. For What the connexion indicated by the for is not immediately clear; but it doubtless refers to an intermediate thought which the apostle knows from experience to be in the mind of the Jew. In bar to the charges of 21-24, you Jews cannot plead your circumcision, for

Made uncircumcision The popular creed was, None circumcised are damned. Yet the more spiritual doctors, indignant at the thought that the outrages of many of their race should be supposable cancelled by the mere rite, taught a better doctrine. Thus one writer makes the Almighty say to the Jews, “It is the proselytes who are the circumcised, you are uncircumcised.” Again, R. Beuchias said, “Let not heretics, apostates, and the impious of Israel say, ‘Since we are circumcised we shall not go down to hell.’ For God will send his angel and restore their foreskins, so that they may go down to hell uncircumcised.”

Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

‘For circumcision indeed profits, if you are a doer of the law, but if you are a transgressor of the law, your circumcision is become uncircumcision.’

Paul then puts circumcision in perspective. His reply is that circumcision does indeed profit those who are doers of the Law from the heart, for it marks them off as observers of the covenant. It is therefore of great value if they are FULLY observing the covenant into which circumcision has introduced them. As a consequence they would be gaining the full benefit from the covenant that God has made with them (see Deu 10:16; Deu 30:6; Jer 4:4; Jer 9:26). On the other hand if they openly and deliberately transgress the Law in any way they are thereby rejecting the covenant relationship, and with the covenant broken their circumcision becomes of no value. It becomes just what circumcision was to most of Israel’s neighbours, something of no significance as far as God was concerned. For then it had ceased to be genuine covenant related circumcision, and had become the equivalent of non-circumcision. The Scriptural claim of the need to be circumcised in heart was proof of that. In other words the man who is circumcised should recognise that he has received a special privilege, membership of the covenant, and should as a consequence throw himself into obedience to the covenant, i.e. to the Law. Many Jewish teachers would have agreed with him in this, but only to a certain extent, for Paul’s thesis will then be that no one, neither Jew nor Gentile, is fully a doer of the Law, in which case circumcision is seen to be valueless.

Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett

Will Not Circumcision Ensure That The Jew Is Treated Differently By God? (2:25-29).

The Jew then goes on to his second argument. If the possession of the Law and the benefits described above will not ensure that the Jew is treated differently by God, what then about the fact that he is circumcised? Is that not the mark of God’s special covenant relationship with him? In reply Paul would have agreed that circumcision was the sign of a special covenant relationship. What he would have disagreed with was the idea that God would as a result soften His attitude towards sin, something for which he would find good support in the Old Testament, especially in Lamentations. Indeed, he would argue that the covenant relationship makes greater demands on the Jew because he has thereby committed himself to obeying the covenant. The Gentiles had not committed themselves to anything. The Jew therefore has a greater responsibility to observe the Law, and if he fails to do so then he is liable to be ‘cut off from Israel’. There are a host of citations from Jewish tradition that suggest that Jews did see circumcision as affording special privileges regardless of behaviour. Paul condemns such an attitude outright.

Some reader may be saying, ‘well that is fine as regards the Jew, but what has it to do with us?’ One answer lies in the fact that to many baptism is seen as parallel to circumcision, thus in their case the same arguments can be applied to baptism. Baptism profits for someone who is truly responsive to God, but is of little value for someone who is not obedient to God. (As 1Pe 3:21 says, its purpose is not a washing away of defilement, but the answer of a good conscience towards God). So in what follows we can read ‘baptism’ for ‘circumcision’. But it is of equal importance in bringing out that the Jew has no special position before God unless he is fully living in accordance with the covenant. As he will point out, the true Jew is the person, whether Jew or Gentile, who is truly circumcised in heart.

Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett

True Circumcision In Rom 2:25-29 Paul explains true circumcision as being of the heart, and not of the flesh. Circumcision was the way a Jew made a distinction between him and a Gentile. In this passage Paul will use the example of Jewish proselytes who converted the Judaism and kept the law with religious zeal while some of their fellow Jews in the synagogues lazily followed the Law because they were trusting in their Jewish birth for justification before God. Paul argues that these Jewish proselytes should be credited with righteousness before the lazy Jews. Paul then concludes that God makes a distinction between a Jew and a Gentile by looking at the heart, and not at the flesh.

Rom 2:26 Comments In Rom 2:26 Paul appears to be referring to Jewish proselytes who are converted and keep the law with greater zeal that their fellow Jews, who lazily follow their traditions, but trust in their birth as Jews for justification before God.

Rom 2:29 “and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter” – Comments We understand by reading the phrase “of the heart, in the spirit,” which stands in apposition in the Greek text, that is, they stand beside each other as equal meanings, that the “spirit” of man is also called the “heart.”

Rom 2:29 Comments In Rom 2:29 Paul says that Christians are Jews in a spiritual since. Paul calls Christians the Israel of God in Gal 6:16. Believers, being children of faith, are also called the children of Abraham (Mat 3:9, Rom 4:16-16, Gal 3:7).

Gal 6:16, “And as many as walk according to this rule, peace be on them, and mercy, and upon the Israel of God .”

Mat 3:9, “And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham .”

Rom 4:16-17, “Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all , (As it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations ,) before him whom he believed, even God, who quickeneth the dead, and calleth those things which be not as though they were.”

Gal 3:7, “Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham .”

Fuente: Everett’s Study Notes on the Holy Scriptures

False and true circumcision:

v. 25. For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the Law; but if thou be a breaker of the Law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision.

v. 26. Therefore, if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the Law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

v. 27. And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfill the Law, judge thee, who by the letter and circumcision dost transgress the Law?

v. 28. For he is not a Jew which is one outwardly, neither is that circumcision which is outward in the flesh;

v. 29. but he is a Jew which is one inwardly, and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.

To the arraignment of Paul the Jews might have raised the objection that he was forgetting the sacrament of circumcision and the special significance which attached to this rite, by which the Jews were separated, set apart, from the heathen round about them. But circumcision does not change the argument of Paul in one single particular. It is true indeed that it has its value, if one practices the Law, follows its injunctions at all times and in all cases. If a circumcised Jew is a transgressor of the Law, the chief purpose of the sacrament is lost, for it bound the Jews under the obedience of the Law. Unless the keeping of the Law followed circumcision, the Jew was exactly in the same position as the Gentile. If, now, the uncircumcision observe the demands of the Law, will not the uncircumcision of such a person be regarded as circumcision? The argument is: If a Jew, though circumcised, break the Law, he will be condemned; if, therefore, a Gentile, though uncircumcised, keep the Law, he shall be justified. What follows? And the uncircumcision by nature (the Gentile, by nature uncircumcised and therefore unclean) that fulfills the Law will judge and condemn thee, who in spite of the letter and of circumcision art a transgressor of the Law. A heathen who with his imperfect natural law succeeds in keeping some of its demands may well condemn a Jew that boasts of the written Law and of the rite of circumcision, and yet does not honor the Law by keeping it.

And so Paul brings on his conclusion. Not he who seems so according to appearances is really a Jew; neither is that a true circumcision which is obvious as having been performed in the flesh. The mere fact that a person is a descendant of Abraham and has received in his body the rite of circumcision does not make him a member of the real Israel of the Lord, of the chosen people in the real sense of the word. The situation rather is this: He is a Jew indeed, a true Israelite, that is one in heart, in the inner man; and the true circumcision is that of the heart, that which is performed in the spirit, not in the letter. When the Holy Ghost, through the Word, changes the unrepentant, unbelieving heart into a believing heart, that is the true circumcision. And the person in whom this miracle has been performed has his praise not from men, but of God, Deu 10:16. He does not rely upon mere outward descent and ceremonies, to which he might boastfully point, but he realizes that his conversion is the work of God alone, Deu 30:6. He gives all praise and honor to God alone. Note: in a similar manner it is true of Baptism, that it must not be regarded as a rite of admission, regardless of faith and change of heart. It is a washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Ghost, and both obliges and enables the baptized person to lead a godly life.

Summary

God, the impartial Judge, will render to every person his reward, from the evidence of his works, according to the Gospel; the Jews that make their boast of the Law and yet transgress the Law become guilty before the Lord and will have to bear His wrath; herein circumcision will avail them nothing, for the mere external rite has no value before God unless it is accompanied also by a circumcision of the heart, which is shown in the fulfilling of the Law

Fuente: The Popular Commentary on the Bible by Kretzmann

Rom 2:25. For It is most evident that , for, cannot here signify that the following words are a reason for what was asserted in those immediately preceding. It seems little more than an expletive, as the particle now is frequently among us. Circumcision is here put for being a Jew, as being one of the chief, and most discriminating rites of that people: It profiteth, says St. Paul, (or, as it may be rendered, It is indeed an advantage,) if thou keep the law.

Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke

Rom 2:25 . Having in Rom 2:17-24 (not merely taken for granted, but) thrown a bright light of illumination on the culpability of the Jews in presence of the law, Paul now briefly and decisively dissipates the fancy of a special advantage , of which they were assured through circumcision . “ For circumcision indeed , the advantage of which thou mightest perchance urge against this condemnation, is useful, if thou doest the law; but if thou art a transgressor of the law, thou hast as circumcised no advantage over the uncircumcised .”

therefore annexes a corroboration of the closing result of Rom 2:23-24 , and does so by excluding every advantage, which the Jew transgressing the law might fancy himself possessed of, as compared with the Gentile, in virtue of circumcision. Stat sententia! in spite of thy circumcision! Hofmann is the less justified, however, in taking the elliptically , with the suppression of its antithesis (Hartung, Partikell . II. p. 414, and generally Baeumlein, Part . p. 163), since against its correspondence with the immediately following no well-founded logical objection exists.

] circumcision , without the article. It is not however, with Kllner and many others, to be taken as a description of Judaism generally; but definitely and specially of circumcision , to which sacrifice of the body consecrating men to membership of the people of God (Ewald, Alterth . p. 127), and meant to be accompanied by the inner consecration of moral holiness (see on Rom 2:28 ) the theocratic Jewish conceit attributed the absolute value of a service rendering them holy and appropriating the Abrahamic promises.

] seeing that it transfers into the communion of all blessings and promises conferred by God on His covenant people; which blessings and promises, however, are attached to the observance of His law as their condition (Gen 17:1 ff.; Lev 18:5 ; Deu 27:26 ; Gal 5:3 ), so that circumcision points at the same time to the new covenant, and becomes a sign and seal of the righteousness that is by faith (see on Rom 4:11 ). This however the Apostle has not yet in view here .

. . . [707] ] Not on the presupposition that, but rather, as also the two following : in the case that, Winer, p. 275 [E. T. 366].

] Has become , has lost, for thee, every advantage which it was designed to secure to thee over the uncircumcised, so that thou hast now no advantage over the latter, and art, just as he is, no member of God’s people. Paul conceives of the latter as a holy people, like the invisible church of God, in which the mortua membra of the people have no part. The same idea is illustrated concretely by R. Berechias in Schemoth Rabb. f. 138, 13 : “Ne haeretici et apostatae et impii ex Israelitis dicant: Quandoquidem circumcisi sumus, in infernum non descendimus. Quid agit Deus S. B.? Mittit angelum et praeputia eorum attrahit, ita ut ipsi in infernum descendant.” See other similar passages in Eisenmenger’s entdeckt. Judenth, II. p. 339 f.

] Present of the completed action; Rom 7:2 ; Rom 14:23 ; Joh 20:23 . It is the emergent ethical result, which takes place .

[707] . . . .

Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary

Rom 2:25 to Rom 3:20

Fifth Section.The external Judaism of the letter, and the internal Judaism of the spirit. The objective advantage of historical Judaism. The subjective equality of Jews and Gentiles before the law of God, according to the purpose of the law itselfto bring about the knowledge of sin. (The utility of circumcision;an accommodation to the need of salvation by the knowledge of sin. The circumcision which becomes uncircumcision, and the uncircumcision which becomes circumcision; or, the external Jew possibly an internal Gentile, while the external Gentile may be an internal Jew. Not the mere possession of the law, but fidelity to the law, is of avail. The latter does not create pride of the law, but knowledge of sinthat is, the need of salvation. The advantage of circumcision therefore consists in this, that to the Jew were committed the oracles of Godthat law by which all men are represented in the guilt of sin. Sin, as acknowledged guilt, represented in contrast with the law.)

Rom 2:25-29

25For circumcision verily [indeed] profiteth, if thou keep [keepest] the law: but if thou be [art] a breaker [transgressor] of the law, thy circumcision is made [has 26become, or, is turned into] uncircumcision. Therefore, if the uncircumcision [so-called, i. e., the uncircumcised] keep the righteousness [decrees, commandments, moral requirements, ] of the law, shall [will] not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision? 27And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfil the law, judge thee, who by37 the letter and circumcision dost transgress the law? [He who is uncircumcised by nature, if he fulfils the law, will even judge thee, who, with the letter and circumcision, dost transgress the law.]38 28For he is not a Jew, which [who] is one outwardly; neither is that 29circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: But he is a Jew, which [who] is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and [omit and] not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.

Footnotes:

[37]Rom 2:27.[The E. V. here, as often, follows Beza, who translates , per, which is its fundamental meaning when it rules the genitive. But here it expresses the state or the circumstances under which the transgression takes placei.e., with or in spite of, notwithstanding, the written law and circumcision; comp. , with patience; , while is circumcision, Rom 4:11; , with offence, Rom 14:20; and Winer, Gramm., 7th ed., p. 355 f.P. S.]

[38]Rom 2:27.[Lange, with Erasmus, Luther, Bengel, De Wette, Meyer, Tholuck (ed. 5), Alford, and others, takes Rom 2:27 to be categorical, and makes a period after law. Hence is emphatically put first, and has the sense of even: Yea, verily, he will even condemn you. The E. V. regards Rom 2:27 as a continuation of the question in Rom 2:26, and supplies before . So also Fritzsche, Olshausen, Luther, Philippi, Ewald, Wordsworth.P. S.]

Fuente: A Commentary on the Holy Scriptures, Critical, Doctrinal, and Homiletical by Lange

25 For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law: but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision.

Ver. 25. If thou keep the law ] Which thou art thereby bound to do, either by thyself, or by thy surety Christ Jesus.

Thy circumcision is made uncircumcision ] Thou art no whit privileged by it. Unregenerate Israel is to God as Ethiopia, Amo 9:7 .

Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)

25 29. ] Inasmuch as CIRCUMCISION was the especial sign of the covenant, and as such, a distinction on which the Jewish mind dwelt with peculiar satisfaction: the Apostle sets forth, that circumcision without the keeping of the law is of no avail, and that true circumcision and true Judaism are matters of the heart, not of the flesh only . , . , ; . , . , , , , , . Chrys. Hom. vii. 474.

Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament

25. ] , chosen as an example in point, and as the most comprehensive and decisive example; and binds it on to the foregoing reasoning: q. d. ‘ in the same way circumcision, &c.’

, not , , because the latter would import the perfect fulfilment of the whole law : whereas the supposition is of acting according to the law, doing the law. here, not , the , like – and – , Rom 2:13 , being a designation generally of a law-breaker , as those of a law-hearer and law-fulfiller .

. . ] counts for nothing : the Jewish transgressor is no better off than the Gentile transgressor.

Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament

Rom 2:25 . : the absence of the article suggests that the argument may be extended to everything of the same character as circumcision. : Circumcision was the seal of the covenant, and as such an assurance given to the circumcised man that he belonged to the race which was the heir of God’s promises. That was undeniably a great advantage, just as it is an advantage now to be born a Christian; but if the actual inheriting of the promises has any moral conditions attached to it (as Paul proceeds to show that it has), then the advantage of circumcision lapses unless these are fulfilled. Now the persons contemplated here have not fulfilled them. : the habitual practice of the law is involved in this expression: as Vaughan says, it is almost like a compound word, “ if thou be a law doer ”. Similarly a law transgressor. The law, of course, is the Mosaic one, but it is regarded simply in its character as law, not as being definitely this law: hence the absence of the article. : by the very fact becomes and remains.

Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: Rom 2:25-29

25For indeed circumcision is of value if you practice the Law; but if you are a transgressor of the Law, your circumcision has become uncircumcision. 26So if the uncircumcised man keeps the requirements of the Law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision? 27And he who is physically uncircumcised, if he keeps the Law, will he not judge you who though having the letter of the Law and circumcision are a transgressor of the Law? 28For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is circumcision that which is outward in the flesh. 29But he is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is that which is of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter; and his praise is not from men, but from God. 2Great in every respect. First of all, that they were entrusted with the oracles of God.

Rom 2:25 “circumcision” Paul is still using diatribe. Someone will raise the statement that, well at least we are circumcised (cf. Gen 17:10-11). We are in the line of Abraham. Paul plainly and boldly dismantles this cherished Jewish claim (cf. Mat 3:7-10; Joh 8:31-59).

All of Israel’s neighbors except the Philistines were circumcised. It was not the act itself that was significant; it was the continuing faith of the recipient (cf. Rom 2:26-27; Deu 10:16; Deu 30:6). This is true of all religious rituals. Religious people often want the blessings of God’s covenant but without the responsibilities.

Rom 2:25-26 “if. . .if. . .if” These are three third class conditional sentences which refer to possible future action. Obedience (cf. Deuteronomy 27-30) is the key in Paul’s argument in Romans 2, but not in Rom 3:21-31 (cf. Galatians 3). Obedience is the result of salvation but grace is the basis (cf. Eph 2:8-10).

Rom 2:26-27 These verses hold out hope that some Gentiles have responded to the light they have (grammar expects a “yes” answer in Rom 2:26). The only possible biblical example of this would be Cornelius of Acts 10. Yet he does not quite fit this verse because he was a God-fearer and worshiped at the local synagogue.

These verses are in reality a counterpoint to Paul’s argument about the need of salvation for the Jews. Rom 3:23 is the summary that all humans are spiritually lost without Christ. If there are Gentiles who live up to the light they have from creation and an inner moral sensitivity, God will provide an opportunity for them to respond to Christ- somehow, someway, sometime.

Rom 2:28-29 “For he is not a Jew. . .he is a Jew” This is an extremely important discussion because some modern theological groups attempt to separate or capsulize the OT people of God from the NT people of God. There is only one covenant and one people (cf. Rom 9:6; Gal 3:7-9; Gal 3:29; Gal 6:16; 1Pe 3:6). The new covenant is a development and fulfillment of the old. The people of God have always been so by faith, not lineage. They are a “heart people” not ritual or racial people. Faith, not the parent, is the key. Covenant mind, not covenant sign, is the mark.

“flesh” See Special Topic at Rom 1:3.

Rom 2:29 The covenant sign of circumcision (cf. Gen 17:14) was a metaphor in the OT for one’s openness to God. It developed metaphorically in several ways

1. heart circumcision (cf. Deu 10:16; Deu 30:6; Jer 4:4; Jer 9:24-25)

2. ear circumcision (cf. Jer 6:10)

3. lip circumcision (cf. Exo 6:12; Exo 6:30)

The Law was never meant to be an external code, but a life transforming daily relationship with YHWH that revealed His character and promises to all the children of Adam. See Special Topic: Paul’s Views of the Law at Rom 13:9.

NASB”that which is of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter”

NKJV”that of the heart, in the Spirit, and not in the letter”

NRSV”a matter of the heart — it is spiritual and not literal”

TEV”which is the work of God’s Spirit, not of the written Law”

NJB”in the heart – something not of the letter but of the spirit”

This phrase is ambiguous in Greek. Some translations take it to refer to the spiritual versus the literal (cf. NRSV, the Twentieth Century New Testament, the Knox translation, the Lamsa translation of the Peshitta, the Williams translation and the New Berkeley Version). Other translations see the contrast as between the Holy Spirit (cf. Rom 7:6; 2Co 3:6, where a similar construction occurs) and the written text (cf. NASB, NKJV, NEB, NIV and TEV). The Jerome Biblical Commentary, p. 299, gives the suggestion that based on 2Co 3:6 it was Paul’s metaphorical/literary way of referring to the Old Covenant and the New Covenant; the first characterized by an external code and the second by an internal new mind and new spirit given by the Holy Spirit in the new age of the Spirit.

Paul has been discussing the fact that some Gentiles might act pleasing to God apart from the Law. If this is true then the children of God included more than those who had been only physically circumcised (cf. Galatians). God’s family is wider than racial Jews (cf. Gen 3:15; Gen 12:3; Exo 19:5); Job, Melchizedek, Jethro, Caleb, Rahab, and Ruth were not racially Jewish. Even the tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh were half Egyptian (cf. Gen 41:50-52).

Fuente: You Can Understand the Bible: Study Guide Commentary Series by Bob Utley

25-29.] Inasmuch as CIRCUMCISION was the especial sign of the covenant, and as such, a distinction on which the Jewish mind dwelt with peculiar satisfaction: the Apostle sets forth, that circumcision without the keeping of the law is of no avail, and that true circumcision and true Judaism are matters of the heart, not of the flesh only. , . , ; . , . , , , , , . Chrys. Hom. vii. 474.

Fuente: The Greek Testament

Rom 2:25. For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law: but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision.

Paul is dealing with the Jew, who was apt to think that he must have a preference beyond the Gentiles on account of his circumcision.

Rom 2:26-29. Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision? And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature if it fulfill the law, judge thee, who by the letter and circumcision dost transgress the law? For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.

If this principle were fully recognized everywhere, it would certainly put an end to all that notion of sacramentarianism which some men hold. It is not the outward, not the external, not the form and ceremony; it is the inward work of the spirit; it is holiness and change of heart. Let none of us ever fall into the gross error of those who imagine that there is attached to certain ceremonies a certain degree of grace. It is not so. He is not a Christian which is one outwardly, he is a Christian who is one inwardly.

This exposition consisted of readings from Psalms 110; Rom 2:25-29; Romans 3.

Fuente: Spurgeon’s Verse Expositions of the Bible

Rom 2:25. , profiteth) He does not say justifieth; the profit is described chap. 3 and 4 Circumcision was still practised among the (believing) Jews.-, if) Paul not only speaks, using the ad hominem argument [argument on his adversarys own principles to confute him], but also speaks according to his own sentiments, and shows, that they are deceiving themselves, who are trusting to circumcision, though they have violated the law.-, a transgressor) A word abhorred by a Jew, Rom 2:27.

Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament

Rom 2:25

Rom 2:25

For circumcision indeed profiteth, if thou be a doer of the law:-Circumcision was the mark of the Jews, and was given to bind or consecrate them to the service of God. But it profited only when those circumcised kept the law which circumcision pledged them to do. [The statement just made in verses 23, 24, which summed up the charge against the sinful Jew, is now corroborated. This turn in thought is not abrupt, for the Jew would at once answer the indictment by adducing his privileges as one circumcised. On this he staked probably more than on any other fact of his history. That the value of circumcision was contingent on his keeping the law was certainly something new to him. It was disastrous to his hope. If the law is not kept, being a son of Abraham, having the law, and being circumcised are useless. Everything depends on keeping the law. The same general principle holds good under the gospel. One thing is void without another. Faith is worthless without repentance, and so is baptism without faith; and coming into Christ is useless unless it is followed by a life of devotion to God.]

but if thou be a transgressor of the law, thy circumcision is become uncircumcision.-Circumcision was a seal and pledge of Gods blessings to those who kept the law. It was a seal of unfaithfulness to those who did not keep the law and assured the deeper condemnation.

Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary

breaker of the law

Sin. (See Scofield “Rom 3:23”).

Fuente: Scofield Reference Bible Notes

circumcision: Rom 2:28, Rom 2:29, Rom 3:1, Rom 3:2, Rom 4:11, Rom 4:12, Deu 30:6, Jer 4:4, Gal 5:3-6, Gal 6:15, Eph 2:11, Eph 2:12

but if: Rom 2:23, Jer 9:25, Jer 9:26, Act 7:51

Reciprocal: Gen 17:23 – circumcised Joh 6:63 – the flesh Act 10:35 – in Rom 2:13 – For not 1Co 7:19 – Circumcision Gal 5:6 – in Phi 3:3 – we Heb 2:16 – verily Heb 4:2 – did Jam 2:14 – What

Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge

:25

Rom 2:25. Circumcision was one of the rites required by the law. These Jews were insisting that it be attended to, yet were indifferent about the many practical duties that the same law required. (See Mat 23:23.)

Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary

Rom 2:25. For circumcision. The statement of Rom 2:23-24, which summed up the charge against the sinful Jew, is now corroborated: what I have said is true in spite of circumcision, for circumcision without the keeping of the law is of no avail; true circumcision and true Judaism are not outward matters but of the heart (Rom 2:28-29). This turn of thought is not abrupt, for the Jew would at once answer the preceding indictment by adducing his privilege as one circumcised. The naturalness of this defence appears from the constant tendency to deal in the same manner with the sacraments, and means of grace in general. The reference here is to the actual rite, which was a sign of membership in the people of God.

Indeed profiteth. This implies that the Jew would say: my circumcision profits me, even if I am guilty as you charge.

If thou keep the law. The original points the constant practice to habitual obedience as a characteristic. Circumcision is the sign and seal of a covenant, and the covenant had for its condition on the part of the Jew, the keeping of the law (Gen 17:1; Lev 18:5; Deu 27:26; Gal 5:3). A further use of circumcision is pointed out in chap. Rom 4:11, but here this docs not come into view. Nor is perfect obedience suggested here, but rather such sincere and hearty obedience as the pious Jew could and did render, prompted by trust in Jehovah, the covenant God, who gave blessings and promises to His people.

Is become uncircumcision. Has lost, for thee, every advantage which it was designed to secure to thee over the uncircumcised, so that thou hast now no advantage over the latter, and art, just as he is, no member of Gods people (Meyer). The unholy Jew virtually becomes a Gentile. The same principle applies to Christian baptism, the initiatory rite of the New Dispensation; it avails nothing; in fact, becomes a ground of condemnation, if the baptized person violates the duties implied in the covenant of which it is the sign and seal.

Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament

It is sufficiently known what great stress the Jews laid upon circumcision; they taught, that this alone was enough to procure the favour of God, and to free them from hell: “God having, as they said, promised Abraham, that if his children transgressed, he would remember the odour of the foreskins, and deliver them for the merit of circumcision.” But all this was a false and vain-glorious bustle.

Our apostle, therefore, in the words before us, assures the Jews, that circumcision without holiness of conversation, would never free them from condemnation: That a circumcised Jew, who walks not in obedience to the law of God, is in as bad, or worse condition, than any uncircumcised Heathen; yea, the uncircumcision, that is, the uncircumcised person that keeps the law, shall be accepted of God, as well as if he had been circumcised; and be preferred by God before the circumcised Jew that transgresses the law.

The sum is, that the obedient Gentile shall condemn the disobedient Jew, and be sooner accepted by God, with whom there is no respect of persons, but with respect to their qualifications: That no church-privileges, no external prerogatives, nor the highest profession of piety and holiness, without an humble, uniform, and sincere obedience, will be anything available to salvation.

And as, then, an uncircumcised Gentile found better acceptance with God than many circumcised Jews; even so, an unbaptized Heathen, at the great day, will not change place with many baptized Christians. It is a sad, but a certain truth, that the case of the Pagan world will be much easier in the day of judgment, than other that live and die disobedient under the gospel of Jesus Christ. The Heathens have abused but one talent, the light of nature; but we thousands, even as many thousands as we have slighted the tenders of offered grace.

Lord, what a fearful aggravation doth it put upon our sin and misery, when we fall from the height of mercy into the depth of misery? We must certainly be accountable to thee at the great day, not only for all the light we had, but for all that we might have had in the gospel-day; and especially for that light we have sinned under, and rebelled against.

Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament

Rom 2:25-27. For circumcision verily profiteth He does not say justifieth. How far it profited is shown in the third and fourth chapters: if thou keep the law Here, as in many other passages, the apostle speaks to the thoughts of the Jewish readers. They fancied that circumcision, by showing that they were descended from Abraham, and were members of Gods covenant, would ensure their salvation, though they were ever so wicked. But the apostle tells them their circumcision would avail them only if they practised the law; that is, performed the things required in the covenant with Abraham; (see Rom 2:12;) in which case, as the seal of that covenant, it would give them assurance of salvation. But, if they did not perform the precepts of that covenant, their circumcision would be of no use to them. If thou be a breaker of the law Living in known sin, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision Is so already in effect. Thou wilt have no more benefit by it than if thou hadst never received it. The very same observation holds with regard to baptism. Therefore, &c. As if he had said, Since the stress of all lies upon keeping the law, therefore, if the uncircumcision That is, a person uncircumcised; keep the righteousness of the law Walk agreeably to it; shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision In the sight of God? He shall be accounted a Jew spiritually, (Rom 2:29,) and accepted of God, rather than you carnal Jews, who continue to live in sin, and boast of your circumcision. The expression, , rendered, the righteousness of the law, is in the plural number, and rendered by Locke, the rectitude of the law; considering Paul as using it for all those precepts of the law which contain in them any part of the natural and eternal rule of rectitude, which is made known to men by the light of reason: a rule of their actions, which all mankind, uncircumcised as well as circumcised, had, and is that which (Rom 1:32) Paul calls , [rendered there, the judgment of God,] because it came from God, and was made by him the moral rule to all mankind, being laid within the discovery of their reason. And this rule of morality Paul says the Gentile world did acknowledge. Doddridge renders the expression, the righteous determinations of the law; and Macknight, the precepts of the law; referring to the above-quoted expression, Rom 1:32, which he considers as signifying the law of God written on mens hearts; or, as he here terms it: the law of faith, the precepts of which, he says, the Gentiles may both know and keep. For the light of natural reason dictates its two great precepts, namely, that men should believe in God, and obey him from love. Further, the precepts of this law are very properly expressed by words which literally signify righteousness of the law, because they who keep them are accounted righteous in the sight of God; that is, are treated by God as righteous persons for the sake of Christ. And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature Those who are, literally speaking, uncircumcised. The words, by nature, are added by the apostle to show that he is speaking of persons without revelation, and not of the converted Gentiles, nor of those who should hereafter be converted: if it fulfil the law, That is, as to the substance of it, namely, the law of faith above mentioned. For though the Gentiles were ignorant of the covenant that was made at the fall, and of its promises, they might both know and perform its requisitions, Rom 2:6-7. Accordingly, many of the Gentiles believed in the true God, and obeyed him from a principle of faith and love. Judge thee Condemn thee by his example, and make thy condemnation appear to be just, in that thou hast more helps and advantages, and yet performest less duty: who by the letter and circumcision By trusting so much to thy having the law in writing, and to thy being circumcised, as if these things were sufficient to save thee: or by trusting to the outward privilege of circumcision, which thou partakest of according to the letter of the law, but wantest the internal and spiritual part thereof. Dost transgress the law Takest liberty thereupon to indulge thyself securely in sin, as if these things would preserve thee from punishment. The judgment which the Gentiles, who fulfil the law, are here said to pass on the wicked Jews, is the same with that which the Jews are said, Rom 2:1, to pass on the wicked Gentiles; namely, that they are worthy of death. But they passed this judgment on the Jews with much more reason than the Jews passed it on them; because, while they condemned the Gentiles, they expected to be saved themselves, though guilty of the very same crimes, abusing far greater privileges, and breaking through much stronger obligations.

Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

Vv. 25-27. For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law: but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision. If then the uncircumcised keep the ordinances of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision? And shall not he who, though uncircumcised by nature, fulfils the law, judge thee, who in full possession of the letter and circumcision, dost transgress the law?

Paul knocks from under the Jew the support which he thought he had in his theocratic position, with its sign circumcision. We have seen it; the adage of the rabbins was: All the circumcised have part in the world to come, as if it were really enough to be a Jew to be assured of salvation. Now, circumcision had been given to Israel as a consecration to circumcision of heart, an engagement to holiness, and not as a shelter from judgment in favor of disobedience and pollution. Taken then in this sense, and according to the mind of God, it had its use; but employed in the Rabbinical sense, it formed only an external wall of separation requiring to be overturned. The prophets never ceased to work in this direction; comp. Isa 1:10-15; Isa 66:1 et seq., strictly: has become, and remains henceforth uncircumcision, in the eyes of God the righteous judge.

Fuente: Godet Commentary (Luke, John, Romans and 1 Corinthians)

For circumcision indeed profiteth, if thou be a doer of the law: but if thou be a transgressor of the law, thy circumcision is become uncircumcision.

Fuente: McGarvey and Pendleton Commentaries (New Testament)

25. For truly circumcision profiteth if you keep the law; but if you are a transgressor of the law your circumcision has become uncircumcision. We see from this verse the condemnatory verdict of the ordinances when uncorroborated by a true and irreproachable Christian character. In that case they become witnesses against us in the Judgment Day.

Fuente: William Godbey’s Commentary on the New Testament

Verse 25

Circumcision; the symbol and token of membership of the Jewish church. The meaning is, that to be a descendant of Abraham, and one of God’s chosen people, is an advantage, provided the heart and conduct correspond with the privileges enjoyed.

Fuente: Abbott’s Illustrated New Testament

SECTION 6 CIRCUMCISION WILL NOT SAVE FROM GODS IMPARTIAL JUDGMENT

CH. 2:25-29

For circumcision profits, if thou practise law; but if thou be a transgressor of law, thy circumcision is become uncircumcision. If then the uncircumcision keep the decrees of the Law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision? And the uncircumcision from nature, accomplishing the Law, shall judge thee who with letter and circumcision art a transgressor of law. For not he that is so in that which is manifest as a Jew; nor is that which is manifest, in flesh, circumcision. But he that is so in secret is a Jew; and circumcision of the heart is in Spirit, not letter, whose praise is not from men, but from God.

Circumcision, which meets us for the first time at the beginning of 7, is as conspicuous a feature of it as was the Law in 6. The mention of circumcision uncovers another secret ground on which the objector of Rom 2:3-4 builds a hope of exceptional kindness on the day of judgment. In 6 he hoped to escape then because God had specially favoured his nation by the gift to them only of the Mosaic Law. But the Law, to which the impenitent man ran for refuge, gave him up to the impartial justice of a dishonoured God. Only one ground of hope remains. He bears in his body the sign and seal of the Covenant of God: by the express command of God he was circumcised. But, just as in 6 Paul showed that the Law, so now he will show that Circumcision, will not save an impenitent sinner from Gods impartial judgment.

Rom 2:25. This verse confirms the condemnation implied in Rom 2:23-24, by proving that circumcision will not save a man from it; and thus still further supports the truth of Gods impartial judgment, the great matter of this chapter.

Circumcision profits: it is better to be a circumcised Jew than an uncircumcised heathen. But the abiding advantage is only for those Jews who practise what the Law bids. What the advantage is, Paul will, in Rom 3:1, inquire. The inquiry is needless here, because, whatever the benefits be, this man is shut out from them by the condition on which only they can be obtained. Circumcision was the sign of a covenant in which blessing was conditioned by obedience to the Law. Therefore, as a visible pledge that God will bestow the promised blessings, it was a benefit; but only for those who practise law.

But if transgressor of law: a complementary truth implied in this limitation, viz. that they who break this law are practically uncircumcised. Circumcision was originally a token of Gods covenant with Abraham: Gen 17:11. The blessings therein promised were a numerous posterity, a special relation to God as His people, the land of Canaan, and that from them should go forth a blessing to all mankind. As first given in Gen 15:18, the covenant was not limited by any condition whatever. It assumed the form, not of a law, but of a promise; an absolute promise independent of mans conduct. See Rom 4:13. Afterwards, circumcision was added as a condition of a personal share in the promised blessings: Gen 17:10-14. Later still God made another covenant at Sinai, which He confirmed and enlarged in the plains of Moab: Exo 24:7; Deu 29:1. This covenant promised the favour of God and abundant temporal blessing on condition of obedience to the Law, and threatened His fearful displeasure in case of disobedience: Leviticus 26 :, Deuteronomy 23 :. Circumcision was enjoined (Lev 12:3) in the Law, and was thus a condition of blessing. It was therefore to the Jews of Pauls day a visible pledge that from Abrahams seed should go forth a blessing for the whole world, and that God would fulfil the covenant which promised personal blessings to those who obey the Law. Consequently, circumcision and the Law always stood together: Joh 7:23; Act 15:1. To undergo circumcision was to accept the Old Covenant as the basis of mans dealings with God: Act 15:5; Gal 5:3; Gal 6:13. Consequently, to a transgressor of law circumcision was practically void: it had become uncircumcision. See further under Gal 5:2.

Rom 2:26. An inference from Rom 2:25, of the fairness of which Paul asks his readers to judge.

Uncircumcision: an abstract term used for a concrete embodiment of its idea, as in all languages and ages: so Rom 3:30. Paul dismisses for a moment all thought about the man except that he is uncircumcised.

Keep: view with jealous care, as when one guards a treasure: Gal 6:13; 1Ti 5:21; 1Ti 6:20; 2Ti 1:14. To disobey the decrees of the Law, is to cast them away as worthless.

Reckoned: in the calculation of the great Judge. In Rom 2:3, Paul questioned the man as to his own reckoning about himself: he now compels him to answer a question about Gods reckoning. Since the blessings of which circumcision is a pledge are given only on condition of obedience to the Law, will not the heathen who fulfils this condition obtain the blessings? will he not on the great day stand, in the Judges reckoning, in the position of a circumcised man? This question implies that outward ordinances are of value, not in themselves, but only as means to moral ends; and that the end is sometimes otherwise gained.

Rom 2:27. A solemn affirmation, following, as in Rom 2:5; Rom 2:23, an unanswered question.

Uncircumcision from nature: absence of circumcision, resulting from the circumstances in which the man was born. See under Rom 2:14.

Accomplishing the Law: attaining the end for which it was given, realising in action what the Law sets forth in words. Compare the word keep in Rom 2:26. Because the Gentile observes with jealous care the decrees of the Law, God will treat him in the judgment as circumcised: and because in him the purpose of the Law has been achieved, his presence in the judgment will pronounce sentence on thousands of Jews in whom that purpose has been utterly defeated.

Shall judge: proclaim punishment awaiting him.

Thee who etc.: vivid description of the unfaithful Jew. He has the letter of the Law before his eyes: in his body he bears the sign of the covenant: but he is none the less a transgressor of law. By his side in the judgment stands a man like Cornelius, in whom the moral purposes of the Law have been to some extent attained. In the impenitent Jew, these purposes have been altogether thwarted. The presence of the Gentile proclaims, in a way not to be misunderstood, the punishment awaiting the Jew. This verse does but re-echo the words of one Greater than Paul: Mat 12:41-42.

The indicative future shall-judge and the cases put conditionally in Rom 2:26; Rom 2:14 imply plainly the possibility of the case here supposed. Same teaching in Act 10:35; and a good example in Rom 2:2; Rom 2:22. From Rom 3:9; Rom 3:23 we infer that this obedience, tried by the absolute standard of the moral law, was imperfect, and therefore (Rom 2:20) could not justify. But it was sufficient to condemn utterly the immoral Jew. Rom 2:26-27 also imply that in the great day the persons in question will enter eternal life: for the only distinction then (see Rom 2:7-8) will be life or destruction. We therefore infer that some heathens will be saved through their obedience, though imperfect, to the law written in their hearts. This does not contradict Rom 3:20. For their obedience, because imperfect, gives them no claim to salvation. Like those who put faith in Christ, they will be saved by the undeserved favour of God, who will reckon-not their faith: for they never heard the Gospel, but-their imperfect obedience-for righteousness. This opens a door of hope for many in Christian lands whose religious advantages have been so few that they have never heard the Gospel in its purity and power. And it warns us not hastily to pronounce on the destiny of some upright men who have not the assurance of salvation enjoyed by many of the servants of Christ.

Rom 2:28-29. A great principle, stated negatively and positively, and supporting Rom 2:27.

Manifest: set conspicuously before the eyes of men, as in Rom 1:19. It includes the various external forms which distinguish Jews from Gentiles.

Jew Circumcision: recalling the same words in Rom 2:17; Rom 2:25.

In the flesh: the weak and dying part of man, to which circumcision belongs. Paul says that the real distinction of men is not in outward things, and that the true mark of that distinction is not in the weak body soon to be laid in the grave.

In secret: so Rom 2:16, God will judge the secret things.

Circumcision of the heart: commanded in Deu 10:16 and promised in Deu 30:6, as the distinguishing mark of the true servants of God. All who have not this mark are uncircumcised: cp. Jer 9:25-26; Act 7:51. The infinite superiority of circumcision of heart, as compared with that in which many Jews trusted, Paul assumes; and goes on to say how it is brought about, viz. in Spirit. This last cannot be the human spirit, as in Rom 1:8 : for then it would be an empty repetition of heart. Most frequently, it denotes with Paul the Holy Spirit: and this gives a good sense here.

Letter: outward form of the written Law. For the outward rite, only a written command was needed: the inward change can be wrought only by the Spirit of God. In 2Co 3:3; 2Co 3:6, written shortly before this epistle, we have an important coincidence of thought; and, especially in 2Co 3:3, written not with ink but with the Spirit of God, a confirmation of the above exposition. This passing mention of the Spirit is an allusion to teaching afterwards more fully developed.

Praise not from men but from God: further description of inward religion, rebuking the vainglory which prompted so much of the outward religion of the Jews. Only that which obtains praise from God will avail in the great day.

Rom 2:28-29 state, in language recalling frequent and explicit O.T. teaching, a great principle which commends itself to the moral sense of all, and which supports both the statement in Rom 2:25 and the inferences drawn from it in Rom 2:26-27. If the real distinctions are within, uncircumcision will not necessarily deprive a man of the blessings of the covenant and circumcision will not save from condemnation one whose sins are the more inexcusable because committed in spite of a written law and by a circumcised man. To prove this, is the chief purpose of Romans 2, of which Rom 2:28-29 sum up the result. God will judge men (Rom 2:6) according to their works: and a mans works flow from his inmost self. He is (Rom 2:11) no respecter of persons: and to respect persons is to treat a man, not according to his inward reality, but according to his appearance and circumstances. Any other theory lands us (Rom 2:21-24) in manifest absurdity. Thus is dispelled all hope of escape from the impartial judgment of God, whether based upon superior knowledge derived from the Law or upon outward and visible union with the people of God.

CHAPTER II. treats of one subject, which naturally divides itself into the three sections I have adopted. Paul began by deducing in Rom 2:1-2 from Rom 1:18-32 a universal truth. That this truth admits of no exceptions, he proves in Rom 2:3-11; and shows in Rom 2:12-24 that a knowledge of the Law, and in Rom 2:25-29 that circumcision, give a man no right to make himself an exception.

The earnestness and reality of Pauls tone prove that the opinions he combats were actually held and widely spread. Of this we have confirmation in the summary given in Matthew 3 of the teaching of John the Baptist. He saw men who while living in sin trusted for salvation to their relation to Abraham, and meets them with arguments similar to those of this chapter. The ancient literature of the Jews reveals the same errors, opposed indeed by the better teachers, but widely current. So Thorath Adam f. 100, ch. 2, All Israel shall have a portion in the age to come: Shemoth Rabba f. 138. 13, Let not heretics and apostates and impious ones of Israel say, Because we are circumcised, we do not descend into hell. What does the Holy and Blessed God? He sends an angel and makes them uncircumcised, that they may descend into hell. We have further and melancholy confirmation of the same in the applicability of the reasoning of this chapter to many Christians, not only in the dark ages, but in our own day and in the most enlightened Churches. Many who do what they know to be wrong rely for salvation, perhaps unconsciously, on their knowledge of the way of salvation-of which knowledge the only result is a readiness to teach or to condemn others less instructed or less orthodox than themselves-or on their outward connection with the people of God or their attention to religious ordinances. By teaching that God looks at the heart and judges all men according to their works, Paul pronounces sentence on all such. This may be seen by reading Christian instead of Jew in this chapter. The substitution only increases the force of the argument. The difference between the words and works of some who bear the name of Christ brings serious dishonour to His name, the name of Him who died to save them, and hinders the work He died to accomplish. God who of old required circumcision of the heart requires to-day that men worship Him in spirit and truth. These deadly errors among ourselves give to this chapter an abiding and infinite worth.

It also teaches the absolute necessity of repentance. Since God is angry with all sin, none except they who turn from sin can enjoy His favour. Consequently none can intelligently seek His favour except those who sincerely endeavour to avoid all sin, and none can intelligently believe that they possess it except those who actually conquer sin. Not only does Paul thus prove mans need of repentance, but by proclaiming Gods anger against all sin he does all that words can do to lead men to it.

This chapter is a safeguard against a common perversion of the fundamental doctrine of this epistle, Justification through Faith. And Paul sets up the safeguard before he develops the doctrine to be guarded. DIV. I., of which Romans 2 is so important a part, was introduced in Rom 1:18 as logically necessary for the completeness of Pauls argument. We see now its moral and spiritual necessity. Through failure of some teachers to give prominence to the truths of this chapter, the doctrine of Justification through Faith has been frequently and seriously perverted.

The teaching of Romans 2 : holds a place in relation to the rest of the epistle analogous to that of the Epistle of James in relation to the Epistles of Paul; of the 1st Gospel in relation to the rest of the N.T.; and especially of the teaching of John the Baptist in relation to the teaching of Christ. The resemblance is seen in modes of thought and even in phrases and words. It is therefore of great value as a means of harmonizing these very different, and at first sight apparently contradictory, portions of the New Testament.

Notice carefully in Rom 1:19-20; Rom 1:24; Rom 3:12-15; Rom 3:26-27 Pauls account of the religious position of the Gentiles. God has manifested Himself to them in the created universe, and has written His law upon their hearts in the inborn moral sense. He has punished them for their forgetfulness and contempt of Him, as shown in their idolatry, by giving them up to gross sin: and in the great day He will judge them according to their obedience or disobedience to the law written within. In that day, some who never heard of Moses will be accepted because, in their careful efforts to do right, the moral purpose of the Law of Moses was in some measure attained.

The chapter from the study of which we now rise receives its entire practical value from the chapters which follow. It is a voice crying in a wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord. Like the greatest of the prophets, it points to that which is greater than itself. We may sum up the whole and its bearing on Romans 1 in the words of the Master, Except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.

Fuente: Beet’s Commentary on Selected Books of the New Testament

2:25 {9} For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law: but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision.

(9) He precisely prevents their objection, who set a holiness in circumcision, and the outward observation of the law: so that he shows that the outward circumcision, if it is separated from the inward, does not justify, and also condemns those who are indeed circumcised, of whom it is required that they fulfil that which circumcision signifies, that is to say, cleanness of the heart and the whole life according to the commandment of the law, so that if there is a man uncircumcised according to the flesh, who is circumcised in heart, he is far better and to be more regarded than any Jew that is circumcised according to the flesh only.

Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes

Next to the Mosaic Law, the Jews boasted almost equally in their circumcision. Most of the Jews in Paul’s day believed that God would not permit any observant Jew to enter perdition.

"R. [Rabbi] Levi said; In the Hereafter Abraham will sit at the entrance to Gehenna, and permit no circumcised Israelite to descend therein. What then will he do to those who have sinned very much? He will remove the foreskin from babes who died before circumcision and set it upon them [the sinners], and then let them descend into Gehenna . . ." [Note: Midrash Rabbah, Genesis , 1:409-10. Cf. Genesis Rabbah, trans. Jacob Neusner, 2:182.]

Another rabbinic view was that God will send an angel who stretches the foreskin of great sinners and then they descend into Gehenna. [Note: Midrash Rabbah, Exodus, pp. 234-35.] The Jews felt circumcision guaranteed their acceptance by God, provided they did not sin "very much" (as some Christians believe baptism guarantees salvation). Paul reminded such people that reality is more important than profession and obedience more vital than testimony. Circumcision would not shield them from God’s wrath if they failed to do all He commanded.

". . . in contrast to Jewish teachers, who held that only a radical decision to renounce the covenant invalidated one’s circumcision, Paul argues that simple transgression of the law can have the same effect." [Note: Moo, p. 169.]

"In the Greek this second part of Rom 2:25 is interesting: ’If you are a lawbreaker, your circumcision has become a foreskin.’" [Note: Witmer, p. 447.]

In our day cans and bottles have labels on them to indicate what is inside. Circumcision was a label and implied that the Jew was obedient to God. However if he was not completely obedient the label was not only worthless but misleading. The contents of the can are more important than the label. Similarly if a Gentile was completely obedient to God the absence of the label of circumcision was not of major consequence. The Jews had put more emphasis on the presence of the label than on the contents of the can. Paul’s point was that disobedience brings condemnation and perfect obedience theoretically brings salvation, regardless of whether one is a Jew or a Gentile.

"Israel’s neighbours for the most part practiced circumcision (the Philistines were a notorious exception); but the circumcision of Israel’s neighbours was not a sign of God’s covenant, as Israelite circumcision was intended to be." [Note: Bruce, p. 89.]

The reference to the "letter" (Rom 2:27) probably means that the Jews had the Law written down.

Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)