Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 2 Samuel 23:16
And the three mighty men broke through the host of the Philistines, and drew water out of the well of Bethlehem, that [was] by the gate, and took [it], and brought [it] to David: nevertheless he would not drink thereof, but poured it out unto the LORD.
16. brake through the host of the Philistines ] A striking proof of the enthusiasm which David inspired in his followers, and a noble instance of the true spirit of chivalry, which fears no danger and shrinks from no self-sacrifice, in order to do the smallest service for the object of its devotion; the spirit which is perfected in the highest example of love (Joh 15:13).
poured it out unto the Lord] The sacrificial term for pouring out a drink-offering or libation (Gen 35:14, &c.). “That which had been won by the lives of those three gallant chiefs was too sacred for him to drink, but it was on that very account deemed by him as worthy to be consecrated in sacrifice to God, as any of the prescribed offerings of the Levitical ritual. Pure Chivalry and pure Religion there formed an absolute union.” Stanley’s Lect. II. 54.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Brake through the host – Their camp was pitched in the valley of Rephaim 2Sa 23:13; 1Ch 11:15. It follows from this that the way from Adullam to Bethlehem lay through or across the valley of Rephaim.
Poured it out unto the Lord – It was too costly for his own use, none but the Lord was worthy of it. For libations, see Jdg 6:20 note.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
2Sa 23:16-17
Nevertheless he would not drink thereof, but poured it out before the Lord.
The sacredness of life
This event is probably to be referred to the time which immediately succeeded Davids accession to the throne over an undivided people. (2Sa 5:3; 2Sa 5:17.)
I. The sacredness of life. To the Hebrew the blood was the vital principle (Gen 4:4.) Hence it was not to be eaten. Even the blood of a hunted animal or bird was to be reverently covered with dust (Lev 17:13.) Because of its sacredness it was used in the temple worship in acts of consecration (Exo 29:20), and in acts of propitiation (Lev 4:6), and in its Divine sacredness, as flowing from the Incarnate Word, it was poured out for, that full, perfect and sufficient sacrifice, oblation and satisfaction for the sins of the whole world. So, too, the solemn act of David expressed the fact that life is a sacred thing.
1. With what mysteries is it linked, and mankind has ever associated the mysterious with the sacred. In what manner did life, in its most rudimentary form, enter into a world that till then had been lifeless? How wondrous is the chain of life–each following link made of more precious material arid more curiously wrought–that runs up from its first appearing to man, to the angels, and to the Eternal!
2. How strangely is life interwoven with life, husband and wife, child and parent, brother and brother, friend and friend. Weakness is linked to strength, and folly to wisdom; while the weakness that is wise is helped by and vet delivers the strength that is foolish. No man liveth to himself in the economy of God.
3. What possibilities lie undeveloped in life. The child that slumbers in its cradle may be a Croesus, a Raphael, a Napoleon, a Shakespeare, a Luther. Even when lifes first stages may seem to justify a forecast of the future, what possibilities remain to us in virtue of diligence, application, fortitude, or through that overruling of things which we name fortune.
4. The everlastingness of its issues makes life sacred. The character it fashions lasts. Any chord once made to vibrate–be it of feeling or thought, or word, or act, or influence–may vibrate for ever. Death far from ending rather reveals lifes issues.
5. Yet in the fact that the Son of God took to Himself a human nature, lived a human life in its varied stages as babe and boy, as youth and man, has life obtained its weightiest and indelible sanctity.
II. What is gained by lifes risk partakes of lifes sanctity. Unharmed the three returned bearing with them a draught of water for which their king and captain had longed. It was the Balaclava of Israelitish history–an act of fruitless bravery, a blunder only possible to heroes–though less fatal in its consequences. Had a warrior been lost then regret for the foolish wish might have prompted the libation. But though no evil had overtaken them the jeopardy had made the water bleed-like and sacred, and lie poured it out unto the Lord.
1. Things necessary when purchased by lifes risk partake of this sacredness. Every life sacrificed in the service of mankind makes man a debtor, and sets the seal of sanctity upon the survivors. The substitute for the conscript who dies upon the battlefield, the fireman who perishes at his task, the lifeboatman who falls a victim to the raging sea, the physician and nurse who die saving the patient, should make these whom they ransom at so great a cost feel that every breath they draw is no common but a most sacred thing.
2. But things of convenience, hardly of necessity, are purchased at the same cost, and obtain a like sanctity. Our boasted and elaborate civilisation is costly in lives. To some it gives comfort and days, for others it shortens the span of existence. And the civilisation which lengthens life is largely dispensible; life without these blessings would be possible, though far less enjoyable. Men could still live in wattled huts and warm themselves with a wood or turf fire. There need be no coal fire, no steam engine, no railway travelling, no great engineering works such as we are accustomed to. Yet, how many and terrible are the disasters to life and limb, which have given us these advantages, and to our nation so much of her wealth. Very costly are many of the comforts and conveniences of our modern civilisation. The cutlery which, bright and sharp, lies upon our dining table, has meant a reduction of the years of life to the grinders who gave it edge. In many of the chemical and mechanical processes which furnish us the conveniences of modern life there is a similar sacrifice of the health and life of the workers. We should shrink from doing without these things; deprived of them men would question if life be worth living; but in the use of things purchased at such a cost let us remember that cost; it would give an earnestness to much of the morally relaxed life we live, could we see these things bedabbled with the blood that procured them.
3. Still more must we feel our responsibility when whims are gratified by the risk of life. That water from the well by the gate was not a necessity; it was the gratification of a sentiment; And it was the sense that life had been jeoparded for a sentiment that made David treat it as he did.
III. There are two directions in which these words have their bearing upon modern life.
1. Employment means employment of life, the hiring of blood. To say a man employs so many hands is to mention the least important of the powers he gets a claim upon. He employs lives, hearts, characters; souls that must live for ever, destinies that never become spent. But these lives must be regarded as sacred things, and every employer should bear with him the solemn sense of responsibility. If he feels as David felt, Is it not the blood of those men who jeoparded their lives? he will give in respect of those who serve him every care for life and for health. Such a man would never send men to sea in an unworthy ship, or to work with deficient apparatus, or expose them to the peril of a risky boiler. Neither should the moral perils of employees be forgotten. No man can justly retain as foreman a man of good ability but bad morals. No clerk should be asked to pen a letter that goes against his moral convictions; no traveller should be permitted to feel he must get orders by means which are not as the noonday clear, The wealth that comes from ruined health, lost lives, seared consciences, damned souls, is it not the blood of these men?
2. Perhaps it is well to remember that most persons are the employers of those who afford amusement. The stern Puritan days are largely past, and the average Christian man does not refrain from public spectacles on the high principle that the world passeth away and the fashion thereof. But dare men believing in the Bible countenance amusements involving the risk of life; did not the early church bring to an end the cruel sport of the Roman amphitheatre? should not such sports as to-day involve the health and lives of those who afford others pleasure be discountenanced, and by moral influence suppressed by the followers of Christ. When we see in the coveted water from the well that is by the gate, in the gratification we have or craved, the whim we have indulged, the needless convenience we have thoughtlessly enjoyed–the blood of men who have jeoparded their lives–then will a solemn sense of lifes sacredness steal upon us, and we shall pray, Deliver me from blood-guiltiness, O God. (J. T. L. Maggs, B. A.)
Waste
We speak of things being wasted when they are not used, or when they are used for an inferior purpose to that which was originally intended. But waste is a relative term; and in these economic days some of the most valuable products have been obtained from substances that used to be thrown out as utter refuse. The most brilliant colours are got from the waste of gas manufacture; the sweetest perfumes and most delicate flavourings from the offal of the street; and the mounds of rubbish excavated from the placer mines of California have formed ever since the most fertile soil, in which have grown harvests far more valuable than their richest gold. That which is said to be wasted is often more precious than that which is employed for some utilitarian purpose. The well of Bethlehem was associated with the happiest days of Davids life, when, as a shepherd boy, without any care or trouble, he drank of it, and went on his way rejoicing. The heat and burden of the day had consumed him in the beleaguered garrison, and the thought of that water was to him like the beautiful mirage–the deserts dream of dewy fields and sparkling streams. And yet, when a goblet full of the clear cold water was put into his bands, and he was free to drink and slake his burning thirst, he would not take it. His spirit rose above his languid frame and asserted its superiority. He nobly denied himself what his body weakly craved. Some might call such spilling of the water upon the ground an uncalled-for waste, and might blame David severely for appearing to lightly esteem the act of the brave men. What though the water had been procured at the cost of so much trouble and danger, did not that circumstance enhance its value? Was it not the very reason why it should not have been thrown away? The worst use to which it could be put was surely to pour it upon the dry ground, where it would do no good to living thing, but would speedily evaporate into the hot air, and leave no trace behind. We have all heard such selfish reasonings, and witnessed such penurious prudence in regard to similar acts of apparently rash generosity. But though the narrow-minded, capable only of the most short-sighted policy, may condemn it, every enlightened conscience, every generous heart, must deeply feel that Davids act of seeming wastefulness was in reality one of the noblest in his life. It would have been selfish in him to drink the water; but it was the height of unselfishness to refuse to drink it. By not using it, he put it to the highest use. By pouring it out upon the ground, seeming to waste it, he put a far greater value upon it than could possibly have been done if it had been used only to slake his thirst. Drunk, it would have refreshed the parched lips of David for a moment, and then the incident would have been forgotten. The draught of water would have accomplished its purpose, and that would have been the end of it for ever. But by being refused, by being wasted upon the ground,, and offered as a libation to the Lord of heaven and earth, its use remained unexhausted, its memory would be for ever cherished. To all generations the deed will he spoken of as one of the finest examples of generous self-denial and pious gratitude; and it will have an inspiring effect upon all who come to know of it, inducing them to practice similar self-denial and devotion in their own lives. The water spilt upon the ground in this way, which could not be gathered up again, rose up to heaven, a beautiful cloud gilded by the sun, to adorn the sky, to be seen and admired of all eyes, and to fall again in fertilising rain and dew upon ground that, but for it would have been for ever barren. (H. Macmillan, D. D.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 16. Poured it out unto the Lord.] To make libations, both of water and wine, was a frequent custom among the heathens. We have an almost similar account in Arrian’s Life of Alexander: “When his army was greatly oppressed with heat and thirst, a soldier brought him a cup of water; he ordered it to be carried back, saying, I cannot bear to drink alone while so many are in want, and this cup is too small to be divided among the whole.” Tunc poculo pleno sicut oblatum est reddito: Non solus, inquit, bibere sustineo, nec tam exiguum dividere omnibus possum. – ARRIAN, lib. vi.
The example was noble in both cases, but David added piety to bravery; he poured it out unto the Lord.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
The host of the Philistines was in the valley of Rephaim, 2Sa 23:13, and in the way to Beth-lehem.
He would not drink thereof; lest by gratifying himself upon such terms, he should seem either to set too high a price upon the satisfaction of his appetite, or too low a price upon the lives of his soldiers, or should encourage others to the like vain-glorious and foolish attempts.
Poured it out unto the Lord, as a kind of drink-offering, and acknowledgment of Gods goodness in preserving the lives of his captains in so dangerous an enterprise; and to show that he esteemed it as a sacred thing, which, considering all things, it was not fit for him to drink it.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
And the three mighty men brake through the host of the Philistines,…. Which lay in the valley of Rephaim, between the hold in which David was and the well of Bethlehem; these three men hearing David express himself in the above manner, though without any view that any should risk their lives to obtain it, only in a general way said, oh for a draught of the water of the well of Bethlehem! immediately set out, and made their way through the army of the Philistines to the well:
and drew water out of the well of Bethlehem, that [was] by the gate,
and took [it], and brought [it] to David; in a vessel which they probably carried with them for that purpose:
nevertheless he would not drink thereof; because, say they who take these words in a spiritual sense, it was not this water, but spiritual water, he desired: but the reason is given in 2Sa 23:17:
but poured it out unto the Lord; as a libation to him, it being rather blood than water, being fetched at the hazard of men’s lives, and therefore more fit to be offered as a sacrifice to God than to be drank by him; and this he might do in thankfulness to God for preserving the lives of the men. Gersom thinks it was now the feast of tabernacles, which was the feast of ingathering the fruits of the earth, when great quantities of water were drawn and poured out at the altar, which was done to obtain the blessing of the former rain; [See comments on Joh 7:37] and [See comments on Joh 7:38].
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
(16) Poured it out unto the Lord.The brave act of the three heroes shows strikingly the personal power of David over his followers and the enthusiasm with which he inspired them. Yet, on the other hand, David would not suffer his own longing to be gratified by the hazard of mens lives. Taking the water, therefore, he poured it out unto the Lord. The word is the technical term for the sacrificial libation, and David assimilated his act to a sacrifice by a solemn consecration of this dangerously won water to the Lord.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
16. Poured it out unto the Lord As a drink offering.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
2Sa 23:16 And the three mighty men brake through the host of the Philistines, and drew water out of the well of Bethlehem, that [was] by the gate, and took [it], and brought [it] to David: nevertheless he would not drink thereof, but poured it out unto the LORD.
Ver. 16. Nevertheless he would not drink thereof. ] Accounting it too dear a draught for himself, he poured it out unto the Lord, out of a religious respect; and this put a difference betwixt this act of David’s, and the like done by Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar. a Finibus, non officiis, a vitiis discernuntur virtutes, saith Augustine, propter Te, Domine.
a Curt., lib. vii.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
the three. The three referred to in 2Sa 23:13.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
the three: 2Sa 23:9, 1Sa 19:5, Act 20:24, Rom 5:7, 2Co 5:14
poured it: Num 28:7, 1Sa 7:6, Lam 2:19, Phi 2:17
Reciprocal: 2Sa 15:14 – and smite 2Sa 17:8 – mighty men 2Sa 23:19 – he attained 1Ch 11:17 – longed Ecc 4:12 – and a Amo 2:9 – I destroyed
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
23:16 And the three mighty men brake through the host of the Philistines, and drew water out of the well of Bethlehem, that [was] by the gate, and took [it], and brought [it] to David: nevertheless he would not drink thereof, but {k} poured it out unto the LORD.
(k) Bridling his affection, and also desiring God not to be offended for that rash enterprise.