Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Zephaniah 2:9
Therefore [as] I live, saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel, Surely Moab shall be as Sodom, and the children of Ammon as Gomorrah, [even] the breeding of nettles, and saltpits, and a perpetual desolation: the residue of my people shall spoil them, and the remnant of my people shall possess them.
9. Jehovah’s oath by Himself, as I live, is rare in early writings, but very common in Ezekiel.
Moab shall be as Sodom ] The vicinity of the two peoples or at least of Moab to the Dead Sea may have suggested the threat that the fate of the cities of the plain shall overtake them.
the breeding of nettles ] a possession of nettles, which overgrow uncultivated places, Pro 24:31; Job 30:7; Isa 34:13.
and saltpits ] These were common around the Dead Sea: Deu 29:23; cf. Isa 13:19; Jer 49:18. The idea suggested is that of utter barrenness. To sow with salt was a symbolical act, signifying to doom to perpetual unfruitfulness and desolation (Jdg 9:45). Eze 47:11 predicts that, though the waters of the Dead Sea shall be sweetened when Israel is finally restored, the miry places and marshes about it shall be used for salt.
shall spoil them ] i.e. make a spoil of them, viz. Moab and Ammon. There is a certain inconsistency in the verse, which is not to be removed by drawing a distinction between the country of Moab and Ammon and the peoples themselves, and fancying that the country shall share the fate of Sodom, while the peoples become the servants of Israel (Hitzig). It is better to consider the prophet’s predictions to be ideal, and to threaten two fates to Moab and Ammon, one, destruction like Sodom and Gomorrah, and the other, absorption by Israel.
remnant of my people ] As R.V., my nation.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Therefore as I live, saith the Lord of hosts – Life especially belongs to God, since He Alone is Underived Life. He hath life in Himself Joh 5:26. He is entitled the living God, as here, in tacit contrast with the dead idols of the Philistines 1Sa 17:26, 1Sa 17:36, with idols generally Jer 10:10; or against the blasphemies of Sennacherib 2Ki 19:4, 2Ki 19:16, the mockeries of scoffers Jer 23:36, of the awe of His presence (Deu 5:25 (Deu 5:26 in Hebrew)), His might for His people Jos 3:10; as the object of the souls longings , the nearness in the Gospel, children of the living God (Hos 1:10 (Hos 2:1 in Hebrew)). Since He can swear by no greater, He sware by Himself Heb 6:13. Since mankind are ready mostly to believe that God means well with them, but are slow to think that He is in earnest in His threats, God employs this sanction of what He says, twice only in regard to His promises or His mercy Isa 49:18; Eze 33:10; everywhere else to give solemnity to His threats Num 14:28; Deu 32:40, (adding ) Jer 22:24; Eze 5:11; Eze 14:16, Eze 14:18, Eze 14:20; Eze 16:48; (as Judge) Eze 17:16, Eze 17:19; Eze 18:3; (in rebuke) Eze 20:3, Eze 20:31, Eze 20:33; Eze 33:27; Eze 34:8; Eze 35:11. In the same sense, I swear by Myself, Jer 22:5; Jer 49:13; hath sworn by Himself, Amo 6:8; by the excellency of Jacob, Amo 8:7). The appeal to the truth of His own being in support of the truth of His words is part of the grandeur el the prophet Ezekiel in whom it chiefly occurs. God says in the same meaning, by Myself have I sworn, of promises which required strong faith .
Saith the Lord of Hosts – Their blasphemies had denied the very being of God, as God, to whom they preferred or likened their idols; they had denied His power or that He could avenge, so He names His Name of power, the Lord of the hosts of heaven against their array against His border, I, the Lord of hosts who can fulfill what I threaten, and the God of Israel who Myself am wronged in My people, will make Moab as Sodom, and the children of Ammon as Gomorrah. Sodom and Gomorrah had once been flourishing cities, on the borders of that land, which Israel had won from the Amorite, and of which Moab and Ammon at different times possessed themselves, and to secure which Ammon carried on that exterminating war. For they were to the east of the plain between Bethel and Ai, where Lot made his choice, in the plain or circle of Jordan Gen 13:1, Gen 13:3, Gen 13:11, the well known title of the tract, through which the Jordan flowed into the Dead Sea. Near this, lay Zoar, (Ziara) beneath the caves whither Lot, at whose prayer it had been spared, escaped from its wickedness.
Moab and Ammon had settled and in time spread from the spot, wherein their forefathers had received their birth. Sodom, at least, must have been in that part of the plain, which is to the east of the Jordan, since Lot was bidden to flee to the mountains, with his wife and daughters, and there is no mention of the river, which would have been a hindrance Gen 19:17-23. Then it lay probably in that broad belt of desolation in the plain of Shittim, as Gomorrah and others of the Pentapolis may have lain in the sulphur-sprinkled expanse between El Riha (on the site of Jericho) and the dead sea, covered with layers of salt and gypsum which overlie the loamy subsoil, literally, fulfilling the descriptions of Holy Writ (says an eye-witness), Brimstone and salt and burning, that it is not sown nor beareth, nor any grass groweth therein Deu 29:23 : a fruitful land turned into salthess Psa 107:34. No man shall abide there, neither shall a son of man dwell in it Jer 49:18. An elaborate system of artificial irrigation was carried through that cis-Jordanic tract, which decayed when it was desolated of man, and that desolation prevents its restoration.
The doom of Moab and Ammon is rather of entire destruction beyond all recovery, than of universal barrenness. For the imagery, that it should be the breeding (literally, possession) of nettles would not be literally compatible, except in different localities, with that of saltpits, which exclude all vegetation. Yet both are united in Moab. The soil continues, as of old, of exuberant fertility; yet in part, from the utter neglect and insecurity of agriculture it is abandoned to a rank and encumbering vegetation; elsewhere, from the neglect of the former artiticial system of irrigation, it is wholly barren. The plant named is one of rank growth, since outcasts could lie concealed under it Job 30:7. The preponderating authority seems to be for mollach, the Bedouin name of the mallow, Prof. E. H. Palmer says , which, he adds, I have seen growing in rank luxuriance in Moab, especially in the sides of deserted Arab camps.
The residue of My people shall spoil them, and the remnant of My people shall possess them – Again, a remnant only, but even these shall prevail against them, as was first fulfilled in Judas Maccabaeus (1 Macc. 5:6-8).
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Verse 9. The breeding of nettles] That is, their land shall become desolate, and be a place for nettles, thorns, &c., to flourish in, for want of cultivation.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
As I live; the most solemn oath, fit for none but God himself to use: see Eze 14:16.
Saith the Lord of hosts, who have all things at my disposal, and can arm all creatures against these proud revilers.
The God of Israel, who by covenant am Israels God, and Israel is my people, in whose reproaches I am reproached.
Shall be as Sodom: this is a proverbial speech in Scripture phrase to speak great destruction, as Isa 1:9. Moab and Ammon were not destroyed by fire, as Sodom and Gomorrah; but the next words are an explication of these.
The breeding of nettles; not cultivated, but run over with nettles, as if it were only to breed them.
And salt-pits; a salt, dry, barren earth, fit only to dig salt out of.
A perpetual desolation; never more to be manured and inhabited, or not for a long, a very long time.
The residue; either the few left with Gedaliah, or the remnant that returned out of Babylon.
Shall spoil them; provoked by the injuries of Moab and Ammon, shall take arms, overcome, and spoil them.
Shall possess them; settle upon their lands, and dwell in those parts that are fit for habitation.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
9. the breeding of nettlesor,the overspreading of nettles, that is, a place overrun withthem.
salt pitsfound at thesouth of the Dead Sea. The water overflows in the spring, and salt isleft by the evaporation. Salt land is barren (Jdg 9:45;Psa 107:34, Margin).
possess themthat is,their land; in retribution for their having occupied Judah’s land.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Therefore [as] I live, saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel,…. The Lord here swears by himself, by his life; partly to show how provoked he was at, and how grievously he resented, the injuries done to his people; and partly to observe the certain fulfilment of what is after declared; and it might be depended upon it would surely be done, not only because of his word and oath, which are immutable; but because of his ability to do it, as “the Lord of hosts”, of armies above and below; and because of the covenant relation that subsisted between him and Israel, being their God; and therefore would avenge the insults and injuries done them:
surely Moab shall be as Sodom, and the children of Ammon as Gomorrah; that is, should be utterly destroyed, as these cities were; whose destruction is often made use of to express the utter ruin and destruction of any other people; otherwise it is not to be supposed that these countries were to be destroyed, or were destroyed, in like manner, by fire from heaven; the similitude lies in other things after expressed:
[even] the breeding of nettles; or “left to nettles” q; or rather to “thorns”, as the Targum: and so the Vulgate Latin version renders it “the dryness of thorns”, though to a very poor sense. In general the meaning of the phrase is, that those countries should be very barren and desolate, like such places as are overrun with nettles, thorns, briers, and brambles; and these so thick, that there is no passing through them without a man’s tearing his garments and his flesh: for Schultens r, from the use of the word s in the Arabic language, shows that the words are to be rendered a “thicket of thorns which tear”; and cut the feet of those that pass through them; and even their whole body, as well as their clothes; and, wherever these grow in such plenty, it is a plain sign of a barren land, as well as what follow:
and saltpits, and a perpetual desolation; signifying that the countries of Moab and Ammon should be waste, barren, and uncultivated, as the above places were, where nothing but nettles grew, as do in great abundance in desolate places; and where saltpits should be, or heaps of salt, as Kimchi interprets it; and wherever salt is found, as Pliny t says, it is a barren place, and produces nothing; though Herodotus u speaks of places where were hillocks of salt, and very fruitful; and where the people used salt in manuring and improving their ground; which must be accounted for by the difference of climate and soil: this passage is produced by Reland w to prove that the lake Asphaltites is not the place, as is commonly believed, where Sodom and Gomorrah stood; since those cities were not overflown, or immersed in and covered with water, but were destroyed by fire and brimstone, and so became desolate; and had no herbs and plants, but nettles, and such like things; and such these countries of Moab and Ammon should be, and ever remain so, at least for a long time; and especially should be desolate and uninhabited by the former possessors of it; see De 29:23 this was fulfilled about five years after the destruction of Jerusalem, when Nebuchadnezzar, as Josephus x relates, led his army into Coelesyria, and made war upon the Ammonites and Moabites, and subjected them to him, who were the inhabitant of it, as the same writer says y:
the residue of my people shall spoil them, and the remnant of my people shall possess them; that is, the Jews, the remnant of them that returned from Babylon: now these, in the times of the Maccabees, and those that descended from them, seized on several places in these countries, and possessed them; for, after these countries had been subdued and made desolate by Nebuchadnezzar, they became considerable nations again. Josephus z says the Moabites in his time were a great nation; though in the third century, as Origen a relates, they went under the common name of Arabians; and, even long before the times of Josephus, they were called Arabian Moabites, as he himself observes; when he tells us that Alexander Jannaeus subdued them, and imposed a tribute on them; and who also gives us an account of the cities of the Moabites, which were taken and demolished by them, as Essebon, Medaba, Lemba, Oronas, Telithon, Zara, the valley of the Cilicians, and Pella; these he destroyed, because the inhabitants would not promise to conform to the rites and customs of the Jews b; though Josephus ben Gorion, who also makes mention of these cities as taken by the same prince, says c he did not demolish them, because they entered into a covenant and were circumcised; and he speaks of ten fortified cities of the king of Syria, added at the same time to the kingdom of Israel, not destroyed: likewise the children of Ammon, after their captivity by Nebuchadnezzar, became a powerful people: we read of the country of the Ammonites in
“Then Jason, who had undermined his own brother, being undermined by another, was compelled to flee into the country of the Ammonites.” (2 Maccabees 4:26)
and, in the times of Judas Maccabeus, Timotheus, their general, got together a strong and numerous army, which being worsted by Judas, he took their city Jasoron, or Jaser,
“Afterward he passed over to the children of Ammon, where he found a mighty power, and much people, with Timotheus their captain.” (1 Maccabees 5:6)
carried their wives and children captive, and burnt their city d; and this people, as well as the Moabites in the third century, as before observed, were swallowed up under the general name of Arabians; and neither of them are any more; all which has fulfilled this prophecy, and those of Jeremiah and Amos concerning them: this, likewise, in a spiritual sense, might have a further accomplishment in the first times of the Gospel, when it was preached in these countries by the apostles, and churches were formed in them; and may be still further accomplished in the latter day, when those parts of the world shall be possessed by converted Jews and by Gentile Christians. Kimchi owns it may be interpreted as future, of what shall be in the times of the Messiah.
q “locus urticae derelictus”, Bochart. Hierozoic. par. 1. col. 872. Stockius, p. 629.; “derelictio urticae”, Burkius. So R. Sol. Urbin. Ohel Moed, fol. 68. 2. r De Defect. Hodiern. Ling. Heb. p. 32. s “laceravit, laceratus est”, Golius, col. 2231. Castel. col. 2165. t Nat. Hist. l. 31. c. 7. “Salsa autem tellus—-frugibus infelix.” Virgil. Georgic. l. 2. u Melpomene, sive l. 4. c. 182, 183. w Palestina Illustrata, l. 1. c. 38. p. 254, 255. x Antiqu. l. 10. c. 9. sect. 7. y Ibid. l. 1. c. 11. sect. 5. z Antiqu. l. 1. c. 11. sect. 5. a Comment. in Job, fol. 2. 1. A. b Antiqu. l. 13. c. 13. sect. 5. c. 15. sect. 4. De Bello Jud. l. 1. c. 4. sect. 2. c Hist. Heb. l. 4. c. 12. p. 297. d Joseph. Antiqu. l. 12. c. 8. sect. 1. 1 Maccab. v. 6.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
In order to cheer the miserable Jews by some consolation, God said, in what we considered yesterday, that the wantonness of Moab was known to him; he now adds, that he would visit with punishment the reproaches which had been mentioned. For it would have availed them but little that their wrongs had been observed by God, if no punishment had been prepared. Hence the Prophet reminds them that God is no idle spectator, who only observes what takes place in the world; but that there is a reward laid up for all the ungodly. And these verses are to be taken in connection, that the faithful may know that their wrongs are not unknown to God, and also that he will be their defender. But that the Jews might have a more sure confidence that God would be their deliverer, he interposes an oath. God at the same time shows that he is really touched with when he sees his people so cruelly and immoderately harassed, when the ungodly seem to think that an unbridled license is permitted them. God therefore shows here, that not only the salvation of his people is an object of his care, but that he undertakes their cause as though his anger was kindled; not that passions belong to him but such a form of speaking is adopted in order to express what the faithful could never otherwise conceive an idea of, that is, to express the unspeakable love of God towards them, and his care for them.
He then says that he lives, as though he had sworn by his own life. As we have elsewhere seen that he swears by his life, so he speaks now. Live do I, that is, As I am God, so will I avenge these wrongs by which my people are now oppressed. And for the same reason he calls himself Jehovah of hosts, and the God of Israel. In the first clause he exalts his own power, that the Jews might know that he was endued with power; and then he mentions his goodness, because he had adopted them as his people. The meaning then is that God swears by his own life; and that the Jews might not think that this was done in vain, his power is brought before them, and then his favor is added.
Moab, he says, shall be like Sodom, and the sons of Ammon like Gomorrah, even for the production of the nettle and for a mire of salt; (99) that is, their lands should be reduced to a waste, or should become wholly barren, so that nothing was to grow there but nettles, as the case is with desert places. As to the expression, the mine ( fodina) or quarry of salt, it often occurs in scripture: a salt-pit denotes sterility in Hebrew. And the Prophet adds, that this would not be for a short time only; It shall be (he says) a perpetual desolation. He also adds, that this would be for the advantage of the Church; for the residue of my people shall plunder them, and the remainder of my nation shall possess them. He ever speaks of the residue; for as it was said yesterday, it was necessary for that people to be cleansed from their dregs, so that a small portion only would remain; and we know that not many of them returned from exile.
The import of the whole is, that though God determined to diminish his Church, so that a few only survived, yet these few would be the heirs of the whole land, and possess the kingdom, when God had taken vengeance on all their enemies.
It hence follows, according to the Prophet, that this shall be to them for their pride. We see that the Prophet’s object is, to take away whatever bitterness the Jews might feel when insolently slandered by their enemies. As then there was danger of desponding, since nothing, as it was said yesterday, is more grievous to be borne than reproach, God does here expressly declare, that the proud triumph of their neighbors over the Jews would be their own ruin; for, as Solomon says, ‘Pride goes before destruction.’ Pro 16:18. And he again confirms what he had already referred to—that the Jews would not be wronged with impunity, for God had taken them under his guardianship, and was their protector: Because they have reproached, he says, and triumphed over the people of Jehovah of hosts. He might have said, over my people, as in the last verse; but there is something implied in these words, as though the Prophet had said, that they carried on war not with mortals but with God himself, whose majesty was insulted, when the Jews were so unjustly oppressed. It follows—
(99) This clause is rendered differently by some. The word [ ממשק ] occurs only here. It is rendered by the Targum by a word which means a “deserted place,” and so Newcome renders it, “A deserted place for the thorn:” so also do Drusius, Grotius, Piscator, and Marckius. The Septuagint have mistaken the word for “Damascus,” and give a version of the whole clause wholly foreign to the context. Henderson thinks that the word has the same meaning with [ משך ], to draw out, to extend, and gives this version, “A region of overrunning brambles.” This is far-fetched. The word, [ חרול ], rendered “nettle” by Calvin, Grotius, and others, cannot be so taken, according to Drusius and Bochart, for in Job 30:7, men are said to gather under it. It is found besides only in Pro 24:31. It may be rendered either a thorn or a bramble. The other part of the sentence is literally “a digging place for salt.”
Moab was to be like Sodom, and Ammon like Gommorah, not as to the manner of their ruin, but as to the extent of it. It was to be an entire overthrow. Their habitation was not to become a pool of water like Sodom and Gommorah, but a place where the bramble was to grow, and salt might be dug. And it was to be “a desolation,” [ עד-עולם ], “for ages;” for the word means an indefinite time. So Drusius regards it here as meaning a long time. But some consider the “desolation,” as having reference to the people and not to the place. If so, the rendering were wholly obliterated. Moab and Ammon, as a separate people, are altogether extinct. The whole verse is as follows—
9. Therefore, as I live, Saith Jehovah of hosts, the God of Israel, Surely Moab like Sodom shall be, And the children of Ammon like Gomorrah, The desert of the thorn and the excavation of salt, Yea, a desolation for ages; The remnant of my people shall plunder them, And the residue of my nation shall possess them.
The two last lines refer to the children of Ammon, as the two preceding especially to Moab. The country of Moab was on the eastern side of the Dead Sea, and that of Ammon was north-east, of Moab. Both were subdued and led captive by Nebuchadnezzar about four or six years after the captivity of Judah. They were afterwards partially restored, especially the children of Ammon, as Tobiah was their chief in the time of Nehemiah. Neh 4:3. They were “plundered,” as recorded in 1Ma 5:35, by Judas Maccabeus. Of Moab we read nothing at that time: but it appears, that for ages it has been desolate. “Not one,” says Burckhart, the traveler, “of the ancient cities of Moab exists as tenanted by man,” and he speaks of “their entire desolation.” Another modern traveler, Seetzen, a Russian, speaking of Ammon, says, “All this country, formerly so populous, is now changed into a vast desert.”— Ed.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
(9) The breeding of nettles.Better, an inheritance of nettles. The propriety of illustrating the fate of Moab and Ammon by that of the cities of the plain is the greater in that Lot, the ancestor of these nationalities, was an inhabitant of Sodom, and narrowly escaped sharing its destruction. Ravages in Moab and Ammon were effected by Nebuchadnezzar in B.C. 582, probably in revenge for the murder of Gedaliah, the ruler of his appointment (Jos., Ant. x. 9 7). But the allusion here is to some later and more permanent work of destruction. The national existence of both Moab and Ammon appears to have ceased long before the Christian era. Josephus assertion (Ant. i. 11 5.) that in his own time the Moabites were a very great nation. is simply unintelligible. The extraordinary number of ruined towns in Moab has been noticed by every modern explorer.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
Zep 2:9. Even the breeding of nettles A forsaken place of nettles. Houbigant. Instead of my people, in the last clause, Houbigant reads my nation.
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
Zep 2:9 Therefore [as] I live, saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel, Surely Moab shall be as Sodom, and the children of Ammon as Gomorrah, [even] the breeding of nettles, and saltpits, and a perpetual desolation: the residue of my people shall spoil them, and the remnant of my people shall possess them.
Ver. 9. Therefore as I live ] This is God’s oath; so, As true as I live, Num 14:21 cf. Psa 95:10 , therefore they are to blame that use it in their common talk.
Surely Moab shall be as Sodom, &c.
Even the breeding of nettles and salt pits
For a perpetual desolation
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
saith the LORD of hosts = [is] the oracle of Jehovah of hosts, the God of Israel. See note on 1Sa 1:3.
the God of Israel. See note on Isa 29:23.
shall be as Sodom. Reference to Pentateuch (Gen 19:24, Gen 19:25). App-92.
the breeding of nettles, &c. Reference to Pentateuch (Deu 29:23, &c.)
of My People. Some codices, with two early printed editions (one Rabbinic), read “of the nations”.
People = nation.
possess = inherit.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
as I: Num 14:21, Isa 49:18, Jer 46:18, Rom 14:11
Surely: Isa 11:14, Isa 15:1 – Isa 16:14, Isa 25:10, Jer 48:1 – Jer 49:7, Eze 25:1 – Eze 26:21, Amo 1:13-15, Amo 2:1-3
as Gomorrah: Zep 2:14, Gen 19:24, Gen 19:25, Deu 29:23, Isa 13:19, Isa 13:20, Isa 34:9-13, Jer 49:18, Jer 50:40
the residue: Zep 2:7, Zep 3:13, Joe 3:19, Joe 3:20, Mic 5:7, Mic 5:8
Reciprocal: Gen 19:38 – children Gen 27:29 – cursed Jdg 9:45 – beat 2Ki 2:20 – salt therein Job 30:7 – the nettles Job 31:40 – thistles Psa 107:33 – turneth Isa 1:9 – we should Isa 16:6 – have Isa 17:14 – the portion Isa 34:13 – thorns Jer 17:6 – a salt Jer 20:16 – as Jer 31:7 – remnant Jer 48:9 – the cities Jer 48:21 – the plain Jer 49:33 – a dwelling Eze 16:50 – therefore Eze 21:32 – thou shalt be no Eze 28:26 – despise Eze 33:11 – As I live Eze 35:9 – perpetual Eze 39:10 – shall spoil Hos 11:8 – Admah Zec 2:9 – and they Luk 17:29 – General 2Pe 2:6 – turning
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Zep 2:9. Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed by fire from heaven (Genesis 19), and these Moabites and Ammonites were to be destroyed; not literally by fire, but with a destruction as decisive. Residue of my people means the remnant that was to return from the captivity ( Ezr 2:64).
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Because of their hostility toward the Israelites, almighty Yahweh, Israel’s God, would definitely destroy these nations as He had Sodom and Gomorrah (cf. Isaiah 15-16; Jer 48:1 to Jer 49:22; Eze 25:1-14; Ezekiel 35; Amo 1:11 to Amo 2:3). God had completely destroyed these cities that stood in the territory later occupied by Moab shortly before either of these nations came into existence (Gen 19:23-29). Sodom and Gomorrah had become a notorious perpetual desolation, a place of salt pits where nothing but nettles grew (cf. Jer 48:9), and that would be what Yahweh would make of Moab and Ammon. The remnant of Israelites would plunder these neighbors and take over their territory as an inheritance from their God (cf. Isa 11:14).