Which was [the son] of Jose, which was [the son] of Eliezer, which was [the son] of Jorim, which was [the son] of Matthat, which was [the son] of Levi, [See comments on Lu 3:28] Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible 1) “Which was the son of Jose,” (you lesou) “The heir-son of … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:29”
Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:28
Which was [the son] of Melchi, which was [the son] of Addi, which was [the son] of Cosam, which was [the son] of Elmodam, which was [the son] of Er, Ver. 28 Which was the son of Melchi,…. This, with the following, “Addi, Cosam, Elmodam, Er, Jose, Eliezer, Jorim, Matthat, Levi, Simeon, Juda, Joseph, Jonan, … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:28”
Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:27
Which was [the son] of Joanna, which was [the son] of Rhesa, which was [the son] of Zorobabel, which was [the son] of Shealtiel, which was [the son] of Neri, Which was the son of Joanna,…. Johannes, or John, the son of Rhesa Mesullam, who governed fifty three years: which was the son of Rhesa, … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:27”
Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:26
Which was [the son] of Maath, which was [the son] of Mattathias, which was [the son] of Semei, which was [the son] of Joseph, which was [the son] of Judah, Which was the son of Maath,…. Surnamed Aser, who governed nine years: which was the son of Mattathias; called Eli Matathias, who governed twelve years: … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:26”
Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:25
Which was [the son] of Mattathias, which was [the son] of Amos, which was [the son] of Naum, which was [the son] of Esli, which was [the son] of Nagge, Which was the son of Mattathias,…. Surnamed Siloah, by the same Philo, who governed ten years: which was the son of Amos; whose surname, according … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:25”
Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:24
Which was [the son] of Matthat, which was [the son] of Levi, which was [the son] of Melchi, which was [the son] of Janna, which was [the son] of Joseph, See, on this genealogy, the notes at Mat. 1:1-16. Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible There have been great disputes about the genealogy of … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:24”
Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:23
And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was [the son] of Heli, 23. began to be about thirty years of age ] Rather, was about thirty years of age on beginning ( His work). So it was understood by Tyndale, but the … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:23”
Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:22
And the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon him, and a voice came from heaven, which said, Thou art my beloved Son; in thee I am well pleased. 22. in a bodily shape ] This addition is peculiar to St Luke, and is probably added to shew the distinctness and … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:22”
Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:21
Now when all the people were baptized, it came to pass, that Jesus also being baptized, and praying, the heaven was opened, 21 38. The Baptism of Jesus. The Genealogy 21. Now when all the people were baptized ] The expression (which is peculiar to St Luke) seems to imply that on this day Jesus … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:21”
Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:20
Added yet this above all, that he shut up John in prison. 20. added yet this above all ] The Jews as well as St Luke regarded the treatment of the Baptist by Antipas as the worst of his crimes, and the cause of his subsequent defeat and disgrace (Jos. Antt. xviii. 5.1 4). in … Continue reading “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 3:20”