Biblia

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Daniel 1:20

And in all matters of wisdom [and] understanding, that the king inquired of them, he found them ten times better than all the magicians [and] astrologers that [were] in all his realm. 20. The king found further, upon putting to them difficult questions, that in a knowledge of the technicalities of their science the four … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Daniel 1:20”

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Daniel 1:19

And the king communed with them; and among them all was found none like Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah: therefore stood they before the king. 19. communed ] talked. The Heb. word is the usual one for ‘speak,’ or ‘talk’; and nothing different from ordinary conversation is meant. ‘Commune’ occurs elsewhere in A.V., R.V., for … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Daniel 1:19”

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Daniel 1:17

As for these four children, God gave them knowledge and skill in all learning and wisdom: and Daniel had understanding in all visions and dreams. 17. Now as for these four youths, God gave them knowledge (the word rendered science in Dan 1:4), and intelligence (cf. intelligent, Dan 1:4) in all literature ( Dan 1:4) … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Daniel 1:17”

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Daniel 1:16

Thus Melzar took away the portion of their meat, and the wine that they should drink; and gave them pulse. 16. And the melar continued taking away their delicacies, and giving them vegetable food ] The Heb. idiom employed implies that the treatment which they received was now continuous. Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Daniel 1:16”

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Daniel 1:11

Then said Daniel to Melzar, whom the prince of the eunuchs had set over Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah, 11. Melzar ] the melar, ‘melar’ being the title of some officer, or attendant, of the court. What officer is intended is, however, uncertain, as the word has not hitherto been satisfactorily explained. Friedr. Delitzsch thinks … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Daniel 1:11”