Biblia

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 2 Samuel 3:13

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 2 Samuel 3:13

And he said, Well; I will make a league with thee: but one thing I require of thee, that is, Thou shalt not see my face, except thou first bring Michal Saul’s daughter, when thou comest to see my face.

13. except thou first bring ] As the text stands it can only be rendered except on condition of thy bringing. But it looks like a combination of two readings, except thou bring (so the LXX.) and before thou bring (Vulg.).

David’s reasons for demanding the restoration of Michal were probably ( a) genuine affection for the wife of his youth who had saved his life (1Sa 18:20; 1Sa 19:11 ff.); ( b) a desire to efface the slight put upon him by the deprivation; ( c) a wish to conciliate the good will of the northern tribes by an alliance with Saul’s family.

Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges

Davids motive in requiring the restitution of Michal was partly his affection for her, and his memory of her love for him; partly the wish to wipe out the affront put upon him in taking away his wife, by obtaining her return; and partly, also, a politic consideration of the effect on Sauls partisans of a daughter of Saul being Davids queen.

Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible

Verse 13. Except thou first bring Michal] David had already six wives at Hebron; and none of them could have such pretensions to legitimacy as Michal, who had been taken away from him and married to Phaltiel. However distressing it was to take her from a husband who loved her most tenderly, (see 2Sa 3:16), yet prudence and policy required that he should strengthen his own interest in the kingdom as much as possible; and that he should not leave a princess in the possession of a man who might, in her right, have made pretensions to the throne. Besides, she was his own lawful wife, and he had a right to demand her when he pleased.

Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible

I will make a league with thee, to wit, upon thy terms; which, all circumstances considered, seems to be lawful, to prevent the great effusion of Israelitish blood, which otherwise would certainly have been split. And although the principle of this action of Abners was base and wicked, yet the action itself was lawful and commendable, and no more than his duty to God and David obliged him to; and therefore David might well persuade and induce him to it.

Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole

And he said, well, I will make a league with thee,…. He accepted of the offer, he was ready and willing to enter into a covenant of friendship with him, and forgive all past offences:

but one thing I require of thee; as the condition of this covenant:

that is, thou shall not see my face; be admitted into my presence, or have any mark of my favour and respect:

except thou first bring Michal, Saul’s daughter, when thou comest to see my face; he insisted on it that Michal, Saul’s daughter, and his wife, should be brought along with him, and presented to him; this was the preliminary to the league and covenant; if this was not complied with, the proposal would not be attended to. This shows the great affection David retained for his first wife, though he had had six since, see 2Sa 3:2, and though she had lived with another man, 1Sa 25:44; as also his great regard to the honour of Saul’s family, that one of them might share with him in the grandeur of the kingdom; though this also might be a piece of policy in him, to gain the friends of Saul’s family to him.

Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible

Abner Treats with David, vs. 13-21

David responded affirmatively to Abner’s suit for peace, with only one stipulation, that his wife Michal, Saul’s daughter, be restored to him. Michal was the first wife of David, and he had a legal right to request that the wrong done him by marrying her to another man righted. However, it would seem that David insisted on this more as a matter of diplomacy than a lingering love for her. Out of spite for David, Michal’s father, Saul, had taken her and married her to a man named Phalti, or Phaltiel.

Acting upon this requirement David sent his messengers to Ishbosheth demanding that Michal be sent to him.lsh-bosheth complied by sending and taking her from her husband. David had won the hand of Michal by answering Saul’s challenge of a hundred foreskins of the Philistines as the dowry. He had produced two hundred, and Saul who had hoped David would be killed, was compelled to give him Michal (see 1Sa 18:20 ff). After David was driven to flight from Saul,her father married Michal to Phalti (1Sa 25:44).

Michal had loved David and had saved his life (1Sa 18:28; 1Sa 19:11 -17). Her present feeling for him is unknown, though at later time she despised him (2Sa 6:16; 2Sa 6:20-23). One thing is positively clear in the section under study, Michal’s new husband, Phaltiel, loved her. It is a very pathetic scene that is related. Phaltiel accompanied the men conveying Michal to David as far as Bahurim, in the Jordan valley east of Jerusalem, where he was made to go back by Abner. Actually he followed along behind the company weeping all the way. The feeling of Michal for Phaltiel might have been mutual. At any rate it seems, from the modern viewpoint, David would have acted in a magnanimous and commendable way to have released Michal to her husband after he made his point of diplomacy.

Abner went first to the elders of Israel, reminding them how they had wanted to make David their king in past times. They had evidently been persuaded against that by Abner, but now he urges them to turn their allegiance to David, reminding them also that the prophecy from the Lord was that David would deliver them from the Philistines. Next he went to the Benjamites, his own and Saul’s tribesmen, and encouraged them to turn to David. Finally he came with his proposal to David himself at Hebron, bringing with him a twenty man delegation. David feasted them, and Abner agreed to leave the meeting and go out into Israel and gather them to David that they may make a treaty of allegiance with him to be their king. So all that David had desired and long awaited would be effected. Thus David allowed Abner to leave peacefully on his errand.

Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary

(13) Except thou first bring Michal.David consents to negotiate with Abner only on condition of the previous restoration of his lawful wife. Besides the justice of this demand (Michal having been wrongfully taken from him by Saul), and besides all question of affection towards one who had loved him and saved his life (1Sa. 18:20; 1Sa. 19:11-17), there were political reasons of importance for the demand. The demand itself showed to all Israel that he bore no malice against the house of Saul, and the restoration would again constitute him Sauls son-in-law, and thus further his claims to the throne; while it also showed publicly that he was in a condition to enforce his rights as against the house of Saul.

Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)

13. First bring Michal She was his own proper wife, and he had a right to demand her. With her restored to him he would stand before the nation as the son in law of Saul. “No doubt it was of great importance to David, on every account, to maintain this matrimonial connexion with the house of Saul as long as possible, in order to preserve the sort of claim to the succession which his alliance gave him; but an additional motive, which urged him to demand her restoration, was the prudential desire of possessing in her a pledge against possible treachery on Abner’s side.” Ewald.

Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

2Sa 3:13. One thing I require David did right in making this stipulation; for, whatever may be said of his other wives, he had certainly a claim to this, as she was his first wife, and a king’s daughter: and there was something of true generosity in this, both to her and to Saul, in that he received her after she had been another man’s, remembering how once she loved him; knowing, probably, that she was without her consent separated from him, and to shew that he did not carry his resentment of Saul’s cruel and unjust persecutions of him to any of his family; whereas many princes, for much less provocations of a wife’s father, would have turned off their consorts, in revenge of them; and even put them to death for having been married to another. Chandler. Mr. Bayle considers it as cruelty in David to ravish Michal from a husband who loved her so well; see 2Sa 3:16.; that is, Mr. Bayle thinks it a great cruelty in David to disturb Phaltiel in an adultery which was agreeable to him, and to restore Michal to her only husband, the husband of her affection and her choice, for whom she had so much tenderness as to save his life at the hazard of her own. Phaltiel certainly is no proper object of pity; and yet his distress upon this occasion as one of the finest pictures of silent grief that any history has left us. Conscious that he had no right to complain, or molest Michal with his lamentations, he follows her at a distance, with a distress silent and self-confined, going and weeping behind her. However such fine paintings of nature pass unregarded in the sacred writings, I am satisfied that in Homer we should survey this with delight. The Jewish rabbies are unanimously of opinion, that Phaltiel was a strictly religious man, and had no nuptial commerce with Michal. Note; Polygamy had long received sanction from prevailing custom; but it is in itself evil, and no custom or authority can consecrate a bad practice. And could David, indeed, have foreseen how his children would have turned out, it would have abated his joy at their birth; for three of them at least lived to give him many a bitter pang. So often do we find our scourges in that wherein we promised ourselves the greatest comfort.

Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke

(13) And he said, Well; I will make a league with thee: but one thing I require of thee, that is, Thou shalt not see my face, except thou first bring Michal Saul’s daughter, when thou comest to see my face. (14) And David sent messengers to Ishbosheth Saul’s son, saying, Deliver me my wife Michal, which I espoused to me for an hundred foreskins of the Philistines.

Is not this a sweet feature in David’s character, his love to Michal. She was his first wife – his lawful wife – his purchased wife, dearly bought; and most evident it was, he loved her. And why should not this remind me of thy love, thou dearest Husband of thy people? Though I have wandered from thee, and left my first love, and have had other lovers, and have; one after them, yet shall David send for his Michal, and will not Jesus demand his spouse, which he hath betrothed to himself forever, and which he hath purchased with a price no less dear than his own most precious blood? Be comforted, my soul, amidst all thine unworthiness, Jesus still loves; he hateth putting away; he will send for thee, and bring thee home, now he is king over all in heaven and in earth.

Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)

2Sa 3:13 And he said, Well; I will make a league with thee: but one thing I require of thee, that is, Thou shalt not see my face, except thou first bring Michal Saul’s daughter, when thou comest to see my face.

Ver. 13. Except thou first bring Michal. ] David’s first love, and rightful wife; though wrongfully she had been detained from him, against her will haply, by the authority and importunity of her father. God seemeth to say the same to us concerning our hearts, so long held from him by the devil.

Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)

Well = Good!

Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics

that is: Heb. saying

Thou shalt: Gen 43:3, Gen 44:23, Gen 44:26

except: As Michal was not divorced, but violently separated from David, he had a legal right to demand her, and was justified in receiving her again. It is probable, also, that her marriage with Phaltiel was a force upon her inclinations; and whatever affections he might have for her, it was highly criminal for him to take another man’s wife. David required Michal probably both out of affection for her, and to strengthen his interest, by asserting his affinity with the house of Saul.

Michal: 2Sa 3:20-23, 1Sa 18:20-28, 1Sa 19:11-17, 1Ch 15:29

Reciprocal: Gen 33:10 – I have seen 1Sa 14:49 – name of the firstborn 2Sa 14:24 – let him not

Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge

2Sa 3:13. And he said, Well; I will make a league with thee David agreed to enter into a treaty with him, but upon condition that he procured the restitution of Michal his wife. Hereby David both showed the sincerity of his conjugal affection to his first and most rightful wife, from whom neither her nor his marrying another had alienated it, and also testified his respect to the house of Saul. David did right in making this stipulation; for, whatever may be said of his other wives, he had certainly a claim to this, as she was his first wife, and a kings daughter. And there was something of true generosity in this, both to her and to Saul, in that he received her after she had been another mans, remembering how once she loved him, and knowing, probably, that she was, without her consent, separated from him; and to show that he did not carry his resentment of Sauls cruel and unjust persecutions of him to any of his family; whereas many princes, for much less provocation of a wifes father, would have turned off their consorts, in revenge of them, and even put them to death for having been married to another. Chandler.

Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments