Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 2 Chronicles 16:12
And Asa in the thirty and ninth year of his reign was diseased in his feet, until his disease [was] exceeding [great]: yet in his disease he sought not to the LORD, but to the physicians.
12. until his disease was exceeding great] R.V. his disease was exceeding great.
he sought not to the Lord, but to the physicians ] Physicians (Heb. rph’m) are condemned by implication here, no doubt as using incantations and adjurations. Contrast Ecclus. ( Ben Sira) Sir 38:9-15 , especially Sir 38:15 (Heb. text). He that sinneth against his Maker, will behave himself proudly against a physician.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Yet in his disease he sought not … – Rather, and also in his disease he sought not. Not only in his war with Baasha, but also when attacked by illness, Asa placed undue reliance upon the aid of man.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
2Ch 16:12-13
And Asa, in the thirty and ninth year of his reign was diseased in his feet
Mind-cure
That sickness is twin born with sin is the oldest tradition in the world.
Our maladies arise from something finer than the germs any microscope can detect; and if all disease has its origin in the ill-disposed spirit, in a different well-disposed spirit it may have its cure. There can be no doubt that a mind morbid or in health affects the body. Some persons, by their presence and air, make us sick or well. Temperance is a virtue before it is a bodily trait. All vice digs a mine of ruin which no physician can countermine. What doctor can prescribe for an inordinate affection, from his pocket-book or medicine-chest? A little mind-cure were better than a complete apothecarys shop; and in ones own mind, often more than in anothers, the remedy lies. Safety and peril reside in the same region of the affections, even as the very sea that tosses brings us to port. Like cures like; the hair of the dog his own bite; and herbs, as George Herbert says, the flesh they find their acquaintance in. There is no malady which guilty intrigues, extravagant passions, and corroding cares may not produce or increase; and none which good affections will not alleviate or remove. Many a heap of flowers have I seen on coffins that would not have been made by plane and hammer so soon had a tithe of the green leaves, lilies, and roses been strewn along the way. Christs miracles were wrought on a promise of faith, for the blind eye, for the withered hand, and for the remorseful conscience in him whom He assured, Son, thy sins be forgiven thee, an insane compunction being in this case the evil root. Peter commanded the cripple to stand on his feet, perceiving that he had faith to be healed. The good Samaritan poured out something more than oil and wine into the robbed travellers wounds. There are in us gashes and ghastly wounds, perhaps unknown to the inflictors, which no sword or dagger ever made. A word or a look was enough to stab us; shall no words or looks suffice to make us whole? No medicaments, only mental cure, can either probe them or bind them up. Right ordering of our active powers is a medicine, as well as that merry heart of which the Preacher speaks. The steadfast will is a life-preserver, and buoys up against spiritual drowning. Heal the mind tired and sore with brooding on absent or unresponsive objects: with labour that eases it, while it wearies the muscles and makes the sweat, according to the old decree, run down the face. As the girders and cross-ties of the bridge distribute the pressure on it of heavy loads, so various duty lightens by dividing every burden of grief or pain. Such considerations may show how far a sane body is not only inhabited, but made, by a sane mind. Let us notice more particularly the connection between sickness and sin.
I. They have the same origin.
II. They have the same propagation and spread.
III. Why, then, should not the cure of sickness run parallel with its continuance and cause? Disorder is inherited. Ezekiel protests against the proverb that the fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the childrens teeth are set on edge. Nevertheless, it is true. For example of this communication or transmission, take the illustration of fear. What a leaven it is! Terror is not only a wretchedness, but a disgrace, an exposure to harm. You will be likely to have what you dread. What you rehearse you will enact. This is the shorthand history of disease, misery, and crime. Bonaparte, in his better days, thought the bullet was not run and moulded he should be hit by, though cannonballs ploughed the earth into powder at his side; felt no alarm for himself from the plague in Egypt, and fortified his soldiers against it, with that brave deportment of his own. To what but panic is due the large destruction of life in buildings falling or on fire, in battles like that of Bull Run, and in wrecks at sea? We must be of good heart to be secure. How many have been sick of a thought or of a certain company or of a single companion! How many have got well with thoughts alone that could cure! By one who served in our civil war I was told of sick soldiers who, in their despair, voluntarily turned their faces to the wall and died, because they wanted, and had made up their mind, to die. If as they lay moaning on their beds had come some token of affection, the step of some Florence Nightingale, or any good message, they would have opened their eyes, stretched their limbs, and lived! A grain, a hair, the twentieth part of a scruple, in delicate conditions and a tremulous suspense determines the scale; and the balance hangs for us all to put the atom into, so intimate is the relation between body and mind. We decide each others fate every day. Balzac tells us of a mother who suddenly expires after one more of her unnatural daughters hard words; and he adds that the slaughter by savages of those too old to continue on the march is philanthropy in the comparison. This is happening every day. A gentle remembrance from one–a note, a flower, a book, a hand-grasp–to assure us our days of usefulness are not over, enables us to live and labour still. The supernatural acts through the natural. Let us make the connection and be all of us well. Be its fault or defect what it may, I greet, therefore, the new departure which lays the stress on the mind. (C.A. Bartol, D.D.)
The sin of Asa
1. Though it is not my purpose to dwell upon the general features in this history, I cannot help remarking how strongly one is inclined in hearing it to exclaim, Lord, what is man! In his best estate, moral as well as physical, he is altogether vanity. Here is a person that appears to have been piously educated, that in his youth was piously and deeply impressed; that when clothed in royal purple still remembered his responsibility to a higher power, and felt and acknowledged his dependence on it; that in his mature years departed not from the way in which he had been trained up; and that knew by a single personal experience that it is a way of pleasantness and a path of peace; in his old age guilty of the greatest inconsistencies, to say the very least. May we not reasonably suppose that, during his long prosperity, his heart had become in a measure hardened by the deceitfulness of sin; that indolence had corrupted, and pride, taking occasion from the happy condition of his people, of which he had been the instrument, had puffed him up; and that prayer, in consequence, had been restrained before God? Be sober, be vigilant, be prayerful, be humble, is the moral of this melancholy tale.
2. This monarchs history may also teach us that, what we deem our strongest point of character may in fact prove our weakest. Asas distrust in Divine, and over-trust in human power, was the last sin, most probably, which he thought would ever beset him. Though all men forsake Thee, said St. Peter, yet will not I. His courage he was sure would abide, however that of the other disciples might falter. That he felt was not his weak point; and probably it was not naturally. When we are conscious of weakness, and in consequence lean constantly on an Almighty arm, then our strength never faileth. How can it? In the confidence of this it was that the apostle Paul said, I can do all things through Christ strengthening me. On the other hand, let a man feel strong in himself, and of consequence lean on himself, in the things of religion, we are told we can do nothing. The lesson, then, to be learned from the history of Asa, in this view of it, plainly is, to glory in nothing as of ourselves, to distrust ourselves even in our strongest point, and to count all our sufficiency as of God through Christ.
3. A third particular in this narrative, well worth noticing, is the pertinacity which Asa exhibited in his sin, and how in consequence one transgression led on to another. David committed some most fearful sins, and a prophet was sent to reprove and warn him. His confession was, I have sinned against the Lord. Not so Asa. His crime, though indeed not so horrible, was equally certain; yet when the prophet reproves him, the historian tells us he was in a rage with him because of this thing; and added to the sin, and to a denial of it, persecution of Gods servant for delivering Gods message. The sin of Asa, though certain and heinous, as I have said, was not so palpable and overt as that of David. It lay more exclusively between God and his own soul. It was an offence which shortsighted men, who cannot read the heart, could not with propriety charge him with. The sins which are known with certainty only to Omniscience are the last which corrupt human nature is willing to acknowledge. It hides itself from its own guilt and from its obligation to confess and forsake its sin, under the cover of its fellow-creatures ignorance. From this hiding place, to which Asa had manifestly fled, man could not dislodge him. Gods resources, however, were not exhausted.
When His prophet failed to do it, He sent another messenger to the king in the shape of a most painful disease which finally proved mortal.
1. Health, it is generally acknowledged, is the very greatest of all personal and temporal blessings. By its influence on the inner man it gives new glory to objects already bright, and pours light on that which would otherwise be dark. It converts to luxuries the plainest food, and adds a sweetness to a cup of cold water which nectar in the hand of an invalid partakes not of. Health is valuable not only as an exemption from pain and anxiety, but as a positive good. It causes positive happiness to spring up–to well up from the depths of the soul, the operation of which the man may be unable to explain, but to the mysterious sweetness of which he is ready to testify with a rejoicing, and, would that we could say always, a grateful heart. I do not mean to say, however, that the blessing when in possession is always adequately realised and appreciate. Like other things, the loss of it, at least for a time, is in many cases necessary to open our eyes to its value. The fact that the natural issue of sickness is death is, of itself, enough to give health an inestimable value; and that fact is felt by him who has felt the gnawings of disease; and who that has reached even middle life has not experienced them?
2. But though it is thus inevitable, disease may be mitigated and its fatal consequences postponed. This is effected by one of the greatest mercies which Providence has vouchsafed to man: I mean the healing art. It is not common, perhaps, to regard it in this light, but most certainly it ought to be so regarded. This art is one of great dignity and beneficence. It is found in every country, and among the most savage and most cultivated nations of the earth; and though it seems to have advanced more slowly than many other–perhaps most other–arts and sciences, yet so early was its commencement, and so universal has been its cultivation, it has now attained great perfection. In most departments, where once human aid was unattempted or unavailing to the patient, it is astonishing what can be done for his relief, and for his restoration to society and the full enjoyment of it. This blessed art, moreover, is but an imitation of a merciful provision of nature; even as when pursued and practised on its proper principles, it consists in a co-operating with, and taking advantage of, the powers of nature. With the recuperative and healing properties of nature a true practitioner of the healing art is a co-worker. It is his high calling, in a scientific manner to aid and minister to and increase this beneficent provision. He is not occupied in helping to gratify an idle vanity, nor in pandering to luxury and over-indulgence. His business is, in the way described, to relieve distress, to dry the tear of sorrow, to rekindle the lamp of hope. It has been acutely observed that there is a likeness in the practice of this art, not only to the healing power of nature referred to, and to the course of that Providence by which both nature and art have been ordained, and to the all-merciful conduct of God manifest in the flesh while He sojourned on the earth, but also in the methods which Providence uses ordinarily for the attainment of these benevolent ends. Both are designed to restore what is lost, and to repair what is disordered; both have the production of ease and happiness for their ultimate object; both frequently make use of pains and privations as the means of procuring it, but neither of them employs an atom more of these than is necessary for that purpose.
3. Now from all this it follows that though nothing is expressly said in commendation of this art in the Holy Scriptures, nor any command given to resort to it for relief under our bodily ailments, yet the art and the use of it are manifestly according to the mind and will of God. The mere fact that God has put healing virtue into the productions of the animal and vegetable kingdoms, and given man the power to discover its existence, is sufficient warrant, in the silence of Scripture, for the thankful use of it wherever it may be necessary. It has been thought by some that the sin here condemned was resorting not to regular physicians, but to those who attempted cures by charms and other superstitious devices. Such conduct, though not generally thought so by those who indulge in it, is essentially atheistic. He was seeking good from a source not sanctioned by Heaven. He was in pursuit of health in a quarter which God did not bless. In a word, he was not seeking it of Him from whom cometh every good and perfect gift. This was atheism. It is not necessary, however, to suppose that Asa ran into this sin. He was guilty enough, and furnished sufficient ground for the censure in the text, without going to this extreme. Let us suppose, what the Scripture narrative makes probable, that through the influence of prosperity and its attendant snares and temptations, the heart of Asa had waxed cold; that his religious feelings had declined; that whereas before, God was in his thoughts as his dependence, his protection, his comfort, his consolation, his joyful portion, now he lives in forgetfulness of Him, or, if thoughts of God ever enter his mind, they come but seldom and are speedily dismissed. While living habitually in this way, sickness smites him, violent and severe, and very naturally alarming. He sends for the physicians–for many of them. His dependence is on the powers of nature to the exclusion of the Divine Author of these powers. He looks anxiously to human skill, but feels no want, or offers no prayer for the Divine blessing on it. Asa seems to have sought a cure, as he would have done had he never heard of that almighty Being in whose hand are the issues of life and death. We see here that the Lord is a jealous God, and will not give His glory to another, and that His glory and His right as God is to be recognised by His intelligent creatures everywhere, in all the exigencies, duties, and privileges of life. In instituting the present system of means and ends, He did not intend that it should be forgotten that He planned the whole; and that the whole, destitute of any self-sustaining power, is sustained only by Him. He not only created all things, but also upholds all things by the word of His power. This is a fact, and a fact manifestly connected with His glory. He expects, therefore, that all intelligent creatures feel it and acknowledge it. There are two errors–opposite extremes, which He would have them carefully avoid. The first is a reliance upon Him to the exclusion or neglect of the means which He has commanded to be used. At first view it might seem as if such conduct were putting special honour upon Jehovah; but in truth it is open rebellion against His will. He hath not commanded this at our hands. It is a strange offering–an unclean sacrifice. In His works and in His Word, God has enjoined the diligent use of means; it is impious to turn away from the commandment, even under the pretence of honouring Him. The other extreme, and equally presumptuous, is a reliance on the means to the neglect of the Divine agency and blessing. If the first was an arrogant theism, this is a gross and stupid atheism. Paradoxical as it may sound, our duty and the dictate of pure reason is, that we use means as diligently as if Gods aid were altogether unnecessary, and rely on God as sincerely as if means were unavailing. This is Scripture; this is the highest reason; nay, this human nature herself teaches when in extremity and unperverted by a theory. Who, when in conscious danger of his life, does not with a convulsive eagerness grasp at any and every means of safety, and at the same time lift a voice of agonising supplication for the Divine assistance? Our duty, then, plainly inculcated by the text, is to use means and to trust in the Lord, and to do this not of necessity, because death is imminent, but from a principle of obedience to His will, respect for His honour, and love to His name; and to do it also not only in extreme cases, but at all times. It belongs to such a spirit, as a matter of privilege as well as duty, to seek to the Lord also, and rely upon His help. In conclusion, I would observe that the text teaches a lesson in all analogous cases. For instance, if such is the temper of mind in which we should look for medicines to heal the body, the same should we have in the use of food for the maintenance of life. A blessing asked, when we take our meals, is only in conformity with these principles. So our Lord when on the earth regarded it, for He sanctioned it by His practice. And again it plainly says to those whose calling in life is trade, that whilst they industriously employ all honourable means for the maintenance and advancement of themselves and their families, they should bear in mind that there is an overruling Providence which sees through the complications of events as man cannot, and can give them such issue as may be pleasing in His sight. In short, the text teaches us that we should all, at all times and under all circumstances, realise the presence of God and lean upon His power and goodness, vouchsafed us through Jesus Christ our Lord. (W. Sparrow, D. D.)
The disease of sin and its true Physician
I. Sin is a disease under which all men are labouring.
II. To get rid of the disease of sin men resort to forbidden and unauthorised means.
III. They ought to depend on Christ as the only effectual and infallible physician of souls. (W. Sparrow, D. D.)
To the medical profession
Here is King Asa with the gout. In defiance of God he sends for certain conjurors or quacks. With the result And Asa slept with his fathers. That is, the doctors killed him. In this sharp and graphic way the Bible sets forth the truth that you have no right to shut God out from the realm of pharmacy and therapeutics. If Asa had said, Oh, Lord, I am sick; bless the instrumentality employed for my recovery! Now, servant, go and get the best doctor you can find, he would have recovered. The world wants Divinely directed physicians. Men of the medical profession, we often meet in the home of distress. We meet to-day by the altars of God. As in the nursery children sometimes re-enact all the scenes of the sick-room, so to-day you play that you are the patient and that I am the physician, and take my prescription just once.
I. In the first place, I think all the medical profession should become Christians because of the debt of gratitude they owe to God for the honour He has put upon their calling. Cicero said: There is nothing in which men so approach the gods as when they try to give health to other men.
II. The medical profession ought to be Christians, because there are so many trials and annoyances in that profession that need positive Christian solace.
III. The medical profession ought to be Christians, because there are professional exigencies when they need God. Asas destruction by unblessed physicians was a warning. There are awful crises in every medical practice when a doctor ought to know how to pray. I do not mean to say that piety will make up for medical skill A bungling doctor, confounded with what was not a very bad case went into the next room to pray. A skilled physician was called in. He asked for the first practitioner. Oh! they said, hes in the next room praying. Well. said the skilled doctor, tell him to come out here and help, he can pray and work at the same time. It was all in that sentence. Do the best we can and ask God to help us.
IV. The medical profession ought to be Christians, because there opens before them a grand field for Christian usefulness. (T. De Witt Talmage.)
Sickness
The great truth taught us in this verse is–that afflictions, in their measure, nature, and duration, result neither from chance nor necessity, nor second causes, but primarily from the wise, sovereign, and righteous appointment of the Eternal.
I. Asas disease. The former part of this verse mentions what this disease was–And Asa in the thirty, and ninth year of his reign was diseased in his feet, until his disease was exceeding great. Commentators suppose that this disease in his feet was the gout, and that it was a just punishment for putting the prophets feet in the stocks. How varied the disease to which human nature is liable.
1. The person afflicted–Asa the king. This circumstance teaches us that when the Almighty wills afflictions, none can escape them–no, not even kings. When kings commit evil they must expect to be punished as well as others. King Jehoram sinned against the Lord, and the Lord visited him with a disease in his bowels. King Uzziah transgressed the Lords commandments, and the Lord smote him with leprosy: And Uzziah the king was a leper unto the day of his death, and dwelt in a separate house, being a leper. Asa was diseased in his feet. Honours, riches, power shield us not from disease. When God gives the commission, afflictions enter the palace as well as the meanest hut.
2. The violence of Asas disorder. His disease was exceeding great. Sometimes we think our trials very heavy; but when compared with those of others we find them light. Hence, if your case is very painful, it is not singular.
3. The period of its continuance. Asa was diseased in his feet two years. When the Lord afflicts us for a month, a week, yea, sometimes, when we are in pain only one day, we think it a long time. But how short the period of our pains when compared with others! It might have lasted for many years.
II. Asas duty. When it is said that Asa sought not unto the Lord, it implies that he ought to have done so.
1. The purposes for which you should seek unto the Lord in your afflictions. The advice which Eliphaz gave to Job in his affliction was most excellent, and is suitable to us on all occasions: Yet man is born unto trouble, as the sparks fly upward. I would seek unto God, and unto God would commit my cause. The afflicted should seek unto God, in disease, that they may know its design. Shew me, prays Job, wherefore Thou contendest with me. The Lords way, both in mercy and in judgment, is in the sea, and His footsteps, oftentimes, are not seen. Since, therefore, none can give us the information we need but God Himself, and since also it is so important for us to know the design of Our trials, let us not do as Asa did, but as Eliphaz recommends–seek unto God. When diseases visit us we should seek unto God, that He would give us grace to sustain them. None but He who lays these burdens on our shoulders can sustain us under them. That these visitations may be duly improved is another end we should propose in seeking unto the Lord. God should be sought unto in affliction, that He may remove them. The Lord should be sought unto in sickness, that His righteousness in afflicting may be devoutly acknowledged.
2. The manner in which God should be approached unto in these circumstances. First, in faith–the Christian must exercise faith in his heavenly Fathers providence, promises, and revealed character. Secondly, in humility–the Christian has merited all he endures, and has nothing of his own to plead. Thirdly, with resignation.
3. Some reasons why the Lord should be sought unto may be specified.
(1) The manifest propriety of the thing itself. Unto whom should the servant go in his distress but unto the master?
(2) The absolute dependence of the creature on God shows the importance and reasonableness. On Gods will depends our health and sickness, adversity and prosperity, joys and sorrows.
(3) These means are Divinely appointed, consequently we cannot neglect them without considerable danger to our souls. For this thing will I be inquired of by the house of Israel, that I may do it for them.
(4) The example of all good men–David, Job, Paul, and others, when in distress, sought unto the Lord in prayer: this was their uniform practice; and, indeed, prayer is the best plaster for all our wounds.
III. Asas sin. Asas sin is a common sin–the way of the multitude, Asas sin was a great sin–he put the creature before the Creator. Asas sin, unrepented of, is a ruinous sin. Shall I not visit for these things, saith the Lord? Asas conduct arises from many causes.
1. Ignorance. Sin has so darkened the mind that many have no right views of their relation to God.
2. Inattention. Some know these things, yet give them little or no serious attention. God is neither in all their ways nor in all their thoughts.
3. Independence. Sin has made man so proud that, if it were possible, he would do without God altogether.
4. Presumption. Many expect health, ease, and success without Gods assistance.
5. Unbelief. Multitudes have no vital faith in God, His Word, nor in the necessity, efficacy, and advantages of prayer.
Learn from this subject–
1. Means may be used, but we must be careful not to abuse them.
2. The best of men do not always keep in the same gracious frame of mind. Compare 2Ch 14:2 with the text, Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.
3. The same sins that were prevalent in Asas day are prevalent now. (H. Hollis.)
Asa and the physicians
I. It is interesting to notice who this sick person was. It was Asa, one of the kings of Judah. A king has no poverty to contend against; but–alike with his meanest subjects–he has sickness. Sickness is impartial, even as death. No luxury can materially soften it, no precaution can keep it away, no wealth can stay its course. What was Asas course? He sought to the physicians. Surely he was, so far, right. It is thought that these physicians were charmers, bringers in of foreign superstitions, singers of useless incantations, and that herein lay Asas wrong. The question does not relate to the kind of physician he went to, but only to the fact of his going. He did no wrong in seeking human help. We are never to give up at the first approach of sickness and wait for a special wonder of cure. It is not that he was wrong in seeking to the physicians, but very wrong in some other particulars.
1. He did not seek to the Lord, without whom human physicians may vainly exercise their skill and talents. Neither will prayer dispense with medicine nor medicine with prayer.
2. Asa was a king. The inconsistency which, in an unknown subject, would provoke but little comment, grows serious in the life of royalty. We expect nobleness, manliness, and exemplary conduct from kings. Asa set a bad example to his subjects and was false to his royal order. Asa was also false to God, for he was head of the Church and yet dishonoured prayer.
3. Asa suffered his disease to make him unjust and irritable. He cast Hanani into prison for telling him Gods holy will.
4. Asa belied a previous life of piety. One of his prayers in time of health, when marching against his numerous enemies, had been more inspiring than the most stirring war-cry or the most martial summons to certain victory. Lord! it is nothing to Thee to help, whether with many or with them that have no power. Help us, O Lord, our God! for we rest on Thee, and in Thy name we go against the multitude. O Lord, Thou art our God; let not man prevail against Thee! But now Asa was sick he forgot the trust he had formerly placed in the God of Israel. Sickness, more terrible than an army with banners, spoiled this king of his faith.
II. The general lesson taught by sickness.
1. Health is the gift of God. Many who are ready to acknowledge recovery to be so, and who gratefully thank God for it, forget that good health is a far greater blessing than recovery.
2. Health is a talent. What has been done with it?
3. Prepare for sickness by continuing mindful of its approach.
4. As regards our conduct to those who are sick. Asa was wrong, impatient, faithless; but the duty of his attendants and subjects was to hear with him. Sickness is trying. What seems like impatience to lookers-on would seem different were the places reversed.
5. The great lesson of all–a lesson of avoidance from Asas fault–is to commit ourselves to the care of God; to seek, if able, to earthly physicians; but to seek with brighter hopes and fuller certainty to the Great Healer Himself (S..B. James, M.A.)
Retribution
From the theological standpoint of the chroniclers school, these invidious records of the sins of good kings were necessary in order to account for their misfortunes. That sin was always punished by complete, immediate, and manifest retribution in this life, and that conversely all misfortune was the punishment of sin, was probably the most popular religious teaching in Israel from early days till the time of Christ. This doctrine of retribution was current among the Greeks. When the Spartan King Cleomenes committed suicide, the public mind in Greece at once inquired of what particular sin he had thus paid the penalty. When in the course of the Peloponnesian war the AEginetans were expelled from their island, this calamity was regarded as a punishment inflicted upon them because fifty years before they had dragged away and put to death a suppliant who had caught hold of the handle of the door of the temple of Demeter Theomophorus. (W. H. Bennett, M.A.)
The most serious punishments of sin
These are not pain, ruin, disgrace. Their are the formation and confirmation of evil character. Herbert Spencer says that motion once set up along any line becomes itself a cause of subsequent motion along that line. This is absolutely true in moral and spiritual dynamics: every wrong thought, feeling, word, or act, every failure to think, feel, speak, or act rightly, at once alters a mans character for the worse. Henceforth he will find it easier to sin and more difficult to do right; he has twisted another strand into the cord of habit; and though each may be as fine as a spiders web, in time there will be cords strong enough to have bound Samson before Delilah shaved off his seven locks. This is the true punishment of sin: to lose the fine instincts, the generous impulses, and the nobler ambitions of manhood, and become every day more of a beast and a devil. (W. H. Bennett, M. A.)
Our disinclination to rely upon God only
Some years ago my wife and I were walking through the streets of Boston, having recently left our place of residence and living in a flat. My wife was without a servant; the summer was unusually hot even for our country, and the task of preparing the meals for the family was a grievance. Like a good husband, I had great sympathy with my wife, and so I rose in the morning and fit the fire. One day I saw a device advertised for cooking by oil, and after a little while I strained a large point, bought the stove, and brought it home in triumph. I said to my wife, You will not have to be roasted any more over that old kitchen range; but she was sceptical, as good wives are wont to be, and when I went in to see how the cooking was going on, I found a roaring fire in the old range as well, in case the new one would not work. I think we all want something to fall back upon, and like to have a roaring fire in the old range–to trust in our own efforts instead of relying on God. (G. F. Pentecost.)
God left out of the calculation
I knew a man who professed to love the Lord, and who really did so. He got into great difficulties, and racked his brain all night without avail for a way out of them. In the morning he went to the squire and the rector, and racked their brains about his troubles, but to no good effect. He then came to me, and asked me to pray with him about them, and my reply was, No, I will not; you have racked your own, the rectors, and the squires brain, and now you wish to make Jesus only the fourth instead of first. I wont take any part in doing that. He fell on his knees with such a beseeching look for forgiveness, and prayed, Oh, how could I forget Thee, Lord? Yet even now I come and ask guidance. It is needless to say that the Lord graciously heard and answered, and gave him a triumphant issue out of all his troubles. (Christian Herald.)
.
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 12. Diseased in his feet] He had a strong and long fit of the gout; this is most likely.
He sought not to the Lord] “He did not seek discipline from the face of the Lord, but from the physicians.” – Targum.
Are we not taught by this to make prayer and supplication to the Lord in our afflictions, with the expectation that he will heal us when he finds us duly humbled, i.e., when the end is answered for which he sends the affliction?
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
He did not humble himself before God, nor earnestly desire his help, but put all his confidence in the skill and faithfulness of his physicians, of whom, it seems, he had great experience.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
12. Asa . . . was diseased in hisfeetprobably the gout.
yet his disease was exceedinggreatbetter, “moved upwards” in his body, whichproves the violent and dangerous type of the malady.
yet in his disease he soughtnot to the Lord, but to the physiciansmost probably Egyptianphysicians, who were anciently in high repute at foreign courts, andwho pretended to expel diseases by charms, incantations, and mysticarts. Asa’s fault consisted in his trusting to such physicians, whilehe neglected to supplicate the aid and blessing of God. The best andholiest men have been betrayed for a time into sins, but throughrepentance have risen again; and as Asa is pronounced a good man (2Ch15:17), it may be presumed that he also was restored to a betterstate of mind.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
And Asa in the thirty ninth year of his reign was diseased in his feet,…. This was about two years before his death, and his disease is generally thought to be the gout in his feet, and a just retaliation for putting the prophet’s feet into the stocks:
until his disease was exceeding great; it increased upon him, and became very severe and intolerable, and the fits were frequent, as well as the pain sharper; though the sense of the Hebrew m phrase may be, that his disease got upwards, into a superior part of his body, head, or stomach, which, when the gout does, it is dangerous. A very learned physician n is of opinion, that not the gout, but what he calls an “aedematous” swelling of the feet, is meant, which insensibly gets up into the bowels, and is successively attended with greater inconveniences; a tension of the abdomen, difficulty of breathing, very troublesome to the patient, and issues in a dropsy, and death itself:
yet in his disease he sought not to the Lord; his seeking to physicians for help in his disease, perhaps, would not have been observed to his reproach, had he also sought unto the Lord, whom he ought to have sought in the first place; and when he applied to the physicians, he should have implored the blessing of God on their prescriptions; but he so much forgot himself as to forget the Lord: this is the first time we read of physicians among the Jews, and some think these were Heathens, and a sort of enchanters: the Jews entertained a very ill opinion of physicians; the best of them, they say o, deserve hell, and they advise p men not to live in a city where the chief man is a physician; but the author of the book of Ecclesiasticus gives a great encomium of them, and exhorts to honour and esteem them,
“1 Honour a physician with the honour due unto him for the uses which ye may have of him: for the Lord hath created him. 2 For of the most High cometh healing, and he shall receive honour of the king. 3 The skill of the physician shall lift up his head: and in the sight of great men he shall be in admiration. 4 The Lord hath created medicines out of the earth; and he that is wise will not abhor them. 5 Was not the water made sweet with wood, that the virtue thereof might be known? 6 And he hath given men skill, that he might be honoured in his marvellous works. 7 With such doth he heal [men], and taketh away their pains. 8 Of such doth the apothecary make a confection; and of his works there is no end; and from him is peace over all the earth,” (Sirach 38)
Julian q the emperor greatly honoured them, and observes, that it is justly said by the philosophers, that the art of medicine fell from heaven.
m “usque ad supra”, Montanus; “usque ad summum”, Vatablus; “usque ad sursum”, Piscator. n Scheuchzer. Physic. Sacr. vol. 4. p. 645. o T. Bab. Kiddashin, fol. 32. 1. Gloss. in ib. p T. Bab. Pesachim, fol. 113. 1. q Opera, par. 2. p. 154.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
(12) Diseased in his feet.1Ki. 15:23, only in the time of his old age he was diseased in his feet. The nature of the disease is not specified here or in Kings.
Until his disease was exceeding great.Unto excess was his disease: ad lmlah, a clause added by the chronicler (see on 1Ch. 22:5).
Yet.And also in his disease, as well as in his war with Baasha.
He sought not to the Lord.Omit to.
But to the physicians.The preposition is expressed here (comp. 1Ch. 10:13-14; 2Ki. 1:2). Asa, like Ahaziah, neglected to consult Jehovah through his priests, and preferred to trust in the Healers of his day, whose art of healing probably consisted in the use of magical appliances, such as amulets, charms, and exorcisms, as we may infer from the analogous practices of Babylon and Assyria. It is not to be supposed that Israel was more enlightened in such matters than the nations to which it owed so large a share of its civilisation, or, indeed, than Christian England of the seventeenth century.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
12. Diseased in his feet Perhaps the gout. See note on 1Ki 15:23.
Yet in his disease he sought not to the Lord in his disease, as in war with Baasha, he sought other counsellors than the prophets of Jehovah.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
2Ch 16:12 And Asa in the thirty and ninth year of his reign was diseased in his feet, until his disease [was] exceeding [great]: yet in his disease he sought not to the LORD, but to the physicians.
Ver. 12. Was diseased in his feet. ] Laborabat podagrd, a saith Vatablus; he was troubled with the gout, with a swelling in his feet, say the Rabbins. As he had laid the good prophet by the heels in prison, so doth God lay him by the heels in his bed; to him therefore he should have sought for release; since natural means in this case could do him little good.
“ Una eademque manus, &c. ”
Until his disease was exceeding great.
Yet in his disease he sought not to the Lord.
But to the physicians.
a He did not , and was therefore podagrinus.
b Euseb.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
sought not. Contrast Hezekiah (2Ki 20:2. Isa 38:2, Isa 38:3.)
physicians = healers. First occurrence of mention of them among the Hebrews. These belonged to the priestly tribe, with traditional knowledge, more or less superstitious. Compare Job 13:4. In NT. we have Luke (Col 4:14).
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
am 3088, bc 916
diseased: Mat 7:2, Luk 6:37, Luk 6:38, Rev 3:19
in his disease: 2Ch 16:9, 2Ch 28:22, 1Ch 10:14, Jer 17:5
physicians: Gen 50:2, Job 13:4, Jer 8:22, Mat 9:12, Mar 2:17, Mar 5:26, Col 4:14
Reciprocal: 1Ki 15:23 – in the time Job 33:19 – pain Luk 8:43 – had
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
2Ch 16:12. Asa was diseased in his feet Afflicted with the gout in a high degree. He put the prophet in the stocks, says Henry, and now God put him in the stocks; so his punishment answered his sin. Until his disease was exceeding great , ad lemaalah chaljo, until his disease came to the height, or, until it ascended, namely, to his stomach, or head: and then it became mortal. Yet in his disease he sought not to the Lord, but to the physicians He did not humble himself before God, but put his confidence in the skill and faithfulness of his physicians. His making use of physicians was his duty, but his trusting in them, and expecting that from them which was to be had from God only, was his sin and folly. The help of every creature must be used with an eye to the Creator, and in dependance on him, who makes every creature that to us which it is, without whom the most skilful and faithful are physicians of no value.
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
16:12 And Asa in the thirty and ninth year of his reign was diseased in his feet, until his disease [was] {e} exceeding [great]: yet in his disease he sought not to the LORD, but to the {f} physicians.
(e) God plagued his rebellion and by this declared that it is nothing to begin well, unless we continue to the end, that is, zealous of God’s glory and put our whole trust in him.
(f) He shows that it is useless to seek the physicians unless we first seek God to purge our sins, which are the chief cause of all our diseases, and later use the help of the physicians as a means by which God works.