Biblia

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Timothy 2:14

And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. 14. the woman being deceived was in the transgression ] The compound verb should be read as in 2Co 11:3, ‘as the serpent beguiled Eve’; ‘Adam was not beguiled,’ a general negative, limited by the compound verb following, ‘you may say … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Timothy 2:14”

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Timothy 2:13

For Adam was first formed, then Eve. 13. ‘The Apostle appeals to the original order and course of things. By inverting this relative position and calling the helpmate assuming the place of the head or guide, and the head facilely yielding to her governance was the happy constitution of Paradise overthrown.’ Fairbairn. Fuente: The Cambridge … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Timothy 2:13”

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Timothy 2:10

But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works. 10. which becometh women professing godliness ] Best as A.V. and R.V. forming a parenthesis to justify the boldness of the dress recommended immediately after. godliness ] The noun occurs only here, the adjective only in Joh 9:31, ‘a worshipper of God.’ It seems to be … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Timothy 2:10”

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Timothy 2:9

In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with braided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array. 9. In like manner also, that women adorn themselves ] The point of likeness consists in the fitting attitude of men and of women towards Public Worship and Common … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Timothy 2:9”

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Timothy 2:6

Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time. 6. a ransom ] The word is a compound naturally formed, as time passed, to represent Christ’s own teaching, antilutron thus recalling the lutron anti of Mat 20:28; Mar 10:45. On this last verse Maclear distinguishes, from Trench’s Syn., p. 276, the … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Timothy 2:6”