Bible Commentary

And Jesus being full of the Holy Ghost returned from Jordan, and was led by the Spirit into the wilderness, Ch. Luk 4:1-13. The Temptation 1. being full of the Holy Ghost ] Omit ‘being.’ St Luke often calls special attention to the work of the Spirit, Luk 3:22, Luk 4:14; Act 6:3; Act 7:55; … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 4:1”

Which was [the son] of Enos, which was [the son] of Seth, which was [the son] of Adam, which was [the son] of God. Luk 3:23; Luk 3:38 Which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God Genealogies As we glance through the list of names given in these chapters (Mat 1:1-25. … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:38”

Which was [the son] of Methuselah, which was [the son] of Enoch, which was [the son] of Jared, which was [the son] of Maleleel, which was [the son] of Cainan, Which was the son of Mathusala,…. The same with Methuselah; and so he is called by the Septuagint in Ge 5:25 which was the son … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:37”

Which was [the son] of Cainan, which was [the son] of Arphaxad, which was [the son] of Shem, which was [the son] of Noah, which was [the son] of Lamech, Verse 36. Of Cainan] This Cainan, the son of Arphaxad, and father of Sala, is not found in any other Scripture genealogy. See Ge 10:24; … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:36”

Which was [the son] of Serug, which was [the son] of Reu, which was [the son] of Phalec, which was [the son] of Heber, which was [the son] of Sala, Which was the son of Saruch,…. The Septuagint call him Serouch, the same with Serug, Ge 11:22 which was the son of Ragau; so the … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:35”

Which was [the son] of Jacob, which was [the son] of Isaac, which was [the son] of Abraham, which was [the son] of Terah, which was [the son] of Nahor, [See comments on Lu 3:32] Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible 1) “Which was the son of Jacob,” (tou lakob) “The heir-son of … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:34”

Which was [the son] of Aminadab, which was [the son] of Aram, which was [the son] of Esrom, which was [the son] of Phares, which was [the son] of Judah, [See comments on Lu 3:32] Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible 1) “Which was the son of Aminadab,” (tou Aminadab) “The heir-son of … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:33”

Which was [the son] of Jesse, which was [the son] of Obed, which was [the son] of Boaz, which was [the son] of Salmon, which was [the son] of Naasson, Which was the son of Jesse,…. The order of the persons from Jesse to Abraham, as Obed, Boaz, Salmon, Naasson, Aminadab, Aram, or Ram, Esrom, … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:32”

Which was [the son] of Melea, which was [the son] of Menan, which was [the son] of Mattatha, which was [the son] of Nathan, which was [the son] of David, [See comments on Lu 3:28] Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible 1) “Which was the son of Melea,” (tou Melea) “The heir-son of … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:31”

Which was [the son] of Simeon, which was [the son] of Judah, which was [the son] of Joseph, which was [the son] of Jonan, which was [the son] of Eliakim, [See comments on Lu 3:28] Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible 1) “Which was the son of Simeon,” (tou Sumeon) “The heir-son of … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:30”