Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Kings 3:23
Then said the king, The one saith, This [is] my son that liveth, and thy son [is] the dead: and the other saith, Nay; but thy son [is] the dead, and my son [is] the living.
Then said the king,…. As judge, summing up what had been said on both sides, which were only bare assertions without proof; the one affirming what the other denied, and the other denying what the other affirmed:
the one saith, this [is] my son that liveth, and thy son [is] the dead;
and the other saith nay; but thy son [is] the dead, and my son [is] the living; this he repeated to show to all present that no determination could be made by what had been said on each side, and that some other method must be taken.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
1Ki 3:23 Then said the king, The one saith, This [is] my son that liveth, and thy son [is] the dead: and the other saith, Nay; but thy son [is] the dead, and my son [is] the living.
Ver. 23. The one saith, This is my son, ] q.d., This is a blind business: here is no better proof than the one is Aio, I affirm, and the other is Nego; I deny, neither is the one of better repute or credit than the other, as being both harlots.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Reciprocal: 1Ki 3:22 – Nay Pro 15:28 – heart