Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Samuel 15:26
And Samuel said unto Saul, I will not return with thee: for thou hast rejected the word of the LORD, and the LORD hath rejected thee from being king over Israel.
1Sa 15:26
Thou hast rejected the word of the Lord, and the Lord hath rejected thee.
One sin too many
The whole story affords an extensive illustration of sin in almost all of its phases of manifestation as judged by the righteous law of God.
1. We discover the simple nature of sin: it is disobedience of a Divine command.
2. We learn, likewise, a lesson concerning the wide reach of sin. Saul felt quite independent in his disobedience It is not possible for any man to keep his sin all to himself. This universe is balanced with great nicety. It cannot endure a sinners perversity without suffering any more than an oarsman can tolerate a perverse boy in a boat; every time the self-willed creature steps across the thwart he rocks the vessel, and makes it uncomfortable and perilous for each one who has anything to do with him.
3. Next to this, we discover an illustration of the bold effrontery of sin. Iniquity often tries to carry off shame with a show of daring, and attempts to restore its self-confidence with a complacency of self-congratulation.
4. Now comes a lesson concerning the certain discovery of sin. Guilt always feels lonely; and yet, curiously enough, always imagines that everybody knows about the crime. Conscience keeps the culprit excited, for he understands that nature positively abhors transgression of law.
5. Once more: the story gives us an illustration of the evasive meanness of sin.
6. Then we have a lesson concerning the hypocritical excuses offered for sin.
7. Now just at this point we receive a lesson concerning the just condemnation of sin.
8. There is likewise here an illustration of the aggregating force of sin. It is hardly worth while to attempt to enumerate the acts of wickedness which followed directly upon this first dereliction of Saul: treachery, lying, vanity, covetousness, hypocrisy–these were among them. There are degrees of depravity, no doubt; but all sin is bad, and tends to what is worse.
9. Still another lesson meets us here, and now it is concerning the inevitable result of sin. Saul had reached the limit of Divine forbearance. Indeed, he had already committed one sin too many. It was of no use for him to plead for pardon any more. There is something very strange in the subsequent career of this monarch; he seems bewildered and off his balance. All sin left to itself is hopeless. The kingdom was taken from this man so that he should not injure anyone else any more. Even heathen people know that is lust. When we were at school we used to declaim this sentence from Demosthenes oration: It is not possible, O Athenians! that a power should be permanent which is marked with injustice, perjury, and falsehood. Hence, finally, sin becomes massed and destructive. It is an Arab saying that we so often quote: The last straw breaks the camels back. No; it is the whole load that kills the camel, but it is the last straw which makes the load complete and intolerable. When the fall of the beast comes, all the burden tells. A time arrives at the last when just one more little act of rebellion against God discharges all the violence of Divine wrath in an absolute reprobation. (C. S. Robinson, D. D.)
Samuel declaring the deposition of Saul
Few characters more blameless than that of Samuel.
I. His office. This was to declare the will of God. He was not called to decide or to adjudicate, but to declare. When Saul was called to the kingdom, Samuel was employed to declare to him the call of God (1Sa 9:17; 1Sa 9:20): He did not select, but declare Gods selection. So when Saul was to be set aside. Samuel was employed to declare his deposition (1Sa 15:28). He did not depose, but declared Gods deposition
II. The spirit in which he acted.
1. He was faithful to the Lord who sent him. He faithfully convicted Saul of his disobedience (1Sa 15:14; 1Sa 15:17). He showed him the hollowness of his vain excuses (1Sa 15:22-23). He fearlessly and faithfully told him that the Lord had that day rent the kingdom from him (1Sa 15:26). Learn that those who have a message from God must give it faithfully.
2. He was most tender to the sinner to whom he was sent. Had he given way to personal jealousy, he might have been pleased at the fall of Saul; for when he was old the people had asked for a king in a most ungrateful spirit.
But he showed no such mean jealousy.
1. When he heard of Sauls fault he was grieved and spent the whole night in prayer (1Sa 15:11). He did not give his reproof in a hard and unfeeling spirit, but with a sorrowing heart. The lips that seemed so severe in declaring judgment had been employed all night in pleading for mercy.
2. When the sentence of God was announced, he did all he could to mitigate the pain. It is the duty of the minister faithfully to denounce sin; but if he would do so effectually, he must prepare the way by tenderness, tears, and prayers; and he must accompany his painful message by a clear evidence of sorrowful tenderness towards the sinner. Nothing tends more to harden sinners than hard denunciation. (E. Horne, M. D.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 26. I will not return with thee] I cannot acknowledge thee as king, seeing the Lord hath rejected thee.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
I will not return with thee: this was no lie, though he afterwards returned, because he spoke what he meant; his words and intentions agreed together, though afterwards he saw reason to change his intentions: compare Gen 19:2,3; which may relieve many perplexed consciences, who think themselves obliged to do what they have said they would do, though they see just cause to change their minds.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
And Samuel said unto Saul, I will not return with thee,…. Not being satisfied with his repentance and confession, he still extenuating his sin, and laying the blame of it on the people. This he said by way of resentment, and as expressing his indignation at him, though he afterwards did return with him on a change of his mind; which a good man may be allowed to make, without any imputation of falsehood or a lie unto him:
for thou hast rejected the word of the Lord, and the Lord hath rejected thee from being king over Israel; which is repeated from 1Sa 15:23 for the confirmation of it, and to let Saul know that his pretended confession and repentance had made no alteration in the decree and sentence of God respecting the kingdom.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
This request Samuel refused, repeating at the same time the sentence of rejection, and turned to depart. “ Then Saul laid hold of the lappet of his mantle (i.e., his upper garment), and it tore ” ( lit. was torn off). That the Niphal is correct, and is not to be altered into , “Saul tore off the lappet,” according to the rendering of the lxx, as Thenius supposes, is evident from the explanation which Samuel gave of the occurrence (1Sa 15:28): “ Jehovah hath torn the sovereignty of Israel from thee to-day, and given it to thy neighbour, who is better than thou.” As Saul was about to hold back the prophet by force, that he might obtain from him a revocation of the divine sentence, the tearing of the mantle, which took place accidentally, and evidently without any such intention on the part of Saul, was to serve as a sign of the rending away of the sovereignty from him. Samuel did not yet know to whom Jehovah would give it; he therefore used the expression , as is applied to any one with whom a person associates. To confirm his own words, he adds in 1Sa 15:29: “ And also the Trust of Israel doth not lie and doth not repent, for He is not a man to repent.” signifies constancy, endurance, then confidence, trust, because a man can trust in what is constant. This meaning is to be retained here, where the word is used as a name for God, and not the meaning gloria, which is taken in 1Ch 29:11 from the Aramaean usage of speech, and would be altogether unsuitable here, where the context suggests the idea of unchangeableness. For a man’s repentance or regret arises from his changeableness, from the fluctuations in his desires and actions. This is never the case with God; consequently He is , the unchangeable One, in whom Israel can trust, since He does not lie or deceive, or repent of His purposes. These words are spoken (theomorphically), whereas in 1Sa 15:11 and other passages, which speak of God as repenting, the words are to be understood (anthropomorphically; cf. Num 23:19).
Fuente: Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
(26) I will not return with thee.Samuel too clearly sees what are the true springs of Sauls repentance, and refuses at first. It was only, as C. a Lapide forcibly urges, a fear on the part of the king, of losing the kingdom and of incurring public disgrace. The prophet for reply again repeats the terrible Divine sentence of rejection.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
(26) And Samuel said unto Saul, I will not return with thee: for thou hast rejected the word of the LORD, and the LORD hath rejected thee from being king over Israel. (27) And as Samuel turned about to go away, he laid hold upon the skirt of his mantle, and it rent. (28) And Samuel said unto him, The LORD hath rent the kingdom of Israel from thee this day, and hath given it to a neighbour of thine, that is better than thou. (29) And also the Strength of Israel will not lie nor repent: for he is not a man, that he should repent. (30) Then he said, I have sinned: yet honour me now, I pray thee, before the elders of my people, and before Israel, and turn again with me, that I may worship the LORD thy God. (31) So Samuel turned again after Saul; and Saul worshipped the LORD.
Though Samuel at first refused to join in worship with Saul; yet perhaps in reflection he judged it to be right. Where shall gracious souls lead sinners but to a throne of grace? The rent of Saul’s skirt was an apt allusion to the renting of the kingdom from him, and as Samuel made application of it to this event, so it is remarkable, that in the after history of Saul’s life, when David cut off a portion of Saul’s skirt, Saul, as if recollecting this circumstance, applied it to David. I know well (said he) that thou shalt surely be King. 1Sa 24:20 .
Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
1Sa 15:26 And Samuel said unto Saul, I will not return with thee: for thou hast rejected the word of the LORD, and the LORD hath rejected thee from being king over Israel.
Ver. 26. The Lord hath rejected thee. ] God loveth to retaliate; and what wonder that the holy and true God casteth off him, whose best was dissimulation?
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
I will not: 1Sa 15:31, Gen 42:38, Gen 43:11-14, Luk 24:28, Luk 24:29, 2Jo 1:11
for thou: 1Sa 15:23, 1Sa 2:30, 1Sa 13:14, 1Sa 16:1, Jer 6:19, Hos 4:6
Reciprocal: 1Ki 11:11 – I will surely 1Ki 14:6 – for I am 2Ki 3:14 – I would not look 2Ki 17:20 – rejected Psa 36:3 – he hath Isa 5:24 – cast away Act 13:22 – when
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
1Sa 15:26. I will not This was no lie, though he afterward returned, because he spoke what he meant; his words and his intentions agreed together, though afterward he saw reason to change his intentions. Compare Gen 19:2-3. This may relieve many perplexed consciences, who think themselves obliged to do what they have said they would do, though they see just cause to change their minds. Hath rejected thee, &c. But he does not say, he hath rejected thee from salvation. And who besides hath authority to say so?