Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Hosea 7:15
Though I have bound [and] strengthened their arms, yet do they imagine mischief against me.
15. Though I have bound and strengthened their arms ] Rather, I indeed have trained and strengthened their arms. The Israelites had had a proof of this not long since when ‘Jehovah saw the affliction of Israel that it was very bitter’, and ‘saved them by the hand of Jeroboam the son of Joash’ (2Ki 14:27).
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Though I have bound – Rather, (as in the E. M) And I have chastened, I have strenghened their arms, and they imagine mischief against Me. God had tried all ways with them, but it was all one. He chastened them in love, and in love He strengthened them; He brought the enemy upon them, (as aforetime in the days of the Judges,) and He gave them strength to repel the enemy; as He raised up judges of old, and lately had fulfilled His promise which He had made to Joash through Elisha. But it was all in vain. Whatever God did, Israel was still the same. All only issued in further evil. The prophet sums up in four words all Gods varied methods for their recovery, and then sets over against them the one result, fresh rebellion on the part of His creatures and His people.
They imagine – Or devise mischief against Me. The order in the Hebrew is emphatic, and against Me they devise evil; i. e., against Me, who had thus tried all the resources and methods of divine wisdom to reclaim them, they devise evil. These are words of great condescension. For the creature can neither hurt nor profit the Creator. But since God vouchsafed to be their King, He deigned to look upon their rebellions, as so many efforts to injure Him. All Gods creatures are made for His glory, and on earth, chiefly man; and among men, chiefly those whom He had chosen as His people. In that, then, they set themselves to diminish that glory, giving to idols (see Isa 42:8), they, as far as in them lay, devised evil against Him. Man would dethrone God, if he could.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Hos 7:15
Though I have bound and strengthened their arms, yet do they imagine mischief against Me.
Divine dispensations abused
I. Gods dispensations with men are characterised by variety. The events of human life are of a mixed and conflicting character. But all are under the direction of the Great Father. As the soil to be fruitful requires the frosts of winter as well as the sunbeams of spring and summer, man requires trials as well as joys to make his spirit fruitful in good works.
II. Whatever the character of the divine dispensations they are often perverted. They imagine mischief against Me It matters not what the treatment, they continue to rebel. They are like the sterile ground, to which all seasons, all weathers are alike. Observe–
1. The force of the human will. It can oppose the influences of God, and turn what He designs for good to ill. Man is a voluntary agent. This links him to moral government, makes him responsible for his actions, and invests his existence with a momentous solemnity.
2. The depravity of the human heart. This force of will explains not mans rebellion, for regenerate souls and holy angels have it, and they run in the way of the Divine commandments. The reason of the rebellion is the depravity of the human heart, which is desperately wicked. Then open your hearts to the various dispensations of heaven; and be thankful for their variety. (Homilist.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 15. Though I have bound and strengthened their arms] Whether I dealt with them in judgment or mercy, it was all one; in all circumstances they rebelled against me.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Though I; but as for me, or, And I.
Bound; or chastised, as the word will bear; or instructed; either notion will well suit the place. When I had chastised them for their sins, as in Jehoahazs time, I strengthened them in Jehoashs time, and in Jeroboams time, and made them stronger than their enemies. Or, I taught them, gave them wisdom and skill to handle their weapons; so David speaks, Psa 18:34, He teacheth my hands to war, and Psa 144:1. But the sense best suits with what he took upon him before, if we retain it as our version hath it, bound as a chirurgeon binds up a weakened member, or, having set a broken one, doth with swathes and bands bind it up; so did God for Ephraim, when the Syrians and other enemies had broken their arms.
And strengthened their arms; as I took care to bind, so I did, what none else could, give strength to them, both courage of mind, and strength of body, and success added to both; so they subdued them that had formerly wasted and spoiled them. What successes Jehoash had, or Jeroboam had, I gave, and they should have owned it, and been thankful; but they imagine mischief against me; they contrived, laid their heads together, and designed what evil they could against me: they imputed their successes to their idols, to their way of worship, and hardened themselves against all thoughts of repentance, and returning to me; and devised mischief against my prophets, and let loose the reins to all impieties. This is their requital for all my love!
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
15. I . . . boundwhen I sawtheir arms as it were relaxed with various disasters, I bound them soas to strengthen their sinews; image from surgery [CALVIN].MAURER translates, “Iinstructed them” to war (Psa 18:34;Psa 144:1), namely, underJeroboam II (2Ki 14:25).GROTIUS explains, “WhetherI chastised them (Margin) or strengthened their arms, theyimagined mischief against Me.” English Version is best.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Though I have bound [and] strengthened their arms,…. As a surgeon sets a broken arm and swathes and binds it, and so restores it to its former strength, or at least to a good degree of strength again, so the Lord dealt with Israel; their arms were broken, and their strength weakened, and they greatly distressed and reduced by the Syrians in the times of Jehoahaz; but they were brought into a better state and condition in the times of Joash and Jeroboam the second; the former retook several cities out of the hands of the Syrians, and the latter restored the border of Israel, and greatly enlarged it; and as all this was done through the blessing of divine Providence, the Lord is said to do it himself. Some render it, “though I have chastised, I have strengthened their arms” u; though he corrected them for their sins in the times of Jehoahaz, and suffered their arms to be broken by their enemies, for their instruction, and in order to bring them to repentance for their sins; yet he strengthened them again in the following reigns:
yet do they imagine mischief against me; so ungrateful were they, they contrived to do hurt to his prophets that were sent to them in his name, to warn them of their sins and danger, and exhort them to repent, and forsake their idolatrous worship, and other sins; and they sought by all means to dishonour the name of the Lord, by imputing their success in the reigns of Joash and Jeroboam to their idols, and not unto him; and so hardened themselves against him, and in their evil ways.
u “castigavi”, Junius & Tremellius, Piscator, Vatablus, Cocceius, Tarnovius.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
Yet Jehovah has done still more for Israel. Hos 7:15. “And I have instructed, have strengthened their arms, and they think evil against me. Hos 7:16. They turn, but not upwards: they have become like a false bow. Their princes will fall by the sword, for the defiance of their tongue: this is their derision in the land of Egypt.” here is not to chastise, but to instruct, so that (their arms) is to be taken as the object to both verbs. Instructing the arms, according to the analogy of Psa 18:35, is equivalent to showing where and how strength is to be acquired. And the Lord has not contented Himself with merely instructing. He has also strengthened their arms, and given them power to fight, and victory over their foes (cf. 2Ki 14:25-26). And yet they think evil of Him; not by speaking lies (Hos 7:13), but by falling away from Him, by their idolatrous calf-worship, by which they rob the Lord of the glory due to Him alone, practically denying His true divinity. This attitude towards the Lord is summed up in two allegorical sentences in Hos 7:16, and the ruin of their princes is foretold. They turn, or turn round, but not upwards ( , an adverb, or a substantive signifying height, as in Hos 11:7; 2Sa 23:1, not “the Most High,” i.e., God, although turning upwards is actually turning to God). From the fact that with all their turning about they do not turn upwards, they have become like a treacherous bow, the string of which has lost its elasticity, so that the arrows do not hit the mark (cf. Psa 78:57). And thus Israel also fails to reach its destination. Therefore its princes shall fall. The princes are mentioned as the originators of the enmity against God, and all the misery into which they have plunged the people and kingdom. , fury, here defiance or rage. Defiance of tongue the princes showed in the lies which they uttered concerning Jehovah (Hos 7:13), and with which they blasphemed in a daring manner the omnipotence and faithfulness of the Lord. stands, according to a dialectical difference in the mode of pronunciation, for , not for (Ewald, 183, a). This, namely their falling by the sword, will be for a derision to them in the land of Egypt: not because they will fall in Egypt, or perish by the sword of the Egyptians; but because they put their trust in Egypt, the derision of Egypt will come upon them when they are overthrown (cf. Isa 30:3, Isa 30:5).
Fuente: Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
God again reproaches the Israelites for having in a base manner abused his goodness and forbearance. Some consider the verb יסר, isar, as meaning, “to chastise,” because God had disciplined the Israelites; and, as I have said yesterday, it is often taken in this sense. But as it signifies sometimes “to bind,” it seems a fitter metaphor for this place. I have bound and strengthened their arms; as though God had said, that he had caused their arms not to be enervated. For we know that the strength of the arm depends on the structure of the nerves. Except the bones were bound together by the nerves, a dissolution would immediately follow. Hence God says, I have bound and strengthened their arms; which two things combine for the same end, and the notion of chastising seems not to me to be in any way suitable to the context. The meaning is, that the Israelites had hitherto continued, because God had sustained them by his power. As when one binds up and strengthens a weak or a loosened arm, so God here reminds Israel that he had preserved them in their position. And the Prophet, I have no doubt, alludes here to the many calamities by which the strength of Israel might have been broken, had not a timely remedy been applied by the Lord.
God then compares himself here to a physician or a surgeon, when he says that he had bound the arm of Israel and strengthened it, when it might have been otherwise broken: for they had been often as it were enervated, but the Lord restored them. We now understand the meaning of the Prophet to be, that God had not only by his power sustained the Israelites, but had also performed the office of a surgeon or a physician, when he saw their arms broken, when they were wasted by slaughters in wars, and by other adversities.
Now the Israelites were so far from being grateful to God and mindful of him, that they were even devising evil against him. For after having obtained victories, after having been restored and even replenished with fulness of all blessings, they the more boldly conspired against him; for under this pretence were superstitions established, and then followed the indulgence of all vices; for pride, and cruelty, and ambition, and frauds, prevailed more and more. Since then the Israelites had thus perverted the blessings of God, was not the hope of pardon and salvation justly cut off from them? Now we are reminded in this place, that whenever God heals our evils, and raises us up in adversity and succors us, we ought devoutly to acknowledge his favor, and not to meditate evil against him, when he so kindly extends his hand to us. Let us now proceed —
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
CRITICAL NOTES.
Hos. 7:15. Bound] Weakened and relaxed, an image from surgery (chastened, marg.). Instructing the arms, according to the analogy of Psa. 18:35, is equivalent to showing where and how strength is to be acquired. The Lord has not contented himself with merely instructing, he has also strengthened their arms and given them power to fight and victory over their foes (cf. 2Ki. 14:25-26) [Keil].
Hos. 7:16. Deceitful] Which cannot carry the arrow; too slack or ill-constructed, which the archer fears will miss its aim. Rage] Blasphemy against God. Derision] Egypt, on which they depended, will ridicule them for their boasting and failure (Isa. 30:33).
THE UNGRATEFUL RETURN.Hos. 7:15-16
God tried all ways with his people, but of no use. He chastised them in judgment and remembered mercy. He gave them into the hands of enemies; they cried in distress, and he delivered them. Whatever God did, they were still the same. Four words sum up the varied methods of God to restore them; the one result was shameful abuse ending in fresh rebellion.
I. Gods kindness to man. I have bound and strengthened their arms. In whatever sense we take the words, the fact of ingratitude remains.
1. God chastised them. Time after time were they afflicted, but God withdraws his displeasure. Men see the greatness of Divine compassion, but never feel all the power of Divine anger. He being full of compassion, forgave their iniquity, and destroyed them not; yea, many a time turned he his anger away, and did not stir up all his wrath.
2. God taught them. Taught them to walk by their arms, as parents teach their children (ch. Hos. 11:3; Deu. 1:31); taught them to war (Psa. 18:34); gave them victory over enemies (2Ki. 14:25-26); girded them with strength for battle. To him they owed all their military skill, strength, and success. All warlike prowess is the gift of God. The Lord is mighty in battle, and the Holy Spirit is the great Drill-Master of heavenly soldiers. God taught and instructed Israel by his prophets and providence, by his word and worship, and by a peculiar mode of discipline trained them up for his service and honour.
3. God strengthened them. Weak within and wounded without, like a kind physician he bound up their wounds and healed their sores. He strengthened their arms and relieved them in sickness. God often restores individuals and reinstates nations in prosperity and health, but what thanks has he? O Israel, thou hast destroyed thyself, but in me is thine help.
II. Mans ingratitude to God. Men like Hezekiah render not again according to the benefit done unto them (2Ch. 32:25). God intends to do them good, but they hate and forsake him.
1. In wicked thoughts. Yet do they imagine mischief against me. Right thoughts of God are essential to right conduct. If we think evil in our hearts, evil will be manifest in our lives. The thought of foolishness is sin. Men think lightly of the responsibility of thought, and declare that thoughts can hurt no one. As the thought is the fountain of the act, God counts it as the act, and holds us responsible for it. Bunyan, unlike many professors, was deeply troubled in remembrance of one sinful thought. Yet how men devise wickedness in their hearts! One meditates on objects of lust and avarice; another on schemes of ambition. Some think in envy, and others in malice and revenge O Jerusalem, wash thine heart from wickedness, that thou mayest be saved. How long shall vain thoughts lodge within thee?
2. In evil conduct. They return, but not to the Most High. The health restored and the life preserved from death should be given to God. Gods kindness should beget loving thoughts and constant gratitude to him. But the conversion of many is feigned and hypocritical; a turning point in life, but not return to God in acknowledgment of his majesty, and dependence upon his word. Man changes from one thing to another: turns from the sins of youth to the sins of age, from the sins of prosperity to the sins of adversity; but he himself remains unchanged, says a writer. True turning is upwards, in recognition of Gods presence and holiness. The sinner looks forward and round, but forgets God in thought and conduct. The prodigal must come home. The penitent must return not half way, but entirely up to God. To forsake some sins and indulge in others, to denounce earthly things without devoting ourselves entirely to God, is not genuine conversion nor guarantee of amendment. If thou wilt return, O Israel, saith the Lord, return unto me.
3. In blasphemous language. For the rage of their tongue. The princes were enraged themselves, and gave vent to their anger against God and his providence to others. The tongue, that unruly member, uttered lies and blasphemy. The nearer destruction approached the more madly princes and politicians contradicted the prediction. Their tongue is as an arrow shot out; it speaketh deceit. Thus did Israel and thus do men treat the kindness of God. In evil thought, rebellious conduct, and abusive language do they manifest ingratitude. Mark the fearful gradations of their sin. (a) Surrounded by mercies, they design mischief. (b) Invited to return, they turn further away from God. (c) Then insults were added to ingratitude and rebellion. (d) Finally their language and conduct drew down Gods anger upon them, and were the instruments of their own destruction. To render good for evil is God-like, but to render evil for good is devilish. What should we do with an undutiful, rebellious child nourished up in tender care? Could any virtue atone for this unnatural conduct? Yet God complains. I have nourished and brought up children, and they have rebelled against me. Rewarding evil for good is condemned by the heathen, hateful to God, and will bring destruction to the sinner himself and his house. Whoso rewardeth evil for good, evil shall not depart from his house.
HOMILETIC HINTS AND OUTLINES
Hos. 7:15. Mischief. Sin is essentially mischief; mischievous in its designs and consequencesto God and man. In one sense man can do no hurt to God, but so bold is he in his sins that he tries, by robbing God of his glory and abusing his gifts. Man would dethrone God if he could [Pusey].
Subject. Divine dispensations abused. I. Gods dispensations with men are characterized by variety. II. That whatever the character of the Divine dispensations they are often perverted. ObserveFirst, The force of the human will. Secondly, The depravity of the human heart [The Homilist].
Hos. 7:16. A deceitful bow.
1. Misdirected in its aim. Looked more to selfish and sinful things than things of God.
2. Treacherous in its acting. When bent, would suddenly start aside and recover its former position. Not to be depended upon. The bow of Jonathan turned not back (2Sa. 1:22).
3. Unfit for use. Israel boasted of the bow, and sang the song of the bow, and a deceitful bow is made a type of their own unstedfastness and degenerate condition. God can turn mans glory into shame, and cast them away as unfit for his purpose in the earth. They were turned aside like a deceitful bow (Psa. 78:57).
Mens shortcoming, in the matter of repentance and conversion to God, showeth from their want of straightness in not intending what they pretend to, which is also a great sin: therefore it is added they are like a deceitful bow, that is, as a bow which hath a throw in it does never direct the arrow to the mark, however it seem to aim at it; so, however they pretend true repentance, yet they do not intend it, but only to deceive and flatter God till they might get out of trouble [Hutcheson].
Return. True repentance consists
1. In decided turning away from evil. Not half turning, nor halting short of God. 2 In decided turning to God. Positive devotion to God, so that he only is served and worshipped. It is not outward reformation, but inward renewal.
ILLUSTRATIONS TO CHAPTER 7
Hos. 7:15-16. Ingratitude. At the battle of the Alma, in September, 1854, a wounded Russian was piteously calling for water. Captain Eddington, whose heart was kind and charitable, ran up to him, and stooping, gave him the much-desired beverage. The wounded man revived. The Captain ran forward to join his regiment, when the wretch who had just been restored by his kindness fired and shot him who had been his friend in time of need. So many seek to injure God by returning him evil for good [Biblical Treasury].
Fuente: The Preacher’s Complete Homiletical Commentary Edited by Joseph S. Exell
(15) Bound.Should be instructed. God has imparted skill and power to fight their enemies. (Comp. Psa. 144:1.) So the grace of the Spirit is often slighted by its recipients.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
15, 16. Neither judgment nor the divine mercy produced repentance or loyalty to Jehovah.
Bound Better, R.V., “taught” (Isa 28:26; Pro 31:1); margin, “chastened.” The object, their arms, in Hebrew goes with both verbs; chasten, therefore, gives no suitable sense, “taught” or “trained” is better; perhaps a reference to divine help in war (2Ki 14:27; compare Psa 18:34); or perhaps only a figurative expression for restoration of prosperity. By such help Jehovah expected to win the hearts of the people, but he failed. Symmachus, an early Greek translator, gives a different sense to the passage by reading after the first verb the pronoun, “I chastened them,” that is, by the judgment implied in Hos 7:14; he understands only the second verb as calling attention to the giving of prosperity. Whether Jehovah sent calamity or prosperity the people persisted in rebellion. LXX. omits the first verb; it makes Hos 7:14 refer, by implication, to one method of God’s dealings, chastisement; Hos 7:15 to the other, lovingkindness. In any case the thought expressed remains the same, the complete failure of Jehovah to win the affections of the people.
I Emphatic in the original: “Though it was I that taught”
They imagine R.V., “devise.”
Mischief against me Not an accurate reproduction of the original. “With regard to me they think,” or, even better, “they keep thinking evil.” Hos 7:13 implies that the people had false conceptions of Jehovah; here the same complaint finds expression. No matter what Jehovah does, the people fail to understand him, they continue to think evil of him. The strongest evidence of the truth of this accusation is their disregard for Jehovah while they appeal to Assyria and Egypt.
They return Better, turn. While not recognizing fully the hopelessness of their condition, they see enough to be persuaded that they need help; to secure it they turn hither and thither; where they finally decide to seek it is stated in Hos 7:11.
Not to the most High R.V., “not to him that is on high,” that is, Jehovah (Hos 7:10; compare Hos 11:7). The Hebrew is obscure; a more literal rendering, upward, would express practically the same thought. LXX. and Peshitto apparently transpose two words and read “unto not” that is, unto that which is not, namely, idols which would be a good continuation of Hos 7:15. Concerning Jehovah they think evil, therefore to the idols the Baalim they turn (compare especially chapter ii). Unto not, which is a peculiar expression, is thought by some to be an intentional substitution for “unto Baal” or “unto Baals” (see on Hos 2:16), which is considered original.
They are like a deceitful bow A bow which is expected to shoot in one direction but disappoints by sending the arrow in another, and thus fails to accomplish its purpose (Psa 78:57). Israel has proved a painful disappointment to Jehovah (compare Isa 5:1-7). 16b is more closely connected with Hos 8:1-3.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
‘Though I have taught and strengthened their arms,
Yet they do devise mischief against me.’
And yet it was YHWH and not Baal Who had taught them and made their arms strong. This may refer to the fact that He had brought them to young adulthood, rearing them as His children (compare Hos 11:3). Or it may refer to Him as having made them strong for battle (compare Psa 18:32-36). Either way the idea is that they owed everything that they were (as possessors of the land and landowners in Israel) to Him, and yet all they had done was devise mischief against Him.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
Hos 7:15. Though I have bound, &c. But I will chastise them. I strengthened their arms, yet did they, &c.
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
Hos 7:15 Though I have bound [and] strengthened their arms, yet do they imagine mischief against me.
Ver. 15. Though I have bound and strengthened their arms ] Quum ego erudivi, so Pagnine, Polanus, and others; when I taught them, or chastened them, as Hos 7:12 , “and strengthened their arms”; there is no and in the original; it is an asyndeton; to show that God had done both for them, together and at once: he had acted the part both of an instructor and of a surgeon (like as, Rev 3:18 , he takes upon him the person both of a rich merchant and a skilful physician); he had done all that could be done to do them good; teaching their hands to war and their fingers to fight, Psa 144:1 , binding up their broken arms, see Eze 30:24 and strengthening their feeble sinews, their hands that hung down, Heb 12:12 . After I have scourged them I have re-established them; but what thanks for my labour? what Minerval or pay for my pains? The world’s wages; such as Hercules paid the schoolmaster Linus, whom he knocked on the head, Hoc ictu ceu didactro accepto Linus mortuus est (Buchol.); or as Agricola’s scholars in Germany killed their master with their penknives; or as physicians and surgeons are many times paid by their penurious patients, of whom the poet wittily,
“ Tres medicus facies habet, unam, quando rogatur;
Angelicam, mox est cum iuvat, ipse Deus.
Ast ubi curato poscit sun munera morbo,
Horridus apparet terribilisque Satan. ”
Yet do they imagine mischief against me
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Though I have bound = Though I, even I, have warned (or instructed). Compare Psa 18:34; Psa 144:1.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
I have: 2Ki 13:5, 2Ki 13:23, 2Ki 14:25-27, Psa 106:43-45
bound: or, chastened, Job 5:17, Psa 94:12, Pro 3:11, Heb 12:5, Rev 3:19
imagine: Psa 2:1, Psa 62:3, Jer 17:9, Nah 1:9, Act 4:25, Rom 1:21, 2Co 10:5
Reciprocal: Pro 31:17 – strengtheneth
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Hos 7:15. The Lord had bestowed upon his people an abundance of good things. He had strengthened them when they were weak, and had defended them when they were unjustly attacked. In turn for these great favors, the people would imagine mischief against the Lord. That word is from CITASHAB and Strong defines it, “To plait or interpenetrate, i. e. (literally) to weave or (generally) to fabricate: figuratively to plot or contrive (usually in a malicious sense) ; to think, regard, value, compute.” Thus the word the Lord had the prophet to write La a stronger one than we ordinarily think it to be. It has the meaning of a malicious scheming against the good Lord who had done so much for them since their beginning as a nation.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Hos 7:15-16. Though I have bound, &c. Though, after bringing them low, I have given them new strength and vigour; yet do they imagine mischief against me Yet they are continually devising some new idolatrous inventions, whereby they may dishonour me. The word , rendered I have bound them, more properly signifies, I have chastised them, and is so rendered by Archbishop Newcome, Bishop Horsley, and others. The general sense of the verse is, Whether I inflict punishment on them, or show them favour, they are still the same, and reject me for their idols. They return, but not to the Most High Their conversion is only outward, not inward and sincere. When they left the worship of Baal, they turned to the worship of the calves; and now they rest in an external reformation, or some ceremonial observances, and do not come up to true repentance, spiritual worship, or holy obedience. This seems to be the meaning of the clause, according to our translation of it. But the Hebrew text, , is very obscure, and variously rendered by interpreters. Grotius and the Vulgate read, Reversi sunt ut essent absque jugo, They have returned that they might be without yoke, that is, without the restraint of Gods law. Which is thus expounded by Grotius, Denuo voluerunt esse absque jugo, They would be again without yoke. The LXX. render it, , They have been turned away to nothing. Thus also the Syriac, or, as Bishop Horsley interprets it, They fall [have fallen] back into nothingness of condition. On which he remarks as follows: The situation of the Israelites, as the chosen people of God, was a high degree; a rank of distinction and pre-eminence among the nations of the earth. By their voluntary defection to idolatry, they debased themselves from this exaltation, and returned to the ordinary level of the heathen, so far above which the mercy of God had raised them. As if a man, ennobled by the favour of his sovereign, should renounce his honours, and, of his own choice, mix himself with the lowest dregs of the people. Thus, voluntarily descending from their nobility of condition, the Israelites returned to not high; for so the Hebrew literally sounds. The bishop observes elsewhere, that the Hebrew words will certainly bear the interpretation given by Grotius and the Vulgate; and of all that have been proposed, says he, it seems the best sense, next after that which I have given in my translation, which is R. Tanchums, and in my judgment the best of all. Thus we say in common speech, of a man who by misconduct has lost all esteem and credit in the world, He has brought himself to nothing. They are like a deceitful bow Which seems bent for and aiming at the mark, yet is too weak to carry the shaft to it; or, is false, and instead of directing the arrow straight to the mark, shoots it on one side or the other. Their princes shall fall, &c., for the rage of their tongue For the dishonour which they have done me by blasphemous speeches; or, shall fall by conspiracies, stirred up and fomented by murmurings and seditious expressions. This shall be their derision in the land of Egypt Their frequent rebellions and conspiracies against their kings, shall make them the derision of Egypt. Houbigant renders it, For the wantonness of their tongues, they shall be a derision in the land of Egypt. It is probable that many of the ten tribes fled to Egypt when invaded by the Assyrians; and that their blasphemies, and other enormities committed there, brought them under deserved reproach.
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
It was Yahweh who had taught His people how to be strong. He had also made them strong militarily (cf. Eze 30:24-25), for example, during Jeroboam II’s reign (cf. 2Ki 14:25-28). Yet they had used what He had given them to sin against Him (cf. Gen 50:20). They treated Him as their enemy. This was further evidence of their ingratitude.