Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Romans 8:35
Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? [shall] tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?
35. Who shall separate us ] He speaks in view of these amazing proofs of the grace and truth of the Father and the Son. “ Who,” not “ what; ” although the following words are of things, not persons. This is in harmony with the intense and vivid tone of the whole passage. Cp. Joh 10:28-29; “ no one shall pluck them out of my hand; no one can pluck them out of my Father’s hand.” “ Us ” is slightly emphatic by position: q. d., “us, thus cared for and pleaded for.”
the love of Christ ] Same word as 2Co 5:14; Eph 3:19. It is the love of Christ for us, not ours for Him. The whole context here relates to our security through the goodness of God. In what sense are the things now to be named viewed as “ not separating ” us from this love? Probably they are to be taken as so many veils or clouds between us and the (outward) manifestation of the love; things which might tempt the believer to think that his Lord had forsaken him. St Paul assures him that this cannot be really so; the separation is but seeming; the love is indissoluble.
tribulation, &c.] St Paul had indeed a right to use such language as the language of experience. See e.g. 2Co 11:23-27; 2Ti 3:10-12. Cp. Heb 11:35-38, (of the O. T. saints.)
It will not be out of place to quote from the letter of a sufferer for his faith, in the French galleys, 1739: “Having, by the grace of God, made a Christian profession, we are bound to be faithful soldiers and submit to the Lord’s will. Our chains are where He has placed them. Our persecutors think to disgrace us by putting us with malefactors; but in this we are honoured of God, who gives us cause for rejoicing that He counts us worthy to bear shame for the name of Jesus. God has predestinated us to be conformed to the image of His Son, that suffering with Him we may also be glorified together. Our life is hid with Christ in God; but when Christ who is our life shall appear, then shall we also appear with him in glory.” (Letter of M. Villevaire, in Bonnefon’s Life of B. du Plan, p. 241, Eng. Trans.)
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Who shall separate us – That is, finally or entirely separate us. This is a new argument of the apostle, showing his strong confidence in the safety of the Christian.
From the love of Christ – This expression is ambiguous; and may mean either our love to Christ or his love to us. I understand it in the former sense, and suppose it means, Who shall cause us to cease to love the Saviour? In other words, the love which Christians have for their Redeemer is so strong, that it will surmount and survive all opposition and all trials. The reason for so understanding the expression is, that it is not conceivable how afflictions, etc. should have any tendency to alienate Christs love from us; but their supposed tendency to alienate our love from him might be very strong. They are endured in his cause. They are caused, in a good degree, by professed attachment to him. The persecutions and trials to which Christians are exposed on account of their professed attachment to him, might be supposed to make them weary of a service that involved so many trials. But no, says the apostle. Our love for him is so strong that we are willing to bear all; and nothing that these foes of our peace can do, can alienate us from him and from his cause. The argument, therefore, is drawn from the strong love of a Christian to his Saviour; and from the assurance that nothing would be able to separate him from that love.
On the other hand, it is alleged that the object of the apostle is to assure us, not so immediately of our love to God, as of his love to us, by directing our attention to his predestinating, calling, justifying, and glorifying us, and not sparing his own Son, but delivering him up for us; that in addition to this it contributes more to our consolation, to have our minds fixed upon Gods love to us, than upon our love to him, which is subject to so many failings and infirmities. Haldane.
Indeed the whole of this passage proceeds, in its triumphing strain, on the ground of what God and Christ have done for us, and not on the ground of anything belonging to us. It is therefore improbable, that the apostle, in the midst of such a strain, should introduce the love of the creature to God, as a just reason for such unparalleled confidence. It is more natural to the Christian to triumph in the love of Christ to him, than in any return he can make. He can glory in the strength of the former, while he mourns over the weakness of the latter. As to the objection that afflictions can have no tendency to alienate Christs love, these are the very things that alienate people from us. There are persons who are called summer friends because they desert us in the winter of adversity. But the love of Christ is greatly exalted by the fact, that none of all possible adverse circumstances, of which the apostle enumerates not a few, shall ever change his love.
Shall tribulation – thlipsis. Note, Rom 2:9. The word properly refers to pressure from without; affliction arising from external causes. It means, however, not infrequently, trial of any kind.
Or distress – stenochoria. This word properly means narrowness of place; and then, great anxiety and distress of mind, such as arises when a man does not know where to turn himself or what to do for relief. It refers, therefore, to distress or anxiety of mind, such as the early Christians were often subject to from their trials and persecutions; 2Co 7:5, Without were fightings, within were fears; see the note at Rom 2:9.
Or persecutions – Note, Mat 5:11. To these the early Christians were constantly exposed.
Or famine – To this they were also exposed as the natural result of being driven from home, and of being often compelled to wander amidst strangers, and in deserts and desolate places.
Or peril – Danger of any kind.
Or sword – The sword of persecution; the danger of their lives to which they were constantly exposed. As all these things happened to them in consequence of their professed attachment to Christ, it might be supposed that they would tend to alienate their minds from him. But the apostle was assured that they had not this power, but that their love to the Saviour was so strong as to overcome all, and to bind them unalterably to his cause in the midst of the deepest trials. The fact is, that the more painful the trials to which they are exposed on his account, the more strong and unwavering is their love to him, and their confidence in his ability to save.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Rom 8:35-39
Who shall separate us from the love of Christ?
Dangers which cannot separate the believer front the love of God
We begin with the general proposition, Who shall separate us? etc. And for the love of Christ it may be taken either actively or passively; actively for our love of Him, or passively for His love of us, which latter acceptation of it seems to be that which is here chiefly intended. First of all, let us look upon it in the thing itself. Who or what shall take off the love of Christ from us? That is, indeed, nothing at all. First, no persons shall be able to do it, whether Satan or wicked men. These they do now and then attempt it: as they are out of Gods love themselves, so they would fain make others so too. First, not by means of accusation: accusation is an expedient way to take off affection. It was the course which Ziba took with Mephibosheth, the son of Jonathan, in reference to David. And it is the course which the devil and his instruments take with those which are faithful in reference to God. Satan he is the accuser of the brethren. Secondly, as not by accusation, so neither by temptation. Again, as no enemy or person, so further no state or condition. That there is no condition, though never so forlorn, that can make God to forsake His people. Now there is a various account which may be given hereof unto us. Ye may take it in these following particulars:–First, from Gods unchangeableness, and the immutability of His own nature considered in Himself (2Ti 2:13; Jam 1:17; Joh 13:1; Jer 31:3; Isa 54:8). Secondly, there is nothing which can separate the love of God from His children, or which can separate His children from His love, because this love of His it is not founded in anything in themselves. If the Lord did therefore love His people because they were thus and thus accommodated with riches, or honours, or strength, or any such accomplishment, He would then also cease to love them when that these were taken away from them. Thirdly, Gods love is immovable as to anything which may happen unto us, because it was pitched upon us before we were, or had any being. That love which is from eternity in its original. Fourthly and lastly, there is no removal or taking off of the love of God from His people, in regard of the conveyance of it to them and the person in whom it is laid; and that is in His Son Jesus Christ–Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? The love which God bears to a Christian it is a love of covenant; and this covenant made in Christ. The second is as to the discovery or manifestation of this His love–Who shall separate us from the love of Christ?–that is, what shall be a sufficient argument to persuade us that Christ does not love us? The afflictions of Gods children are no arguments for the separation of Gods love. First, because they are all dispensed out of the principles of love; that cannot be an argument to prove the want of love which is an argument rather to prove the truth of love, His love unto them. As many as I love, I rebuke, etc. Secondly, it cannot be that affliction should be a withdrawing of Gods affection, because He never shows more affection than He does in such a condition. Thirdly, these outward afflictions are no good argument for the separation of Gods love, because the love of God reaches farther than these things here below. It is not limited or confined to this present life. Times of separation in other respects, yet they cannot be separating in this. They may separate a minister from his people; they may separate a husband from his wife; they may separate a father from his children; they may separate the soul from its body. Oh, but they cannot separate a Christian or true believer from Christ, nor from the love of God to him in Christ. And so now I have done with the first general part of the text which is this question or challenge, as it is considerable in the general proposition, Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? The second is the particular specification of evils themselves, which are seven in number: Shall tribulation or distress? etc. The first which is here presented is tribulation. The word in the Greek signifies to press, or pinch, or vex; and the word in the Latin signifies a threshing instrument or flail, wherewith the corn uses to be broken or beaten out; both of them do serve to set forth to us the nature of this present evil. First, I say, this evil of tribulation, it is such as is incident even to the saints and servants of God; they are such as are liable to great pains and griefs of body. St. Paul he had his tribulation, his thorn in the flesh, etc. And so it is with many others, etc. The apostle here instances in this as a principal evil, as that which is more general and which few escape. As for some other particulars which we find here mentioned in the text, they are such as all do not taste of. But yet even this in the next place shall not separate them from the love of God in Christ; a child of God is most dear to Him, even under tribulation itself. The second particular evil is distress: shall distress? The Greek word signifies properly straitness of place, when a man is so hampered as that he knows not which way to move, as it is with those who are shut up in some close and strait prison, or are in some violent throng and crowd. Now, this is another evil which Gods people are also liable unto, as to great and strong pressures of body, so to be in many sad distractions of spirit, to be in distress. It has been the lot sometimes of those who have been the dearest servants of God. This is an evil somewhat further and heavier than the former, which we spake of before; anguish of spirit is somewhat more than pressure of body, and which many times has a great influence upon it, A Christian is never brought into those exigencies and straits and extremities but he has still a God to go to, into whose bosom he may comfortably empty and unload himself, and find satisfaction in all his distresses. The third is persecution: shall persecution? which signifies properly a driving from place to place. When men are forced and constrained to leave their home and proper habitations, and to fly into other places and countries. It may separate us from our houses, these poor cottages of clay, but it cannot separate us from God, who is our abode and dwelling-place in all generations, nor deprive us of our everlasting habitation. The fourth thing here instanced in is famine. This is another great affliction which Gods people are subject unto here in this life. It is a wonderful thing to consider what strange kind of ways and means God has been pleased to provide for His servants in this particular. The fifth particular evil is nakedness. This is another trial of the saints, and the evil of it consists in two particulars. The one is as it is matter of shame, and the other as it is matter of danger, and hazard of life itself. Well, but this nakedness or stripping of apparel cannot strip the children of God of His love and favour in Christ, which shall still compass them about as a garment. The sixth here instanced in is peril, whereby we are to understand any danger or hazard of life in any kind whatsoever. Danger and fear of evil is many times a greater evil than the evil itself; and we know what difficulties and adventures it has sometimes put men upon. There are seasons and times of peril which Gods children are exposed unto; but God does not leave them at such times, nor withdraw His love from them; in the world sometimes it is otherwise. There are many that will own their friends in times of safety, which yet will not know them in times of danger. The seventh and last is sword, whereby we are to understand all kind of violent death whatsoever. (Thomas Horton, D.D.)
Christs love to us
An aged man over ninety years of age was asked by his pastor this question: My dear aged friend, do you love Jesus? His deeply-furrowed face was lit up with a smile that sixty-seven years of discipleship had imparted, and, grasping my hand with both Of his, said: Oh! I can tell you something better than that. I asked him, What is that? Oh, sir! he said, He loves me.
The Christians security
There is a well-known little shell-fish which has its dwelling on the rocks. To these it clings with such surprising tenacity, that almost all attempts to dislodge it are vain. It takes alarm at the slightest touch; resists the more, the more it is assailed; and maintains its persistency to such degree, that it will sooner submit to be crushed than to be removed Christian, learn of this little animal the secret of your strength and security in times of trouble. Your place of defence is the munitions of rocks. Let nothing draw or drive you from your stronghold.
The Christian rejoicing in Christs unchangeable love
I. The love of God as the ground of the Christians security. This love in Rom 8:39 he terms the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. This is consonant with the general testimony of Scripture. In Him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead; and if the fulness, then the love. So that it is useless to seek Gods love out of Christ–there is none out of Christ. Now to make this love our confidence, we must bear in mind two things–
1. It has been the spring of all that has been done for our salvation.
(1) We speak of God as acting in this with a view to His own glory. True, but this is what we might almost venture to call an incidental circumstance. The sun manifests his glory as he rises day by day, but it is not the brightness of the sun that causes him to arise; we must look elsewhere for the source of that. So, if we would find the spring and origin of our salvation, we must look for it, not in the glory of the Godhead, but in the love of the Divine mind. Wisdom, justice, faithfulness, power, all shine forth here and are glorified; but how? As loves instruments. But what set love in action? We can give no answer; there is none to give; we are come to the fountain-head; we can go no farther.
(2) The same as to Christ. Various motives are assigned in Scripture for all He did and suffered for us; the hope of reward–for the joy that was set before Him He endured the Cross; obedience to His Father–He became obedient unto death; but without setting these things aside, we may still say, He loved us and gave Himself for us. He looked upwards–there was His Father whom He delighted to obey; He looked forwards–there was the glory He was soon to inherit; but no matter where He looked, His heart was with us.
2. The same love that was the spring of all that has been done for our salvation, still exists in God unimpaired and unchanged. The apostle, you observe, does not speak of it as something passed and gone. Many of the great things it has already done, it is not necessary it should do again. If Christ has once died for my soul, His one oblation of Himself once offered fully atones for all my sins; if God has once justified me, no other justification do I need; if He has built for me one heaven, I cannot want another; but so much does He love me now, that if my Saviour had not died, if my guilty soul had not been justified, etc., my God would do for me just what He has already done. For six thousand years the sun has shone without suspension, but there will come a day when he will shine no more. But the love of God existed for a boundless period before that sun, and it will exist for as boundless a period after Him. It is not something God has created; it is a part of His own nature.
II. The confidence we may feel, if we have an interest in this love, that nothing can ever separate us from it.
1. There is a love of God in which we are all interested, for we are all partakers of it. It keeps us in being, it gives us innumerable comforts, it makes to us in the gospel the most gracious offers of salvation; but if we trample on these offers or neglect them, there comes a time when this love turns away from us. It would go farther with us, but it cannot. The question is, then, Are you the objects of Gods peculiar, saving love? And the way to answer it is to ask, Have you ever sought to become the objects of it? Most men hold the love of God cheaper by far than they hold one anothers love. Do you feel that it is dearer to your soul than all other love?
2. There are two ways in which we can conceive it possible for a separation to be made between us and Gods love. One is, for Him to withdraw His love from us; the other, for us to withdraw ourselves from that. The uniting cord, we may say, may break at either end, either at its higher end with God, or at its lower end with us.
(1) As to the former of these cases, we need scarcely say a word. The very supposition seems a dishonour to Jehovah. He abandon me after having once freely loved me, and brought me to love and trust Him? I can feel, with Paul, that the whole universe could not prevail on Him to do it, were the whole universe to try (Rom 8:38). Other love will often cool and wither away of itself; here is a love which nothing can wear away.
(2) But let us turn to the other case–the drawing of us away from our love to Christ. This, the apostle expresses his firm conviction, is also impossible; and this conviction, he states, is the result of his own experience. There may now and then, he intimates, be struggling and conflict; we may have to put forth our strength, and a strength greater than ours, against these things, the force and pressure of them, but the struggle is sure to end in one way–we overcome. He has made to us new discoveries of His love in it, and these have made us more determined to love and adhere to Him. (C. Bradley, M.A.)
Separated from Christ
1. The apostle had passed through experiences varied and trying enough to entitle him to make this inquiry. He knew what he was talking about. It is not the unchastened enthusiasm of a recruit, but the sober declaration of a veteran that is before us–a No which has an unconquerable human soul in it! History has sufficiently answered this inquiry from one side of Christian experience. Set it down as a fact that terror has failed. The scaffold, the rack, the stake, the dungeon, have fairly been worsted in this great fight. Enemies have killed the body, but the principle of truth lives; they have slain Christians, but Christianity is conqueror.
2. But has the apostle covered the whole ground? Does he exhaust the whole possibility of Christian trial? I think not. It is instructive to mark the development of the antagonisms to Christianity. In the text we have nothing but the roughest and vulgarest of opposition, yet the most natural. The fist, the thumb-screw, the scourge, are what we think of at the beginning: first, that which is natural, afterwards that which is spiritual. The opposition does not end where the cruelty ends. We have thought that now the day of persecution has gone. I propose to substitute, Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall flattery, or ease, or luxury? shall selfishness or gentility, or the praise of men? The apostles were not tried upon these points. They were only out in the rough weather: they knew not the warmth of flattery or the power of the soft tongue. They fought their battle to the point of triumph; how are we going to fight ours? They conquered the stake: can we throw off the silken cords?
3. Paul himself gave an answer to the inquiry at a later date: Demas hath forsaken me, having loved this present world. When he wrote this epistle no answer came back upon him. But when he became an older man he saw further into the subtle play of the devil, and lived to see that love of the present world had done what tribulation, distress, etc., had failed to do! See the beginning of the mischief! Demas was separated from his nominal love of Christ, not by the sword, but by a bribe. If any man love the world the love of the Father is not in him. No man can serve two masters. Ye cannot serve God and Mammon! Yet men are still tempted to believe that somehow, having two hands, they can carry two worlds, and having two feet, they can walk upon two paths. Go to a Christian man and say, If you do not surrender your religious convictions you shall be burnt in the public market-place as a common felon, and if there is one spark of real manhood in his nature he will say, So be it! in the sufficiency of Divine grace I am ready. Go to that self-same man in a neighbourly way and show him how a certain thing in trade can be done so as to put him into the possession of considerable resources–with which he can afterwards do good. Possibly you may succeed! When you threatened him with the stake, he spat upon your fire; when you tempted him with a bribe, he said, I will think about it. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Not Nero; but a friend in the trade! Men are separated from the love of Christ in the name of wife and children. If thou wast a single man, and thy universe bounded by a carpet-bag, how virtuous and honourable thou wouldst be! You say to God in effect, The woman that Thou gavest to be with me, and the children of whom I am the father–these are my tempters. Has it come to this, that a man may not slay himself alone, but that he must do it in the name which should be dearest to him, and make his very children a weight about his neck that shall drag him to the depths of perdition? If you go to a Christian preacher and say to him, If you dont cease to preach you shall be thrown to the lions, if he has one spark of manhood left in him, he will declare his readiness to suffer in the name of Christ. The best memories will crowd upon him; he will think of that wondrous climax–Who through faith stopped the mouths of lions, quenched the violence of fire, etc. When is the apostle going to finish that, and say, Refused the bribe; and as utterly defied the subtlety as the violence of the enemy? The apostle exclaimed to Timothy, Endure afflictions! What have we to say to young preachers now? Endure prosperity! It never occurred to Paul to say to Timothy, Now be on thy guard against flattery and merely outward success. When he charged those who were following him in the good cause, he said, Fight the good fight, endure hardness. All his talk ran along the line of his own experience, as if it never occurred to him that in the ages to come all the violent attacks would be laid aside and the enemy would betake himself to a more subtle course of assault upon the citadel of faith!
4. Turning this matter over carefully, I have seen how possible it might be for certain constitutions and temperaments really to be terrified from the open and distinct avowal of faith; yet right down in their hearts really to be loving Jesus all the time. But a man led away from the truth by a bribe, a soul to whom prosperity was shown as a lure–that is the meanest, basest cowardice! If the man who shrank from martyrdom may escape, what escape can there be for the man who took forbidden fruit, did things in secret which he was ashamed of in public, and who was separated from the love of Christ, not nominally and professionally, but who had his heart eaten out of him by some invisible and voracious foe? Separated from the love of Christ! What by? By the stroke of a feather! by a whispered temptation! by a mouthful of poisoned honey! The apostles gave the right answers to violence–what reply shall we make to subtlety? (J. Parker, D.D.)
The indissoluble bond
Who? No one who cannot do one of three things.
I. Annihilate the loved ones. The being who could blot out of existence those whom Christ loved might effect the object, but who could do this? No creature in the heavens or on the earth. No one but the Absolute.
II. Blot the loved ones from the memory of the lover. The being who could cause Christ to forget His disciples would succeed. For those whom we cease to remember we cease to love. But who can do this? He is omniscient, the past, present, and the future are all alike to Him. Duration is all a now to Him. He is the same yesterday.
III. Give new information of the loved ones to the lover. Were it possible for a being to inform Christ of some bad qualities and some enormous crimes connected with the loved ones of which He was ignorant, His love might be extinguished. But who could do this? No one in heaven or on earth. He knew from eternity all concerning the objects of His love. (D. Thomas, D.D.)
The two states
Is this he who so lately cried out, O wretched man that I am! Who shall deliver me? who now triumphs? O happy man! Who shall separate us from the love of God? Yes, it is the same. Pained then with the thoughts of that miserable conjunction with a body of death, and so crying out for a deliverer; now he hath found a deliverer to do that for him to whom he is for ever united. (Abp. Leighton.)
As it is written, For Thy sake we are killed all the day long.
Killing the saints
First, we will take notice of the affliction, and that is killing. We are killed. We see here what is the lot of the saints and servants of God. First of all, in regard of the enemies. What is the matter with them, that in their dealings with the people of God nothing will serve their turn but killing and slaying and taking away their lives? Surely it is not to be wondered at; there is very good reason for it, which may be given in these considerations: First, look upon them in their brood and generation and the stock they come of. Whose children are they? and from whom do they proceed? Children take after their parents. Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do (Joh 8:44). Therefore, in the second place, their dispositions carry them hereunto, and that in a twofold respect. First, it proceeds from their malice; they hate them and cannot abide them, therefore they kill them. Hatred, when it comes to the height of it, very easily proceeds to murder. The second is their jealousy and fear. As they kill them because they hate them, so they kill them because they fear them. Herod feared John, and therefore beheaded him. The second is how it comes about in regard of the saints themselves, whence they come to suffer it, and for what reason God Himself permits it. Why does He so? First, for the honour of religion and for the evidence of their faith itself, that the world from hence may be convinced of their sincerity and universal obedience to the will of God. Secondly, which is pertinent hereunto, for the multiplying and increasing of their number and the drawing on of more unto them. Thirdly, as the signification and evidence of future judgment and the dispensations of another world, the slaying and killing of the saints, it tells us what shall be done to the enemies, and how it is likely hereafter to go with the servants of God. Therefore it teaches us both to expect and prepare for the like, to provide for killing, and to be content to profess Christianity, even at so dear a rate as this. It will be worth it when all is done. For Thy sake we are killed. But if they were indeed killed, how could they say they were killed, and tell us so in so many terms? Killing, it takes away complaining, and makes the parties which are so dealt with incapable of saying what they are. First, as an expression of impatience, and making the worst of their evil and affliction that possibly they could. This we shall find sometimes to be the disposition of sorrow, to aggravate itself and make it seem greater than it is. But secondly, in the reality of the thing, the desperateness of their condition. They call it killing because it tended thereunto, and was in a manner death itself. Thirdly, from the preparation of their minds, and disposition which was in them hereunto, as occasion might require. The people of God in this Scripture count themselves killed, because they were ready to be so if God should please to call them unto it. Killing, it is not to be interpreted in this place according to the event, but according to the intention and purpose. They that go out in a wrong cause, they kill where they do not hit, because they go out upon killing and murdering principles. Lastly, the people of God might here say they were killed while they lived, by way of sympathy and participation. They were killed forasmuch as others were killed which they were interested in. And thus much now also of the first thing which I propounded to be considered in this complaint: the affliction itself, We are killed, or put to death. The second is the occasion or ground of it, We are killed for Thy sake, which may admit of divers constructions. First, as the pretence of the enemies. They kill us for Thy sake, that is, they deal thus cruelly with us, and make the world in the meantime believe as if herein they had respect unto Thee. Secondly, For Thy sake, that is, for our reference to. Thee, because we are Thy people, and worship Thy name, and profess Thy truth, and have Thy ordinances amongst us. Thirdly, it appears that Gods cause is the thing which the enemies aim at in their killing of Gods people, from a consideration of the means and ways whereby they labour to effect it, and that is by such as are most effectual to the extirpation of religion itself. Thirdly, For Thy sake. We may carry it a little further than so, not only as a complaint, but a confession. Not so much for a complaint of their enemies, as indeed a complaint of themselves. We are killed for Thy sake, that is, in satisfaction to Thy justice, Who art a just and righteous God, and wilt not suffer sin to be unpunished. Our enemies have nothing against us themselves, but they kill us for Thy sake, that is, to accomplish Thy holy decrees, to bring about Thy wise providence, to fulfil Thy righteous judgments, to visit and avenge the quarrel of Thy covenant. And so much of these words, as they may be taken under the emphasis of complaint. The second is under the emphasis of triumph, in the words of the apostle, and so we have this from it, that the main ground of rejoicing in suffering is the cause we suffer for. Then we have cause of quiet and comfort, when we can say, Tis for Thy sake. There are two things which are principally to be looked at in suffering–the one is a good conscience, and the other is a good cause. This it serves as a distinction between martyrs and malefactors. (Thomas Horton, D.D.)
Suffering in Gods cause
First, we will take it emphatically, and consider it so. There is that in the cause of God which is able to keep the heart up in the greatest sufferings. To be killed for Gods cause, it is a matter of special triumph. Secondly, it is a matter of rejoicing to suffer for Gods sake, because herein we are made conformable to Christ Himself. Thirdly, we hereby come to partake of greater glory hereafter; suffering in a good cause has the promise of a good reward, and has amends made it for time to come in another place (Mat 5:11-12). And thus it is true emphatically. That suffering for Gods sake is a matter of joy and rejoicing, we are killed: therefore glory in this our tribulation. Secondly, we may take it exclusively. For Thy sake we are killed, and that is for Thy cause and nothing else. From whence we have this observable, that there is not anything in suffering which can comfort the heart for itself except it be for Gods cause. It is not the punishment, but the cause, which makes the martyr. Again, further, as out of this there is no comfort in suffering, so indeed there is a great deal of discontent when a man shall reflect and enter into his conscience, and find that he does not suffer for Gods cause; he will have a very sad reckoning to make of it when he shall give up his accounts to God. There are three particular considerations which do make our sufferings and persecutions to be said to be for Gods sake. First, the intent of the enemies which we suffer from. We then suffer in this sense for Gods sake when they shall impose such evils and sufferings upon us in reference to God, because we are professors of religion and maintain the cause of God. It is thus far a suffering for Gods sake because the enemy he looks at God in it. But, secondly, we may be said to suffer for Gods sake from the nature of the thing itself which we suffer for. This now, it comes a little nearer, a man suffers for Gods sake when he suffers for well-doing, not only in the apprehension of the enemy, but likewise in the thing itself. First, when it is sinful in itself. He that suffers thus does not suffer for Gods sake, let an enemy be never so violent. Again, secondly, as when it is sinful in the thing. So likewise, when it is mingled and involved with any sinful circumstances, we do not properly suffer for God except we suffer every way for God. Thirdly, we are said to suffer for Gods sake according to the disposition of the spirit we suffer with, that is, when we have a pure respect to Gods glory in our suffering. And this is the second particular, the ground or occasion of these sufferings, For Thy sake. The third particular in these words is the extent and continuance of the persecution, All the day long. First, I say, but for a day. It pleases the Spirit of God to set forth to us the Churchs persecution under an expression of short continuance; it is not a week, or a month, or a year, but only a day; it is but one day and we have done. When evils are at any time upon us, as we see they are now at this present, we think they will never be gone, through our impatient disposition; but we should learn in this case to submit to the providence of God in the humbling of ourselves for our sins. The second is the extent of its continuance. As it is but a day, so it is a whole day, all the day long. We must take notice of that. And under this expression we have three things intimated unto us. First, the continuance of the affliction, An whole day. This it does denote unto us thus much, how that the afflictions of the people of God they do stay and abide upon them their appointed time. The second is the unweariedness of the enemy, All the day long. It is a sign that they are not spent nor tired out in this execution. They kill, and take no respite between. First, because it is natural to them. It is a business which they are carried unto by their proper inclinations. Actions which are natural are unwearied. The eye it is not weary of seeing, nor the ear is not weary of hearing, nor the pulse is not weary of beating, because all these are natural to them. Secondly, it is delightful to them. That is another account of it. Those things which are pleasing are unwearied. Thirdly, they are unwearied in this business, because they have very good help and assistance to further them in it. Many hands they use to make light work. Where the burden lies all upon one, or some few, it is easy to be weary. Well, this teaches us what to do in this condition. If they kill all the day long, we should pray all the day long. The third is the patience of the saints, Killed all the day long. Who could ever endure that? Yes, there where God gives help and strength to bear it men may be able to do it. And so was the Church here; she did not faint under continual tribulations. Here is now the great faith and constancy and patience of the saints. (Thomas Horton, D.D.)
The world seeking to destroy the good
First, by way of designation, they have determined and appointed us hereunto. Thus it is with those who are enemies to the saints and people of God; they resolve, if they can, to destroy them. First, I say, they look upon them as unprofitable, as a people of whom there is no use or good comes at all. Creatures which are unprofitable, you know, we use to dispatch and destroy. But, secondly, as they look upon them as unprofitable, and so destroy them for that, so withal they look upon them as troublesome and pernicious, and destroy them for that. It is ordinary and familiar with them to impute all the mischief that falls out to them as the causes. Secondly, by way of expectation. They count us as sheep for the slaughter–that is, they make sure of our destruction; they do verily and fully make account to see us destroyed. The reason of it is this: First, because they would very fain have it so. That which men desire they believe. And then, secondly, because most commonly they judge according to outward appearance. And then, thirdly, the Lord does also infatuate them and give them up to their own imaginations and vain conceits many times. That is the second thing, by way, namely, of expectation, They count us as sheep, etc, that is, they make sure of our destruction. Thirdly and lastly, which I conceive is principally intended in a way of scorn and contempt, They count us as sheep for the slaughter, that is, they make no reckoning of our destruction. They make no more of killing us than a butcher would do of killing a sheep. First, I say, their readiness to procure it. That which men have any esteem or account of they are very chary how they set themselves about it. These enemies they do it readily; they are not long ere they set themselves about it. That is one thing whereby they discover how cheap such mens deaths are with them. Secondly, their unmercifulness in the doing of it. These and the like considerations do manifest this truth unto us, how cheap the death of Gods people is in the esteem and account of Gods enemies. Well, let it be as cheap as it will be with such graceless persons as these are, yet we know there is One which sets a price and valuation upon it. Precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of His saints. The second is the form of allegation, As it is written. Therefore let us be persuaded to the exercising of ourselves in this book with all kind of diligence, to be acquainted with the Word of God and the principal passages of it, so as it may be no strange or unheard-of thing to us. Ye see hero how the apostle alleges it here in this place, As it is written; no more, but so. He does not tell them where, nor in what place, as taking it for granted that they know it. We should be so cunning and skilled in the Scripture that we should be able to know when it is Scripture which is alleged to us and when it is not from our acquaintance and conversation in it. Now, secondly, for that which is intimated and signified from it. And that is this, as the consent of Scripture with Scripture, so the consent of times with times, and the conditions of the people of God in all ages of the Church. We see here that it is no new business for Gods people to be under affliction; we have it here upon writing and record as that which has been long ago. First, there are the same grounds of persecution in Gods people themselves. Secondly, there is the same disposition in their enemies as has been in times past. Thirdly, there is the same wisdom and power in God Himself: wisdom to know how to impose them, and power how to moderate that they exceed not and go beyond bounds and their due proper limits. (Thomas Horton, D.D.)
Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors.—
More than conquerors
I. The Christian is conqueror. The battle consists of a moral conflict, with inward and outward enemies all leagued in terrible force against the soul. To this is added–what, indeed, was most peculiar to the early Church–a war of external suffering, of penury, persecution, and martyrdom. Now the way Christ provides for the holy warriors passage through this fiery contest is not by shunning, but by facing the foe. The Captain of their salvation might have withdrawn His people from the field and conducted them to heaven without the hazard of a conflict. But not so. He will lead them to glory, but it shall be by the path of glory. They shall carve their way to the crown by the achievements of the sword. But in what sense are we conquerors? Just in that sense in which the Holy Ghost obtains the victory. It is not the believer himself who conquers; it is the Divine Spirit within. No movement is seen, no tactics are observed, no war-cry is heard, and yet there is passing within the soul a more important battle, and there is secured a more brilliant victory, than ever the pen of the historian recorded. There is the conquest of–
1. Faith (Heb 11:1; Joh 5:4). Faith in the truth of Gods word, in the veracity of Gods character, in the might, and skill, and wisdom of our Commander; faith, eyeing the prize, gives the victory to the Christian combatant, and secures the glory to the Captain of his salvation.
2. Patience (Heb 6:12; Heb 6:15). Is it no real victory when beneath the pressure of great affliction the Christian is enabled to say, Though He slay me yet will I trust in Him?
3. Joy (1Th 1:6; Jam 1:2; Joh 16:20). And who but Jesus can turn our sorrow into joy?–not only assuaging our griefs and tempering the flame, but actually making our sorrows the occasion of thanksgiving. Confide your grief to Jesus, and He will cause it sweetly to sing (Psa 30:11-12; 2Co 7:4).
II. He is more than a conqueror. The same word as a far more and exceeding and eternal weight of glory. So we are far more exceeding conquerors. It is more than a mere victory which the believer gains. A battle may be won at a great loss to the conqueror. A great leader may fall at the head of his troops. The flower of an army may be destroyed, and the best blood of a nations pride may be shed. But the Christian conquers with no such loss. Nothing whatever essential to his well-being is perilled. His armour, riveted upon his soul by the Holy Spirit, he cannot lose. His life, hid with Christ in God, cannot be endangered. There is not a grace in his soul but shall come out purer and brighter for the conflict. Losing nothing, he gains everything! All his resources are augmented by the result. His armour is brighter, his sword is keener, his courage is more dauntless, for the conflict. Faith is strengthened–love is expanded–experience is deepened–knowledge is increased.
III. through Him that loved us. Here is the great secret of our victory, the source of our triumph. Thanks be to God which giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ. Through the conquest which He Himself obtained, through the grace which He imparts, through the strength which Be inspires, through the intercession which He presents, in all our tribulation, distress, persecution, etc., we are more than conquerors. Fear not, then, the darkest cloud, nor the proudest waves, nor the deepest wants–in these very things you shall, through Christ, prove triumphant. Nor shrink from the battle with the last enemy. He stands at your side a crownless king, and waving a broken sceptre. (O. Winslow, D.D.)
More than conquerors
I. The victories already won by those who have been possessed by the love of Jesus.
1. Tribulation, in the Latin, signifies threshing, and Gods people are often beaten with the heavy flail of trouble; but they are more than conquerors, since they lose nothing but their straw and chaff. The Greek, however, suggests pressure from without. It is used in the case of persons who are bearing heavy burdens, and are heavily pressed upon. Now, there are very few who do not meet with outward pressure, either from sickness, poverty, or bereavement; but under all believers have been sustained. It is said of the palm-tree that the more weights they hang upon it the more straight and lofty it is; and it is so with the Christian.
2. Distress. The Greek refers to mental grief. Straitness of place is something like the word. We sometimes get into a position in which we feel as if we could not move; the way is shut up; and our mind is distracted; we cannot calm and steady ourselves. Well, now, if you are a genuine Christian, you will be more than a conqueror over mental distress. Jesus shall say, as He walks the tempest of your soul, It is I, be not afraid.
3. Persecution. This in all its forms has fallen upon the Church, and up to this moment it has never achieved a triumph, but it has cleared it of hypocrisy; when cast into the fire the pure gold lost nothing but its dross, which it might well be glad to lose.
4. Famine. We are not so exposed to this as they were in Pauls time, who suffered the loss of all their goods, and consequently did not know where to find food for their bodies. No doubt there are some now who by their conscientious convictions are reduced to famine. But Christians bear even this sooner than sell their conscience and stain their love to Christ.
5. Nakedness. Another terrible form of poverty.
6. Peril–i.e., constant exposure to sudden death. 7, The sword–one cruel form of death as a picture of the whole. The noble army of martyrs have given their necks to the sword as cheerfully as the bride upon the marriage day gives her baud to the bridegroom. At this day you are not, the most of you, called to all this, but if ye were, my Lord would give you grace to bear the test. Your danger is lest you grow rich, become proud, and conform to the world, and lose your faith. If you cannot be torn in pieces by the roaring lion, you may be hugged to death by the bear. I fear that the Church is far more likely to lose her integrity in these soft and silken days than she was in those rough times. Are there not professors whose methods of trade are just as vicious as those of the most tricky?
II. The laurels of the fight. The words more than conquerors might be rendered more exceeding conquerors. The Vulgate has a word which means over over-comers, over and above conquering. For a Christian to be a conqueror is a great thing: how can he he more than a conqueror? Because–
1. The power by which he overcomes is nobler far. Here is a champion just come from the Greek games, Why! the mans muscles are like steel, and you say to him, I do not wonder that you beat and bruised your foe; if I had set up a machine made of steel it could have done the same. Where is the glory? One big brute has beaten another big brute, that is all. Dogs and bulls and game-cocks have endured as much, and perhaps more. Now, see the Christian champion. He is a simple, unlettered person, who just knows that Christ came into the world to save sinners; yet he has won the victory over philosophers. He has been tempted and tried; he was very weak, yet somehow he has conquered. This is victory indeed when the base things of this world overthrow the mighty.
2. The conqueror fights with some selfish motive, even when the motive is patriotism. But the Christian fights neither for any set of men nor for himself: in contending for truth he contends for all men, but especially for God; and in suffering for the right he suffers with no prospect of earthly gain.
3. The Christian loses nothing even by the fight itself. In most wars the gain seldom makes any recompense for the effusion of blood; but the Christians faith, when tried, grows stronger; his patience, when tempted, becomes more patient.
4. Most conquerors have to struggle and agonise to win the conquest, but Christians, when their love to Christ is strong, have found it even easy to overcome suffering for the Lord. Look at Blandina, enveloped in a net, tossed upon the horns of bulls, and then made to sit in a red hot iron chair to die, and yet unconquered to the close. Indeed, the tormentors were tormented to think they could not conquer timid women and children. I saw upon the lake of Orta, in northern Italy, on some Roman holy day, a number of boats coming from all quarters of the lake towards the church upon the central islet of the lake, and it was beautiful to hear the plash of the oars and the sound of song; and the rowers never missed a stroke because they sang, neither was the song marred because of the plash of the oars, but on they came, singing and rowing: and so has it been with the Church of God. That oar of obedience, and that other oar of suffering–the Church has learned to ply both of these, and to sing as she rows, Thanks be unto God, who always maketh us to triumph in every place!
5. They have conquered their enemies by doing them good. The Church has been the anvil, but she has broken many hammers. All true believers are far more glorious than the Roman conqueror. What flowers are they which angels strew in the path of the blessed? What songs are those which rise from yonder halls of Zion, conjubilant with song as the saints pass along to their everlasting habitations?
III. The persons that have conquered. Men who believed in Christs love to them, and who were possessed with love to Christ. This is their sole distinction. The poorest have been as brave as the wealthy; the learned have died gloriously, but the unlearned have almost stolen the palm. There is room for all who love the Lord in this fight, and there are crowns for each.
IV. The power which sustained these more than conquerors. It was through Him that loved us. Much depends upon the leader. Christ showed them how to conquer by enduring and conquering as their example. They triumphed through Christ as their Teacher, for His doctrines strengthened their minds, but, above all, because Christ was with them. The name by which the apostle called our Lord is the key to the text, Through Him that loved us. They knew that He loved them, and that if they suffered for His sake, it was His love which let them suffer for their ultimate gain, and for His permanent honour. (C. H. Spurgeon.)
More than conquerors
They not only resist, but prevail; and not only prevail, but triumph. They not only refuse to succumb and submit to their enemies, but they make those enemies submit to them. They lead captivity captive; they take the spoils of death and hell. There is such a thing as so conquering in battle as to suffer as much loss as a defeat would have cost. Or an army may merely repulse a foe, and maintain its ground. Some commanders, who are too stubborn to be beaten, are yet totally unable to follow up a victory, or make any adequate use of it. It is not so with the Christian. He can keep his ground; he can repel his enemies. He can do much more than that, He can win from them, as it were, honour, riches, territory, and renown. He can make them defray the cost of the campaign. He can extort from them the materials of the reward of his triumph. He can bind them to his chariot wheels, and like the old Roman generals, when a public triumph was awarded them, he can make his vanquished foes serve his interests, and heighten the glory of his renown. All this, however, is not by any might or prowess of his own, but it is through Him that loved us, Of Christ it is affirmed that His foes are made His footstool; and from their backs, prostrate in the dust, He leaps up to His throne. And Christs victory is our victory too. If we suffer with Him, we shall also reign with Him. (T. G. Horton.)
More than a conqueror
I. The spiritual life of man on earth is a battle. This is true of all men, whether godly or ungodly. There are two powers in every mans soul eternally antagonistic–the spiritual and the carnal; the former struggling ever for the absolute right, and the other for the personally gratifying. In the case of the ungodly, of course the spiritual is the weaker. Selfishness and passions struggle to keep the conscience down; whereas, in the case of the godly, the spiritual is the stronger, and the struggle of the higher nature is, to bring the dictates of self and the flesh into absolute subjection. The preceding chapter is a moral history of this conflict.
II. A conqueror in this battle is a glorious character He who conquers his passions, and subdues all the evil tendencies of his nature, is a hero in the highest sense.
1. He has developed some of the noblest attributes–as courage, self-sacrifice, perseverance. It requires a far higher courage to battle on the unobserved arena of the soul, against the favourite lusts and gods of the depraved nature, than to face an army in the open field.
2. He has pursued a course absolutely right. The course of a warrior admits of many solemn questions as to its rectitude; but he who battles against the wrong in his own heart is engaged in a struggle of undoubted righteousness.
3. He has achieved a result entirely benevolent. Even the most useful of the mere material wars have been mixed with immense evils; but in the case of this moral victory, nothing is destroyed but the destroyer, etc.
III. The Christian is more than a conqueror. A man is a conqueror when he overcomes his enemy; he is more than this when he is a gainer by the conquest.
1. He has lost nothing in the conquest. He might have been a conqueror and yet have lost much by his battles. Indeed, most material conquerors have suffered great losses; if not a loss of property, a loss of friends; a loss, perhaps, of health; a loss of peace of mind. But a Christian conqueror has lost nothing.
2. He has gained much by his conquest.
(1) Power. There is a tribe of savages whose warriors have the idea that the strength of the men they have killed flows into them by the fatal stroke. This has a reality in the moral conflict. Every moral enemy slain gives the slayer strength.
(2) Dominion. In material warfare a man may conquer, often does, and not become a king. Not so in this conflict; the Christian conqueror becomes the monarch of his own soul.
(3) Invincibility. In physical campaigns, conquerors have been conquered over again. Not so in this spiritual victory; the man who once conquers sin, becomes unconquerable for ever–he is kept by the power of God, etc.
IV. The Christian is more than conqueror through Christ.
1. Christ revealed the terribleness of the enemy. The soul would not have known how terrible her spiritual enemies were, had it not been for the revelation of Christ. He has shown what sin is.
2. Christ furnished the armour for the battle (Eph 6:14-18).
3. Christ gave the inspiration for the engagement. His love kindled the martial spirit in the sinners soul, and roused him to the conflict.
4. Christ gave them the conquering power. He made His strength perfect in their weakness. Thus their victory is through Christ, and the songs of eternity ascribe all spiritual conquests to His love (Rev 5:9; Rev 5:12-13). (D. Thomas, D.D.)
More than conquerors
A heterogeneous mass the apostle here brigades together as an antagonistic army. There is no attempt at an exhaustive enumeration, or at classification.
I. The impotent enemies of love. There is contempt in the careless massing together of the foes which the apostle enumerates. He begins with the widest word that covers everything–affliction. Then he specifies various forms of it. Distress, straitening, as the word might be rendered. Then he comes to evils inflicted for Christs sake by hostile men, persecution. Then he passes purely physical evils, hunger and nakedness. Then he harks back again to mans antagonism, peril, and sword. And thus carelessly, and without an effort at logical order, he lumps together, as specimens of their class, these salient points, as it were, and crests of the great sea, whose billows threaten to roll over us; and he laughs at them all, as impotent and naught, when compared with the love of Christ, which shields us from them all. There is no need, in order to rise to the full height of the Christian contempt for calamity, to deny any of its terrible power. These things can separate us from much. They can separate us from joy, from hope, from almost all that makes life desirable. They can strip us to the very quick, but the quick they cannot touch. The frost comes and kills the flowers, burns the leaves, cuts off the stems, binds the sweet music of the flowing rivers in silent chains, casts mists and darkness over the face of the solitary grey world, but it does not touch the life that is in the root. You need not be very much afraid of anything being taken from you as long as Christ is left you. You will not be altogether hopeless so long as you feel the sweet and all-pervading consciousness of the changeless love of Christ.
II. The abundant victory of love. Mark how the apostle, in his enthusiastic way, is not content here with simply saying that he and his fellows conquer. There must be something more than that to correspond to the power of the victorious Christ that is in us. Note, then, further, that not only is this victory more than bare victory, being the conversion of the enemy into allies, but that it is a victory, which is won even whilst we are in the midst of the strife. No ultimate victory, in some far-off and blessed heaven, will be ours unless moment by moment, here, to-day, we are more than conquerors through Him that loved us. So, then, about this abundant victory there are these things to say–You conquer the world only then when you make it contribute to your conscious possession of the love of Christ. Has the world helped me to lay hold on Christ? Then I have conquered it. Has the world loosened my grasp upon Him? Then it has conquered me. Note, then, further, that this abundant victory depends on how we deal with the changes of our outward lives, our sorrows or our joys. The set of your sails, and the firmness of your grasp upon the tiller, determine whether the wind shall carry you to the haven or shall blow you out, a wandering waif, upon a shoreless and melancholy sea. The worst of all afflictions is a wasted affliction, and they are all wasted unless they teach us more of the reality and the blessedness of the love of Jesus Christ.
III. The love which makes us conquerors. The apostle, with a wonderful instinctive sense of fitness, names Christ here by a name congruous to the thoughts which occupy his mind, when he speaks of Him that loved us. His question has been, Can anything separate us from the love of Christ? And his answer is, So far from that being the case, that very love, by occasion of sorrows and afflictions, tightens its grasp upon us, and, by the communication of itself to us, makes us more than conquerors. This great love of Jesus Christ, from which nothing can separate us, will use the very things that seem to threaten our separation as a means of coming nearer to us in its depth and in its preciousness. The apostle says, Him who loved us, and the words in the original distinctly point to some one fact as being the great instance of love. That is to say they point to His death. And so we may say Christs love helps to conquer because in His death He interprets for us all possible sorrows. The Cross is the key to all tribulation, and declares it to be a token and an instrument of an unchanging love. Further, that great love of Christ helps us to conquer, because in His sufferings and death He becomes the companion of all the weary. The rough, dark, lonely road changes its look when we see His footprints there, not without specks of blood in them, where the thorns tore His feet. And, lastly, this dying lover of our souls communicates to us all, if we will, the strength whereby we may coerce all outward things into being helps to the fuller participation of His perfect love. (A. Maclaren, D.D.)
Conquerors through Christ
There are two points of consideration before us–
I. The things in which we are victorious. In all these things, says the apostle. We may classify these–
1. The condemning power of the law and sin. Who is He that condemneth? The Christian never loses sight of the fact that he has been, and still is, a guilty sinner. The power of sin to visit judgment through the law is a fearful thing to an unforgiven sinner; but before it all, the believer can stand in serene triumph and feel himself safe. Looking up, around, and beneath, he can see none that can enforce condemnation against him. The law cannot–for its honour and claims have been satisfied in atoning blood.
2. Further, a whole group of trials is found in the hindering powers of the world and Satan. Look at the array of troubles of which the apostle speaks–Tribulations, distress, persecution, etc. In our day, the form and manner of opposition, temptation and danger are somewhat different, but they are just as real and almost as numerous. Till Satan and the world cease to be what they are, our Christian life must lie through temptations, opposing powers, influences that imperil and destroy. The forces of sin sometimes charge on men in violent assault–a fierce assailment in an open crisis battle, for supremacy in the soul. We all have our moral Sedans, where we are put to the alternative of winning or losing the crown of Christian character. Such times of mighty peril are more frequent than most persons suspect, for the battles are not always open in their meaning. Men are on trial for life or death, often, when they know it not. It is often a decisive battle between the powers of darkness and light for the soul of the young, when they are to decide their calling in life, between a business safe and pure, and one full of temptation. Sometimes the temptation is insidious and gradual in its approaches and power. Fabius mode of warfare was that of ever hanging about his enemy and weakening him little by little, inflicting small but continual injuries. This is the commonest way of the warfare of the world and sin on the Christian. A continual pricking of a polished surface with needle-points will ultimately tarnish it. A continual dropping will wear away the solid rock; and the most perilous trials of Christians may be suffered from quiet but continuous touches of evil from the world and sin. It may be an incipient development of a worldly spirit, filling your heart with the love of money and moving you nearer and nearer to the edge of some moral precipice. It may be the growth of a temper of neglect for known duty, till the spirit of duty is eaten all out of your heart, or the plants of grace are all smothered to feebleness or death. So it is, too, as to afflictions, more generally so-called–the things that form distresses to be borne rather than temptations to sin. In the trials of the apostle, there was a great fight of afflictions. And it is while burdened with trouble and struggling against sorrows that every believer has his victory to reach. But here again, in view of it all, God throws down on you the light and cheer of this experience of the apostle: In all these things we are more than conquerors.
II. How we are made conquerors. This is a point of grand importance to us. As the Israelites, imperilled by Pharaohs pursuing army, were concerned to see how to go forward in safety, we are concerned to know the way to overcome the oppositions and trials in our onward Christian way. How conquerors? Through Him that hath loved us.
1. Not, therefore, in and of ourselves. Dependence on self alone is a broken reed that here plunges into defeat. However much extolled, and really grand a thing self-reliance is, in some relations in this spiritual work it is inadequate. The fetters of depravity and condemning sin are too strong for human strength alone to wrest off. The power of temptation is too mighty to be withstood without aid.
2. But through Christ that loved us, we are conquerors. It is surely only by Him that we triumph against the threatening curse of sin, in the matter of justification. And in the matter of temptation and trials, our victory is in Him. With Christ on our side, they are more that are for us than they that are against us. It is often surprising how Christ and Christs love give strength to the feeble. There were giants in those days. In a better sense, there are giants in all days–Christians made mightier than all the powers of evil. They have locks of triumphant strength against all the Philistines of temptation, sin, and harassment that may be upon them.
3. But though through Christ, it is not without our own effort. Christ keeps us by enabling us to keep ourselves. We are strong, not effortless, but by and in effort. Every iota of the might by which the victory is given us must run along spiritual nerves within us–must come into our hearts, go into the will, and flow out into the hands and feet of personal activity and steadfastness. Divine strength is always ready for the needy Christian, but he must use it. How do you overcome the perilous temptation of love of the world? It is by so receiving the grace of Christ as to crucify your affection for its follies and sins. How do Christians in general prove safe against the incessant temptations to evil about them? It is by storing their own minds and hearts with the light, truth, counsel, and quickening force of Gods Word. All evils will be powerless against you, if, like the tree that grows strong against storms by receiving the strength that comes up from every root, pours through every vein into every branch, and hardens into firmness and might by the air and sunbeams, you take up into the fibre and nerve of your own Christian life the invigorating influence of all Gods grace furnished you, and you grow strong and compact as a tree of righteousness, Christ living and acting in you.
4. But observe–the assurance goes further, With beautiful force it says: We are more than conquerors. Our victories, in which we remain safe, are a means of increasing our faith, our love, our power. Trials are turned into occasions of development and power. The mind brightens by its use. The heart is enriched by the exercise of its virtues. Idleness and ease enfeeble. The Church is often too indolent and peaceful for its proper development and high glory. There is nothing like war to make soldiers. It is by wrestling with the angels of trial, affliction, and labour, that you become a prince with God. How blessed is the Christian–the victory given him here, the crown hereafter. It is for us to know whether we are conquering, daily–defeating Satan, subduing sin, proving successful in doing good, in the face of everything that opposes. (M. Valentine, D.D.)
More than conqueror
Ignatius, who was martyred in the year 107, said, Let fire and the cross, let wild beasts, let all the malice of the devil come upon me; only may I enjoy Jesus Christ. It is better for me to die for Christ, than to reign over the ends of the earth. Stand firm, he added, as an anvil when it is beaten upon. It is part of a brave combatant to be wounded, and yet to overcome. In losing life he found it.
The Christian more than conqueror through Christ
It is a rough sort of life that most resolute Christians lead. I do not speak of commonplace professors, many of whom shuffle through easily enough. But those, of whom the apostle himself was one, have a severe and sifting ordeal to pass. As it is written, For Thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter. It was thus that Immanuel Himself was treated. It was a doomed life He led on earth. The rudest language and the harshest treatment were reckoned good enough for Him. It is enough for the servant to be as his Lord. But just as Jesus conquered it all, so each disciple will overcome it too. Like the little boat that follows in the great ships wake, which receives the blast somewhat abated by the statelier form ahead, but in other respects backs the same billows and plunges down into the same sea-trough; so the believer follows the Forerunner, encountering in mitigated fury the head-wind which opposed His course, but riding the same billows of tribulation, distress, and peril which He breasted on His path to glory. But, like the cord which connects the little boat and the great ship together, there is that which joins the Saviour and the believing soul to one another. Tribulation, distress, persecution cannot sever them, and in the same haven of security, the same sea of glass, where the mightier sail is already furled, and Immanuels own anchor is already dropped, the fragile little bark which follows will soon come to its quiet mooring, more than conqueror through Him who went before it. (J. Hamilton, D.D.)
The Christian conqueror
I. Christians are conquerors.
1. At their first conversion, when through grace they obtain deliverance from the power of darkness and unbelief.
2. When grace gains the ascendancy, and particular corruptions are weakened and subdued. Growing Christians are going on conquering and to conquer. Partial advantages give assurance of a final conquest.
3. At a throne of grace. God fulfils their requests, and often exceeds them, as He did those of Solomon.
4. Over the afflictions and trials of the present life, and such as they are called especially to endure for Christs sake.
5. In a dying hour. The victory then obtained is great and glorious, complete and everlasting (1Co 15:54-57).
II. Christians are more than conquerors.
1. They conquer those enemies which none besides can conquer, and which to all others would be invincible. They overcome those powers of darkness which have overcome the world. Those who have obtained the greatest victories are often the slaves of the basest lusts. But the Christian triumphs over himself; and while he is waging war with the corruptions that are in the world, he is no less successful in his opposition to that depravity which reigns within. They conquer that by which all are conquered, even death; thus they lead captivity captive.
2. The means by which they overcome are such as enhance the glory of their conquests. When kings go forth to battle, they muster the host, calculate their numbers, and oppose force to force. But in the Christian warfare, it is not by might, nor by power, but by My Spirit, saith the Lord of hosts. I can do all things, said Paul, through Christ who strengtheneth me (Psa 18:29; Isa 30:1; 1Co 12:9-10; Rev 12:11).
3. The manner in which they overcome makes them more than conquerors. They are sure of success beforehand, which no other combatants are. They also conquer in a little time. The sound of an alarm is quickly followed by the sound of triumph. The conflict may continue as long as life; but what is our life? It is but a vapour. Besides, continued resistance will weaken the hands of our enemies and strengthen ours, so that the conquest shall be easy, and obtained with little loss. A victory is often dearly purchased; but the Christian loses nothing that is worth retaining; he gains by every battle.
4. The victory obtained is over and above measure, as the word signifies. The victory is exceedingly great and glorious, far beyond what is accomplished in any other warfare. It is not like a drawn battle, in which both sides may claim the advantage; the defeat is total, and the enemy is swallowed up in victory. We must remember, however, that all our successes are owing to Him that hath loved us (Psa 41:4; 2Ti 4:7; 1Jn 4:4).
Improvement.
1. Let not believers be dismayed at any opposition they may meet with (Psa 27:1-3).
2. The most successful Christian should take heed of pride and self-sufficiency. Let him say with the apostle, Not I, but Christ who dwelleth in me. (B. Beddome, M.A.)
The gain of the Christian conqueror
To be simply a conqueror is barely to overcome an enemy–to be more than conqueror is to derive absolute gain from the contest. Those Roman Christians were engaged in a struggle so severe that it would often seem doubtful to them whether they could be conquerors at all. They saw corruption reigning unbridled in power, and regal in success, while they were subject to hunger, nakedness, and peril. It is a difficult thing to maintain firm belief in a truth when all circumstances seem to oppose it, and proclaim it untrue. And still more, their danger through the deepening hatred of the populace must have tempted them, daily, to save themselves by denying their Lord. Amid the long, hard struggle they would doubtless think it a great achievement if they could only hold fast till the close, and barely overcoming, enter heaven. Paul tells them they would do more. That phrase, more than conquerors, etc., was a power to nerve those Roman men to stand fast in the evil day, until death found them steadfast still. But although the peculiar energy of the troubles of that day must have clothed these words with marvellous force, they still present a truth which every Christian needs to learn. For every man has his own temptation to overcome, and his own battle to fight, which no other can fight for him. But, if we conquer, it is better for us to have fought a hard fight, than to have been without one; our struggles become our possessions, crowning us with glory. Our subject becomes–the gain of the Christian conqueror.
I. Its nature. More than conquerors. But at the outset we must guard against a perversion of the truth. It is not true to say that by every struggle a man becomes better than if he had had no struggle, for if he allow himself consciously to slide into sin and then afterwards resist it, he is not nobler for that resistance than if he had not sinned at all. It has been said that a mans sins are aids to progress, because by falling under temptation and then overcoming it he is stronger than if he had never fallen. We are told that young men must be young men; that by a few outbursts of wild immoral life at first, they give vent to the fierce impulses of evil–which must come forth–and then settle down into a calmer and stronger manhood. Now, every form of that doctrine which makes sin a culture is false, and utterly different from Pauls assertion. Every temptation that conquers us blinds that fine spiritual preception by which we distinguish the right from the wrong. Every sin leaves a ghastly scar on the immortal soul that impedes it from soaring upwards to God. Paul is speaking of temptations resisted; and he affirms that he who conquers thus is greater than if he had never been tried. Let us proceed now to see how this is so–Through Him that loved us.
1. Every conquered temptation deepens our love to Christ, and thus we are more than conquerors. We come here on the track of that great law, that the trial of principle is its true strengthening. Just as the virtue that stands temptation becomes stronger than the frail thing that has never been tested, so the love of Christ ripens to its manhood through temptations, and therefore our temptations become our possessions, and we are more than conquerors . But to show this clearly, note that all great emotions render impediments aids to their own growth. Passion catches fire by antagonisms. Men speak of the power of circumstances to hinder a Christian life; of course they have a power, but it is none the less true that a strong love makes the most adverse circumstances the grandest aid to its own progress. Thus, the man of passionate temperament wrestles down the fiery impulse of a great passion, and when the battle-storm is over, he finds in his heart a deep, calm love, which renders the next conquest easier–therefore he is more than conqueror. The lonely student in his chamber fights through the midnight hours with a subtle doubt which is driving him to unbelief, but when the victory is won, his faith is all the deeper for the struggle, and that struggle is henceforth a possession, rendering him more than conqueror.
2. The love of Christ to us is a pledge that our conquests will become our gains. Paul evidently had this thought when he said, Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, etc. The living Christ is watching the temptation, and He will take care that its issue is a greater glory than that which could have come from a life of perpetual repose. We may see, in fact, how this is so. Temptations enlarge our capacity of sympathy with the Saviour. In conflict, under slander, in sorrow, we get nearer to the Christ of the wilderness, the judgment-hall, and the garden; and that deeper sympathy is its own great reward God will open hereafter the marvellous book of the human soul, and show how each struggle left its eternal inscription of glory there.
II. Its attainment. How shall we know that we are becoming more than conquerors? When the love of Christ is–
1. The strongest power in life.
2. A progressive power. (E. L. Hull, B.A.)
The Christian conquest
We begin with a Christians success. First, to speak of the positive supposition, We are conquerors. But whom or what is a Christian conqueror of? First, he is a conqueror even of God Himself. First, from the reflection of their graces, and that loveliness which is put upon their purposes. Secondly, the children of God they do conquer Him by the efficacy of their prayers. Prayer, it is wonderful victorious. This victory in prevailing with God, it is the ground and foundation of all other victories besides. They which can conquer Him, they may conquer everything else. Secondly, they are their own conquerors; they conquer and overcome themselves. He that cannot conquer his affections will never conquer his afflictions; whereas he that can do that, he will find these by little and little yielding unto him. Take a carnal man, and he is a captive to every temptation: he is like a city without wails, which is easily taken; but a good Christian he is otherwise affected. But thirdly (which is most agreeable to the scope of the text), in regard of all their enemies. First, the children of God are conquerors over their personal enemies; and in particular evil men, they have a great deal the better of them. First, a Christian conquers his enemies by doing of that which is good. Secondly, by suffering of that which is evil; a Christian conquers thus also. Thus the martyrs in ancient times overcame their very tormentors by their patience and constancy. A Christian, he is above all the evils which in this world are incident unto him; and that in three respects especially. First, by prevention of them. Secondly, by cheerfulness under them. And thirdly, by profiting by them. And so much may suffice to have spoken of the success of a Christian, as it is here laid down in the first notion and proposal of it, namely, in its positive supposition, and that is, We are conquerors. The second is in its comparative amplification, we are so, and somewhat besides–we are conquerors, yea, more than conquerors. It is a very emphatical word, and such as our English language does not easily reach to–over-overcome. First, as to the thing itself, being Christians, we are more than conquerors here, and that again in two particulars. First, as to the disabling of our enemies. A man may conquer his enemy for the present, but yet he may recover again. All the enemies of a Christian shall be at last perfectly subdued unto him, and so as they shall not be able any more to rise up against him. Secondly, We are more than conquerors, so far forth as we hereby benefit ourselves. A Christian does not only destroy his enemy, but he does likewise divide the spoil. Now secondly, are we so likewise as to the manners of the victory, and that in sundry circumstances in which it may be made good unto us. First, we do more than conquer, because we conquer with a little strength. They conquer many times by very weak and feeble means. It is all one with God to conquer by many or few. Secondly, they do more than conquer, because they conquer in a little time. Thirdly, they do more than conquer, because they conquer with a little loss. Fourthly, they do more than conquer, because they conquer where they do not fight. Stand still, says Moses to the Israelites, and ye shall see the salvation of the Lord. Lastly, Gods servants do more than conquer, because they conquer when they are conquered themselves. The consideration of this point may be thus far useful to us, namely, as to show us the dignity and excellency of all true Christians and believers. The world, for the most part, looks upon Gods children as a contemptible generation, as those who of all others are the most easily conquered and overcome. The second is the account or ground of this success unto him, that is laid down in these words, Through Him that loved us. First, to take notice of his affection, in his great care for the shunning of pride and ostentation, and vainglory in himself, lie had said in the words before of himself, and the rest of believers, That in all these things we are more than conquerors. This was a big and great word, and it might seem to carry a price of too much self-confidence in it. Now, therefore, does he here seasonably correct it, and qualify it, Through Him that loved us. So, likewise, Php 4:13, a place much like to this at present, there he says, He can do all things. He can want and abound, and everything; well, but how? Through Christ that strengthens me. Still he is careful of this, not to give way to a spirit of presumption. First, it is a thing which is easy, if men do not the better look to themselves. But then secondly, it is again very dangerous, and it is that which the children of God smart for, where they are guilty of it. Pride and presumption in assurance is the next way to lose assurance. Now in the next place we may take notice of his expression, in the substance of the words themselves, Through Him that loved us. Through Him that loved us! Who is that? namely, Jesus Christ. And there are two things again which are here considerable of us. First, for the description of Christ. It is by this periphrasis, of Him that loved us, as that indeed whereby He is best of all known unto us; and as if there were none that loved us but He alone. Who loved me, and gave Himself for me (Gal 2:20). Who loved us and washed us in His blood (Rev 1:5). Christ loved His Church and gave Himself for it, etc. (Eph 5:25). This love of Christ unto us, it was manifested in sundry particulars; that wherein it first showed and discovered itself unto us, was in the business of His incarnation, and taking of our nature upon Him. Especially if we shall further consider upon what terms, and in what circumstances He took it. And so the acts of His mediatorship, which were consequent and dependent hereupon; they were the expressions of the same love. There are two reasons especially why he makes use of this expression in the text, rather than of any other besides. First, it was most comprehensive; when he said, He that loved us, he said in effect everything else. He that was born for us, that died for us, that redeemed us, that saved us; all is comprehended in Him that loved us, because that all these things were the effects of His love. Secondly, as it was the most comprehensive expression, it was also the most proper expression, and pertinent to the business in hand; for he had made mention before of afflictions and persecutions, and such things as those as unable to separate believers from the love of Christ. The second is the account, or cause, of victory to a Christian, and that is through the help of this Person thus described. Now there are three ways especially whereby Christ does accomplish this victory for us, and help us to be partakers of it. First, I say, in that the Spirit of Christ works the graces and abilities themselves. There are divers graces of this nature; as to instance in one or two of them. First, the grace of faith, that is a conquering grace (1Jn 5:4). Secondly, another grace is self-denial; that is another victorious accomplishment. The best way for any man to get victory over his afflictions, is by a restrained affection to his comforts. Thirdly, the grace of humility. As there is nothing which is nearer ruin than pride, so there is nothing which is nearer victory than humility. God Himself resists the proud, pitches battle against them; but He gives grace to the humble, and success with it. Lastly, the grace of patience. This grapples with the greatest evils. Now further, He does also upon occasion actuate those graces in us; and thus He helps us to conquer by His power. Secondly, as by His Spirit, so by His example (1Pe 2:21). Thirdly, by His Word. In this Christ goes forth conquering and to conquer. It is His chariot of triumph (2Co 2:14). Ye are strong, and the Word of God abides in you (1Jn 2:14). One thing more, and so I have done: Through Him that loved us. These words may be taken not only simply, but reflexively, and by way of reduplication; as intimating unto us whence it is that Christ does enable us to be such conquerors, and that is from His unspeakable love. It is from Him that loved us; and from Him so far forth as He loved us. When it is said here from His love; this does not exclude His power, but supposes, and it takes it in; therefore as in this place it is said, Through Christ that loves us. So again in another place it is said, Through Christ that strengthens us; because indeed they are both concomitant. There is nothing whatsoever we enjoy, if we be true believers, but we enjoy it as a fruit of Christs love. It is from the love of Christ that He afflicts us, and it is from the love of Christ also that He strengthens us and enables us to endure affliction. It is not from common providence, but from special favour; it is not from the power of nature, but from the privileges and prerogatives of grace. (Thomas Horton, D.D.)
Christian heroes
Conquerors, although victorious, are often all but defeated. The battle of Waterloo was won by a hairs breadth. Napoleon said, on the morning of the day of Waterloo, We have ninety out of a hundred chances. The conquering army had nothing to spare. The believer in Christ has many foes and fiercer to war against, but he has no doubt as to the result; and when the battle is over he has a surplus of force by which he could conquer still worse and more numerous enemies. He is more than a conqueror. God is with him, and he cannot fail. His last enemy is death, to which, as he looks it in the face, he triumphantly exclaims, O death, where is thy sting? Thanks be unto God which giveth me the victory!
Through trials to victory:—When Garibaldi was thrown into prison he said, Let fifty Garibaldis be thrown into prison, but let Rome be free. This spirit set Italy on fire. When he went before a crowd of young men to appeal for recruits, they asked what he had to offer as inducements. The old man replied, Poverty, hardship, battles, wounds, and–victory. They caught his enthusiasm, threw their hats into the air, and enlisted on the spot.
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 35. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ?] I do think that this question has been generally misunderstood. The apostle is referring to the persecutions and tribulations to which genuine Christians were exposed through their attachment to Christ, and the gracious provision God had made for their support and final salvation. As in this provision God had shown his infinite love to them in providing Jesus Christ as their sin-offering, and Jesus Christ had shown his love in suffering death upon the cross for them; so, here, he speaks of the love of the followers of God to that Christ who had first loved them. Therefore the question is not, Who shall separate the love of Christ from us? or prevent Christ from loving us? but, Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Who or what shall be able to remove our affection from him? And the questions that immediately follow show that this is the sense of the passage; for the tribulation, distress, c., which he enumerates, are things by which they might be affected, but by which Christ could not be affected and, consequently, the question most evidently refers to their love to him who had first loved them, and, while it affords a strong presumption of their perseverance, furnishes a most powerful argument against apostasy.
Shall tribulation?] , grievous affliction, or distress of any kind; from , to compress, oppress, straiten, c. any thing by which a man is rendered miserable.
Or distress?] , a word of nearly the same import with the former, but more intense in its signification. It signifies straitness, being hemmed in on every side, without the possibility of getting out or escaping; from , strait or narrow, and , a place.
Or persecution?] , from , to pursue, press upon, prosecute, signifies such pursuing as an enemy uses in order to overtake the object of his malice, that he may destroy him.
Or famine?] , from , to fail; the total want of bread, and all the necessaries of life.
Or nakedness?] , being absolutely without clothing; forcibly expressed by the derivation of the word , having one’s limbs only, being totally unclothed.
Or peril?] , a state of extreme and continued danger, perplexing and distressing with grievous forebodings and alarms; derived from , it excites anguish; because much evil is felt, and much more feared.
Or sword?] , slaughter; the total destruction of life, and especially beheading, and such like, done by the order of the civil magistrate; for the word is used in this epistle, Ro 13:4, to signify the authority and power which he has of judicially terminating life; i.e. of inflicting capital punishment.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Who shall separate us? He continues his triumph: he does not say what, but who; though he instanceth in things, and not in persons, yet it is expressed personally, because that these things do commonly do us hurt in the improvement of persons, whether of Satan or wicked men, who are instrumental thereunto.
From the love of Christ; understand it either actively, from our love of him; or passively, from his love of us. The latter seems to be chiefly intended;
Who shall separate us from the love of Christ, or from the sense and manifestation thereof?
Shall tribulation, &c. He makes an enumeration of particular evils, of seven in number; and he begins with the lesser, and rises to the greater; placing them in order, not casually, but by choice. The word tribulation signifies any thing that presseth or pincheth us.
Or distress? The word properly signifies straitness of place, and is transferred from the body to the mind, to point out the anguish or perplexity thereof.
Or persecution; the word properly signifies a driving from place to place; banishment is implied therein, if not chiefly intended: see Mat 10:23.
Or peril; any danger or hazard of life, in any kind whatsoever: see 2Co 11:26.
Or sword; this is put figuratively for death itself, especially violent death.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
35, 36. Who shall separate us fromthe love of Christ?This does not mean “our love toChrist,” as if, Who shall hinder us from loving Christ? but”Christ’s love to us,” as is clear from the closing wordsof the chapter, which refer to the same subject. Nor would the othersense harmonize with the scope of the chapter, which is to exhibitthe ample ground of the believer’s confidence in Christ. “It isno ground of confidence to assert, or even to feel, that we willnever forsake Christ; but it is the strongest ground of assurance tobe convinced that His love will never change” [HODGE].
shalltribulation, c.”None of these, nor all together, howterrible soever to the flesh, are tokens of God’s wrath, or the leastground for doubt of His love. From whom could such a question comebetter than from one who had himself for Christ’s sake endured somuch? (See 2Co 11:11-331Co 4:10-13). The apostlesays not (remarks CALVINnobly) “What,” but “Who,” just as if allcreatures and all afflictions were so many gladiators taking armsagainst the Christians [THOLUCK].
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Who shall separate us from the love of Christ?…. By “the love of Christ” is not meant the saints’ love to Christ, but his love to them; he is indeed the object of their love, and so strong is their love to him, that it can never be destroyed; for though there may be an abatement in the fervour of it, it can never be lost; yet this is never called the love of Christ: besides, the apostle is speaking not of their love to Christ, but of the love of God and Christ to them, throughout the context; and his design is, to strengthen the faith of God’s people, and comfort their souls, under their various afflictions: now nothing more effectually serves such purposes, than the love of Christ; and the things here instanced in are such, as are apt to inject doubts and fears, about interest in the love of Christ, and of the love of God in Christ, as it is interpreted in some following verses: moreover, the separation here interrogated is not of Christ from us, but of us from him; whereas was it our love to Christ, which is here meant, it should rather have been put, who shall separate him from us, and not us from the love of Christ? That Christ does love the elect of God, who are the persons here spoken of, is evident from his undertaking for them, espousing their persons, assuming their nature, dying in their room and stead, paying off their debts, and redeeming their persons, by going to prepare a place for them, by interceding for them, by supplying them with all grace, and using them in the most free and familiar manner; which love of his is wonderful, matchless, and inconceivable, special and peculiar, free and undeserved, exceeding affectionate, unchangeable, durable, and for ever. This is the bond of union to Christ; and the union which is made by it is exceeding near and close; it is real; perfect, and indissoluble, nothing can separate from it: not
tribulation; or “affliction”, which springs from his love, and is the fruit of it; and notwithstanding that, he rests in his love; this is not taken away, but is often sensibly enjoyed, in the midst of afflictions:
or distress; whether of body or mind; straitness in the affairs and circumstances of life, or straitness of mind, in the exercise of grace, and discharge of duty; for “though we believe not, yet he abides faithful”, 2Ti 2:13, to his covenant and promises:
or persecution: from the world; for this is rather an evidence that Christ has loved them chosen and called them, because the world hates them:
or famine: want of the necessaries of life, as food and drink; being exposed to great hunger and thirst, which has sometimes been the lot of the dear children of God:
or nakedness; want of proper clothing, or the use of common apparel; wandering about in sheep skins and goat skins, which has been the case of some, of whom the world was not worthy, and so no proof of separation from the love of Christ:
or peril; dangers from different quarters, by different persons and ways; such as the Apostle Paul had trial of, who was highly in the love of Christ, 1Co 11:26;
or sword; that is, death by the sword; which death James the brother of John died, Ac 12:13: now, though this may separate the head from the body, and separate soul and body, yet cannot separate from the love of Christ.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
Shall separate (). Future active of old verb from adverb and that from , space. Can any one put a distance between Christ’s love and us (objective genitive)? Can any one lead Christ to cease loving us? Such things do happen between husband and wife, alas. Paul changes the figure from “who” () to “what” (). The items mentioned will not make Christ love us less. Paul here glories in tribulations as in 5:3ff.
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
1) “Who shall separate us from the love of Christ?” (tis hemas chorisei apo tes agapes tou Christou); “who shall separate (set us apart) from the love of Christ?” As true children of God cannot be condemned to eternal death any more, neither can they be severed from union with Christ, or ever perish. Joh 5:24; Joh 10:27-28; Joh 15:1; 1Jn 5:13.
2) “Shall tribulation,” (thlipsis) “shall affliction?” The answer is, it shall not, based on the pledge and integrity of Jesus Christ, Joh 16:33; 1Co 10:13; Rom 5:3-5; Php_4:19; Rev 7:14-17.
3) “Or distress,” (e stenochoria) “or shall distress?” emotional burdens; stress – the true metal or character of God’s children should be manifest greatest in such experiences, 2Co 6:4; 2Co 12:10.
4) “Or persecution,” (e diogmos) “or persecution?” Is the servant greater than his Lord? Did persecution cause Jesus to turn back on God? No! Neither should it cause any believer to quit, Mat 5:11-12; Joh 15:20.
5) “Or famine,” (e limos) “or famine?” People of God are not to quit loving God, and God does not quit loving them, when he sends national, regional, or world judgment of famine nature, because of sin; as he did in Egypt in Joseph’s day, and in Judah in Naomi’s day, they loved God still.
6) “Or nakedness,” (e gumnotes) “or nakedness;- it may bring shame to men, but it does not mean that God does not love men, even in their helplessness. He clothed Adam and Eve in his love for them, Genesis 3; Jas 2:15.
7) “Or peril,” (e kundunos) “or peril;” ordinary dangers that seriously jeopardize mens lives in the sea, in the air, and on the earth; Paul met perils of storms, thugs and bandits, etc. 2Co 11:26, but such did not sever him from the love of God in Christ.
8) “Or sword,” (e machaira); “or sword?” Shall the sword used judicially against a believer or even used in war sever or separate him from (from the benefits of) the love of God? The answer is nay, Heb 11:37.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
35. Who shall separate us, etc. The conviction of safety is now more widely extended, even to lower things; for he who is persuaded of God’s kindness towards him, is able to stand firm in the heaviest afflictions. These usually harass men in no small degree, and for various reasons, — because they interpret them as tokens of God’s wrath, or think themselves to be forsaken by God, or see no end to them, or neglect to meditate on a better life, or for other similar reasons; but when the mind is purged from such mistakes, it becomes calm, and quietly rests. But the import of the words is, — That whatever happens, we ought to stand firm in this faith, — that God, who once in his love embraced us, never ceases to care for us. For he does not simply say that there is nothing which can tear God away from his love to us; but he means, that the knowledge and lively sense of the love which he testifies to us is so vigorous in our hearts, that it always shines in the darkness of afflictions: for as clouds, though they obscure the clear brightness of the sun, do not yet wholly deprive us of its light; so God, in adversities, sends forth through the darkness the rays of his favor, lest temptations should overwhelm us with despair; nay, our faith, supported by God’s promises as by wings, makes its way upward to heaven through all the intervening obstacles. It is indeed true, that adversities are tokens of God’s wrath, when viewed in themselves; but when pardon and reconciliation precede, we ought to be assured that God, though he chastises us, yet never forgets his mercy: he indeed thus reminds us of what we have deserved; but he no less testifies, that our salvation is an object of his care, while he leads us to repentance.
But he calls it the love of Christ, and for this reason, — because the Father has in a manner opened his compassions to us in him. As then the love of God is not to be sought out of Christ, Paul rightly directs to him our attention, so that our faith may behold, in the rays of Christ’s favor, the serene countenance of the Father. The meaning is, — that in no adversities ought our confidence to be shaken as to this truth — that when God is propitious, nothing can be adverse to us. Some take this love in a passive sense, for that by which he is loved by us, as though Paul would have us armed with invincible courage (275) but this comment may be easily disproved by the whole tenor of Paul’s reasoning; and Paul himself will presently remove all doubt by defining more clearly what this love is.
Tribulation, or distress, or persecution? etc. The pronoun masculine which he used at the beginning of the verse, contains a hidden power: for when he might have adopted the neuter gender and said — “What shall separate us?” etc., he preferred ascribing personality to things without life, and for this end, — that he might send forth with us into the contest as many champions as there are of temptations to try our faith.
But these three things have this difference: tribulation includes every kind of trouble or evil; distress is an inward feeling, when difficulties reduce us to such an extremity, so that we know not what course to pursue. Such was the anxiety of Abraham and of Lot, when one was constrained to expose his wife to the danger of prostitution, and the other, his daughters; for being brought to straits and being perplexed, they found no way of escape. Persecution properly denotes the tyrannical violence by which the children of God were undeservedly harassed by the ungodly. Now though Paul denies in 2Co 4:8, that the children of God are reduced to straits, στενοχωρεῖσθαι, he does not yet disagree with himself; for he does not simply make them to be exempt from anxious solicitude, but he means that they are delivered from it, as also the examples of Abraham and Lot testify.
(275) According to [ Poole ], several of the Fathers entertained this opinion, such as [ Origen ], [ Chrysostom ], [ Theodoret ], and [ Ambrose ] : but even [ Hammond ] and [ Grotius ], great admirers of the Fathers, regard this love as that of God or of Christ to us. [ Wolfius ] says, that all the Lutheran divines give this exposition. It is indeed impossible rightly to view the whole passage without seeing that this explanation is the true one. In verse 32, it is incontestably evident that God’s love to us is what is spoken of: then in verse 37, it is expressly said, “through him who loved us;” and the last verse seems sufficient to remove every possible doubt. The difficulty of [ Barnes ], in thinking it “not conceivable how afflictions should have any tendency to alienate Christ’s love from us, ” arises from a misconception: for when we speak of not being separated from the love of Christ, the obvious meaning is, that nothing can separate us from participating in the effects of his love, that He, on account of his love, will sustain us under the greatest trials, and make “us more than conquerors.” The substance of what is here said, is contained in the last clause of Rom 8:32, — “How shall he not with him also freely give us all things?” It was the assurance of this truth that the Apostle obviously intended to convey. — Ed.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
(35) The love of Christ.That is to say, the love which Christ has for us, not that which we have for Christ.
Shall tribulation?Comp. 2Co. 6:4; 2Co. 11:23. The Apostle is speaking from his own actual experience.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
35. Who separate The apostle now issues his third challenge to the foes of the redeemed. He has called for the accuser, the condemner, and now he summons the separator, sure that none dare appear. He next challenges an entire catalogue of enemies by name and declares the discomfiture of all.
Love of Christ It is a strange dispute between commentators whether this phrase signifies our love to Christ or Christ’s love to us. We often speak of a person being separated from another’s affection, but whoever heard of a man being separated from his own love to another? Besides, it is God’s and Christ’s maintenance of the cause of the Christian which runs through the entire passage. In the present verse the apostle enumerates a series of earthly or natural foes of the Christian, and in 38 and 39 the supernatural or transcendent.
Nothing, indeed, can separate the believer from Christ; but the man may depart from his faith and cease to be a believer. Nothing can kill the Christian, but he may commit suicide. None can pluck him out of his Father’s hand, but he may leap out of that hand himself. And hence of that one enemy which a man may be to himself the apostle makes no mention in his hostile catalogue.
Tribulation The apostle now enumerates seven enemies which assail the Christian in vain. Not but that these foes can materially harm him, though they can neither accuse nor condemn him as before God. From their corporeal assaults, even the Divine Protector promises no immunity and no deliverance from their earthly power. But they cannot break, they will brighten, rather, and strengthen the golden chain that fastens the justified to Christ.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
‘Who will separate us from the love of Christ? Will tribulation, or anguish, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?’
In view of the fact that it is Christ in His love Who pleads our cause (Rom 8:34), it demonstrates the impossibility of our being separated from that love. His continual intercession for us is evidence that He has our interests at heart. And so Paul issues the challenge, ‘who will separate us from the love of Christ?’, with the answer due to come back of ‘nothing’. It is quite clear from the passage that Paul is putting ‘God’ and ‘Christ’ on the same level. Their love is interchangeable. He then lists a number of possibilities of things that might make us doubt His love. We note here that the legal language is now replaced by that of love. It is love that underlies all God’s activities on behalf of His people (Rom 5:5; Rom 5:8). Thus whatever happens we need not doubt the love of Christ for us. It is the love which passes all knowledge (Eph 3:19). It will be noted that the list includes natural disasters such as famine which cannot directly be the consequence of persecution (although could, of course, arise indirectly). The aim would appear to be to cover all possibilities of suffering, with words like ‘anguish’ and ‘peril’ being catch-all descriptions. It is a reminder that the love of Christ remains firm whatever situations we face, whether spiritual or physical, and that in the face of them we need not doubt His love. We are to hold onto the fact of ‘the love of Christ which passes all knowledge’ (Eph 3:19).
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
Rom 8:35-38. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? &c. To answer the argument hence urged, to shew that man cannot fall from grace, because if once they truly loved God, they cannot cease to do so in principle, let it be noted: First, That this inquiry is not, who shall separate us from the love with which we love God; but, who shall separate us who truly love God, and testify that love by our obedience to his commands, Joh 15:10 and by our patient sufferings for his sake, Rom 8:36-37 from his affections towards us.
The Apostle therefore only intimates, that such persons continuing in the love of God, shall be preserved by him from, or be enabled to overcome, the temptations here mentioned; and be so supported by his grace and Holy Spirit as to be able to triumph ever them. But he does not say, that the love of no believer shall wax cold, Mat 24:12. Were there no fear of this, why does Christ exhort his disciples to continue in his love, Joh 15:9.? and his Apostles exhort others to keep themselves in the love of God, Jud 1:21 to continue in the grace of God, Act 13:43 to look diligently to it, that they fail not of, or that they fall not from (for so it may be rendered) the grace of God, Heb 12:15. Note. Secondly, That the Apostle does not say, that nothing shall separate true believers from the love of God or Christ; but only says , I am persuaded that nothing will do it; nor have I any cause to fear, that any of these temporal sufferings, or enjoyments, will shake their steadfastness, in expectation of those eternal and inestimable blessings, which God has promised, and Christ has purchased for his church; these light afflictions being not worthy to be compared with the glory that shall be revealed, Rom 8:18 and all co-operating for the good of them that love God, Rom 8:28.that as to the weakness of the flesh which rendered these temptations so dreadful, and gave strength to them, they lived in hopes of a glorious redemption of the body from them, Rom 8:23.; and while they groan under them, they have the assistance of the Spirit of God, to strengthen them, and to help them to bear their infirmities; a powerful and loving Father to be with them, a Saviour exalted to the right hand of God to intercede for them, Rom 8:33-34. Upon all which accounts he might well say, I am persuaded that none of these things shall separate you from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus. The Apostle does not by these words intend to teach believers, that they could not be shaken by these things; for this would have contradicted the drift of his Epistles, in which he offers so many arguments and motives to prevent the effect of those temptations, and does so often express his fears, lest they should be shaken with them; and be so far tempted by them, as to be moved away from the hope of the Gospel, Col 1:23 and render his labour vain, 1Th 3:5. He only intends to say, that upon these considerations, they had such great inducements to persevere, and continue in the love of God, as made him strongly persuaded that they would do so.
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
35 Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?
Ver. 35. Who shall separate us ] Who shall separate me? saith the Syriac.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
35 .] Who (i.e. what : but masc. for uniformity with Rom 8:33-34 ) shall separate us from the love of Christ? Is this (1) our love to Christ , or (2) Christ’s love to us , or (3) our sense of Christ’s love to us ? The first of these is held by Origen, Chrys., Theodoret, Ambr [64] , Erasm., al. But the difficulty of it lies in consistently interpreting Rom 8:37 , where not our endurance in love to Him , but our victory by means of His love to us , is alleged. And besides, it militates against the conclusion in Rom 8:39 , which ought certainly to respond to this question. The third meaning is defended by Calvin. But the second, as maintained by Beza, Grot., Est., al., Thol., Reiche, Meyer, De Wette, appears to me the only tenable sense of the words. For, having shewn that God’s great love to us is such that none can accuse nor harm us, the Apostle now asserts the permanence of that love under all adverse circumstances that none such can affect it, nay more, that it is by that love that we are enablea to obtain the victory over all such adversities. And finally he expresses his persuasion that no created thing shall ever separate us from that love, i.e. shall ever be able to pluck us out of the Father’s hand.
[64] Ambrose, Bp. of Milan , A.D. 374 397
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
Rom 8:35 f. ; If this verse is to be most closely connected with Rom 8:34 , will appear the more probable reading, for there Christ is the subject throughout; but at Rom 8:28 ; Rom 8:31 ; Rom 8:39 the love of God is the determining idea, and at this point it seems to be caught up again in view of the conclusion facts which favour the reading . In any case it is the Divine love for us which is meant. With the list of troubles cf. 2Co 6:4-10 ; 2Co 11:26 f., Rom 12:10 . They were those which had befallen Paul himself, and he knew that the love of God in Jesus Christ could reach and sustain the heart through them all. The quotation from Psa 44:12 is peculiar. It exactly reproduces the LXX, even the being simply transferred. The implies that such experiences as those named in Rom 8:35 are in agreement with what Scripture holds out as the fortune of God’s people. Possibly the mention of the sword recalled to the Apostle’s memory the of the psalm, and suggested the quotation. The point of it, both in the psalm and in the epistle, lies in . This is what the Psalmist could not understand. That men should suffer for sin, for infidelity to God, was intelligible enough; but he and his countrymen were suffering because of their faithfulness, and the psalm is his despairing expostulation with God. But the Apostle understood it. To suffer for Christ’s sake was to enter into the fellow-ship of Christ’s sufferings, and that is the very situation in which the love of Christ is most real, near, and sure to the soul. Cf. chap. Rom 5:3 , 2Co 1:5 , Col 1:24 . Instead of despairing, he glories in tribulations.
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
separate. Greek. chorizo. See Act 18:1.
love. App-135. Compare Rom 5:5. 2Co 5:14.
tribulation. See Rom 2:9.
distress. Rendered “anguish” in Rom 2:9.
persecution. See Act 8:1.
peril. Greek. kindunos. Only here and 2Co 11:26. These four questions and answers in verses: Rom 8:33-35 form the Figure of speech Anaphora. Rom 8:35 gives the Figure of speech Paradiastole. See App-6.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
35.] Who (i.e. what: but masc. for uniformity with Rom 8:33-34) shall separate us from the love of Christ? Is this (1) our love to Christ, or (2) Christs love to us, or (3) our sense of Christs love to us? The first of these is held by Origen, Chrys., Theodoret, Ambr[64], Erasm., al. But the difficulty of it lies in consistently interpreting Rom 8:37, where not our endurance in love to Him, but our victory by means of His love to us, is alleged. And besides, it militates against the conclusion in Rom 8:39, which ought certainly to respond to this question. The third meaning is defended by Calvin. But the second, as maintained by Beza, Grot., Est., al., Thol., Reiche, Meyer, De Wette, appears to me the only tenable sense of the words. For, having shewn that Gods great love to us is such that none can accuse nor harm us, the Apostle now asserts the permanence of that love under all adverse circumstances-that none such can affect it,-nay more, that it is by that love that we are enablea to obtain the victory over all such adversities. And finally he expresses his persuasion that no created thing shall ever separate us from that love, i.e. shall ever be able to pluck us out of the Fathers hand.
[64] Ambrose, Bp. of Milan, A.D. 374-397
Fuente: The Greek Testament
Rom 8:35. , who shall separate us) The perpetuity of the union, for the time to come, with the love of Christ and of God, is deduced from the death of Christ, from His resurrection, His sitting at the right hand of God and His intercession, comp. ch. Rom 5:5-6; Rom 5:9-10; Heb 7:25. But the who is presently after explained by the enumeration [shall tribulation or distress, etc.], without an aetiology following after: from which again it is evident, that the aetiology, [assigning of the reason] must be sought for before the words, who shall separate us, in Rom 8:34 : and he says who, not what, although he subjoins [shall] affliction, etc., because personal enemies lurk under these adverse things.- , from the love) towards us, Rom 8:37; Rom 8:39. The foundation of the impossibility of being separated from the love of Christ is love; the foundation of this confidence is love clearly perceived.- , of Christ) The love of God is one with the love of Christ, Rom 8:39.-) nakedness, the want of clothing, the extreme of poverty, 1Co 4:11; 2Co 11:27. The enumeration for the most part goes on in pairs, hunger and nakedness, etc.-, peril) Hypocrites often sink under mere dangers.- , or sword) an instrument of slaughter. Paul mentions the kind of death, with which he himself had been sometimes threatened, ch. Rom 16:4; Php 2:17, note. Many martyrs, who survived other tortures, were despatched with the sword, [consummati sunt].
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
Rom 8:35
Rom 8:35
Who shall separate us from the love of Christ?-If God is for us, justifies us, and Jesus is our Advocate at the right hand of God, and the Holy Spirit dwells within us and intercedes for us with groanings that cannot be uttered, who shall separate us from love that so guards us?
shall tribulation, or anguish, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?-Shall we let the things brought upon us to school and fit us for the enjoyment of the eternal honors God has for us in heaven, discourage, dishearten, and turn us back and cause us to forfeit those honors and glories purchased for us by the blood of Jesus Christ, our Redeemer?
Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary
shall separate: Rom 8:39, Psa 103:17, Jer 31:3, Joh 10:28, Joh 13:1, 2Th 2:13, 2Th 2:14, 2Th 2:16, Rev 1:5
shall tribulation: Rom 8:17, Rom 5:3-5, Mat 5:10-12, Mat 10:28-31, Luk 21:12-18, Joh 16:33, Act 14:22, Act 20:23, Act 20:24, 2Co 4:17, 2Co 6:4-10, 2Co 11:23-27, 2Ti 1:12, 2Ti 4:16-18, Heb 12:3-11, Jam 1:2-4, 1Pe 1:5-7, 1Pe 4:12-14, Rev 7:14-17
Reciprocal: Deu 33:3 – all his saints Jdg 6:33 – Then all 1Sa 26:25 – prevail Psa 4:8 – for Psa 27:3 – war Psa 36:11 – hand Psa 121:7 – preserve Psa 129:2 – yet they have Pro 1:33 – and shall Pro 10:30 – never Pro 12:13 – but Pro 18:14 – spirit Jer 15:15 – know Luk 6:48 – the flood Luk 10:42 – which Joh 16:22 – and your Act 21:13 – for Rom 8:28 – we know 1Co 4:11 – and are naked 2Co 4:8 – yet 2Co 11:27 – nakedness 2Co 12:10 – I take Phi 1:21 – to die Phi 1:30 – the same 1Th 3:3 – we are 2Ti 3:11 – Persecutions Heb 11:25 – Choosing 1Jo 5:4 – overcometh Rev 2:9 – tribulation
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
:35
Rom 8:35. This question implies a similar answer to the foregoing. When Christ loves us, these hardships cannot separate us from Him.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Rom 8:35. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Christs love to us, rather than our love to Him, or even our sense of His love to us. Still the separation .must refer to possible hindrances in its gracious effects upon us; hence the separation would include a failure to feel His love to us. If we connect the question with Rom 8:34, we may paraphrase thus: Christ Jesus is the very one who died to atone for our sins; yes, more than this, He is the one who was raised from the dead for our justification (chap. Rom 4:25); it is He who sits at the place of power lovingly ruling the world for our sake; He it is who is pleading on our behalf; how then can any one, or anything, separate us from His love? The questions which follow suggest what might seem to threaten such separation.
Tribulation, or anguish, as in chap. Rom 2:9; the former referring to outward trial, the latter to the inward sense of it. First of all believers are pressed into anxiety by the world. Then there comes persecution itself, which drives them out to famine and nakedness; the end is peril, the danger of death, and sword, death itself (Lange). There seems to some such climax. In those days these very things threatened; in our day the dangers are different, but none the less real and quite as often disturbing our sense of Christs love to us.
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
That is, none shall separate, nothing shall separate the believer from the love of Christ; either from the love that Christ bears to him, or from that love which he bears unto Christ; no person shall, no condition of life can separate them, neither outward troubles, nor inward distresses, no evils either felt or feared; the apostle defies and despises them all, because neither of them alone, nor all together, can unclasp the arms of divine love, in which believers are safely enfolded.
Learn hence, That no troubles, tribulations or distresses whatsoever, can dissolve the union betwixt Christ and believers, or ever separate them from his love.
Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament
Rom 8:35-37. Who shall separate us By saying , who, the apostle personifies the things he is going to mention, namely, affliction, &c.; from the love of Christ Toward us? By this, some understand the love which we bear to Christ. But to separate us from our own love, seems an unusual expression. Even this, however, may be included thus; What creature or occasion shall cause us to withdraw our love from him, and consequently cause him, in any degree, to withdraw his love from us? Shall tribulation? or affliction, as is generally rendered; or distress?
, perplexity, when we know not which way to turn ourselves. The former word, according to Esthius, signifies sickness and other bodily evils; whereas the latter rather means trouble of mind, arising from doubtful and perplexing straits and difficulties. He proceeds in order from less troubles to greater. Can any of these separate us from his protection in the trial, and (if he sees good) deliverance from it? The sword is here put for a violent death. As none can imagine that Christ would love his faithful servants less for enduring such extremities for his sake, the text must of necessity be intended to express the apostles confidence, that his love to his people, illustrated already in so glorious a manner, would engage him to support them under all their trials, by vital communications of divine strength. As it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day That is, every day, continually: we are accounted By our enemies, by ourselves; as sheep for the slaughter The Psalm from which this quotation is taken, is thought by some to have been written during the Babylonish captivity, when the Jews suffered great persecution for their religion: but at other times also the Jews were exposed to a variety of evils from their conquerors, on account of their adherence to the worship and service of the true God. See note on Psa 44:22. Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors We are not only no losers, but abundant gainers by all these trials. The original expression, , signifies to obtain a great victory. The victory which the people of God obtain over their persecutors is of a very singular nature. It consists in their patient bearing of all the evils which their persecutors inflict upon them, and that through the assistance of Christ, and in imitation of his example. For by suffering in this manner, they maintain his cause in spite of all opposition, and confound their persecutors.
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Vv. 35-37. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ?shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? As it is written, For Thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter. But in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him that loved us.
The pronoun , who, refers properly to persons; here it is applied to all the sufferings about to be enumerated, as if Paul saw in each of them an enemy bearing a grudge at the bond uniting him to Christ.
The love of Christ, from which nothing will separate him, is not the love which we have to Him; for we are not separated from our own personal feeling. It is therefore the love which He has to us; and this is confirmed by the close of Rom 8:37 : through Him that loved us. We might, with Calv., Thol., Rck., understand; nothing will separate us from the feeling we have of the love of Jesus to us. But is not Paul rather representing this love itself as a force which takes hold of and possesses us? Comp. 2Co 5:14 : The love of Christ constraineth us (holds us pressed). Paul is thinking of the profound action which this love exercises through the Holy Spirit at once on our heart and will. Such is the mysterious power from the operation of which nothing will be able to withdraw us. , tribulation: overwhelming external circumstances; , anguish, literally, compression of heart, the inward effect produced by tribulation; , legal persecution. To understand the words: famine, nakedness, peril, it is enough to refer to the sketch of St. Paul’s life, given in 2Co 11:23 et seq. The sword: the symbol of capital punishment. When Paul writes this word, he designates, as Bengel observes, his own future mode of death.
Fuente: Godet Commentary (Luke, John, Romans and 1 Corinthians)
Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or anguish, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? [The thought of Rom 8:28; which has not been out of the apostle’s mind since he introduced it, here comes once more squarely to the front. Shall any of the hardships of our present life so work evil as to cause Christ to change his present feeling toward us, or his future purpose to justify us? Can we who know his love ask such a question? Can anything in the whole catalogue of hardships work such results? Though in our day the sufferings may vary somewhat from the items given by the apostle, yet they raise the same doubts–produce in us the same effects. It is natural to man to look upon the sufferings of the Christian life as a contradiction to the scheme of grace. According to our earthly conceptions, a journey which is to end in glorification should continually rise toward it, so that pleasures, joys, honors, etc., should increase daily. When, instead of such a program, we meet with tribulation, anguish, nakedness, etc., it looks to us as if God were leading us the wrong way–the way that would end in degradation and death, rather than glorification and life. The answer to such thoughts is found in this argument of the apostle. God makes any road lead to good and glorification, and especially those roads which seem to run in the opposite direction; so that we may regard those things which appear to argue his hatred and neglect as, on the contrary, the strongest evidences of his love and care. And this, adds the apostle, is no new truth, for it has been the experience of God’s people in the past, as the Scripture testifies.]
Fuente: McGarvey and Pendleton Commentaries (New Testament)
35. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or difficulty, or persecution, or famine, or peril, or sword? The answer is clearly in the negative, as two hundred millions of martyrs singing their death song in the fire have abundantly attested.
Fuente: William Godbey’s Commentary on the New Testament
Verse 35
The love of Christ. This expression is obviously susceptible of two significations. It may denote the love of Christ for the believer, or the love of the believer for Christ. What precedes the expression, as it here stands, seems to require that it should be understood in the former sense, as the certainty of divine protection has been the subject of the writer’s remarks. But, on the other hand, what follows would rather indicate that the latter–that is, the love of the believer for Christ–is intended, as this only can be well supposed to be affected by the causes named below. On the whole, the former supposition is probably correct, as is indicated by the analogous expressions in Romans 8:37,39, especially in the latter. The meaning of the whole passage, then, will be, that the believer has no cause to fear for his ultimate safety. His present state of reconciliation with God is not accidental, and it will not be temporary. It is the result of the long-settled purpose of God. It is a work which God has undertaken; he will accomplish what he has begun; and Jesus, their Redeemer, who once gave his life for their ransom, will, now that he has risen to majesty and power, never forsake them in any of the darkest and most discouraging times of trial which they may be called to endure.
Fuente: Abbott’s Illustrated New Testament
8:35 Who shall separate us from the love of {q} Christ? [shall] tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?
(q) With which Christ loves us.
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes
Present trials and sufferings are no indication that God has withdrawn His love from us. Even though the Father allowed His Son to suffer, He did not stop loving Him. The Father deals with His adopted sons as He dealt with His unique Son (cf. Joh 16:33). Paul suggested seven things, in increasing intensity, that a believer might experience-and he experienced them all (2Co 11:23-28)-that some might think could come between a believer and Christ’s love. [Note: Witmer, p. 475.]